<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Inside the Queensway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/category/vault/inside-the-queensway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:23:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>And the ITQ Awesome Department of the Week Award goes to &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/16/and-the-itq-awesome-department-of-the-week-award-goes-to/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/16/and-the-itq-awesome-department-of-the-week-award-goes-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghosts of commissions of inquiries past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITQ awesome department of the week award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taking political geekery to new heights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this almost makes up for actionplan.gc.ca (but not quite)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=87648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PCO &#8212; yes, that PCO &#8212; for fulfilling one of ITQ&#8217;s most oft-muttered wishes...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/16/and-the-itq-awesome-department-of-the-week-award-goes-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
	PCO &#8212; yes, that PCO &#8212; for fulfilling one of ITQ&#8217;s most oft-muttered wishes...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harris Decima/CP:  &#8230; Then again, maybe not.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/15/harris-decimacp-then-again-maybe-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/15/harris-decimacp-then-again-maybe-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grumble grumble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harris-Decima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[where'd that majority go? i just put it down ten minutes ago!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=87501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slightly less blue-rose-coloured numbers from Harris Decima, which polled from October 1 to 12...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/15/harris-decimacp-then-again-maybe-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
	Slightly less blue-rose-coloured numbers from Harris Decima, which polled from October 1 to 12...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EKOS Weekly: Tories just an armful of oversized novelty cheques away from the big M?(!)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/15/ekos-weekly-tories-just-an-armful-of-oversized-novelty-cheques-away-from-the-big-m/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/15/ekos-weekly-tories-just-an-armful-of-oversized-novelty-cheques-away-from-the-big-m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ekos weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rosedale is red/calgary is blue ...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zarathustriansfornoneoftheabove.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=87395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy EKOSDay, everyone! 
Conservatives: 40.7 (+1.0)
Liberals: 25.5 (-0.2)
NDP: 14.3 (-0.9)
Green: 10.5...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/15/ekos-weekly-tories-just-an-armful-of-oversized-novelty-cheques-away-from-the-big-m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
	Happy EKOSDay, everyone! 
Conservatives: 40.7 (+1.0)
Liberals: 25.5 (-0.2)
NDP: 14.3 (-0.9)
Green: 10.5...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#039;s always got time for Tim Hortons?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/14/whos-always-got-time-for-tim-hortons/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/14/whos-always-got-time-for-tim-hortons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and i didn't even mention christine elliott's views on the HST!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cue the kazoos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double double vision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memories of GST battles past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[six degrees of separation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[still a small world after all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom trbovich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=87173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty&#8217;s staff, that&#8217;s who!
According to lobby communications logs (and yes, ITQ wishes...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/14/whos-always-got-time-for-tim-hortons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
	Jim Flaherty&#8217;s staff, that&#8217;s who!
According to lobby communications logs (and yes, ITQ wishes...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy one year anniversary, 40th Parliament of Canada!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/14/happy-one-year-anniversary-40th-parliament-of-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/14/happy-one-year-anniversary-40th-parliament-of-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[do oversized novelty cheques count as 'paper'?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long strange etc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[one year down!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=87115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know, it seems like so much longer, doesn&#8217;t it?
ITQ is just disappointed...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/14/happy-one-year-anniversary-40th-parliament-of-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
	I know, it seems like so much longer, doesn&#8217;t it?
ITQ is just disappointed...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#039;s new at the public opinion research depository? So glad you asked!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/13/whats-new-at-the-public-opinion-research-depository-so-glad-you-asked/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/13/whats-new-at-the-public-opinion-research-depository-so-glad-you-asked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability is just another word for -- hey! look over there! the pm is playing the piano!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic action plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaPBOWatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what would don draper do?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[who wants some entrails! (itq does! itq does!)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=86924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, PORRD. What would Hill journalists do during break weeks without you? And look...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/13/whats-new-at-the-public-opinion-research-depository-so-glad-you-asked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
	Oh, PORRD. What would Hill journalists do during break weeks without you? And look...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note to PCO: Y&#039;all might want to consider spending a little less money advertising the Economic Action! Plan &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/09/note-to-pco-yall-might-want-to-consider-spending-a-little-less-money-advertising-the-economic-action-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/09/note-to-pco-yall-might-want-to-consider-spending-a-little-less-money-advertising-the-economic-action-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[if kevin page was the probation officer someone would be back in custody by now]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pbowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[to say nothing of that hideous logo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=86803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; and putting a little more time and effort into documenting how the money...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/09/note-to-pco-yall-might-want-to-consider-spending-a-little-less-money-advertising-the-economic-action-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
	&#8230; and putting a little more time and effort into documenting how the money...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can you hear that whistle blowin&#039;? (Let the witch hunt begin!)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/09/can-you-hear-that-whistle-blowin-let-the-witch-hunt-begin/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/09/can-you-hear-that-whistle-blowin-let-the-witch-hunt-begin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[about that whistleblower protection act ...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is the era of brown envelopes upon us?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenge of the federal accountability act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[somewhere allan cutler ... just doesn't know what to think]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[things may be about to get very interesting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=86698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s going to be a very long, and not particularly relaxing weekend for senior...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/09/can-you-hear-that-whistle-blowin-let-the-witch-hunt-begin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>146</slash:comments>
	It&#8217;s going to be a very long, and not particularly relaxing weekend for senior...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATED AGAIN: A constitutional crisis? On the Friday before a long weekend?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/09/a-constitutional-crisis-on-the-friday-before-a-long-weekend/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/09/a-constitutional-crisis-on-the-friday-before-a-long-weekend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don't mess with a woman who eats her seal heart raw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michaëlle Jean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[so whose side will the monarchists be on?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[where are all those constitutional lawyers when you need one?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=86588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#60;GOB voice&#62;Come on!&#60;/GOB voice&#62;
Sadly, as the ever-vigilant Colleague Potter points out, that&#8217;s one...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/09/a-constitutional-crisis-on-the-friday-before-a-long-weekend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
	&#60;GOB voice&#62;Come on!&#60;/GOB voice&#62;
Sadly, as the ever-vigilant Colleague Potter points out, that&#8217;s one...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A labour economist, a bureaucrat and a cabinet minister walk into a room &#8230; &#8211; Liveblogging the EI reform bill at HUMA</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/08/a-labour-economist-a-bureaucrat-and-a-cabinet-minister-walk-into-a-room-liveblogging-the-ei-reform-bill-at-huma/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/08/a-labour-economist-a-bureaucrat-and-a-cabinet-minister-walk-into-a-room-liveblogging-the-ei-reform-bill-at-huma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bet they got cookies at the blue-ribbon panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=86432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s no blue-ribbon panel, but at least they&#8217;ll let us watch, right? Join ITQ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/08/a-labour-economist-a-bureaucrat-and-a-cabinet-minister-walk-into-a-room-liveblogging-the-ei-reform-bill-at-huma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	It&#8217;s no blue-ribbon panel, but at least they&#8217;ll let us watch, right? Join ITQ...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An ITQ Poll: Let the traditional pointing of the fingers begin!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/08/an-itq-poll-let-the-traditional-pointing-of-the-fingers-begin/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/08/an-itq-poll-let-the-traditional-pointing-of-the-fingers-begin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itq survey says!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[let the anger and recriminations begin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numfar do the dance of shame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=86309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/08/an-itq-poll-let-the-traditional-pointing-of-the-fingers-begin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
	...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EKOS Weekly: Zoooooooooom! (Thud.)(39.7/25.7/15.2/9.7/38.7)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/08/ekos-weekly-zoooooooooom-thud-39-725-715-29-738-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/08/ekos-weekly-zoooooooooom-thud-39-725-715-29-738-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis baldrick - crisis!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ekos weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it's all about him]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[that speech on tax hikes will totally turn this around]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=86300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Liberals! Aren&#8217;t you glad you weren&#8217;t actually able to bring down the government...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/08/ekos-weekly-zoooooooooom-thud-39-725-715-29-738-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>223</slash:comments>
	Hey Liberals! Aren&#8217;t you glad you weren&#8217;t actually able to bring down the government...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gerard Kennedy and the Infrastructure Spending Sunshine Express: Liveblogging the Transport and Infrastructure committee</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/07/gerard-kennedy-and-the-infrastructure-spending-sunshine-express-liveblogging-the-transport-and-infrastructure-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/07/gerard-kennedy-and-the-infrastructure-spending-sunshine-express-liveblogging-the-transport-and-infrastructure-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gerard kennedy gets things done]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transport infrastructure and communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why stay the course when you can rock the boat?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=86170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As promised, ITQ will be liveblogging the debate over at the Transport, Infrastructure and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/07/gerard-kennedy-and-the-infrastructure-spending-sunshine-express-liveblogging-the-transport-and-infrastructure-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
	As promised, ITQ will be liveblogging the debate over at the Transport, Infrastructure and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EffectiveOppositionWatch: Now this is more like it, Liberals.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/07/effectiveoppositionwatch-now-this-is-more-like-it-liberals/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/07/effectiveoppositionwatch-now-this-is-more-like-it-liberals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filibuster bait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gordon landon come on down!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure and communities committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memories of in and out hearings past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=86002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ITQ looks forward to liveblogging the ensuing antics, although presuming that he&#8217;s already managed...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/07/effectiveoppositionwatch-now-this-is-more-like-it-liberals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
	ITQ looks forward to liveblogging the ensuing antics, although presuming that he&#8217;s already managed...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FloorCrossWatch: Uh, guys? It&#039;s supposed to be the Liberals who can&#039;t get their stories straight on this one</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/07/floorcrosswatch-uh-guys-its-supposed-to-be-the-liberals-who-cant-get-their-stories-straight-on-this-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/07/floorcrosswatch-uh-guys-its-supposed-to-be-the-liberals-who-cant-get-their-stories-straight-on-this-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alykhan Velshi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[but what about those floor-crossers?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dimitri soudas' straight talk express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metamediameta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheels within wheels -- falling off]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=85975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Way to step all over what turns out to have been your own agitprop,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/07/floorcrosswatch-uh-guys-its-supposed-to-be-the-liberals-who-cant-get-their-stories-straight-on-this-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
	Way to step all over what turns out to have been your own agitprop,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey, remember that Code of Conduct for MPs? &#8211; Liveblogging the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commish at Procedure and House Affairs</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/06/hey-remember-that-code-of-conduct-for-mps-liveblogging-the-conflict-of-interest-and-ethics-commish-at-procedure-and-house-affairs-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/06/hey-remember-that-code-of-conduct-for-mps-liveblogging-the-conflict-of-interest-and-ethics-commish-at-procedure-and-house-affairs-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[back to basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary dawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procedure and house affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=85786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s this? A meeting to deal with &#8216;matters related to the Conflict of Interest...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/06/hey-remember-that-code-of-conduct-for-mps-liveblogging-the-conflict-of-interest-and-ethics-commish-at-procedure-and-house-affairs-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	What&#8217;s this? A meeting to deal with &#8216;matters related to the Conflict of Interest...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>So, who all wants to talk about hockey? &#8211; Liveblogging Michael Ignatieff&#039;s the Dryden/Garneau post-tactics scrum</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/06/so-who-all-wants-to-talk-about-hockey-liveblogging-michael-ignatieffs-post-tactics-scrum/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/06/so-who-all-wants-to-talk-about-hockey-liveblogging-michael-ignatieffs-post-tactics-scrum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael ignatieff meets the press (because that always works out so well for him)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no pianos in sight -- yet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we love the smell of internecine warfare in the morning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=85770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to an unexpectedly cordial and uneventful Ethics committee meeting, ITQ is heading to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/06/so-who-all-wants-to-talk-about-hockey-liveblogging-michael-ignatieffs-post-tactics-scrum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
	Due to an unexpectedly cordial and uneventful Ethics committee meeting, ITQ is heading to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gavel, gavel, who gets the gavel? &#8211; Liveblogging the Ethics committee</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/06/gavel-gavel-who-gets-the-gavel-liveblogging-the-ethics-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/06/gavel-gavel-who-gets-the-gavel-liveblogging-the-ethics-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[can you feel the excitement?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internecine warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palace coups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul szabo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours of war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worth missing the ignatieff media avail to cover? we'll see!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=85766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s right, it&#8217;s time for one of ITQ&#8217;s very favourite rituals: election of committee...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/06/gavel-gavel-who-gets-the-gavel-liveblogging-the-ethics-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	That&#8217;s right, it&#8217;s time for one of ITQ&#8217;s very favourite rituals: election of committee...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right on schedule &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/06/right-on-schedule-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/06/right-on-schedule-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[another wonderful week in the life of the leader of the opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[but they seemed so happy last week!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignatiff in trouble? it must be tuesday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LiberalMeltdownWatch (Fall 2009 edition)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=85762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; those rumours of potential floorcrossing by disgruntled Liberal MPs, first hinted at obliquely...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/06/right-on-schedule-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
	&#8230; those rumours of potential floorcrossing by disgruntled Liberal MPs, first hinted at obliquely...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATED: Strategic Counsel: Look up &#8211; waaaaay up! (41/28/14/9/40)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/05/strategic-counsel-look-up-waaaaay-up-412814940/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/05/strategic-counsel-look-up-waaaaay-up-412814940/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and yet the liberals are up in quebec. figure that one out.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[none dare call it majority territory!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic counsel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=85718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest Globe and Mail/CTV poll reveals what are likely to be some seriously...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/05/strategic-counsel-look-up-waaaaay-up-412814940/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
	The latest Globe and Mail/CTV poll reveals what are likely to be some seriously...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>They are pundits, hear them roar! &#8211; Liveblogging Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant at the Justice committee</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/05/they-are-pundit-hea-them-roar-liveblogging-mark-steyn-and-ezra-levant-at-the-justice-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/05/they-are-pundit-hea-them-roar-liveblogging-mark-steyn-and-ezra-levant-at-the-justice-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first time someone says star chamber "drink!"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech (just watch what you say) (don't sue over that metallica)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark steyn? ezra levant? pinch me i'm dreaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 13]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=85635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Join ITQ for full coverage of what is likely to be a standing-room only...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/05/they-are-pundit-hea-them-roar-liveblogging-mark-steyn-and-ezra-levant-at-the-justice-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
	Join ITQ for full coverage of what is likely to be a standing-room only...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>When commemorative ceremonies get awkward&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/05/when-commemorative-ceremonies-get-awkward/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/05/when-commemorative-ceremonies-get-awkward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happy anniversary! now get out of the shot!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in space no one can hear you ask about infrastructure spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=85562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; commemorating ministers get cryptic:
<strong>MINISTER CLEMENT MARKS SPACE MILESTONE...</strong>
OTTAWA, October 5, 2009]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/05/when-commemorative-ceremonies-get-awkward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
	&#8230; commemorating ministers get cryptic:
<strong>MINISTER CLEMENT MARKS SPACE MILESTONE...</strong>
OTTAWA, October 5, 2009
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Angus Reid: Pollocalypse now! (37/27/17/6/41)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/angus-reid-pollocalypse-now-372717641/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/angus-reid-pollocalypse-now-372717641/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angus Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the narrative is robust!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=85344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now here&#8217;s the death-defying Liberal plunge we were expecting to see:
Conservatives:  37 (-)...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/02/angus-reid-pollocalypse-now-372717641/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
	Now here&#8217;s the death-defying Liberal plunge we were expecting to see:
Conservatives:  37 (-)...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Funny, it doesn&#039;t feel any different up here: Liveblogging the (first) afternoon of official opposition on the Hill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/01/let-them-bring-on-all-their-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/01/let-them-bring-on-all-their-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ElectionWatch 2009 - No]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is that a sniffle that i hear from the NDP lobby?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it's falling! it's falling! it's -- not falling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[It's Not Going To Happen This Time.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the suspense is killing us]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=85056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Join ITQ for an afternoon of wandering betwixt Chamber, Foyer and everywhere in between...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/01/let-them-bring-on-all-their-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
	Join ITQ for an afternoon of wandering betwixt Chamber, Foyer and everywhere in between...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EKOS Bonus Round: Is &quot;Meh&quot; an option?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/01/ekos-bonus-round-is-meh-an-option/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/01/ekos-bonus-round-is-meh-an-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afghanistan! the environment! mandatory voting! not one question on the economy!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ekos extra bonus round extravaganza]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=84932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As promised, a spin-off post for the bonus questions, which can be found, in...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/01/ekos-bonus-round-is-meh-an-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
	As promised, a spin-off post for the bonus questions, which can be found, in...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EKOS Weekly: Apocalypse? We&#039;ve all been there. (36/29.7/13.9/10.5/39.6)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/01/ekos-weekly-apocalypse-weve-all-been-there-3629-713-910-539-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/01/ekos-weekly-apocalypse-weve-all-been-there-3629-713-910-539-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ekos weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nothing to see here move along move along (just kidding)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uh - is that it? really?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=84920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And this, EKOS respondents, is no apocalypse. It&#8217;s barely even a blip. Given all...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/01/ekos-weekly-apocalypse-weve-all-been-there-3629-713-910-539-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
	And this, EKOS respondents, is no apocalypse. It&#8217;s barely even a blip. Given all...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ImminentLiberalMeltdownWatch Day Three &#8211; Liveblogging the post-QP scrums</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/30/84795/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/30/84795/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marble floors and high heels simply don't mix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrumdiddlyumptious!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stalking the wily talking point]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=84795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the fizzling economy finally overtake the Coderre Affair in the race to capture...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/30/84795/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
	Will the fizzling economy finally overtake the Coderre Affair in the race to capture...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>PBOWatch: &quot;He wants more information on infrastructure spending? Hasn&#039;t he seen the ads for the website?&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/29/pbowatch-he-wants-more-information-on-infrastructure-spending-hasnt-he-seen-the-ads-for-the-website/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/29/pbowatch-he-wants-more-information-on-infrastructure-spending-hasnt-he-seen-the-ads-for-the-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada action! plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pbowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulicious!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[your taxdollars at work - (image not available)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=84668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As noted by Colleague Wherry earlier today, midway through the Toronto Star&#8217;s coverage of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/29/pbowatch-he-wants-more-information-on-infrastructure-spending-hasnt-he-seen-the-ads-for-the-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
	As noted by Colleague Wherry earlier today, midway through the Toronto Star&#8217;s coverage of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Once more unto the scrums, my friends: Liveblogging the post-QP madness</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/29/once-more-unto-the-scrums-my-friends-liveblogging-the-post-qp-madness/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/29/once-more-unto-the-scrums-my-friends-liveblogging-the-post-qp-madness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it's melting - MELTING I TELL YOU!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal woes make happy journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liveblogging the scrums .. again (but don't get used to it -- commitees come back soon)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the coderre affair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=84638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, since ITQ has been deprived, albeit temporarily, of tender, juicy committees to which...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/29/once-more-unto-the-scrums-my-friends-liveblogging-the-post-qp-madness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
	Well, since ITQ has been deprived, albeit temporarily, of tender, juicy committees to which...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memories of Outremont-induced Liberal meltdowns past &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/29/memories-of-outremont-induced-liberal-meltdowns-past/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/29/memories-of-outremont-induced-liberal-meltdowns-past/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chess for one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the coderre affair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[who wants to bet this one will come back stamped 'undeliverable' too]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why does ITQ even bother?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=84566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suddenly-self-identifying Cassandras are claiming this particular leader is, to put it plainly, a dud]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/29/memories-of-outremont-induced-liberal-meltdowns-past/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
	Suddenly-self-identifying Cassandras are claiming this particular leader is, to put it plainly, a dud
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attention, fellow obsessive committee watchers:  Don&#039;t panic.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/29/attention-fellow-obsessive-committee-watchers-dont-panic/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/29/attention-fellow-obsessive-committee-watchers-dont-panic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CommitteeNotWatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[so what's ITQ supposed to do with her afternoon now?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=84522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite its current appearance, the main committee website has not, in fact, been hijacked...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/29/attention-fellow-obsessive-committee-watchers-dont-panic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
	Despite its current appearance, the main committee website has not, in fact, been hijacked...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brevity is &#8230; wit: Liberal confidence motion REVEALED!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/28/brevity-is-wit-liberal-confidence-motion-revealed/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/28/brevity-is-wit-liberal-confidence-motion-revealed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and now we play the waiting game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this is what the leader has been working on all day?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=84457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, look, everybody! The Liberals have released the text of Thursday&#8217;s confidence motion! And...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/28/brevity-is-wit-liberal-confidence-motion-revealed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
	Hey, look, everybody! The Liberals have released the text of Thursday&#8217;s confidence motion! And...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Coderre Affair vs. The Stimulus Update</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/28/the-coderre-affair-vs-the-stimulus-update-liveblogging-the-post-qp-scrums/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/28/the-coderre-affair-vs-the-stimulus-update-liveblogging-the-post-qp-scrums/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lights! cameras! action! plan reaction!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quebec politics are hard - let's do math!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three guesses which won out]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=84424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A frenzy of activity at today's post-QP scrums]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/28/the-coderre-affair-vs-the-stimulus-update-liveblogging-the-post-qp-scrums/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
	A frenzy of activity at today's post-QP scrums
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you were an Irving-employed machinist, you&#039;d be home now: Virtually liveblogging the PM&#039;s Action! Plan update</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/28/if-you-were-an-irving-employed-machinist-youd-be-home-now-virtually-liveblogging-the-pms-action-plan-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/28/if-you-were-an-irving-employed-machinist-youd-be-home-now-virtually-liveblogging-the-pms-action-plan-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[an action! plan update from an action! prime minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is anyone else as excited about this as ITQ?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saint john must be lovely at this time of year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=84296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s &#8220;virtually&#8221; as in, through the magic of television, not almost, but not quite...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/28/if-you-were-an-irving-employed-machinist-youd-be-home-now-virtually-liveblogging-the-pms-action-plan-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
	That&#8217;s &#8220;virtually&#8221; as in, through the magic of television, not almost, but not quite...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>While we wait for the Stephen Harper Action! Plan Update &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/28/while-we-wait-for-the-stephen-harper-action-plan-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/28/while-we-wait-for-the-stephen-harper-action-plan-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it always seems like a good idea at the time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random monday morning musings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=84250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; which will kick off sometime around 1:30 pm Atlantic time &#8212; that&#8217;s 12:30...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/28/while-we-wait-for-the-stephen-harper-action-plan-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
	&#8230; which will kick off sometime around 1:30 pm Atlantic time &#8212; that&#8217;s 12:30...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATED: Dubious Poll Reporting Achievement of the Week Award: Sun Media/Leger Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/28/dubious-poll-reporting-achievement-of-the-week-award-sun-medialeger-marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/28/dubious-poll-reporting-achievement-of-the-week-award-sun-medialeger-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maybe this is why we can't have the freaking discussion on the future of the mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[picking fights with pollsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[you've got some 'splaining to do sun media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=84237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honestly, ITQ isn&#8217;t trying to pick on Sun Media or Leger Marketing here, but...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/28/dubious-poll-reporting-achievement-of-the-week-award-sun-medialeger-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
	Honestly, ITQ isn&#8217;t trying to pick on Sun Media or Leger Marketing here, but...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let the (non) confidence games begin! (Yes, again.) UPDATED</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/27/let-the-non-confidence-games-begin-yes-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/27/let-the-non-confidence-games-begin-yes-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don't make any plans past thursday (or possibly tuesday)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elecspec 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the wings of butterfly in saint john ...]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=84196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harper tables the third report on the Economic Action Plan Monday. So when might we be heading to the polls?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/27/let-the-non-confidence-games-begin-yes-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>218</slash:comments>
	Harper tables the third report on the Economic Action Plan Monday. So when might we be heading to the polls?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>GiornoWatch: Well, since we&#039;re on the GEDS site anyway &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/25/giornowatch-well-since-were-here-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/25/giornowatch-well-since-were-here-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adieu adieu to yieu and yieu and yieu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giornowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today is the first day of the rest of pierre pettigrew's life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=84105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; why not cast a curious eye on the other changings of the guard...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/25/giornowatch-well-since-were-here-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
	&#8230; why not cast a curious eye on the other changings of the guard...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATED: Sterling, Cooper &#8230; Giorno? ITQ investigates the shadowy world of PMO&#039;s in-house ad shop</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/25/sterling-cooper-giorno-itq-investigates-the-shadowy-world-of-pmos-in-house-ad-shop/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/25/sterling-cooper-giorno-itq-investigates-the-shadowy-world-of-pmos-in-house-ad-shop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giornowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i promise: no more mad men references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not exactly adscam but still makes you go hmmm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=84029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As GiornoWatch enthusiasts no doubt recall from previous dispatches, the fact that PMO has...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/25/sterling-cooper-giorno-itq-investigates-the-shadowy-world-of-pmos-in-house-ad-shop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
	As GiornoWatch enthusiasts no doubt recall from previous dispatches, the fact that PMO has...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mad Man (and Woman): Liveblogging Michael Ignatieff and Martha Hall Findlay on partisan political advertising</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/25/mad-man-and-woman-liveblogging-michael-ignatieff-and-martha-hall-findlay-on-partisan-political-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/25/mad-man-and-woman-liveblogging-michael-ignatieff-and-martha-hall-findlay-on-partisan-political-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad firms need stimulus too!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada action! plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Hall Findlay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[that logo alone deserves a full independent judicial inquiry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=83953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, remember that $34 million in Economic Action! Plan-related ad spending that Canadian Press...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/25/mad-man-and-woman-liveblogging-michael-ignatieff-and-martha-hall-findlay-on-partisan-political-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
	Hey, remember that $34 million in Economic Action! Plan-related ad spending that Canadian Press...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATED: EKOS spin-off post: Who&#039;s the rich, urban internationalist now, Patrick Muttart?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/ekos-spin-off-post-whos-the-rich-urban-internationalist-now-patrick-muttart/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/ekos-spin-off-post-whos-the-rich-urban-internationalist-now-patrick-muttart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double the analysis double the fun!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ekos weekly extra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Graves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[so does that mean the ads didn't even play well in cosmopolitia?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=83762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Sorry, sorry; just couldn&#8217;t resist, given how he characterized the new Liberal ad campaign...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/ekos-spin-off-post-whos-the-rich-urban-internationalist-now-patrick-muttart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
	(Sorry, sorry; just couldn&#8217;t resist, given how he characterized the new Liberal ad campaign...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATED: EKOS Weekly (with bonus Nanos): WATCH OUT! It&#039;s a runaway train!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/ekos-weekly-with-bonus-nanos-watch-out-its-a-runaway-train/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/ekos-weekly-with-bonus-nanos-watch-out-its-a-runaway-train/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ekos weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more data tables please]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[now with 100% more nanos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=83678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seven point lead! Seven point lead! Seven point one lead, even, if you want...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/ekos-weekly-with-bonus-nanos-watch-out-its-a-runaway-train/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>92</slash:comments>
	Seven point lead! Seven point lead! Seven point one lead, even, if you want...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATED! Whose website is it, anyway? ITQ investigates &#8230; in realtime (for now).</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/23/whose-website-is-it-anyway-itq-investigates-in-realtime-for-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/23/whose-website-is-it-anyway-itq-investigates-in-realtime-for-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at least 'just visiting' isn't an atrocity against art and nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curiouser and curiouser and even curiouser again]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure hides a multitude of sins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[that website; that *website* (tm)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=83503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATE!...</strong>
Unless you&#8217;ve spent the last few days on a self]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/23/whose-website-is-it-anyway-itq-investigates-in-realtime-for-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
	<strong>SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATE!...</strong>
Unless you&#8217;ve spent the last few days on a self
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATED: PrenticeWatch: Ten feet from the podium? Canada&#039;s back again!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/22/prenticewatch-ten-feet-from-the-podium-canadas-back-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/22/prenticewatch-ten-feet-from-the-podium-canadas-back-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[According to Jim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autumn in new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prenticewatch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=83393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Toronto Star&#8217;s Mitch Potter managed to catch up with Canada&#8217;s curiously elusive environment...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/22/prenticewatch-ten-feet-from-the-podium-canadas-back-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
	The Toronto Star&#8217;s Mitch Potter managed to catch up with Canada&#8217;s curiously elusive environment...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATED: Whatever you do, don&#039;t look around the corner! &#8211; Not liveblogging Jim Prentice at the UN climate change conference</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/22/whatever-you-do-dont-look-around-the-corner-not-liveblogging-jim-prentices-conference-call-from-the-un-meeting-on-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/22/whatever-you-do-dont-look-around-the-corner-not-liveblogging-jim-prentices-conference-call-from-the-un-meeting-on-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Prentice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[just around the corner (is an oncoming train)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shhhhh be very very quiet and nobody will notice canada's back]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=83328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Huh. Well, that was odd.
ITQ was all ready to liveblog Jim Prentice&#8217;s conference...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/22/whatever-you-do-dont-look-around-the-corner-not-liveblogging-jim-prentices-conference-call-from-the-un-meeting-on-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
	Huh. Well, that was odd.
ITQ was all ready to liveblog Jim Prentice&#8217;s conference...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

