Sun News: in bed with separatists and radical lefties

The communists are everywhere. Even where you’d least expect them.

by Martin Patriquin on Friday, August 12, 2011 5:09pm - 180 Comments

You know what’s great about Sun News Network? No, it’s not the seamless marriage of perpetual fury and Wayne’s World-esque production values. It’s not even the daily five o’clock cutoff, where all the female talent goes ‘poof!’ and the Sun set becomes a soapbox for hours of spitty white male outrage. The best thing about the folks who bring you “Hard News, Straight Talk” is their utter lack of consistency. Or, since we’re all we’re straight talking here, let’s call it what it really is: hypocrisy.

Just over a week ago, the Sun News people grabbed hold of the story about interim NDP leader Nycole Turmel having been a member of the Bloc Québécois… and, well, hasn’t really let go since. Just yesterday the network fronted a story touting Turmel’s membership in the BQ as well as the “radically separatist” Québec Solidaire. ‘Byline‘ host (and, in the spirit of SNN’s trademark hyperbole, the network’s in-house right-wing commie-baiter) Brian Lilley took to his blog to decry Turmel’s separatist past and supposed radically communist leanings. “Quebec Solidiare is no mild-mannered left-wing political party or your grandfather’s labour movement political action group, they are full on commies,” Brian wrote.

Brian has every right in the world to denounce radical left-wing fringe elements, real or imagined, in Canadian society. However, he might have taken a look in his backyard before getting all frothy. Had he done so, he’d note that QMI, Sun’s own press agency, which provides much of the content to the Sun chain of papers, regularly publishes the bon mots of one Jacques Lanctôt. Why, just today Lanctôt wrote a breezy 700 words about the delights—”justice, peace, health care and culture for all”—of Castro’s Cuba.

You be the judge as to whether Lanctôt qualifies as ‘radical’, based on his past: he was one of the driving forces behind the Front de libération de Québec (FLQ) and founder of the FLQ’s ‘Liberation cell’ that was responsible for the kidnapping of British trade secretary James Cross in 1970. He served three years in jail as a result, and went into exile for eight years after his release. Now he writes for the same outfit as Brian Lilley, who for some reason has made no mention of this flagrant infiltration of a known communist, separatist radical into one of the largest media companies in the country. What if the CBC had published the columns of a known communist, separatist radical? You think we’d be hearing the same silence?

As for run-of-the-mill, non-kidnapping, non-radical separatists: Quebecor, the company that owns Sun News and the Sun chain of newspapers, employs those too. There’s former PQ minister Joseph Facal and Richard Martineau, who also hosts a show on Quebecor’s LCN all-news network. Hell, even former premier Bernard Landry, the man who once compared the Canadian flag to a “red rag,” once wrote for Quebecor—before his union sympathies got the better of him and he gave up his column during the Journal de Montréal lockout in 2009. If there’s a pan-Canadian outfit that promotes the thoughts and words of separatists and radicals, it seems the NDP has a competitor.

Oh, and remember the news about Conservative Transportation Minister Denis Lebel being a Bloc Québécois member? I asked the folks at the media monitoring service Infomart to find the number of times SNN hosts talked about it. The answer: once, on August 9. How about Turmel’s similar dalliance with the avowed separatist party? 936 times between August 2 and August 11. Straight news, indeed.

Finally, a digression. Last June, Sun News journalist (and proud SUNshine Girl) Krista Erickson grilled dancer and choreographer Margie Gillis, asking her, among other things, “the sum total of grants and public money [Gillis] has received throughout [her] career.” It was a cutesy bit of TV: pit the airy, Atwood-inflected arts type against Erickson’s blond indignation and watch the sparks fly. SNN would be guilty only of ripping off what Fox news does every day, were it not for one not-so-small detail: Quebecor, Sun News’s parent corporation, regularly avails itself of taxpayer dough—and complains, loudly, when it doesn’t get it.

Exhibit A: last year, the company took in $3.7 million in Federal government subsidies, through Heritage Canada’s Canadian Periodical fund.

Exhibit B: in 2010, Quebecor President Pierre-Karl Péladeau threatened to sue the Canadian Media Fund when it refused to pony up money for TVA’s Star Académie, our very own version of American Idol that is, in Péladeau’s words, “the biggest success in the history of Canadian broadcasting.”

Now why would the biggest success in Canadian broadcasting history need even one cent of taxpayer money? Sounds like the kind of hard biting question for Sun News, doesn’t it?

Bookmark and Share
  • Jeff Primus

    I cannot wait for Brian Lilley to provide his rebuttal to your article.   He is brilliant, and actually gives a what.  What have you done lately to actually call yourself a journalist.   Got your own TV show?

  • Graham Templeton

    It’s telling that, for a MacLeans writer, it’s hypocritical for a media outlet to tolerate and publish more than one point of view. Notice that this article does not accuse any one person of being inconsistent – that would have been a fine point to make. Rather, it seems to argue that Lilley can’t attack “radical separatism” unless the venue in which he does so is committed to systematic exclusion of separatists.It is of course totally fine for a media outlet to construct an ideological identity. It is, however, also fine for a media outlet to be a platform for more than one point of view on a particular subject. That this second point is lost on Patriquin is, as I said, illustrative of the internal culture at Macleans. It is NOT hypocritical for Lilley to say anything at all, based on conflicting comments from a different person who just happens to work for the same company.

  • Graham Templeton

    It’s telling that, for a MacLeans writer, it’s hypocritical for a media outlet to tolerate and publish more than one point of view. Notice that this article does not accuse any one person of being inconsistent – that would have been a fine point to make. Rather, it seems to argue that Lilley can’t attack “radical separatism” unless the venue in which he does so is committed to systematic exclusion of separatists.It is of course totally fine for a media outlet to construct an ideological identity. It is, however, also fine for a media outlet to be a platform for more than one point of view on a particular subject. That this second point is lost on Patriquin is, as I said, illustrative of the internal culture at Macleans. It is NOT hypocritical for Lilley to say anything at all, based on conflicting comments from a different person who just happens to work for the same company.

  • Anonymous

    Sounds like sour grapes to me. Sun TV’s ratings are catching up to the other media outlets and that is a real concern to them. So now they are beginning to trash Sun TV. Sad really.

  • Anonymous

    Sounds like sour grapes to me. Sun TV’s ratings are catching up to the other media outlets and that is a real concern to them. So now they are beginning to trash Sun TV. Sad really.

    • Anonymous

      Catching up, eh?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=513120415 Peter LeTourneux

    What a great article! I mean hey, this is exactly what Sun News is all about, flushing out differing opinions. Obviously Patriquin is very much anti Sun News and very pro left wing causes. His piece is just as radical and mean as what he espouses about Sun News, isn’t that something? You can take Sun News or not, the channel changer works just fine. It appears the freedom of the media on both sides is working just fine too. Carry on Sun.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=513120415 Peter LeTourneux

    What a great article! I mean hey, this is exactly what Sun News is all about, flushing out differing opinions. Obviously Patriquin is very much anti Sun News and very pro left wing causes. His piece is just as radical and mean as what he espouses about Sun News, isn’t that something? You can take Sun News or not, the channel changer works just fine. It appears the freedom of the media on both sides is working just fine too. Carry on Sun.

  • Anonymous

    Well I guess as a CBC guest hack you were probably told to dig up any garbage, real or not, and write a column about the SUN. As one of the resident CBC hacks can you tell me why you and Tasha baby, another CBC hack are doing the dirty work for the CBC. I haven’t heard a peep out of the State Broadcaster but yet those such as yourself write the columns for the CBC. Is it the $500.00 that you receive for your appearances on PnP?  Or are you hoping that you will some day be invited to join that sorry group. Just one last suggestion Patriquin. Buy yourself some decent clothing.

    And one last item. The viewership that the SUN is getting must be bothering the State Broadcaster because the garbage from the left is coming faster and more furious by the week.

    • Anonymous

      “And just one last rant in addition to my last, last rant.” The facts really angry-up the blood, don’t they AC?

      You are right. SUNTV is great…comedy. I keep expecting Guy Caballero to wheel his wheelchair across the screen.

    • Anonymous

      “And just one last rant in addition to my last, last rant.” The facts really angry-up the blood, don’t they AC?

      You are right. SUNTV is great…comedy. I keep expecting Guy Caballero to wheel his wheelchair across the screen.

  • http://profiles.google.com/jimesontag Diogenes van Sinope

    Great article PW.  The anger of the fans of SNN on display here is encouraging.  I didn’t know so many of them could actually read or understand four syllable words like “hypocrisy”.

    • Anonymous

      “  I didn’t know so many of them could actually read”

      Says the guy who can’t even read who posted this..

    • Anonymous

      “  I didn’t know so many of them could actually read”

      Says the guy who can’t even read who posted this..

  • http://profiles.google.com/jimesontag Diogenes van Sinope

    Great article PW.  The anger of the fans of SNN on display here is encouraging.  I didn’t know so many of them could actually read or understand four syllable words like “hypocrisy”.

  • Mike Nichols

    We don’t want fox news in Canada.

  • Mike Nichols

    We don’t want fox news in Canada.

  • Anonymous

    No mention about Gillis campaign to remove Sun TV from the air…I’m sure she is a true believer of freedom of speech though.

  • Anonymous

    No mention about Gillis campaign to remove Sun TV from the air…I’m sure she is a true believer of freedom of speech though.

  • http://profiles.google.com/oddsoxster Fred Jensen

    What an idiotic artcile. I can’t even begin to comment on it.

    • Anonymous

      … because Patriquin has left you speechless over the rank hypocrisy Sun displays?

    • Anonymous

      … because Patriquin has left you speechless over the rank hypocrisy Sun displays?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Darren-Abrey/607192264 Darren Abrey

    Ratings agency BBM says the interview, on Levant’s show The Source,
    had 64,000 viewers at 5:00 p.m. ET and 89,000 viewers at 10:00 p.m., for
    a combined audience of 153,000 viewers.
    
On the same day, CTV News Channel had 59,000 viewers at 5:00 p.m. and 41,000 at 10:00 p.m.

    “What makes this all the more amazing, is we are beating CTV News
    Channel more and more regularly despite their 14-year head start and
    their channel being offered in millions more households,” said Sun News
    spokesman Luc Lavoie. “As our channel becomes available to more
    Canadians, I expect we will do even better.”

  • Anonymous

    Hey you got to remember that this is an organization to sell content and sell content.  Full stop.
    If it has to use fake outrage to do well so what!   

  • Tong Van

    a great article phim hay nhat hinh anh vui truyen cuoi    

  • http://twitter.com/Dys_Parrot Dysfunctional Parrot

    Sunmedia pounds their fists with neo-conservative rants for one reason only…a desperate attempt at ratings.  Hardly anyone in the company believes a word of it.  Well, except Ezra.  I’m sure he sleeps with a tin-foil hat.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FPZE4G2HO42FFT3HIHG6QHJ2YY thedingo8

    hypocrisy .. isnt macleans owned by Rogers.. who bought everything they have with the money stolen from years of consistant overbilling?  Anyone who ever had the pleasure of anything but basic service from Rogers has been overbilled. Or better still how about Toronto Star TV ..licensed as a news station and after several months of 0 viewers, quickly became an infomercial channel, on the main tier, getting money from every cable subscriber.. no different from a Ponzi scheme , money for nothing, .  why has there been no investigation of this fraud against millions of Canadians?

  • Anonymous

    The fact that Turmel only recently dropped her Bloc membership, still holds another separatist membership, is the interim leader for a “federalist” party which recently swept to power as the opposition party- although we know that the sovereignty movement still makes up a huge number of Quebecers – is significant (who was voted in their place?).   And remember how often the seperatists were dishonest in past referendum matters (Parizeau, Bouchard). I think there is reason for concern here.  It’s not necessarily that the NDP could be hidden seperatists (although of course some are seperatists), it’s that the party is made up largely of members who represent separatist areas and will be pandering to some of their views which could be disastrous for the country (remember Jack Layton said 50% + 1 would be sufficient for separation).

  • Anonymous

    The fact that Turmel only recently dropped her Bloc membership, still holds another separatist membership, is the interim leader for a “federalist” party which recently swept to power as the opposition party- although we know that the sovereignty movement still makes up a huge number of Quebecers – is significant (who was voted in their place?).   And remember how often the seperatists were dishonest in past referendum matters (Parizeau, Bouchard). I think there is reason for concern here.  It’s not necessarily that the NDP could be hidden seperatists (although of course some are seperatists), it’s that the party is made up largely of members who represent separatist areas and will be pandering to some of their views which could be disastrous for the country (remember Jack Layton said 50% + 1 would be sufficient for separation).

  • Anonymous

    With regard to Jacques Lanctôt, if Sun Media allows his materials this would only seem consistent with freedom of speech.  There is a difference between this man expressing his opinion and having a seperatist as an interim leader to a federalist party.  This article seems more like a knee-jerk-dig at Sun Media because of Sun News.

  • Anonymous

    With regard to Jacques Lanctôt, if Sun Media allows his materials this would only seem consistent with freedom of speech.  There is a difference between this man expressing his opinion and having a seperatist as an interim leader to a federalist party.  This article seems more like a knee-jerk-dig at Sun Media because of Sun News.

  • http://twitter.com/Daveszombie Bubba Voltair

    OOOOOooooo, someone is chewing through a big bowl of sour grapes.

From Macleans