Colby Cosh

Colby Cosh

Maclean’s man in Edmonton writes about everything. Follow Colby on Twitter: @colbycosh

RAM parts

by Colby Cosh on Friday, August 19, 2011 5:47am - 7 Comments

I hope no one will be offended if I take a moment to publicize the design submissions for the new home of the Royal Alberta Museum. Maclean’s is aware that the R-word is irksome to many Canadians; in the contemporary parlance of sexual abuse treatment, it can be a “trigger” for unwelcome memories of colonial worthlessness. But we are stuck with the accepted name of the RAM, so I must trust in the reader’s courage and forgiveness.

The architecture buff will quickly perceive that the province asked four builder-led teams to submit designs for museums and instead ended up, unaccountably, with what look like leftover plans for office buildings. One supposes it is still impossible for a museum façade to declare its purpose in the aggressive classicist manner of the Field Museum in Chicago. But was it too much to ask for the building to be visible at all? Ellis-Don has hidden its imaginary structure behind sheets of mesh and inexplicable metal forests that can provide neither shade nor shelter.

Graham-Jardeg, by contrast, got Richard Meier to design something that looks like a giant industrial refrigerator. Ledcor basically wrote “MUSEUM” on the side of a pile of boxes; somehow, looking at the actual building, one almost feels there has been a mistake, and that the words should read “UNCHALLENGING COMMUNITY COLLEGE”. PCL’s different arrangement of boxes plays up the rooftop garden element while somehow remaining both sinister and cockeyed as imagined from street level. The teeth, certainly, do not help. Public buildings are always an expression of power, but the postmodern suspicion of right angles often introduces a slight element of dementia that makes one crave a soothing dose of Euclid.

It is hard to find anything to love in these drawings, and the locals aren’t having much luck. But maybe violence and political uncertainty have driven Edmontonians to unfounded premature despair, and other Canadians—Canadians with tourist dollars who might one day patronize this museum—will react more warmly. At least we are unlikely to end up in the predicament Calgary faces with its Glenbow Museum—a marvelous institution in its own right, but one torn between heritage and contemporary-art mandates while it struggles for oxygen in an unfriendly concrete caisson.

Bookmark and Share
  • Anonymous

    I am for  Team: Laing O’Rourke of the United Kingdom, IBI Group Architects
    Engineers of Alberta, Richard Meier & Partners of New York, Solomon
    & Bauer (Museum Planners) of Watertown, MA

  • TonyAdams

    If I lived in Alberta I would vote for something similar to Chicago’s Field Museum because the four official designs look like airport’s arrivals concourse level or somesuch and will please few people  aesthetically. 

    Field Museum looks like proper museum, something to be reckoned with, the four Albt finalists don’t.

    There was one drawing that focused on Starbucks, which says it all, really.

    And I live on Ontario and we have ROM. I prefer RAM to ROM so I am envious. 

    “Maclean’s is aware that the R-word is irksome to many Canadians …. ”

    Did you read Hepburn column? I think my baby boomer parents were in same classroom because they had same reaction as Hepburn. Apparently acknowledging reality is step backwards in Canada’s development and it is much better to pretend we don’t have Queen as Monarch. 

    I am only 40 years old and told my parents that I would be shocked if there are large numbers of people my age or younger who are completely outraged. There will be a few left wing nutters arguing about perception but most Canadians are secure in our identity, surely.

  • Anonymous

    My pseudo-vote that is

  • Halo_Override

    Wow, that is indeed a dispiriting collection. The Graham submission at
    least has a hint of some grandeur, but anything approaching Brutalism is
    going to compensate for aging gracefully by being largely unloved by
    the people who have to pass by it every day…

    I guess going for either imagination or tradition is too risky, even for
    a Have province. Best to stick with what’s least likely to be noticed.

  • Anonymous

    The problem isn’t the architects.  It’s the kind of committee that thinks the sorts of questions it suggests on the website are sane.  Apparently they think if you make the architecture inviting enough, you can make people who are uninterested in a museum’s contents decide to hang out there.  It’s the Overaccommodating Nerd Theory of Popularity.

    Let’s assume, for a moment, that you actually are trying to attract people to come in.  Okay.  Fine.  Then what you do is make it look exclusive, powerful, elegant, and important.  People are not attracted by desperate efforts to be popular.  Make the people who voluntarily come and visit feel superior.  Try to inspire some awe in the students who are going to be dragged there on field trips.  You’ve got the Royal adjective; be kingly, be palatial.

    Again, I don’t blame the architects.  Architects design for the client.  People who ask questions like “Will the design appeal to Albertans of all ages? Will it engage our young people and students; will they see it as a place they want to visit and feel welcome in?” are asking for this kind of nonsense.

  • Anonymous

    One hundred years after Laurier had the courage to give the Empire authorities the finger and insist Canada would have it’s own Navy under Canadian command, Alberta is going to put up impractical crap designed to win foreign architectural awards. Real progress.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Geoff-McKenzie/757580360 Geoff McKenzie

    I admire the honesty of their mediocrity. More efficient than, for example, the Cantos National Music Centre in Calgary which solicited five exciting designs from world-class architects, picked the least challenging (but still pretty good) design among them, and then spent a year dumbing that down until it looked like a parking garage.

    Before:
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_iH1J16C6uo4/Sr0FsDLDIXI/AAAAAAAAAWs/li1Uw-au0zY/s320/2025732.jpg

    After:
    http://www.nmc.ca/sites/default/files/images/renderings/nmc-aerial.jpg 

From Macleans