<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Andrew Coyne</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/category/vault/andrew-coynes-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:52:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s really up (and down) with incomes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/31/whats-really-up-and-down-with-incomes/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/31/whats-really-up-and-down-with-incomes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/31/whats-really-up-and-down-with-incomes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Soaring inequality would be terribly concerning if there were any factual basis for it]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/31/whats-really-up-and-down-with-incomes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
	Soaring inequality would be terribly concerning if there were any factual basis for it
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs, Jobs, Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/06/jobs-jobs-jobs-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/06/jobs-jobs-jobs-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 20:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/06/jobs-jobs-jobs-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jobs’s story reminds us not only of the heroism of the entrepreneur, but of the nobility of craft]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/06/jobs-jobs-jobs-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	Jobs’s story reminds us not only of the heroism of the entrepreneur, but of the nobility of craft
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How we really beat the deficit: or, revisionism revisited</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/17/how-we-really-beat-the-deficit-or-revisionism-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/17/how-we-really-beat-the-deficit-or-revisionism-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chretien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mulroney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/17/how-we-really-beat-the-deficit-or-revisionism-revisited/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne on why spending cuts played a bigger role than economic growth]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/17/how-we-really-beat-the-deficit-or-revisionism-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
	Andrew Coyne on why spending cuts played a bigger role than economic growth
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cut it in half and no one would notice</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/16/cut-it-in-half-and-no-one-would-notice/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/16/cut-it-in-half-and-no-one-would-notice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 20:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cabinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/05/16/cut-it-in-half-and-no-one-would-notice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we wait for Stephen Harper to appoint a new cabinet, it is worth...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/16/cut-it-in-half-and-no-one-would-notice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
	As we wait for Stephen Harper to appoint a new cabinet, it is worth...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;That&#039;s kind of the sentiment we&#039;re getting at&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/thats-kind-of-the-sentiment-were-getting-at/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/thats-kind-of-the-sentiment-were-getting-at/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 00:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/05/06/thats-kind-of-the-sentiment-were-getting-at/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People in politics have no idea how loathsome they sound]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/thats-kind-of-the-sentiment-were-getting-at/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>308</slash:comments>
	People in politics have no idea how loathsome they sound
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ottawa&#039;s new power couple</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/ottawas-new-power-couple/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/ottawas-new-power-couple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 22:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/05/04/ottawas-new-power-couple/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harper's is the first majority to rely equally on Ontario and the West]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/ottawas-new-power-couple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
	Harper's is the first majority to rely equally on Ontario and the West
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fascist takeover! Or else a Commalition! Consensus at last!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/25/fascist-takeover-commalition-consensus-at-last/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/25/fascist-takeover-commalition-consensus-at-last/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/fascist-takeover-commalition-consensus-at-last/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Polls show the Fascists continuing their march on the capital while a Commie insurgency is brewing]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/25/fascist-takeover-commalition-consensus-at-last/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
	Polls show the Fascists continuing their march on the capital while a Commie insurgency is brewing
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commies leading Traitors! A special investigation!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/22/commies-leading-traitors-a-special-investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/22/commies-leading-traitors-a-special-investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/04/22/commies-leading-traitors-a-special-investigation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated seat projections, reflecting Commies&#8217; recent surge. Fascists still short of &#8220;absolute power,&#8221; Visitors...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/22/commies-leading-traitors-a-special-investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
	Updated seat projections, reflecting Commies&#8217; recent surge. Fascists still short of &#8220;absolute power,&#8221; Visitors...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Harper prepared to do a King-Byng?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/is-harper-preparing-another-king-byng/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/is-harper-preparing-another-king-byng/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 02:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King-Byng]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/04/21/is-harper-preparing-another-king-byng/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harper's dogmatic opposition to coalitions raises a few questions]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/is-harper-preparing-another-king-byng/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>217</slash:comments>
	Harper's dogmatic opposition to coalitions raises a few questions
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh look, new Coyne v Wells</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/oh-look-new-coyne-v-wells/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/oh-look-new-coyne-v-wells/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 01:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/04/21/oh-look-new-coyne-v-wells/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Layton&#8217;s surge, and whether Harper&#8217;s fiscal plan is really decentralizing as all that....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/oh-look-new-coyne-v-wells/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	On Layton&#8217;s surge, and whether Harper&#8217;s fiscal plan is really decentralizing as all that....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Maclean&#039;s/CPAC debate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/the-macleanscpac-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/the-macleanscpac-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 01:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/04/21/the-macleanscpac-debate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who missed the outstanding debate last night (or wants to see it again!)...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/the-macleanscpac-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	Anyone who missed the outstanding debate last night (or wants to see it again!)...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carrément, une première (presque)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/carrement-une-premiere-presque/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/carrement-une-premiere-presque/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/04/21/carrement-une-premiere-presque/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fun fact: If the NDP take a plurality of the vote in Quebec this...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/carrement-une-premiere-presque/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
	Fun fact: If the NDP take a plurality of the vote in Quebec this...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your seat projections have arrived (UPDATED)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/18/your-seat-projections-have-arrived/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/18/your-seat-projections-have-arrived/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/your-seat-projections-have-arrived/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At this point, everybody is losing]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/18/your-seat-projections-have-arrived/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>124</slash:comments>
	At this point, everybody is losing
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who won? Who cares?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/thoughts-on-the-debate-and-other-stuff/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/thoughts-on-the-debate-and-other-stuff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/04/13/thoughts-on-the-debate-and-other-stuff/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COYNE: We’re not picking the best debater. We’re picking a prime minister.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/thoughts-on-the-debate-and-other-stuff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>225</slash:comments>
	COYNE: We’re not picking the best debater. We’re picking a prime minister.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who will save us now (part III)?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/who-will-save-us-now-part-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/who-will-save-us-now-part-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parti Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Marois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=181579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barring a miracle, we are about to enter the third cycle of Parti Québécois government in Quebec]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/who-will-save-us-now-part-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>103</slash:comments>
	Barring a miracle, we are about to enter the third cycle of Parti Québécois government in Quebec
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>That seventies platform</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/03/that-seventies-platform/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/03/that-seventies-platform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 03:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/04/03/that-seventies-platform/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Liberal platform wants to take the country back 40 years]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/03/that-seventies-platform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>174</slash:comments>
	The Liberal platform wants to take the country back 40 years
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The debates mess (3) &#8211; The whole thing</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/the-debates-mess-3-the-whole-thing/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/the-debates-mess-3-the-whole-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/03/31/the-debates-mess-3-the-whole-thing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne on the urgent necessity of reforming leaders debates]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/the-debates-mess-3-the-whole-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
	Andrew Coyne on the urgent necessity of reforming leaders debates
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The debates mess (2) &#8211; Harper v Ignatieff?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/the-debates-mess-2-harper-v-ignatieff/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/the-debates-mess-2-harper-v-ignatieff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/03/31/the-debates-mess-2-harper-v-ignatieff/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some propose going further than just excluding the Greens. Why, they say, are even...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/the-debates-mess-2-harper-v-ignatieff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
	Some propose going further than just excluding the Greens. Why, they say, are even...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The debates mess (1) &#8211; The Greens</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/the-debates-mess-1-the-greens/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/the-debates-mess-1-the-greens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/03/31/the-debates-mess-1-the-greens/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let’s suppose Ford, GM and Chrysler sat down with all the television networks, and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/the-debates-mess-1-the-greens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
	Let’s suppose Ford, GM and Chrysler sat down with all the television networks, and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gilles Duceppe, federalist hardliner</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/27/gilles-duceppe-federalist-hardliner/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/27/gilles-duceppe-federalist-hardliner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cabinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-abnegation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/03/27/gilles-duceppe-federalist-hardliner/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Mr. Duceppe clarified that he, too, would never be part of a formal coalition...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/27/gilles-duceppe-federalist-hardliner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
	&#8220;Mr. Duceppe clarified that he, too, would never be part of a formal coalition...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Canada a nation?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/27/is-canada-a-nation/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/27/is-canada-a-nation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/03/27/is-canada-a-nation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COYNE: Ignatieff has no doubt Quebec is a nation. But is Canada? And if so, are Quebecers part of it?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/27/is-canada-a-nation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
	COYNE: Ignatieff has no doubt Quebec is a nation. But is Canada? And if so, are Quebecers part of it?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iggy&#039;s (continuing) problem, Harper&#039;s opportunity</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/27/iggys-continuing-problem-harpers-opportunity/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/27/iggys-continuing-problem-harpers-opportunity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/03/27/iggys-continuing-problem-harpers-opportunity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As others have pointed out, and as I’ve said myself, Ignatieff’s formal disavowal of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/27/iggys-continuing-problem-harpers-opportunity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>113</slash:comments>
	As others have pointed out, and as I’ve said myself, Ignatieff’s formal disavowal of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#039;s on first</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/27/whos-on-first-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/27/whos-on-first-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King-Byng]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/03/27/whos-on-first-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Argh. I had a feeling something wasn’t quite right as I was typing it,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/27/whos-on-first-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
	Argh. I had a feeling something wasn’t quite right as I was typing it,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harper&#039;s hypocrisy problem</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/26/harpers-hypocrisy-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/26/harpers-hypocrisy-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 01:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=179674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne on why he considers the coalition issue settled]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/26/harpers-hypocrisy-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>413</slash:comments>
	Andrew Coyne on why he considers the coalition issue settled
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iggy&#039;s coalition problem</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/25/iggys-coalition-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/25/iggys-coalition-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/03/25/iggys-coalition-problem/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Red door, blue door? This was the best answer the Liberal leader could come up with?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/25/iggys-coalition-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>373</slash:comments>
	Red door, blue door? This was the best answer the Liberal leader could come up with?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>More ado about Oda</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/18/more-ado-about-oda/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/18/more-ado-about-oda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bev Oda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=173778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne responds to Colby Cosh's defence of Bev Oda]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/18/more-ado-about-oda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>172</slash:comments>
	Andrew Coyne responds to Colby Cosh's defence of Bev Oda
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A test of our democracy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/16/a-test-of-our-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/16/a-test-of-our-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 01:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bev Oda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=173108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne on why we should be wondering whether this government can be held to basic norms of civilized behaviour]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/16/a-test-of-our-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>377</slash:comments>
	Andrew Coyne on why we should be wondering whether this government can be held to basic norms of civilized behaviour
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In time for the vote, as it happens</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/22/in-time-for-the-vote-as-it-happens/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/22/in-time-for-the-vote-as-it-happens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 02:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cynicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/in-time-for-the-vote-as-it-happens/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We learned via the Star&#8217;s Susan Delacourt that MP Scott Simms &#8220;has a raw,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/22/in-time-for-the-vote-as-it-happens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	We learned via the Star&#8217;s Susan Delacourt that MP Scott Simms &#8220;has a raw,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Iowa car crop</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/16/the-iowa-car-crop/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/16/the-iowa-car-crop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protectionism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/the-iowa-car-crop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m borrowing this from Mike Moffatt, who got it from Stephen Gordon, who cut-and-pasted...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/16/the-iowa-car-crop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	I&#8217;m borrowing this from Mike Moffatt, who got it from Stephen Gordon, who cut-and-pasted...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of jobs and jets</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/15/of-jobs-and-jets/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/15/of-jobs-and-jets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 22:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pork]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/09/15/of-jobs-and-jets/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COYNE on the F-35 controversy]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/15/of-jobs-and-jets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	COYNE on the F-35 controversy
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yankee, go &#8230; get &#039;em</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/14/yankee-go-get-em/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/14/yankee-go-get-em/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David McGuinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oilsands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rank hypocrisy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=147256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#8220;revelation&#8221; (shock! horror!) that the NRA has been offering advice to Canadian groups...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/14/yankee-go-get-em/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The &#8220;revelation&#8221; (shock! horror!) that the NRA has been offering advice to Canadian groups...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vive le transit libre!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/14/vive-le-transit-libre/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/14/vive-le-transit-libre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Jacobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suburbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=147179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transit and traffic are emerging as major issues in the Toronto mayoral election, with...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/14/vive-le-transit-libre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Transit and traffic are emerging as major issues in the Toronto mayoral election, with...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>None dead in crash of metaphor</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/13/none-dead-in-crash-of-metaphor/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/13/none-dead-in-crash-of-metaphor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 02:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bogus metaphors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lazy journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=138259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh for the love of&#8230;
The bus carrying Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff broke down...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/13/none-dead-in-crash-of-metaphor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Oh for the love of&#8230;
The bus carrying Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff broke down...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>That David Johnston scandal, in full</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/12/that-david-johnston-scandal-in-full/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/12/that-david-johnston-scandal-in-full/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bogus conspiracy theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict of interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Johnston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=138110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ANDREW COYNE: A reasonable person would conclude there was neither quid, nor pro, nor quo]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/12/that-david-johnston-scandal-in-full/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
	ANDREW COYNE: A reasonable person would conclude there was neither quid, nor pro, nor quo
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How will they know how many boaters to harass?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/08/how-will-they-know-how-many-boaters-to-haras/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/08/how-will-they-know-how-many-boaters-to-haras/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boating licence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incoherence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inconsistency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infuriating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanny-statism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=137696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the name of reducing government intrusion in people’s lives, the Conservative government is...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/08/how-will-they-know-how-many-boaters-to-haras/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In the name of reducing government intrusion in people’s lives, the Conservative government is...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>On second thought</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/08/on-second-thought-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/08/on-second-thought-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=137659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having been appointed to the Senate 18 months ago on a solemn promise to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/08/on-second-thought-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Having been appointed to the Senate 18 months ago on a solemn promise to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#039;best of Canada&#039; indeed</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/08/the-best-of-canada-indeed/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/08/the-best-of-canada-indeed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Johnston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=137624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more I think about this David Johnston appointment, the more I’m inclined to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/08/the-best-of-canada-indeed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The more I think about this David Johnston appointment, the more I’m inclined to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The final communique</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/27/the-final-communique/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/27/the-final-communique/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/06/27/the-final-communique/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Taylor, whose contacts within government are pretty good, posts what he says is...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/27/the-final-communique/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	Stephen Taylor, whose contacts within government are pretty good, posts what he says is...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Puzzling outbreak of gratitude at G8</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/26/strange-outbreak-of-gratitude-at-g8/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/26/strange-outbreak-of-gratitude-at-g8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 18:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/06/26/strange-outbreak-of-gratitude-at-g8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Summitry is difficult enough for the summiteers — witness the months of preparation and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/26/strange-outbreak-of-gratitude-at-g8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	Summitry is difficult enough for the summiteers — witness the months of preparation and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fake lake wake</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/25/fake-lake-wake/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/25/fake-lake-wake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/06/25/fake-lake-wake/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s get this out of the way off the top, while we&#8217;re waiting for...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/25/fake-lake-wake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
	Let&#8217;s get this out of the way off the top, while we&#8217;re waiting for...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How can a Bloc MP take this oath?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/16/how-can-a-bloc-mp-take-this-oath/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/16/how-can-a-bloc-mp-take-this-oath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 02:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detainee documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oath of loyalty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/06/16/how-can-a-bloc-mp-take-this-oath/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COYNE: MPs have to "bear true loyalty to Canada and to its people" in order to see Afghan detainee docs]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/16/how-can-a-bloc-mp-take-this-oath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>169</slash:comments>
	COYNE: MPs have to "bear true loyalty to Canada and to its people" in order to see Afghan detainee docs
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;The committee will have access to all documents.&quot; So will it?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/16/the-committee-will-have-access-to-all-documents-so-will-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/16/the-committee-will-have-access-to-all-documents-so-will-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 01:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghan detainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliamentary supremacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/06/16/the-committee-will-have-access-to-all-documents-so-will-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cancel my initial reaction. I think the NDP and this Globe story have it...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/16/the-committee-will-have-access-to-all-documents-so-will-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
	Cancel my initial reaction. I think the NDP and this Globe story have it...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coalition of the pundits</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/coalition-of-the-pundits/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/coalition-of-the-pundits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 18:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rep by pop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=127175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wells and I debate whether the UK coalition offers any lessons or examples for...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/coalition-of-the-pundits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
	Wells and I debate whether the UK coalition offers any lessons or examples for...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Montreal Sovereigntists</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/16/the-montreal-sovereigntists/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/16/the-montreal-sovereigntists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 20:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montreal Canadiens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tendentiousness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=126788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Montreal Canadiens are the precise embodiment of everything the Parti Québécois has ever stood for]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/16/the-montreal-sovereigntists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
	The Montreal Canadiens are the precise embodiment of everything the Parti Québécois has ever stood for
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;The government put other conditions on the table.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/13/the-government-put-other-conditions-on-the-table/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/13/the-government-put-other-conditions-on-the-table/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 23:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afghan detainee docs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=126380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the question is, will the opposition allow themselves to be played in this way?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/13/the-government-put-other-conditions-on-the-table/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>168</slash:comments>
	So the question is, will the opposition allow themselves to be played in this way?
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
