<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Arizona</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/arizona/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:14:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Where have Georgia&#039;s immigrant workers gone?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/15/where-have-the-workers-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/15/where-have-the-workers-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Findlay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=196421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Echoing Arizona, Georgia passed a tough immigrant law. Now it finds itself desperately short of farmhands.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/15/where-have-the-workers-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	Echoing Arizona, Georgia passed a tough immigrant law. Now it finds itself desperately short of farmhands.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dust-up in the Phoenix desert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/11/dust-up-in-the-desert/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/11/dust-up-in-the-desert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon Gatehouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Bettman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goldwater institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matthew hulsizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winnipeg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=182886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Death threats, hate mail, conspiracy theories. Welcome to hockey night in Phoenix.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/11/dust-up-in-the-desert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
	Death threats, hate mail, conspiracy theories. Welcome to hockey night in Phoenix.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>This week: Good news, bad news</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/08/this-week-good-news-bad-news-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/08/this-week-good-news-bad-news-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good news, bad news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bedford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College of Registered Nurses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[halifax water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivory Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laurent Gbagbo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcJobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nova Scotia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard goldstone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[southwest airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wilfred gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yuma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=182109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are the Vancouver Canucks the prohibitive Cup favourites?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/08/this-week-good-news-bad-news-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Are the Vancouver Canucks the prohibitive Cup favourites?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not much Glee over these slushies</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/05/not-much-glee-over-these-slushies/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/05/not-much-glee-over-these-slushies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Weinman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naruto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slushing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=169846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A show that takes a stand against bullying might have given bullies some ideas]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/05/not-much-glee-over-these-slushies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	A show that takes a stand against bullying might have given bullies some ideas
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;I believe we can be better&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/12/i-believe-we-can-be-better/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/12/i-believe-we-can-be-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 02:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christina Taylor Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=166588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An account of President Barack Obama's remarks in Tucson]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/12/i-believe-we-can-be-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
	An account of President Barack Obama's remarks in Tucson
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s the matter with Arizona?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/12/what%e2%80%99s-the-matter-with-arizona/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/12/what%e2%80%99s-the-matter-with-arizona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Derry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Goldwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Brewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Lee Loughner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharron Angle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=166568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Giffords shooting isn't out of character for the desert state]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/12/what%e2%80%99s-the-matter-with-arizona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
	Why the Giffords shooting isn't out of character for the desert state
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do we take our own words seriously?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/12/do-we-take-our-own-words-seriously/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/12/do-we-take-our-own-words-seriously/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Selley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conor friedersdorf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heather MacDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Taibbi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=166429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conor Friedersdorf, writing about the rhetoric of Palin &#38; Co., gets at what I...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/12/do-we-take-our-own-words-seriously/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>179</slash:comments>
	Conor Friedersdorf, writing about the rhetoric of Palin &#38; Co., gets at what I...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;No public figure can be completely immune&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/11/no-public-figure-can-be-completely-immune/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/11/no-public-figure-can-be-completely-immune/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominic LeBlanc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=166358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberal MP Dominic LeBlanc, recently the subject of death threats, considers the reality of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/11/no-public-figure-can-be-completely-immune/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
	Liberal MP Dominic LeBlanc, recently the subject of death threats, considers the reality of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Let’s at least make troubled individuals easier to spot&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/11/let%e2%80%99s-at-least-make-troubled-individuals-easier-to-spot/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/11/let%e2%80%99s-at-least-make-troubled-individuals-easier-to-spot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ailes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuscon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=166339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Stewart and Roger Ailes find themselves vaguely in agreement on something.
I do...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/11/let%e2%80%99s-at-least-make-troubled-individuals-easier-to-spot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
	Jon Stewart and Roger Ailes find themselves vaguely in agreement on something.
I do...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Timeout</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/10/timeout/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/10/timeout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discourse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuscon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=166314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Dickerson considers what should happen now.
Any speech now, from the president or...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/10/timeout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
	John Dickerson considers what should happen now.
Any speech now, from the president or...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;The extent of angry rhetoric in the country can lead people to extreme actions&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/10/the-extent-of-angry-rhetoric-in-the-country-can-lead-people-to-extreme-actions/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/10/the-extent-of-angry-rhetoric-in-the-country-can-lead-people-to-extreme-actions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24 Sussex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=166260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a story about how MPs cope with potential threats to their personal security,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/10/the-extent-of-angry-rhetoric-in-the-country-can-lead-people-to-extreme-actions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
	In a story about how MPs cope with potential threats to their personal security,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>On rhetoric</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/09/on-rhetoric/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/09/on-rhetoric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Morrissey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Shafer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=166251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack Shafer defends angry rhetoric.
The great miracle of American politics is that although...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/09/on-rhetoric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>161</slash:comments>
	Jack Shafer defends angry rhetoric.
The great miracle of American politics is that although...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sheriff Joe comes to tea</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/sheriff-joe-comes-to-tea/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/sheriff-joe-comes-to-tea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Arpaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party Caucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=150867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arizona’s tough-talking cop is a Tea Party favourite, in spite of accusations of financial irregularities]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/sheriff-joe-comes-to-tea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Arizona’s tough-talking cop is a Tea Party favourite, in spite of accusations of financial irregularities
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;I call on you today to say that there are no beheadings&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/03/i-call-on-you-today-to-say-that-there-are-no-beheadings/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/03/i-call-on-you-today-to-say-that-there-are-no-beheadings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beheadings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crosses burning on lawns as we speak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=145388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s going well in Arizona:...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/03/i-call-on-you-today-to-say-that-there-are-no-beheadings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	It&#8217;s going well in Arizona:...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Khabi bull</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/01/khabi-bull/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/01/khabi-bull/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcoholism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daryl Katz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david staples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmonton Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmonton Oilers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extreme DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impaired driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeff drouin-deslauriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Arpaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maricopa County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national hockey league]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikolai khabibulin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyler dellow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=144811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oiler goaltender Nikolai Khabibulin&#8217;s trial for the offence of &#8220;extreme&#8221; impaired driving was the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/01/khabi-bull/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Oiler goaltender Nikolai Khabibulin&#8217;s trial for the offence of &#8220;extreme&#8221; impaired driving was the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How partisan politics are hurting immigration reform</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/16/how-partisan-politics-are-hurting-immigration-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/16/how-partisan-politics-are-hurting-immigration-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=142892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once upon a time, George W. Bush was looking for a bipartisan consensus]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/16/how-partisan-politics-are-hurting-immigration-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Once upon a time, George W. Bush was looking for a bipartisan consensus
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s immigration law gamble</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/22/obamas-immigration-law-gamble/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/22/obamas-immigration-law-gamble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barak Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=138806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How badly will the lawsuit against Arizona hurt the Democrats?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/22/obamas-immigration-law-gamble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	How badly will the lawsuit against Arizona hurt the Democrats?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The importance of Jon Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/19/the-importance-of-jon-stewart/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/19/the-importance-of-jon-stewart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Parisella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Parisella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=139112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you ask the twentysomething crowd where they get their news, few will mention...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/19/the-importance-of-jon-stewart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	When you ask the twentysomething crowd where they get their news, few will mention...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Origins of the Great Arizona Civil War</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/21/origins-of-the-great-arizona-civil-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/21/origins-of-the-great-arizona-civil-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam stoddard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[america's toughest sheriff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Arpaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maricopa County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=93802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patricia Treble&#8217;s short piece about Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the publicity-hogging Faulknerian nightmare who runs...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/21/origins-of-the-great-arizona-civil-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
	Patricia Treble&#8217;s short piece about Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the publicity-hogging Faulknerian nightmare who runs...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vultures in the desert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/25/vultures-in-the-desert/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/25/vultures-in-the-desert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 21:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Köhler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subprime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=3672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadians are snapping up foreclosed homes in the U.S. Southwest. Is it the opportunity of a lifetime, or a disaster in the making?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/25/vultures-in-the-desert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	Canadians are snapping up foreclosed homes in the U.S. Southwest. Is it the opportunity of a lifetime, or a disaster in the making?
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

