<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Stephen Gordon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/author/stephengordon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:34:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Questions for Tom Mulcair</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/13/some-questions-for-tom-mulcair-about-oil-refining-and-the-environment/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/13/some-questions-for-tom-mulcair-about-oil-refining-and-the-environment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 15:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-and-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dutch disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refineries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Mulcair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgraders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=382861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... on oil, refining and the environment]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/13/some-questions-for-tom-mulcair-about-oil-refining-and-the-environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	... on oil, refining and the environment
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The National Household Survey: Pig, meet lipstick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/08/the-national-household-survey-pig-meet-lipstick/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/08/the-national-household-survey-pig-meet-lipstick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 14:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-form census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Household Survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=381365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The survey won't answer the crucial questions only the long-form census could, writes Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/08/the-national-household-survey-pig-meet-lipstick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The survey won't answer the crucial questions only the long-form census could, writes Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The recession and recovery: Australia did it better</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/03/the-recession-and-recovery-australia-did-it-better/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/03/the-recession-and-recovery-australia-did-it-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 14:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=379832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon takes a broader measure of Canada's economic performance]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/03/the-recession-and-recovery-australia-did-it-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon takes a broader measure of Canada's economic performance
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Carney&#8217;s legacy, and what it means for his successor</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/01/mark-carneys-legacy-and-what-it-means-for-his-successor/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/01/mark-carneys-legacy-and-what-it-means-for-his-successor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 16:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiff Macklem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=378914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whoever takes the reins will have to live up to a rock star image that has little to do with monetary policy, writes Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/01/mark-carneys-legacy-and-what-it-means-for-his-successor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Whoever takes the reins will have to live up to a rock star image that has little to do with monetary policy, writes Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, Dean Del Mastro, emission regulations have costs</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/30/yes-dean-del-mastro-environmental-regulations-have-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/30/yes-dean-del-mastro-environmental-regulations-have-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=378304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(And they're actually larger than those of a carbon price)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/30/yes-dean-del-mastro-environmental-regulations-have-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	(And they're actually larger than those of a carbon price)
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note to the NDP (and everyone else): the popular tax hikes don&#8217;t increase tax revenues</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/24/note-to-the-ndp-and-everyone-else-the-popular-tax-hikes-dont-increase-tax-revenues/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/24/note-to-the-ndp-and-everyone-else-the-popular-tax-hikes-dont-increase-tax-revenues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate tax rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high income taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starve the beast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=374916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon on good politics and not very good economics]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/24/note-to-the-ndp-and-everyone-else-the-popular-tax-hikes-dont-increase-tax-revenues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon on good politics and not very good economics
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the Reinhart-Rogoff glitch doesn&#8217;t matter for Canada</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/22/why-the-reinhart-rogoff-glitch-doesnt-matter-for-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/22/why-the-reinhart-rogoff-glitch-doesnt-matter-for-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=375004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not right now, anyways, say Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/22/why-the-reinhart-rogoff-glitch-doesnt-matter-for-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Not right now, anyways, say Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The economy&#8217;s potential may be a little lower than we thought</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/the-economys-potential-may-be-a-little-lower-than-we-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/the-economys-potential-may-be-a-little-lower-than-we-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monetary policy report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[output gap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=373271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon spots a quiet revision]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/the-economys-potential-may-be-a-little-lower-than-we-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon spots a quiet revision
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs and other myths about trade</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/16/jobs-and-other-myths-about-trade/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/16/jobs-and-other-myths-about-trade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=371367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon on a debunking spree]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/16/jobs-and-other-myths-about-trade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon on a debunking spree
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A very Canadian housing slump</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/15/a-very-canadian-housing-slump/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/15/a-very-canadian-housing-slump/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=365073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prepare for long grind (but not a fire sale), says Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/15/a-very-canadian-housing-slump/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Prepare for long grind (but not a fire sale), says Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A message for the NDP: profits are people, too</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/a-message-for-the-ndp-profits-are-people-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/a-message-for-the-ndp-profits-are-people-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=369001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yours truly, Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/a-message-for-the-ndp-profits-are-people-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Yours truly, Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Conservatives don&#8217;t mind big government if it&#8217;s cheap</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/04/the-conservatives-dont-mind-big-government-if-its-cheap/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/04/the-conservatives-dont-mind-big-government-if-its-cheap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starve the beast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=366749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon on doing damage the cost-effect way]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/04/the-conservatives-dont-mind-big-government-if-its-cheap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon on doing damage the cost-effect way
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dutch disease down under</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/02/the-dutch-disease-down-under-how-did-high-resource-prices-work-out-for-australia/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/02/the-dutch-disease-down-under-how-did-high-resource-prices-work-out-for-australia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 13:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commodity prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dutch disease]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=365762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[High resource prices worked out quite well for Australia, says Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/02/the-dutch-disease-down-under-how-did-high-resource-prices-work-out-for-australia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	High resource prices worked out quite well for Australia, says Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The anti-trade budget</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/the-anti-trade-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/the-anti-trade-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=364357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative trade legacy consists of higher tariffs and more obstacles to foreign investment]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/the-anti-trade-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Conservative trade legacy consists of higher tariffs and more obstacles to foreign investment
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The incredible shrinking conservative deficit</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/the-incredible-shrinking-conservative-deficit/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/the-incredible-shrinking-conservative-deficit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 23:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget deficit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emphasis on 'incredible,' says Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/the-incredible-shrinking-conservative-deficit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Emphasis on 'incredible,' says Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The conservative agenda in the numbers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/the-conservative-agenda-in-the-numbers-of-budget-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/the-conservative-agenda-in-the-numbers-of-budget-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon details the 'starve the beast strategy' in budget 2013]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/the-conservative-agenda-in-the-numbers-of-budget-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon details the 'starve the beast strategy' in budget 2013
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget may aim to close tax loopholes, which isn&#8217;t as easy as it seems</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/budget-may-aim-to-close-tax-loopholes-which-isnt-as-easy-as-it-seems/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/budget-may-aim-to-close-tax-loopholes-which-isnt-as-easy-as-it-seems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=362093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon on fixing outdated tax credits]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/budget-may-aim-to-close-tax-loopholes-which-isnt-as-easy-as-it-seems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon on fixing outdated tax credits
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What will be (and what should be) in the federal budget</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/14/a-look-at-what-will-be-and-what-should-be-in-the-federal-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/14/a-look-at-what-will-be-and-what-should-be-in-the-federal-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=360224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon on good and bad ideas to look out for]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/14/a-look-at-what-will-be-and-what-should-be-in-the-federal-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon on good and bad ideas to look out for
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do they call it Dutch &#8216;disease,&#8217; anyways?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/12/why-do-they-call-it-dutch-disease-anyways/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/12/why-do-they-call-it-dutch-disease-anyways/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commodity prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dutch disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=358899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon on why Canada's much-talked-about affliction is actually a blessing]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/12/why-do-they-call-it-dutch-disease-anyways/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon on why Canada's much-talked-about affliction is actually a blessing
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Stockholm Syndrome about supply management</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/05/our-stockholm-syndrome-about-supply-management/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/05/our-stockholm-syndrome-about-supply-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada-EU trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=356798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why our debates about international trade miss the point entirely]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/05/our-stockholm-syndrome-about-supply-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Why our debates about international trade miss the point entirely
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should the recent GDP slump affect the 2013 federal budget?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/should-the-recent-gdp-slump-affect-the-2013-federal-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/should-the-recent-gdp-slump-affect-the-2013-federal-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=356294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The short answer is no. So is the long answer. Here's why.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/should-the-recent-gdp-slump-affect-the-2013-federal-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The short answer is no. So is the long answer. Here's why.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want to help the poor? Don&#8217;t waste your time with the minimum wage</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/19/want-to-help-the-poor-dont-waste-your-time-with-the-minimum-wage/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/19/want-to-help-the-poor-dont-waste-your-time-with-the-minimum-wage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimum wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=351663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon reviews the evidence on the minimum wage]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/19/want-to-help-the-poor-dont-waste-your-time-with-the-minimum-wage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon reviews the evidence on the minimum wage
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A little context on the decline of manufacturing employment in Canada</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/12/some-context-for-the-decline-in-canadian-manufacturing-employment/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/12/some-context-for-the-decline-in-canadian-manufacturing-employment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dutch disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=348971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon looks at the numbers—and zooms out]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/12/some-context-for-the-decline-in-canadian-manufacturing-employment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon looks at the numbers—and zooms out
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The federal deficit will be less than predicted</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/08/the-federal-deficit-will-be-less-than-the-government-predicted/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/08/the-federal-deficit-will-be-less-than-the-government-predicted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 18:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=348181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Possibly much less, writes Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/08/the-federal-deficit-will-be-less-than-the-government-predicted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Possibly much less, writes Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to expect from the federal budget</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/07/what-to-expect-from-the-federal-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/07/what-to-expect-from-the-federal-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 18:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=347583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slower-rising transfers and lower program spending. Basically, more of the same, writes Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/07/what-to-expect-from-the-federal-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Slower-rising transfers and lower program spending. Basically, more of the same, writes Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Employment Insurance Whack-a-Mole game</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/05/the-employment-insurance-whack-a-mole-game/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/05/the-employment-insurance-whack-a-mole-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EI reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=346526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's no way to get it completely right, writes Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/05/the-employment-insurance-whack-a-mole-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	There's no way to get it completely right, writes Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the PBO&#8217;s mandate actually says</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/01/what-the-pbos-mandate-actually-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/01/what-the-pbos-mandate-actually-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=343114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A refresher, kindly brought to you by Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/01/what-the-pbos-mandate-actually-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A refresher, kindly brought to you by Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Carney, Liberals haven&#8217;t cleared the air</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/28/mark-carney-and-the-liberals-have-not-cleared-the-air/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/28/mark-carney-and-the-liberals-have-not-cleared-the-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal party of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Carney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=341808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A political party headhunting a sitting central bank governor *is* a big deal]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/28/mark-carney-and-the-liberals-have-not-cleared-the-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A political party headhunting a sitting central bank governor *is* a big deal
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the BoC revised its growth forecast down—and up</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/24/how-the-boc-revised-its-growth-forecast-down-and-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/24/how-the-boc-revised-its-growth-forecast-down-and-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 01:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monetary policy report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=341523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon puts the January Monetary Policy Report under the lens]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/24/how-the-boc-revised-its-growth-forecast-down-and-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon puts the January Monetary Policy Report under the lens
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Harper, state venture capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/14/stephen-harper-state-venture-capitalist/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/14/stephen-harper-state-venture-capitalist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Venture Capital and Private Equity Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venture capital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=337069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon: what's the problem the Venture Capital Action Plan is supposed to fix?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/14/stephen-harper-state-venture-capitalist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon: what's the problem the Venture Capital Action Plan is supposed to fix?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dealing with inequality, part I: The bottom 99 per cent</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/11/dealing-with-inequality-part-i-the-bottom-99-per-cent/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/11/dealing-with-inequality-part-i-the-bottom-99-per-cent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=331333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon on why you should love the GST/HST]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/11/dealing-with-inequality-part-i-the-bottom-99-per-cent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon on why you should love the GST/HST
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pension reform isn&#8217;t for everyone</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/09/pension-reform-isnt-for-everyone/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/09/pension-reform-isnt-for-everyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=331396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An expanded CPP could hurt low-income earners, says Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/09/pension-reform-isnt-for-everyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	An expanded CPP could hurt low-income earners, says Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NGDP targeting could change the way we manage inflation</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/07/ngdp-targeting-could-change-the-way-we-manage-inflation/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/07/ngdp-targeting-could-change-the-way-we-manage-inflation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation targeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monetary policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGDP targeting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=328129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you should know what it is. Stephen Gordon explains]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/07/ngdp-targeting-could-change-the-way-we-manage-inflation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	So you should know what it is. Stephen Gordon explains
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talking at cross-purposes about income inequality</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/21/talking-at-cross-purposes-about-income-inequality/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/21/talking-at-cross-purposes-about-income-inequality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 00:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gini coefficient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=316095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne&#8217;s column arguing that income inequality has stopped getting worse drew a sharply-worded...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/21/talking-at-cross-purposes-about-income-inequality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Andrew Coyne&#8217;s column arguing that income inequality has stopped getting worse drew a sharply-worded...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Canada won&#8217;t have an effective climate change policy anytime soon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/18/why-canada-wont-have-an-effective-climate-change-policy-anytime-soon/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/18/why-canada-wont-have-an-effective-climate-change-policy-anytime-soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=329203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We want action, but aren't ready to pay, writes Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/18/why-canada-wont-have-an-effective-climate-change-policy-anytime-soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	We want action, but aren't ready to pay, writes Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Carney affair with the Liberal Party: It will all end in tears</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/16/the-carney-affair-with-the-liberal-party-of-canada-it-will-all-end-in-tears/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/16/the-carney-affair-with-the-liberal-party-of-canada-it-will-all-end-in-tears/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Party of Canada leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Carney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=329039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hypothetical questions around the wooing of the Governor of the Bank of Canada]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/16/the-carney-affair-with-the-liberal-party-of-canada-it-will-all-end-in-tears/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Hypothetical questions around the wooing of the Governor of the Bank of Canada
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Well managed or not, state-owned enterprises are probably good for Canada</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/14/well-managed-or-not-state-owned-enterprises-are-probably-good-for-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/14/well-managed-or-not-state-owned-enterprises-are-probably-good-for-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state-owned enterprises]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=328307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon responds to Jack Mintz ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/14/well-managed-or-not-state-owned-enterprises-are-probably-good-for-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon responds to Jack Mintz 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Develop the oil sands, or make life difficult for foreign investors</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/we-either-develop-the-oil-sands-or-we-make-life-difficult-for-foreign-investors/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/we-either-develop-the-oil-sands-or-we-make-life-difficult-for-foreign-investors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNOOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign takeovers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petronas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progress Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=325660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can't do both, writes Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/we-either-develop-the-oil-sands-or-we-make-life-difficult-for-foreign-investors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	We can't do both, writes Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is the Bank of Canada holding interest rates firm?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/why-is-the-bank-of-canada-holding-interest-rates-firm-a-surge-in-wages-may-be-the-answer/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/why-is-the-bank-of-canada-holding-interest-rates-firm-a-surge-in-wages-may-be-the-answer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monetary policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=324250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon says a surge in wages may be the answer]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/why-is-the-bank-of-canada-holding-interest-rates-firm-a-surge-in-wages-may-be-the-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon says a surge in wages may be the answer
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attention boomers: Why demographics threatens your retirement</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/03/attention-boomers-why-demographics-threatens-your-retirement/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/03/attention-boomers-why-demographics-threatens-your-retirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech bubble]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=322532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An entire generation might start selling soon...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/03/attention-boomers-why-demographics-threatens-your-retirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	An entire generation might start selling soon...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>PM Stephen Harper and Mark Carney: Were they simply lucky?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/29/stephen-harper-and-mark-carney-good-or-just-lucky/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/29/stephen-harper-and-mark-carney-good-or-just-lucky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=320188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon on what really accounts for Canada's performance through and after the crisis]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/29/stephen-harper-and-mark-carney-good-or-just-lucky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon on what really accounts for Canada's performance through and after the crisis
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who will be the next Bank of Canada governor?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/26/who-will-be-the-next-bank-of-canada-governor/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/26/who-will-be-the-next-bank-of-canada-governor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Carney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=319473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe a francophone, says Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/26/who-will-be-the-next-bank-of-canada-governor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Maybe a francophone, says Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada is missing the bigger story about the oil sands</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/26/canada-is-missing-the-bigger-story-about-the-oil-sands/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/26/canada-is-missing-the-bigger-story-about-the-oil-sands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil sands equipment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=311164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon on driving away much-needed money and losing opportunities]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/26/canada-is-missing-the-bigger-story-about-the-oil-sands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon on driving away much-needed money and losing opportunities
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 2013-14 Quebec budget: PQ cut spending to buy time</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/20/the-quebec-budget-cutting-spending-to-buy-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/20/the-quebec-budget-cutting-spending-to-buy-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec budget]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=316985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon: How to propose an austerity budget and try to dodge a political battle]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/20/the-quebec-budget-cutting-spending-to-buy-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon: How to propose an austerity budget and try to dodge a political battle
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What do we know about the 1 per cent?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/19/what-do-we-know-about-the-one-per-cent/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/19/what-do-we-know-about-the-one-per-cent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the one percent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=314474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Little, but enough to debunk a few common misconceptions]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/19/what-do-we-know-about-the-one-per-cent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Little, but enough to debunk a few common misconceptions
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
