<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Adrian Dix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/adrian-dix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:54:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>B.C. NDP election loss not an issue of leadership: party president</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/b-c-ndp-election-loss-not-an-issue-of-leadership-party-president/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/b-c-ndp-election-loss-not-an-issue-of-leadership-party-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Dix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VANCOUVER &#8211; The surprising electoral loss of British Columbia&#8217;s New Democrats this week should...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/b-c-ndp-election-loss-not-an-issue-of-leadership-party-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	VANCOUVER &#8211; The surprising electoral loss of British Columbia&#8217;s New Democrats this week should...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The B.C. pollster who got it right &#8212; and those who didn&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/a-word-from-the-b-c-pollsters-who-got-it-wrong-and-one-who-didnt/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/a-word-from-the-b-c-pollsters-who-got-it-wrong-and-one-who-didnt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Macdonald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Dix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.C. election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christy Clark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['Clearly we missed some of it pretty badly']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/a-word-from-the-b-c-pollsters-who-got-it-wrong-and-one-who-didnt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	'Clearly we missed some of it pretty badly'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The meaning of Adrian Dix&#8217;s defeat</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/the-meaning-of-adrian-dixs-defeat/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/the-meaning-of-adrian-dixs-defeat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Dix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice Funke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pundits Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Progressives: Be tough and get young people to vote for you]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/the-meaning-of-adrian-dixs-defeat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Progressives: Be tough and get young people to vote for you
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drawing the battle lines in B.C.&#8217;s election</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/18/drawing-the-battle-lines/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/18/drawing-the-battle-lines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Macdonald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Dix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=373047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Adrian Dix looks to return B.C. to the NDP, all eyes are on the most important provincial election in years]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/18/drawing-the-battle-lines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	As Adrian Dix looks to return B.C. to the NDP, all eyes are on the most important provincial election in years
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising rules</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/23/advertising-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/23/advertising-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Dix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=340881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The British Columbia New Democrats are proposing new rules for government advertising.
Dix said...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/23/advertising-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The British Columbia New Democrats are proposing new rules for government advertising.
Dix said...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Thomas Mulcair tries to look and sound the part</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/15/the-commons-thomas-mulcair-tries-to-look-and-sound-the-part/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/15/the-commons-thomas-mulcair-tries-to-look-and-sound-the-part/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Dix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Dexter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Selinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=337538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP leader waxes poetic about "best practices"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/15/the-commons-thomas-mulcair-tries-to-look-and-sound-the-part/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The NDP leader waxes poetic about "best practices"
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I am being kind when I call her position &#8216;disingenuous&#8217;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/25/i-am-being-kind-when-i-call-her-position-disingenuous/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/25/i-am-being-kind-when-i-call-her-position-disingenuous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 20:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Dix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Rathgeber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christy Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Leslie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=276865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative MP Brent Rathgeber questions Christy Clark&#8217;s position on the Northern Gateway pipeline.
If...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/25/i-am-being-kind-when-i-call-her-position-disingenuous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Conservative MP Brent Rathgeber questions Christy Clark&#8217;s position on the Northern Gateway pipeline.
If...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harper’s plugged pipeline policy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/13/harpers-plugged-pipeline-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/13/harpers-plugged-pipeline-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paul Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Dix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christy Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enbridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Prentice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Oliver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Gateway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=273542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time to change the agenda--again?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/13/harpers-plugged-pipeline-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Time to change the agenda--again?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the NDP could make national unity a provincial issue</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/10/how-the-ndp-could-make-national-unity-a-provincial-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/10/how-the-ndp-could-make-national-unity-a-provincial-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Goldenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Dix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clarity act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dutch disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherbrooke Declaration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=265736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never heard of the Sherbrooke Declaration? You're not alone.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/10/how-the-ndp-could-make-national-unity-a-provincial-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Never heard of the Sherbrooke Declaration? You're not alone.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada 2013: a world of fun</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/07/canada-2013-a-world-of-fun/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/07/canada-2013-a-world-of-fun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 14:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Dix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danielle Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Marois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=251098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Danielle Smith stomping across Alberta in the boots of history (OK, lousy metaphor),...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/07/canada-2013-a-world-of-fun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	With Danielle Smith stomping across Alberta in the boots of history (OK, lousy metaphor),...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
