<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; 3-D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/3-d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:21:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Three Musketeers go sci-fi</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/21/the-three-musketeers-go-sci-fi/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/21/the-three-musketeers-go-sci-fi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Weinman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alexandre dumas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three musketeers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/27/the-three-musketeers-go-sci-fi/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remaking Dumas’s story is a tradition, though the novel isn’t exactly a masterpiece]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/21/the-three-musketeers-go-sci-fi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	Remaking Dumas’s story is a tradition, though the novel isn’t exactly a masterpiece
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drama for 3-D TVs</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/27/bright-idea-drama-for-3-d-tvs/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/27/bright-idea-drama-for-3-d-tvs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sorensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=167628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flat panel 3-D television sets first came out early last year. But few people own one, or know anyone who does.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/27/bright-idea-drama-for-3-d-tvs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	Flat panel 3-D television sets first came out early last year. But few people own one, or know anyone who does.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Edition:</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/01/entertainment-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/01/entertainment-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Castro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Plummer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efil4zaggin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ellen DeGeneres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Aniston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin bieber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lily Safra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lottery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nana Mouskouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Abdul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Killen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vampire weekend]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=116086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The season's golden girls, bad boys, and red-carpet rebels]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/01/entertainment-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The season's golden girls, bad boys, and red-carpet rebels
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>James Cameron has no clothes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/17/james-cameron-has-no-clothes/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/17/james-cameron-has-no-clothes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2154]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-Americanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Na’vi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pandora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Titanic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=107110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On almost every level, says this critic, ‘Avatar’ is a sub-prime performance]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/17/james-cameron-has-no-clothes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
	On almost every level, says this critic, ‘Avatar’ is a sub-prime performance
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two sides of Moore&#039;s Law</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/15/two-sides-of-moores-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/15/two-sides-of-moores-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anopheles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circularly polarized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green laser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual ventures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jordin kare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawrence livermore national laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lowell wood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manpads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosquito death ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosquitoes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nathan myhrvold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olpc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[one laptop per child]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic defense initiative]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=107623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suppose a lot of you have seen the astonishing video of the Intellectual...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/15/two-sides-of-moores-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
	I suppose a lot of you have seen the astonishing video of the Intellectual...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why haven’t you seen Avatar yet?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/18/why-havent-you-seen-avatar-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/18/why-havent-you-seen-avatar-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian D. Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Globes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immersion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[na'vi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uncanny valley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=101193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Cameron’s Golden Globe-winning movie has single-handedly brought back old-fashioned movie magic]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/18/why-havent-you-seen-avatar-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
	James Cameron’s Golden Globe-winning movie has single-handedly brought back old-fashioned movie magic
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes Indeedy, Producers Are Greedy And Needy For 3-D</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/20/yes-indeedy-producers-are-greedy-and-needy-for-3-d/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/20/yes-indeedy-producers-are-greedy-and-needy-for-3-d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Weinman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gimmicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katzenberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=44668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two articles in one day about the push to make 3-D the Future of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/20/yes-indeedy-producers-are-greedy-and-needy-for-3-d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	Two articles in one day about the push to make 3-D the Future of...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
