<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; John Geddes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/author/jgeddes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:13:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nigel Wright resigns. Now what?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/19/two-possible-paths-from-nigel-wrights-resignation/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/19/two-possible-paths-from-nigel-wrights-resignation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister stephen harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=385376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes notes a new test of Harper's tactical acumen]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/19/two-possible-paths-from-nigel-wrights-resignation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes notes a new test of Harper's tactical acumen
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The line from Harper&#8217;s office on Wright and Duffy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/the-line-from-harpers-office-on-wright-and-duffy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/the-line-from-harpers-office-on-wright-and-duffy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew MacDougall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=385027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on the Tories' efforts at damage control]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/the-line-from-harpers-office-on-wright-and-duffy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on the Tories' efforts at damage control
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wright and Duffy: the contrast in styles is vivid, but what about the rules?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/15/wright-and-duffy-the-contrast-in-personas-is-vivid-but-what-about-the-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/15/wright-and-duffy-the-contrast-in-personas-is-vivid-but-what-about-the-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict of interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Fife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Ethics Officer Lyse Ricard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on the conflict of interest potential in a besieged senator's $90,000 gift]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/15/wright-and-duffy-the-contrast-in-personas-is-vivid-but-what-about-the-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on the conflict of interest potential in a besieged senator's $90,000 gift
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking at art with history in mind: a very brief Ottawa summer tour</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/10/looking-at-art-with-history-in-mind-a-very-brief-ottawa-summer-tour/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/10/looking-at-art-with-history-in-mind-a-very-brief-ottawa-summer-tour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 19:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1920s art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur Watkins Crisp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Museum of Civilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian war museum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First World War art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haida art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Minister James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sir William Nicholson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winnipeg Art Gallery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=382768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among the many fine things about a classic summer family road trip is the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/10/looking-at-art-with-history-in-mind-a-very-brief-ottawa-summer-tour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Among the many fine things about a classic summer family road trip is the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax cheats have nowhere to hide</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/03/nowhere-to-hide-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/03/nowhere-to-hide-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Revenue Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore bank accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax evasion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=379266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[High-profile leaks of private bank data raise new questions about the widespread use of offshore accounts]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/03/nowhere-to-hide-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	High-profile leaks of private bank data raise new questions about the widespread use of offshore accounts
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What we&#8217;ll miss about Mark Carney</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/what-well-miss-about-mark-carney/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/what-well-miss-about-mark-carney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 23:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Poloz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=380104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You judge us shallow for dwelling on performance style? Show a little pity.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/what-well-miss-about-mark-carney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	You judge us shallow for dwelling on performance style? Show a little pity.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justin Trudeau&#8217;s feminine mystique</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/the-feminine-mystique/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/the-feminine-mystique/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian political poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political attack ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=379244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Liberal leader is being portrayed as not manly enough--which won't hurt his polling numbers at all]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/the-feminine-mystique/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The new Liberal leader is being portrayed as not manly enough--which won't hurt his polling numbers at all
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A first look at Justin Trudeau&#8217;s new ad: not a tree in sight</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/24/a-first-look-at-justin-trudeaus-new-ad-not-a-tree-in-sight/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/24/a-first-look-at-justin-trudeaus-new-ad-not-a-tree-in-sight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIberal ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political attack ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=376231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on Liberals and locale]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/24/a-first-look-at-justin-trudeaus-new-ad-not-a-tree-in-sight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on Liberals and locale
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government denies link between RCMP arrests and House terrorism debate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/22/government-denies-any-link-between-rcmp-arrests-and-house-terrorism-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/22/government-denies-any-link-between-rcmp-arrests-and-house-terrorism-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Combating Terrorism Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root causes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=375546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spokesman says no connection between Bill S-7 debate and arrests in alleged train attack plot]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/22/government-denies-any-link-between-rcmp-arrests-and-house-terrorism-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Spokesman says no connection between Bill S-7 debate and arrests in alleged train attack plot
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justin Trudeau’s other opponent</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/20/trudeaus-other-opponent/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/20/trudeaus-other-opponent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian political poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=373049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Liberal leader’s biggest rivalry may not be with Harper, but fellow progressive Mulcair]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/20/trudeaus-other-opponent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The new Liberal leader’s biggest rivalry may not be with Harper, but fellow progressive Mulcair
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trudeau, Harper and the Boston bombings: Let&#8217;s go back to the tape</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/18/listening-closely-to-trudeau-on-terrorism-and-harper-on-trudeaus-reaction/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/18/listening-closely-to-trudeau-on-terrorism-and-harper-on-trudeaus-reaction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 21:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=373801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on what the Liberal Leader said ... and how the PM responded ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/18/listening-closely-to-trudeau-on-terrorism-and-harper-on-trudeaus-reaction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on what the Liberal Leader said ... and how the PM responded 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justin Trudeau: Where to now?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/14/justin-trudeaus-acceptance-speech-the-winners-three-key-themes/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/14/justin-trudeaus-acceptance-speech-the-winners-three-key-themes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Party of Canada leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=371622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on three key themes in the Liberal Party leader's acceptance speech]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/14/justin-trudeaus-acceptance-speech-the-winners-three-key-themes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on three key themes in the Liberal Party leader's acceptance speech
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What we now know about Trudeau</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/12/centre-stage/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/12/centre-stage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal leadership race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal party of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soapbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=370488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new leader of the Liberals revealed more during the race than anyone expected]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/12/centre-stage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The new leader of the Liberals revealed more during the race than anyone expected
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The lingering political problem of World War I: Tories vs. Boulerice and beyond</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/the-lingering-political-problem-of-world-war-i-tories-vs-boulerice-and-beyond/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/the-lingering-political-problem-of-world-war-i-tories-vs-boulerice-and-beyond/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexandre Boulerice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battle of Vim Ridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sir Robert Borden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Blaney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War I]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=370061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thoughts on refighting the past]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/the-lingering-political-problem-of-world-war-i-tories-vs-boulerice-and-beyond/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Thoughts on refighting the past
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mulroney on Thatcher: &#8216;She could dish it out, but she could take it&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/09/mulroney-on-thatcher-clashes-common-causes-and-a-duet-on-white-cliffs-of-dover/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/09/mulroney-on-thatcher-clashes-common-causes-and-a-duet-on-white-cliffs-of-dover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Mulroney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margaret Thatcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Maxwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south africa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=369765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former PM on clashes, common causes, and a 'White Cliffs of Dover' duet with the Iron Lady]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/09/mulroney-on-thatcher-clashes-common-causes-and-a-duet-on-white-cliffs-of-dover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The former PM on clashes, common causes, and a 'White Cliffs of Dover' duet with the Iron Lady
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justin Trudeau&#8217;s next big test</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/06/trudeaus-next-big-test-the-question-period-question/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/06/trudeaus-next-big-test-the-question-period-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 22:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick O'Hagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominic LeBlanc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal party of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=368866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on the Question Period question]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/06/trudeaus-next-big-test-the-question-period-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on the Question Period question
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Trudeau performs when tested</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/06/how-justin-trudeau-performs-when-tested-the-coronation-route-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/06/how-justin-trudeau-performs-when-tested-the-coronation-route-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 14:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joyce Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal party of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Hall Findlay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Cauchon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=368759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes revisits 'the coronation route' ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/06/how-justin-trudeau-performs-when-tested-the-coronation-route-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes revisits 'the coronation route' 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada&#8217;s jobs and skills mismatch: an expert on the federal budget&#8217;s training thrust</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/28/canadas-jobs-and-skills-mismatch-an-expert-on-the-federal-budgets-training-thrust/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/28/canadas-jobs-and-skills-mismatch-an-expert-on-the-federal-budgets-training-thrust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Tal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Job Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIBC World Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance minister jim flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=365815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among the most-discussed measures in last week’s federal budget was the government’s plan to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/28/canadas-jobs-and-skills-mismatch-an-expert-on-the-federal-budgets-training-thrust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Among the most-discussed measures in last week’s federal budget was the government’s plan to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The big cut Jim Flaherty won&#8217;t have to make: Budget 2013&#8242;s spending mystery explained</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/the-big-cut-jim-flaherty-wont-have-to-make-budget-2013s-spending-mystery-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/the-big-cut-jim-flaherty-wont-have-to-make-budget-2013s-spending-mystery-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance minister jim flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=364649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the biggest unanswered question about the budget Finance Minister Jim Flaherty tabled last...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/the-big-cut-jim-flaherty-wont-have-to-make-budget-2013s-spending-mystery-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Perhaps the biggest unanswered question about the budget Finance Minister Jim Flaherty tabled last...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mulcair doesn&#8217;t like the direction Flaherty&#8217;s budget austeres Canada</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/mulcair-doesnt-like-the-direction-flaherty-budget-austeres-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/mulcair-doesnt-like-the-direction-flaherty-budget-austeres-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 22:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NDP Leader Tom Mulcair apparently couldn&#8217;t think of a verb for the sort of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/mulcair-doesnt-like-the-direction-flaherty-budget-austeres-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	NDP Leader Tom Mulcair apparently couldn&#8217;t think of a verb for the sort of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trudeau predicts federal-provincial friction over Budget 2013</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/trudeau-predicts-fed-prov-friction-over-budget-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/trudeau-predicts-fed-prov-friction-over-budget-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 22:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance minister jim flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The issue of job training will create conflict between the Conservative government and the provinces]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/trudeau-predicts-fed-prov-friction-over-budget-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The issue of job training will create conflict between the Conservative government and the provinces
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Flaherty&#8217;s budget of contradictions</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-overview-jim-flahertys-trick-plus-everything-else-you-need-to-know-about-budget-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-overview-jim-flahertys-trick-plus-everything-else-you-need-to-know-about-budget-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can the government be a “benign and silent partner” and still take major action? John Geddes evaluates.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-overview-jim-flahertys-trick-plus-everything-else-you-need-to-know-about-budget-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Can the government be a “benign and silent partner” and still take major action? John Geddes evaluates.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The question of infrastructure &#8212; and a $53-billion answer</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/jim-flaherty-commits-53b-to-infrastructure/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/jim-flaherty-commits-53b-to-infrastructure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The test of Flaherty’s budget? How municipalities greet big numbers and long-term horizons.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/jim-flaherty-commits-53b-to-infrastructure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The test of Flaherty’s budget? How municipalities greet big numbers and long-term horizons.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget shifts Canada Day party to Heritage, and away from National Capital Commission</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-shifts-canada-day-party-to-heritage-and-away-from-national-capital-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-shifts-canada-day-party-to-heritage-and-away-from-national-capital-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among the signature elements of the Conservative party’s approach to political marketing is its...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-shifts-canada-day-party-to-heritage-and-away-from-national-capital-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Among the signature elements of the Conservative party’s approach to political marketing is its...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why a War of 1812 monument doesn&#8217;t belong on Parliament Hill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/a-look-at-the-war-of-1812-monument-designs-and-why-they-dont-belong-on-parliament-hill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/a-look-at-the-war-of-1812-monument-designs-and-why-they-dont-belong-on-parliament-hill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 22:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frances Loring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George-Etienne Cartier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lester B. Pearson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Gallery of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National War Memorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sculpture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Borden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sir john a. macdonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War of 1812 monument]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=362722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on tradition and the Hill]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/a-look-at-the-war-of-1812-monument-designs-and-why-they-dont-belong-on-parliament-hill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on tradition and the Hill
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada is spending more to combat less crime, PBO finds</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/more-spending-to-combat-less-crime-the-pbos-report-should-clarify-the-law-and-order-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/more-spending-to-combat-less-crime-the-pbos-report-should-clarify-the-law-and-order-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics of policing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incarceration rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety Minister Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=362496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Kevin Page's report won't clarify the law-and-order debate]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/more-spending-to-combat-less-crime-the-pbos-report-should-clarify-the-law-and-order-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Why Kevin Page's report won't clarify the law-and-order debate
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 5 areas to watch on budget day</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/time-to-choose-5-areas-to-watch-on-budget-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/time-to-choose-5-areas-to-watch-on-budget-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=362107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's time to choose: From tax reform to infrastructure spending, John Geddes sets up the big issues]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/time-to-choose-5-areas-to-watch-on-budget-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	It's time to choose: From tax reform to infrastructure spending, John Geddes sets up the big issues
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Penashue Labrador&#8217;s best ever MP?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/19/is-penashue-labradors-best-ever-mp-a-quick-look-at-the-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/19/is-penashue-labradors-best-ever-mp-a-quick-look-at-the-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newfoundland and Labrador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Penashue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas G. W. Ashbourne]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=362142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes takes a quick look at the competition]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/19/is-penashue-labradors-best-ever-mp-a-quick-look-at-the-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes takes a quick look at the competition
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why does Parliament Hill need a monument to the War of 1812?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/15/next-week-well-see-the-1812-monument-designs-for-parliament-hill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/15/next-week-well-see-the-1812-monument-designs-for-parliament-hill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Capital Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War of 1812 monument]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=361140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes explains why Canadians ought to be wary of plans for the slope by East Block]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/15/next-week-well-see-the-1812-monument-designs-for-parliament-hill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes explains why Canadians ought to be wary of plans for the slope by East Block
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Combat cutbacks: Conservatives target the military budget</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/14/cutting-where-it-hurts-most/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/14/cutting-where-it-hurts-most/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=359943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes takes a close look at the Conservative brand and defence spending]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/14/cutting-where-it-hurts-most/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes takes a close look at the Conservative brand and defence spending
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defining Moments in Inuit Art veers far from the predictable</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/11/so-long-soapstone-bear/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/11/so-long-soapstone-bear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inuit art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Gallery of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winnipeg Art Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winnipeg art scene]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=357629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Winnipeg gallery is betting heavily on Inuit art that goes beyond gift-shop clichés]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/11/so-long-soapstone-bear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A Winnipeg gallery is betting heavily on Inuit art that goes beyond gift-shop clichés
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada&#8217;s Senate: Chamber of disrepute</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/08/contempt-for-the-whole-institution/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/08/contempt-for-the-whole-institution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate term limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=357559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After months of scandals, could it finally be time to scrap the Senate? John Geddes reports]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/08/contempt-for-the-whole-institution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	After months of scandals, could it finally be time to scrap the Senate? John Geddes reports
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stompin&#8217; Tom and the places he put in songs</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/07/stompin-tom-connors-and-the-places-he-put-in-songs/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/07/stompin-tom-connors-and-the-places-he-put-in-songs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stompin' Tom Connors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=358112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on why we love Conners]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/07/stompin-tom-connors-and-the-places-he-put-in-songs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on why we love Conners
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hall Findlay&#8217;s &#8216;class&#8217; remark echoes through Canadian politics</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/19/hall-findlays-class-remark-echoes-through-canadian-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/19/hall-findlays-class-remark-echoes-through-canadian-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal party of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Hall Findlay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=352395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What it means to be out of touch]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/19/hall-findlays-class-remark-echoes-through-canadian-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	What it means to be out of touch
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Duncan exits cabinet on an unusually clear-cut infraction</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/15/john-duncan-exits-on-an-unusually-clear-cut-infraction/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/15/john-duncan-exits-on-an-unusually-clear-cut-infraction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal ethics rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Duncan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Ottawa law professor Adam Dodek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=351476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on the reason for the Aboriginal affairs minister's resignation]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/15/john-duncan-exits-on-an-unusually-clear-cut-infraction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on the reason for the Aboriginal affairs minister's resignation
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entrepreneurs against poverty: a Canadian wins a prize</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/15/entrepreneurs-against-poverty-a-canadian-wins-a-prize/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/15/entrepreneurs-against-poverty-a-canadian-wins-a-prize/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Opportunity Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Longmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social entrepreneurship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=351395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a decade now the Ottawa-based group Digital Opportunity Trust has been sending interns...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/15/entrepreneurs-against-poverty-a-canadian-wins-a-prize/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	For a decade now the Ottawa-based group Digital Opportunity Trust has been sending interns...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>He said he wouldn&#8217;t, but Garneau rounds on Trudeau</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/he-said-he-wouldnt-but-garneau-rounds-on-trudeau/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/he-said-he-wouldnt-but-garneau-rounds-on-trudeau/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 20:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal party of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Party of Canada leadership race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=350014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Garneau getting serious? Or is he desperate? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/he-said-he-wouldnt-but-garneau-rounds-on-trudeau/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Is Garneau getting serious? Or is he desperate? 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives&#8217; claim to curb illegal guns falls flat</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/11/off-target/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/11/off-target/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun smuggling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=347352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are cracks in the Harper government's claim that it has stepped up the fight against gun smugglers]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/11/off-target/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	There are cracks in the Harper government's claim that it has stepped up the fight against gun smugglers
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How did Patrick Brazeau rate a seat in the Senate?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/08/patrick-brazeaus-sordid-story-and-senate-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/08/patrick-brazeaus-sordid-story-and-senate-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 23:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assembly of First Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idle No More]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister stephen harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate term limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Bert Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Patrick Brazeau]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=348744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Removed from this week's news, it's a question worth asking]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/08/patrick-brazeaus-sordid-story-and-senate-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Removed from this week's news, it's a question worth asking
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The debate over for-profit child care heats up</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/07/the-debate-over-for-profit-child-care-heats-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/07/the-debate-over-for-profit-child-care-heats-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Childcare Resource and Research Unit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daycare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early childhood learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal of European Social Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Friendly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University Child Care Benefit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=348023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada shouldn't ignore the mixed experiences reported in other countries, writes John Geddes]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/07/the-debate-over-for-profit-child-care-heats-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Canada shouldn't ignore the mixed experiences reported in other countries, writes John Geddes
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Liberal &#8216;debate&#8217; in Winnipeg: so laid-back, not much laid bare</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/02/the-liberal-debate-in-winnipeg-so-laid-back-not-much-laid-bare/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/02/the-liberal-debate-in-winnipeg-so-laid-back-not-much-laid-bare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 23:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deborah Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal party of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Party of Canada leadership race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Hall Findlay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=346077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on what came up instead of fiscal policy, Mali, the poverty of First Nations and Canada's aging population]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/02/the-liberal-debate-in-winnipeg-so-laid-back-not-much-laid-bare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on what came up instead of fiscal policy, Mali, the poverty of First Nations and Canada's aging population
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The aboriginal affairs minister on First Nations schools</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/29/the-aboriginal-affairs-minister-on-first-nations-schools/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/29/the-aboriginal-affairs-minister-on-first-nations-schools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aboriginal Affairs Minister John Duncan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first nations education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Duncan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=344132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today in Question Period, Aboriginal Affairs Minister John Duncan fielded questions on the consultation...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/29/the-aboriginal-affairs-minister-on-first-nations-schools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Today in Question Period, Aboriginal Affairs Minister John Duncan fielded questions on the consultation...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Nations first: the political agenda as the House returns</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/28/first-nations-first-the-political-agenda-as-the-house-returns/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/28/first-nations-first-the-political-agenda-as-the-house-returns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada-EU trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idle No More]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Part of Canada leadership race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theresa Spence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=342449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes considers the PM's To Do list at the start of 2013 ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/28/first-nations-first-the-political-agenda-as-the-house-returns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes considers the PM's To Do list at the start of 2013 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rocket man: Can Marc Garneau pull off a Liberal leadership upset?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/24/the-space-between-them/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/24/the-space-between-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal party of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=341242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Canada's first astronaut stacks up against Justin Trudeau]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/24/the-space-between-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	How Canada's first astronaut stacks up against Justin Trudeau
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Carney on the price of your house (and the value of his privacy)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/23/mark-carney-on-house-prices-and-those-other-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/23/mark-carney-on-house-prices-and-those-other-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 20:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiff Macklem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=341018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget cottaging with a Liberal, the governor confirmed the real estate market has cooled]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/23/mark-carney-on-house-prices-and-those-other-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Forget cottaging with a Liberal, the governor confirmed the real estate market has cooled
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
