<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:36:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PepsiCo pulls Mountain Dew ad following criticism</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/01/pepsico-pulls-mountain-dew-ad-following-criticism/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/01/pepsico-pulls-mountain-dew-ad-following-criticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=379530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK, N.Y. &#8211; PepsiCo is once again learning the risks of celebrity partnerships...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/01/pepsico-pulls-mountain-dew-ad-following-criticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	NEW YORK, N.Y. &#8211; PepsiCo is once again learning the risks of celebrity partnerships...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How hit songs become advertising sound-alikes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/hit-songs-at-bargain-basement-prices/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/hit-songs-at-bargain-basement-prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosemary Westwood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=362622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[‘Please rip off the Black Keys, Mumford &#038; Sons, Lumineers']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/hit-songs-at-bargain-basement-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	‘Please rip off the Black Keys, Mumford &#038; Sons, Lumineers'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The cure for Facebook&#8217;s feature-bloat? New features!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/12/the-cure-for-facebooks-feature-bloat-new-features/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/12/the-cure-for-facebooks-feature-bloat-new-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=359530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does simplification involve so many confusing features?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/12/the-cure-for-facebooks-feature-bloat-new-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Why does simplification involve so many confusing features?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better know a talking point</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/better-know-a-talking-point-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/better-know-a-talking-point-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Notes on the government's advertising math]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/better-know-a-talking-point-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Notes on the government's advertising math
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warning: not safe for work (outside city limits anyway)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/29/warning-not-safe-for-work-outside-city-limits-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/29/warning-not-safe-for-work-outside-city-limits-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 04:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Wheat Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheesecake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CWB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gil elvgren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Farmers Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pin-up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=344327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Farmers Union looks at an ad based on a classic pin-up, and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/29/warning-not-safe-for-work-outside-city-limits-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The National Farmers Union looks at an ad based on a classic pin-up, and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coca-Cola to tackle obesity for first time in major U.S. ad campaign</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/14/coca-cola-to-tackle-obesity-for-first-time-in-major-u-s-ad-campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/14/coca-cola-to-tackle-obesity-for-first-time-in-major-u-s-ad-campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=336997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK, N.Y. &#8211; Coca-Cola became one of the world&#8217;s most powerful brands by...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/14/coca-cola-to-tackle-obesity-for-first-time-in-major-u-s-ad-campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	NEW YORK, N.Y. &#8211; Coca-Cola became one of the world&#8217;s most powerful brands by...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;A little bit Conservative&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/23/a-little-bit-conservative/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/23/a-little-bit-conservative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 20:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by-election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dale Gann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=318840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting pitch from the Conservative candidate in Victoria (a riding that hasn&#8217;t elected...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/23/a-little-bit-conservative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	An interesting pitch from the Conservative candidate in Victoria (a riding that hasn&#8217;t elected...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>As seen on TV</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/09/as-seen-on-tv-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/09/as-seen-on-tv-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontario]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=313308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Harper government has committed another $4 million to advertise itself.
Supplementary estimates released...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/09/as-seen-on-tv-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Harper government has committed another $4 million to advertise itself.
Supplementary estimates released...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>According to the Conservatives, your government is awesome</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/22/the-price-of-persuasion/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/22/the-price-of-persuasion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada’s Economic Action Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic action plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=304279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal government is spending tens of millions on commercials that make the Tories look good]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/22/the-price-of-persuasion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The federal government is spending tens of millions on commercials that make the Tories look good
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attacking the attacks</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/10/attacking-the-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/10/attacking-the-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-and-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Fingas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=301896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg Fingas considers the NDP&#8217;s new web ad.
Well, the good news is that...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/10/attacking-the-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Greg Fingas considers the NDP&#8217;s new web ad.
Well, the good news is that...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case of the union sponsorships</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/27/the-case-of-the-union-sponsorships/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/27/the-case-of-the-union-sponsorships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice Funke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=286348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joanna Smith reports that the NDP returned $344,468 after the Conservatives complained about union...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/27/the-case-of-the-union-sponsorships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Joanna Smith reports that the NDP returned $344,468 after the Conservatives complained about union...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did you Yahoo! that?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/14/did-you-yahoo-that/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/14/did-you-yahoo-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banner ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Wide Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=282214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The one-time star of the dot-com era tries to figure out what to be as it grows up]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/14/did-you-yahoo-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The one-time star of the dot-com era tries to figure out what to be as it grows up
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rolex and Federer: Perfect timing</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/23/perfect-timing/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/23/perfect-timing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emma Teitel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roger federer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rolex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tennis endorsements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wimbledon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=275339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minutes after the tennis star's Wimbledon win, ads were out]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/23/perfect-timing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Minutes after the tennis star's Wimbledon win, ads were out
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertisers leave after Knicks lose Lin</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/18/advertisers-leave-after-knicks-lose-lin/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/18/advertisers-leave-after-knicks-lose-lin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sorensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeremy lin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=275225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That didn&#8217;t take long. It hasn&#8217;t even been 24 hours since the New York...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/18/advertisers-leave-after-knicks-lose-lin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	That didn&#8217;t take long. It hasn&#8217;t even been 24 hours since the New York...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Television’s mid-life crisis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/12/televisions-mid-life-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/12/televisions-mid-life-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Weinman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSI: Miami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry’s Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parks & Recreation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Ofﬁce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=272019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A show can be a hit, but if its viewers are over 49, chances are it’ll get the axe]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/12/televisions-mid-life-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A show can be a hit, but if its viewers are over 49, chances are it’ll get the axe
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 memorable but cheesy hockey player product pitches</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/11/10-memorable-but-cheesy-hockey-player-product-pitches/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/11/10-memorable-but-cheesy-hockey-player-product-pitches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog of Lists</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog of Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commericals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=273495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Messier can't stop eating Lays, while Sundin's mom wants to make sure he eats his Chunky Soup.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/11/10-memorable-but-cheesy-hockey-player-product-pitches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Messier can't stop eating Lays, while Sundin's mom wants to make sure he eats his Chunky Soup.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lost in the supermarket</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/29/lost-in-the-supermarket/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/29/lost-in-the-supermarket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Muttary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Marketing in Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Delacourt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=271404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Susan Delacourt reviews Political Marketing in Canada, which includes an interview with Conservative strategist...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/29/lost-in-the-supermarket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Susan Delacourt reviews Political Marketing in Canada, which includes an interview with Conservative strategist...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>GM drops Facebook ads days before IPO</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/15/gm-drops-facebook-ads-days-before-ipo/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/15/gm-drops-facebook-ads-days-before-ipo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Warnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=258792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[General Motors announced plans to stop advertising on Facebook Tuesday, just days before shares...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/15/gm-drops-facebook-ads-days-before-ipo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	General Motors announced plans to stop advertising on Facebook Tuesday, just days before shares...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The science of attack ads</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/20/the-science-of-attack-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/20/the-science-of-attack-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sadie Dingfelder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=253870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadie Dingfelder reviews the latest research on political advertising.
In one study, published in...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/20/the-science-of-attack-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Sadie Dingfelder reviews the latest research on political advertising.
In one study, published in...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How does Google know what I&#8217;m looking at?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/how-does-google-know-what-im-looking-at/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/how-does-google-know-what-im-looking-at/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jesse Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Active View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=253205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Active View is supposed to reveal whether or not an online display ad was seen]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/how-does-google-know-what-im-looking-at/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Active View is supposed to reveal whether or not an online display ad was seen
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Jack&#8217;s vision is in good hands&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/10/jacks-vision-is-in-good-hands/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/10/jacks-vision-is-in-good-hands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olivia Chow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=251293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As viewers of last night&#8217;s Blue Jays game know, the NDP has launched the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/10/jacks-vision-is-in-good-hands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	As viewers of last night&#8217;s Blue Jays game know, the NDP has launched the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sleeves: rolled up</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/05/sleeves-rolled-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/05/sleeves-rolled-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 13:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=250750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP launches its campaign with an ad for the Quebec market....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/05/sleeves-rolled-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The NDP launches its campaign with an ad for the Quebec market....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Selling the opposition</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/04/selling-the-opposition/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/04/selling-the-opposition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=250541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a release this morning, the NDP announced the creation of an official app...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/04/selling-the-opposition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In a release this morning, the NDP announced the creation of an official app...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The robocall rules (II)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/12/the-robocall-rules-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/12/the-robocall-rules-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Valeriote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guelph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robocalls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=245333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elections Canada has no comment on reports of an automated call sent out by...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/12/the-robocall-rules-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Elections Canada has no comment on reports of an automated call sent out by...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Communicating like a bar fight</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/20/communicating-like-a-bar-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/20/communicating-like-a-bar-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Armour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=234836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jennifer Ditchburn connects the dots between Stephane Dion, Michael Ignatieff, the health care accord...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/20/communicating-like-a-bar-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Jennifer Ditchburn connects the dots between Stephane Dion, Michael Ignatieff, the health care accord...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The permanent campaign continues</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/28/the-permanent-campaign-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/28/the-permanent-campaign-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Lavigne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long gun registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=227228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP buys billboard space to attack the elimination of the long-gun registry.
The...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/28/the-permanent-campaign-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	The NDP buys billboard space to attack the elimination of the long-gun registry.
The...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a campaign is spent</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/11/how-a-campaign-is-spent/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/11/how-a-campaign-is-spent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice Funke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pundits Guide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=224998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alice Funke reviews the financial returns for last spring&#8217;s election.
The Liberals also outspent...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/11/how-a-campaign-is-spent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Alice Funke reviews the financial returns for last spring&#8217;s election.
The Liberals also outspent...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pitchmen with pitchforks</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/17/pitchmen-with-pitchforks/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/17/pitchmen-with-pitchforks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farmers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frito Lays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=208638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fast food restaurants are getting the farmers that grow their food to sell it too]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/17/pitchmen-with-pitchforks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Fast food restaurants are getting the farmers that grow their food to sell it too
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;If this is how the game is being played, we better figure that out&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/if-this-is-how-the-game-is-being-played-we-better-figure-that-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/if-this-is-how-the-game-is-being-played-we-better-figure-that-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=201016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hill Times talks to Bob Rae.
<strong>You said on Tuesday that the Liberals ...</strong>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/if-this-is-how-the-game-is-being-played-we-better-figure-that-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
	The Hill Times talks to Bob Rae.
<strong>You said on Tuesday that the Liberals ...</strong>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>No sex please, they&#039;re children</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/17/no-sex-please-theyre-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/17/no-sex-please-theyre-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mothers' Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=197358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The British government is trying to tackle the issue of kids’ sexualization]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/17/no-sex-please-theyre-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	The British government is trying to tackle the issue of kids’ sexualization
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;His failure to define himself was his choice&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/01/his-failure-to-define-himself-was-his-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/01/his-failure-to-define-himself-was-his-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Giorno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=194844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative campaign chairman Guy Giorno puts his faith in the voters.
Mr. Giorno said...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/01/his-failure-to-define-himself-was-his-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>128</slash:comments>
	Conservative campaign chairman Guy Giorno puts his faith in the voters.
Mr. Giorno said...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A war on two fronts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/30/a-war-on-two-fronts/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/30/a-war-on-two-fronts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=188694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Liberals release two new adverts—one aimed at the NDP, the other at the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/30/a-war-on-two-fronts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
	The Liberals release two new adverts—one aimed at the NDP, the other at the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>This woman seems very concerned</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/27/this-woman-seems-very-concerned/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/27/this-woman-seems-very-concerned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=187561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservative spot that seems in highest rotation at the moment....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/27/this-woman-seems-very-concerned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>158</slash:comments>
	The Conservative spot that seems in highest rotation at the moment....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imagine all the people&#8230; voting NDP</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/imagine-all-the-people-voting-ndp/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/imagine-all-the-people-voting-ndp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=187157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest spot from the New Democrats....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/imagine-all-the-people-voting-ndp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
	The latest spot from the New Democrats....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Half an hour to make his case</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/24/half-an-hour-to-make-his-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/24/half-an-hour-to-make-his-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=186762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 30-minute Liberal ad that airs across the country today]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/24/half-an-hour-to-make-his-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
	The 30-minute Liberal ad that airs across the country today
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Truth in advertising</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/22/truth-in-advertising-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/22/truth-in-advertising-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 20:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=186710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While noting the Conservative campaign&#8217;s interest in factual accuracy, the NDP quibbles on various...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/22/truth-in-advertising-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
	While noting the Conservative campaign&#8217;s interest in factual accuracy, the NDP quibbles on various...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The highest compliment</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/22/the-highest-compliment/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/22/the-highest-compliment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=186566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservative side directs an attack ad at Jack Layton....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/22/the-highest-compliment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>138</slash:comments>
	The Conservative side directs an attack ad at Jack Layton....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smiling Jack</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/smiling-jack/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/smiling-jack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=186395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest ad from the NDP....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/smiling-jack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
	The latest ad from the NDP....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Direct appeal</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/direct-appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/direct-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=186107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Liberals will air a half-hour program on Sunday afternoon showcasing Mr. Ignatieff and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/direct-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
	The Liberals will air a half-hour program on Sunday afternoon showcasing Mr. Ignatieff and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back and forth</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/20/back-and-forth/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/20/back-and-forth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=185852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the Conservatives aim an attack ad at an attack ad that is no...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/20/back-and-forth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	While the Conservatives aim an attack ad at an attack ad that is no...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Stephen Harper approve of this message?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/19/does-stephen-harper-approve-of-this-message/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/19/does-stephen-harper-approve-of-this-message/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=185812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Liberals have edited and rereleased their disputed ad....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/19/does-stephen-harper-approve-of-this-message/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
	The Liberals have edited and rereleased their disputed ad....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jack Layton knows where he stands, even when he&#039;s sitting</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/14/jack-layton-knows-where-he-stands-even-when-hes-sitting/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/14/jack-layton-knows-where-he-stands-even-when-hes-sitting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=184281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new advert from the New Democrats.
A companion piece is here....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/14/jack-layton-knows-where-he-stands-even-when-hes-sitting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
	A new advert from the New Democrats.
A companion piece is here....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>About that $11-billion</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/about-that-11-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/about-that-11-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=183787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest spot from the Liberal side....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/about-that-11-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
	The latest spot from the Liberal side....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;It&#039;s just the beginning&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/its-just-the-beginning/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/its-just-the-beginning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright levy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=183719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest spot from the Conservative side. The Bull Meter has already taken this...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/its-just-the-beginning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
	The latest spot from the Conservative side. The Bull Meter has already taken this...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trainwreck</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/12/trainwreck/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/12/trainwreck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=183606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest spot from the Liberal side....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/12/trainwreck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	The latest spot from the Liberal side....
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
