<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cutting the right taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:43:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-556230</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 06:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-556230</guid>
		<description>Wow. Now if the whole world were populated with people just like you, you&#039;d have a point.

If you want examples, go to any good will store and watch what people buy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Now if the whole world were populated with people just like you, you&#8217;d have a point.</p>
<p>If you want examples, go to any good will store and watch what people buy. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-556201</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-556201</guid>
		<description>And if it&#039;s a corporate tax, doesn&#039;t all the same still apply?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if it&#8217;s a corporate tax, doesn&#8217;t all the same still apply?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-556202</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-556202</guid>
		<description>In which case, it&#039;s the same as a consumption tax, only more salable to the public. Sounds like a win-win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In which case, it&#8217;s the same as a consumption tax, only more salable to the public. Sounds like a win-win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-556085</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-556085</guid>
		<description>Noted, and I so completely agree with you that I&#039;d be delighted to bring it forward if I could.  I don&#039;t suppose you&#039;d consider becoming a Liberal in order to help me?  Not that all Liberals would currently be against it (in fact I think it would pass) but it takes the passion of several to get the policy to the point of a vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noted, and I so completely agree with you that I&#8217;d be delighted to bring it forward if I could.  I don&#8217;t suppose you&#8217;d consider becoming a Liberal in order to help me?  Not that all Liberals would currently be against it (in fact I think it would pass) but it takes the passion of several to get the policy to the point of a vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-556086</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-556086</guid>
		<description>Noted, and I so completely agree with you that I&#039;d be delighted to bring it forward if I could.  I don&#039;t suppose you&#039;d consider becoming a Liberal in order to help me?  Not that all Liberals would currently be against it (in fact I think it would pass) but it takes the passion of several to get the policy to the point of a vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noted, and I so completely agree with you that I&#8217;d be delighted to bring it forward if I could.  I don&#8217;t suppose you&#8217;d consider becoming a Liberal in order to help me?  Not that all Liberals would currently be against it (in fact I think it would pass) but it takes the passion of several to get the policy to the point of a vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-556080</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-556080</guid>
		<description>That was what I mean, but now I want to know what you were thinking about with &quot;source of employment income&quot; unless you were thinking about something dumb like &quot;Canadian Tire employees are taxed at this rate while Home Depot employees have to pay this rate.&quot;  That would be a mess, indeed.  

There are credits that apply to dividends, and a calculation for capital gains, but after that it is &quot;income&quot; and all streams come down to one tax on income.  But that&#039;s a good point, too, in that those &#039;extra&#039; calculations are needlessly complicating.  I mean, who thought up &quot;grossing up&quot; in order to provide a credit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was what I mean, but now I want to know what you were thinking about with &#8220;source of employment income&#8221; unless you were thinking about something dumb like &#8220;Canadian Tire employees are taxed at this rate while Home Depot employees have to pay this rate.&#8221;  That would be a mess, indeed.  </p>
<p>There are credits that apply to dividends, and a calculation for capital gains, but after that it is &#8220;income&#8221; and all streams come down to one tax on income.  But that&#8217;s a good point, too, in that those &#8216;extra&#8217; calculations are needlessly complicating.  I mean, who thought up &#8220;grossing up&#8221; in order to provide a credit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-556078</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-556078</guid>
		<description>Do you stop time in all your decisions?  For example, if you bought milk two years ago, would you scoff at a family member suggesting a purchase of milk?  

Liberals were against it at first because a) they were in opposition and are supposed to provide an alternative viewpoint but mostly b) it was new, untried, and suggested at 9%.  That was 1991.  Since then, we have seen the value of the GST.  Since then, it has been the Conservatives giving the tax a bad name.  But you blithely skip over that and speak about twenty years ago as if it were today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you stop time in all your decisions?  For example, if you bought milk two years ago, would you scoff at a family member suggesting a purchase of milk?  </p>
<p>Liberals were against it at first because a) they were in opposition and are supposed to provide an alternative viewpoint but mostly b) it was new, untried, and suggested at 9%.  That was 1991.  Since then, we have seen the value of the GST.  Since then, it has been the Conservatives giving the tax a bad name.  But you blithely skip over that and speak about twenty years ago as if it were today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-556051</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-556051</guid>
		<description>I think it would be wonderful if a major federal party (with an actual chance of winning power) took up the kind of tax reform you&#039;re talking about.  It&#039;s what I would like to see happen.  However, I&#039;m not holding my breath.

I think the federal Liberal Party got completely spooked by what happened at the polls when Dion was leader and proposed the Green Shift.  I think they concluded from that that anything that even looks like a tax increase is toxic at the polls.  I would love to be proven wrong on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be wonderful if a major federal party (with an actual chance of winning power) took up the kind of tax reform you&#8217;re talking about.  It&#8217;s what I would like to see happen.  However, I&#8217;m not holding my breath.</p>
<p>I think the federal Liberal Party got completely spooked by what happened at the polls when Dion was leader and proposed the Green Shift.  I think they concluded from that that anything that even looks like a tax increase is toxic at the polls.  I would love to be proven wrong on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-556038</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-556038</guid>
		<description>In recent months, our federal deficit has been heading down.  So it may not catch up with him.  We&#039;ll just have to wait and see.  If we get a double-dip recession, then it may well catch up with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent months, our federal deficit has been heading down.  So it may not catch up with him.  We&#8217;ll just have to wait and see.  If we get a double-dip recession, then it may well catch up with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-556039</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-556039</guid>
		<description>In recent months, our federal deficit has been heading down.  So it may not catch up with him.  We&#039;ll just have to wait and see.  If we get a double-dip recession, then it may well catch up with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent months, our federal deficit has been heading down.  So it may not catch up with him.  We&#8217;ll just have to wait and see.  If we get a double-dip recession, then it may well catch up with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-556040</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-556040</guid>
		<description>In recent months, our federal deficit has been heading down.  So it may not catch up with him.  We&#039;ll just have to wait and see.  If we get a double-dip recession, then it may well catch up with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent months, our federal deficit has been heading down.  So it may not catch up with him.  We&#8217;ll just have to wait and see.  If we get a double-dip recession, then it may well catch up with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-556019</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-556019</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think I could agree more with a tax package that eliminated all these stupid tax credits, lowered personal and corporate income tax rates and raised consumption taxes.

So long as the G/HST credits to low-income households are increased to offset the effects of an increased GST, this is got to be the best way to go.

Clearly the CPC won&#039;t ever implement such a package because of the GST and the NDP doesn&#039;t understand that the GST doesn&#039;t have to be regressive, nor would they ever think of reducing corporate taxes.

Take note, potential Liberal leaders.  This is how you get my vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I could agree more with a tax package that eliminated all these stupid tax credits, lowered personal and corporate income tax rates and raised consumption taxes.</p>
<p>So long as the G/HST credits to low-income households are increased to offset the effects of an increased GST, this is got to be the best way to go.</p>
<p>Clearly the CPC won&#8217;t ever implement such a package because of the GST and the NDP doesn&#8217;t understand that the GST doesn&#8217;t have to be regressive, nor would they ever think of reducing corporate taxes.</p>
<p>Take note, potential Liberal leaders.  This is how you get my vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-556017</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-556017</guid>
		<description>&quot;But how about we talk about sources of income and taxation rates that change with the source as well as the amount?&quot;

We have that.  That&#039;s why there&#039;s income tax, capital gains tax, dividend tax etc...

I hope that&#039;s what you mean, and not have different income tax rates depending on the source of your employment income, because that would be the biggest mess of all time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But how about we talk about sources of income and taxation rates that change with the source as well as the amount?&#8221;</p>
<p>We have that.  That&#8217;s why there&#8217;s income tax, capital gains tax, dividend tax etc&#8230;</p>
<p>I hope that&#8217;s what you mean, and not have different income tax rates depending on the source of your employment income, because that would be the biggest mess of all time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555999</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555999</guid>
		<description>Actually what happened in B.C. was a rational hatred of Gordon Campbell.  Had he introduced it the way McGuinty did, he wouldn&#039;t have had the problem with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually what happened in B.C. was a rational hatred of Gordon Campbell.  Had he introduced it the way McGuinty did, he wouldn&#8217;t have had the problem with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555998</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555998</guid>
		<description>His whole schtick is that he is the steady hand of a conservative economist who is the only one who can weather us through these stormy waters.  So first up he creates a structural deficit.  As if this won&#039;t catch up with him?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His whole schtick is that he is the steady hand of a conservative economist who is the only one who can weather us through these stormy waters.  So first up he creates a structural deficit.  As if this won&#8217;t catch up with him? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555996</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555996</guid>
		<description>Turd, have a look at p. 32 of Conservative platform:

“A Conservative government will…preserve income trusts by not imposing any new taxes on them.”  

Selective memory is widespread, don&#039;t you think?

Diane Francis:  
“The income trust fiasco has created $2 billion a year in tax leakage, and counting, instead of stemming it as promised; it disrupted the junior oil and other markets by removing competitors for their assets; it blackened Canada’s reputation to offshore investors…many of whom were in the UK and banked on Harper’s promise and, worst of all, has spawned a spate of foreign leveraged buyouts of Canadian assets and corporations.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turd, have a look at p. 32 of Conservative platform:</p>
<p>“A Conservative government will…preserve income trusts by not imposing any new taxes on them.”  </p>
<p>Selective memory is widespread, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>Diane Francis: <br />
“The income trust fiasco has created $2 billion a year in tax leakage, and counting, instead of stemming it as promised; it disrupted the junior oil and other markets by removing competitors for their assets; it blackened Canada’s reputation to offshore investors…many of whom were in the UK and banked on Harper’s promise and, worst of all, has spawned a spate of foreign leveraged buyouts of Canadian assets and corporations.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555994</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555994</guid>
		<description>Of course as a typical Conservative Turd would have preferred that the country defaulted, that we tripled the debt to pass on to our children.  Don&#039;t worry Turd, with Conservatives back in government, we&#039;re on track again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course as a typical Conservative Turd would have preferred that the country defaulted, that we tripled the debt to pass on to our children.  Don&#8217;t worry Turd, with Conservatives back in government, we&#8217;re on track again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555992</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555992</guid>
		<description>Or maybe once he had a serious look at the books he knew that good governance was more important than good politics.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe once he had a serious look at the books he knew that good governance was more important than good politics. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555985</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555985</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you know, Jenn and Jan have selective memory when it comes to Liberal lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you know, Jenn and Jan have selective memory when it comes to Liberal lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555984</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555984</guid>
		<description>- In response to JanBC 

I agree. It was a dumb move to buy votes from people who are still angry about the GST. My point is, if the Liberals hadn&#039;t turned the GST into a boogey man that type of move wouldn&#039;t work and we&#039;d be free to actually look at the merit of the tax.

Sadly, Mulroney didn&#039;t sell it very well and the Chrétien marketing team did a great job of manipulating the electorate into believing that it was an evil plot. Harper is just taking advantage of the now entrenched fear.

Sadly, we&#039;re stuck with high income tax. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- In response to JanBC </p>
<p>I agree. It was a dumb move to buy votes from people who are still angry about the GST. My point is, if the Liberals hadn&#8217;t turned the GST into a boogey man that type of move wouldn&#8217;t work and we&#8217;d be free to actually look at the merit of the tax.</p>
<p>Sadly, Mulroney didn&#8217;t sell it very well and the Chrétien marketing team did a great job of manipulating the electorate into believing that it was an evil plot. Harper is just taking advantage of the now entrenched fear.</p>
<p>Sadly, we&#8217;re stuck with high income tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555981</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555981</guid>
		<description>2Jenn, reality check:  In the federal Liberal Party&#039;s Red Book campaign platform in the 1993 federal election, there was an explicit promise that they would get rid of the GST.  Jean Chretien and company repeated this promise throughout the election campaign.

Once elected, Chretien did not get rid of the GST.  Ergo, he lied.  So did the rest of his caucus and party.  Sheila Copps said she&#039;d resign if they didn&#039;t get rid of the GST.  She didn&#039;t resign when it became quite evident that the Liberals had lied their faces off and were keeping the GST.  It was only when there was a firestorm of public anger at Copps at her bald-faced mendacity that she finally relented, &quot;resigned&quot; her ultra-safe seat in Hamilton, promptly ran again in the same ultra-safe seat and got re-elected.  Most of us didn&#039;t share Copps&#039; self-serving interpretation of the word &quot;resign&quot;.  We thought it meant, you know, leave.  For good.  Like she should have done had she had any integrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2Jenn, reality check:  In the federal Liberal Party&#8217;s Red Book campaign platform in the 1993 federal election, there was an explicit promise that they would get rid of the GST.  Jean Chretien and company repeated this promise throughout the election campaign.</p>
<p>Once elected, Chretien did not get rid of the GST.  Ergo, he lied.  So did the rest of his caucus and party.  Sheila Copps said she&#8217;d resign if they didn&#8217;t get rid of the GST.  She didn&#8217;t resign when it became quite evident that the Liberals had lied their faces off and were keeping the GST.  It was only when there was a firestorm of public anger at Copps at her bald-faced mendacity that she finally relented, &#8220;resigned&#8221; her ultra-safe seat in Hamilton, promptly ran again in the same ultra-safe seat and got re-elected.  Most of us didn&#8217;t share Copps&#8217; self-serving interpretation of the word &#8220;resign&#8221;.  We thought it meant, you know, leave.  For good.  Like she should have done had she had any integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555952</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555952</guid>
		<description>@Turd__Ferguson:disqus We&#039;re not talking about Harper cutting it - I don&#039;t remember any huge public demand for him to do that, he chose to do it thinking he could buy votes.  It was a stupid thing to do economically.  And now, he would look lke an idiot to backtrack and put it back or raise it.  He&#039;d have to admit he&#039;d made a mistake and we know that will never happen. He&#039;s now got to do a lot of cutting to fill the void.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Turd__Ferguson:disqus We&#8217;re not talking about Harper cutting it &#8211; I don&#8217;t remember any huge public demand for him to do that, he chose to do it thinking he could buy votes.  It was a stupid thing to do economically.  And now, he would look lke an idiot to backtrack and put it back or raise it.  He&#8217;d have to admit he&#8217;d made a mistake and we know that will never happen. He&#8217;s now got to do a lot of cutting to fill the void. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555953</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555953</guid>
		<description>@Turd__Ferguson:disqus We&#039;re not talking about Harper cutting it - I don&#039;t remember any huge public demand for him to do that, he chose to do it thinking he could buy votes.  It was a stupid thing to do economically.  And now, he would look lke an idiot to backtrack and put it back or raise it.  He&#039;d have to admit he&#039;d made a mistake and we know that will never happen. He&#039;s now got to do a lot of cutting to fill the void.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Turd__Ferguson:disqus We&#8217;re not talking about Harper cutting it &#8211; I don&#8217;t remember any huge public demand for him to do that, he chose to do it thinking he could buy votes.  It was a stupid thing to do economically.  And now, he would look lke an idiot to backtrack and put it back or raise it.  He&#8217;d have to admit he&#8217;d made a mistake and we know that will never happen. He&#8217;s now got to do a lot of cutting to fill the void. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555943</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555943</guid>
		<description> - In response to JanBC

No confusion. The GST is a poison pill and the Conservatives are playing politics with it.

Name one Government, federal or provincial, that has raised their consumption tax and survived an election since the GST was introduced.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> - In response to JanBC</p>
<p>No confusion. The GST is a poison pill and the Conservatives are playing politics with it.</p>
<p>Name one Government, federal or provincial, that has raised their consumption tax and survived an election since the GST was introduced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555936</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555936</guid>
		<description>Reading Wells piece this mornng, I see Kenney claims this government is acting conservative and cites cutting the GST as proof.  There seems to be some confusion on your tax policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading Wells piece this mornng, I see Kenney claims this government is acting conservative and cites cutting the GST as proof.  There seems to be some confusion on your tax policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555937</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555937</guid>
		<description>Reading Wells piece this mornng, I see Kenney claims this government is acting conservative and cites cutting the GST as proof.  There seems to be some confusion on your tax policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading Wells piece this mornng, I see Kenney claims this government is acting conservative and cites cutting the GST as proof.  There seems to be some confusion on your tax policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555934</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555934</guid>
		<description>When it was first introduced. They ran an entire election against it with the promise to scrap it. Remember?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it was first introduced. They ran an entire election against it with the promise to scrap it. Remember?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555935</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555935</guid>
		<description>When it was first introduced. They ran an entire election against it with the promise to scrap it. Remember?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it was first introduced. They ran an entire election against it with the promise to scrap it. Remember?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555930</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555930</guid>
		<description>Which Liberals would those be?  I&#039;m pretty sure we were against LOWERING the GST rate, and the Liberals in Ontario and BC can hardly be said to be against the tax (that would be the PCs).  So, when/where did the Liberals do such a thing?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which Liberals would those be?  I&#8217;m pretty sure we were against LOWERING the GST rate, and the Liberals in Ontario and BC can hardly be said to be against the tax (that would be the PCs).  So, when/where did the Liberals do such a thing? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555931</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555931</guid>
		<description>Which Liberals would those be?  I&#039;m pretty sure we were against LOWERING the GST rate, and the Liberals in Ontario and BC can hardly be said to be against the tax (that would be the PCs).  So, when/where did the Liberals do such a thing?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which Liberals would those be?  I&#8217;m pretty sure we were against LOWERING the GST rate, and the Liberals in Ontario and BC can hardly be said to be against the tax (that would be the PCs).  So, when/where did the Liberals do such a thing? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555923</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555923</guid>
		<description>@Turd_Ferguson:disqus 

That was the funniest exchange I&#039;ve seen on here in a long while.  Too bad you weren&#039;t actually trying to be amusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Turd_Ferguson:disqus </p>
<p>That was the funniest exchange I&#8217;ve seen on here in a long while.  Too bad you weren&#8217;t actually trying to be amusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555922</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555922</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m completely onside with getting rid of tax credits.  I&#039;m also okay with the HST hike, except for the fact that some provinces have moved to fill the gap, and I don&#039;t think a 17% HST should be inflicted on anyone during an economic whateveryouwanttocallthis.  But how about we talk about sources of income and taxation rates that change with the source as well as the amount? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m completely onside with getting rid of tax credits.  I&#8217;m also okay with the HST hike, except for the fact that some provinces have moved to fill the gap, and I don&#8217;t think a 17% HST should be inflicted on anyone during an economic whateveryouwanttocallthis.  But how about we talk about sources of income and taxation rates that change with the source as well as the amount? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555921</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555921</guid>
		<description>I will do my best in the future to avoid that. :)
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will do my best in the future to avoid that. :)<br />
 <br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555917</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555917</guid>
		<description>&quot;Surely, Turd, you see the problem with that.&quot; - TJCook

I&#039;m not saying I like the rules of the game, I&#039;m just saying he&#039;s good at the game.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Surely, Turd, you see the problem with that.&#8221; &#8211; TJCook</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying I like the rules of the game, I&#8217;m just saying he&#8217;s good at the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555916</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555916</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Haper seems to have pretty good aim if killing off opposition is the goal&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Surely, Turd, you see the problem with that.
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Haper seems to have pretty good aim if killing off opposition is the goal</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Surely, Turd, you see the problem with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555915</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555915</guid>
		<description>I am in favor of controlling the amount of tax I pay, and the only means of that is through consumption tax.
 
I can choose to buy a smaller house, a smaller car, to not buy all the newest and best toys out there and thus reduce my tax burden while at the same time inadvertently helping the environment. Wow! Isn&#039;t consumption tax great?
 
Too bad the Liberals took a $hit on it and made it so unappealing to the average Canadian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in favor of controlling the amount of tax I pay, and the only means of that is through consumption tax.<br />
 <br />
I can choose to buy a smaller house, a smaller car, to not buy all the newest and best toys out there and thus reduce my tax burden while at the same time inadvertently helping the environment. Wow! Isn&#8217;t consumption tax great?<br />
 <br />
Too bad the Liberals took a $hit on it and made it so unappealing to the average Canadian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug rogers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555913</link>
		<dc:creator>doug rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555913</guid>
		<description>With enough choice, consumers can choose not to buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With enough choice, consumers can choose not to buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555911</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555911</guid>
		<description>So which is which? Haper seems to have pretty good aim if killing off opposition is the goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So which is which? Haper seems to have pretty good aim if killing off opposition is the goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555909</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555909</guid>
		<description>There is difference between putting a gun into the hands of an elite marksman and putting it into the hands of a neophyte.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is difference between putting a gun into the hands of an elite marksman and putting it into the hands of a neophyte.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555910</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555910</guid>
		<description>There is difference between putting a gun into the hands of an elite marksman and putting it into the hands of a neophyte.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is difference between putting a gun into the hands of an elite marksman and putting it into the hands of a neophyte.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555908</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555908</guid>
		<description>Yeah, they probably saw the writing on the wall. Lucky for them the PC&#039;s went ahead with it otherwise they may have remained a rump party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, they probably saw the writing on the wall. Lucky for them the PC&#8217;s went ahead with it otherwise they may have remained a rump party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555906</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555906</guid>
		<description>The Reform party certainly did oppose the GST.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Reform party certainly did oppose the GST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555907</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555907</guid>
		<description>The Reform party certainly did oppose the GST.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Reform party certainly did oppose the GST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug rogers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555905</link>
		<dc:creator>doug rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555905</guid>
		<description>Well, D&#039;oh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, D&#8217;oh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-555903</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889#comment-555903</guid>
		<description>To appeal to the same illogical fears created by the Liberals.
 
Basically, politics. 
 
Irrational? Yup. Effective? Yup.

You can&#039;t ever say Harper hasn&#039;t learned to play the game, he basically uses the same weapons Chrétien used.


 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To appeal to the same illogical fears created by the Liberals.<br />
 <br />
Basically, politics.<br />
 <br />
Irrational? Yup. Effective? Yup.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t ever say Harper hasn&#8217;t learned to play the game, he basically uses the same weapons Chrétien used.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
