<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Budget 2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/budget-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:01:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Parliament as defender of the public purse&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/08/parliament-as-defender-of-the-public-purse/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/08/parliament-as-defender-of-the-public-purse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 03:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective bargaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crown corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pierre poilievre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=381977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pierre Poilievre invokes the highest principle]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/08/parliament-as-defender-of-the-public-purse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Pierre Poilievre invokes the highest principle
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The CBC, C-60 and splitting the bill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/the-cbc-c-60-and-splitting-the-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/the-cbc-c-60-and-splitting-the-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective bargaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=379685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another omnibus bill, another fight]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/the-cbc-c-60-and-splitting-the-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Another omnibus bill, another fight
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>From omnibus to &#8220;minibus,&#8221; Finance Minister Flaherty tables new budget bill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/from-omnibus-to-minibus-finance-minister-flaherty-tables-new-budget-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/from-omnibus-to-minibus-finance-minister-flaherty-tables-new-budget-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=378482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Finance Minister Jim Flaherty tabled a trimmed-down budget bill Monday that he...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/from-omnibus-to-minibus-finance-minister-flaherty-tables-new-budget-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Finance Minister Jim Flaherty tabled a trimmed-down budget bill Monday that he...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>C-60: the first budget implementation act of 2013</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/c-60-the-first-budget-implementation-act-of-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/c-60-the-first-budget-implementation-act-of-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=378415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A slightly smaller kind of omnibus]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/c-60-the-first-budget-implementation-act-of-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A slightly smaller kind of omnibus
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tories to introduce latest budget bill, including changes to worker program</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/tories-to-introduce-latest-budget-bill-including-changes-to-worker-program/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/tories-to-introduce-latest-budget-bill-including-changes-to-worker-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=378348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; The Conservatives are set to introduce legislation today to implement their 2013...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/tories-to-introduce-latest-budget-bill-including-changes-to-worker-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; The Conservatives are set to introduce legislation today to implement their 2013...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fewer jobs, less growth</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/fewer-jobs-less-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/fewer-jobs-less-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=378309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What budget cuts mean for the economy]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/fewer-jobs-less-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	What budget cuts mean for the economy
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking news: Your imported hockey helmet will cost less</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/breaking-news-your-imported-hockey-helmet-will-cost-less/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/breaking-news-your-imported-hockey-helmet-will-cost-less/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Thibeault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=374411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Finance Department admits an oversight]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/breaking-news-your-imported-hockey-helmet-will-cost-less/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Finance Department admits an oversight
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do you explain away an increase in tariffs?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/16/how-do-you-explain-away-an-increase-in-tariffs/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/16/how-do-you-explain-away-an-increase-in-tariffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Thibeault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Moffatt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murray Rankin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shelly Glover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=372665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['There are no tax increases in budget 2013']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/16/how-do-you-explain-away-an-increase-in-tariffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	'There are no tax increases in budget 2013'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The iPod Tax debate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/12/the-ipod-tax-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/12/the-ipod-tax-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=370990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP asks that this House condemn...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/12/the-ipod-tax-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The NDP asks that this House condemn...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The iPod tax: The finance department responds</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/the-ipod-tax-the-finance-department-responds/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/the-ipod-tax-the-finance-department-responds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 02:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Moffatt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=370308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More on the portable music player tariff crisis]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/the-ipod-tax-the-finance-department-responds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	More on the portable music player tariff crisis
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great iPod Tax Crisis of 2013</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/09/the-great-ipod-tax-crisis-of-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/09/the-great-ipod-tax-crisis-of-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Moffatt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=369766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How the cost of an iPod became the signature issue of the budget]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/09/the-great-ipod-tax-crisis-of-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	How the cost of an iPod became the signature issue of the budget
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Conservatives don&#8217;t mind big government if it&#8217;s cheap</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/04/the-conservatives-dont-mind-big-government-if-its-cheap/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/04/the-conservatives-dont-mind-big-government-if-its-cheap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starve the beast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=366749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon on doing damage the cost-effect way]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/04/the-conservatives-dont-mind-big-government-if-its-cheap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon on doing damage the cost-effect way
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The estimates don&#8217;t make sense</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/01/the-estimates-dont-make-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/01/the-estimates-dont-make-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter DeVries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Clark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=366686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to fix the way Parliament is supposed to scrutinize government spending]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/01/the-estimates-dont-make-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	How to fix the way Parliament is supposed to scrutinize government spending
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada&#8217;s jobs and skills mismatch: an expert on the federal budget&#8217;s training thrust</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/28/canadas-jobs-and-skills-mismatch-an-expert-on-the-federal-budgets-training-thrust/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/28/canadas-jobs-and-skills-mismatch-an-expert-on-the-federal-budgets-training-thrust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Tal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Job Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIBC World Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance minister jim flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=365815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among the most-discussed measures in last week’s federal budget was the government’s plan to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/28/canadas-jobs-and-skills-mismatch-an-expert-on-the-federal-budgets-training-thrust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Among the most-discussed measures in last week’s federal budget was the government’s plan to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Stephen Harper hiding?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/28/what-harper-is-hiding/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/28/what-harper-is-hiding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic action plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=365539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Wells on what the latest Economic Action Plan fails to say ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/28/what-harper-is-hiding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Paul Wells on what the latest Economic Action Plan fails to say 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Stephen Harper would rather not focus on the details</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/27/the-commons-stephen-harper-would-rather-not-focus-on-the-details-of-the-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/27/the-commons-stephen-harper-would-rather-not-focus-on-the-details-of-the-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Leslie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Menzies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=365325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Commons: Read Ted Menzies' lips]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/27/the-commons-stephen-harper-would-rather-not-focus-on-the-details-of-the-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Commons: Read Ted Menzies' lips
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;We feel that we&#8217;ve given them that office&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/27/we-feel-that-weve-given-them-that-office/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/27/we-feel-that-weve-given-them-that-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Paikin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=365128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Page talks to Steve Paikin]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/27/we-feel-that-weve-given-them-that-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Kevin Page talks to Steve Paikin
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Ted Menzies challenges everyone to find a tax increase in the budget</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/26/the-commons-ted-menzies-challenges-everyone-to-find-a-tax-increase-in-the-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/26/the-commons-ted-menzies-challenges-everyone-to-find-a-tax-increase-in-the-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Christopherson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Menzies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=364934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The budget becomes a reading comprehension test]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/26/the-commons-ted-menzies-challenges-everyone-to-find-a-tax-increase-in-the-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The budget becomes a reading comprehension test
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does budget secrecy mean anymore?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/26/what-does-budget-secrecy-mean-anymore/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/26/what-does-budget-secrecy-mean-anymore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Small]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Ashfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCMP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=364800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here a leak, there a leak, everywhere a leak leak]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/26/what-does-budget-secrecy-mean-anymore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Here a leak, there a leak, everywhere a leak leak
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The big cut Jim Flaherty won&#8217;t have to make: Budget 2013&#8242;s spending mystery explained</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/the-big-cut-jim-flaherty-wont-have-to-make-budget-2013s-spending-mystery-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/the-big-cut-jim-flaherty-wont-have-to-make-budget-2013s-spending-mystery-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance minister jim flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=364649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the biggest unanswered question about the budget Finance Minister Jim Flaherty tabled last...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/the-big-cut-jim-flaherty-wont-have-to-make-budget-2013s-spending-mystery-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Perhaps the biggest unanswered question about the budget Finance Minister Jim Flaherty tabled last...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Flaherty&#8217;s $1 billion tax on everything (except hockey gear and baby clothes)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/jim-flahertys-1-billion-tax-on-everything-except-hockey-gear-and-baby-clothes/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/jim-flahertys-1-billion-tax-on-everything-except-hockey-gear-and-baby-clothes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=364483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservatives raise tariffs on hundreds of items]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/jim-flahertys-1-billion-tax-on-everything-except-hockey-gear-and-baby-clothes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Conservatives raise tariffs on hundreds of items
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: The 2013 budget deconstructed</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/24/video-the-2013-budget-deconstructed/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/24/video-the-2013-budget-deconstructed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 11:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=364276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How did Jim Flaherty do? The verdict from our Ottawa bureau]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/24/video-the-2013-budget-deconstructed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	How did Jim Flaherty do? The verdict from our Ottawa bureau
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget briefing: A recap on the Morning After Budget Day</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/23/macleans-live-the-ottawa-bureau-talks-about-the-federal-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/23/macleans-live-the-ottawa-bureau-talks-about-the-federal-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Taylor-Vaisey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=362713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get the inside story on all the highlights, and how Budget 2013 will touch Canadians]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/23/macleans-live-the-ottawa-bureau-talks-about-the-federal-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Get the inside story on all the highlights, and how Budget 2013 will touch Canadians
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politics on TV: Budget fallout</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/politics-on-tv-budget-fallout/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/politics-on-tv-budget-fallout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 23:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POLITICS ON TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=364057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The three things you need to see]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/politics-on-tv-budget-fallout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The three things you need to see
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The QP Clip: Nathan Cullen demands answers on infrastructure funding</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/the-qp-clip-nathan-cullen-demands-answers-on-infrastructure-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/the-qp-clip-nathan-cullen-demands-answers-on-infrastructure-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 20:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Taylor-Vaisey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Taylor-Vaisey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The exchange you can't miss from this afternoon's Question Period]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/the-qp-clip-nathan-cullen-demands-answers-on-infrastructure-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The exchange you can't miss from this afternoon's Question Period
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What now for Jim Flaherty &#8230; and other questions of the day</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/macleans-view-from-the-hill-how-will-the-government-balance-the-budget-by-2015/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/macleans-view-from-the-hill-how-will-the-government-balance-the-budget-by-2015/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our View from the Hill with bonus cameo by Stephen Gordon ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/macleans-view-from-the-hill-how-will-the-government-balance-the-budget-by-2015/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Our View from the Hill with bonus cameo by Stephen Gordon 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do you hate veterans?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/why-do-you-hate-veterans/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/why-do-you-hate-veterans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Post Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Conservative MP explains why MPs have to support the budget]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/why-do-you-hate-veterans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A Conservative MP explains why MPs have to support the budget
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The morning after: piecing together the Budget</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/the-morning-after-piecing-together-the-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/the-morning-after-piecing-together-the-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What we think we know and what we definitely don't know]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/the-morning-after-piecing-together-the-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	What we think we know and what we definitely don't know
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interactive: a history of federal revenues and expenditures</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/slideshow-a-history-of-federal-revenues-and-expenditures/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/slideshow-a-history-of-federal-revenues-and-expenditures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Erica Alini tracks the changes]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/slideshow-a-history-of-federal-revenues-and-expenditures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Erica Alini tracks the changes
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ottawa prepared to go it alone on securities regulator</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/ottawa-prepared-to-go-it-alone-on-securities-regulator/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/ottawa-prepared-to-go-it-alone-on-securities-regulator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is sending out a notice that he is...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/ottawa-prepared-to-go-it-alone-on-securities-regulator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is sending out a notice that he is...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Jim Flaherty toasts his fine work</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/the-commons-jim-flaherty-toasts-his-fine-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/the-commons-jim-flaherty-toasts-his-fine-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 22:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geoff Regan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tilly O'Neill-Gordon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The deficit will be eliminated. Somehow.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/the-commons-jim-flaherty-toasts-his-fine-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The deficit will be eliminated. Somehow.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mulcair doesn&#8217;t like the direction Flaherty&#8217;s budget austeres Canada</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/mulcair-doesnt-like-the-direction-flaherty-budget-austeres-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/mulcair-doesnt-like-the-direction-flaherty-budget-austeres-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 22:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NDP Leader Tom Mulcair apparently couldn&#8217;t think of a verb for the sort of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/mulcair-doesnt-like-the-direction-flaherty-budget-austeres-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	NDP Leader Tom Mulcair apparently couldn&#8217;t think of a verb for the sort of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>@JimFlaherty introduces the budget to Twitter: &#8216;Game Time.&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/jimflaherty-introduces-the-budget-to-twitter-game-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/jimflaherty-introduces-the-budget-to-twitter-game-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 22:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Economic Action Plan 2013 seen form the Twitterverse]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/jimflaherty-introduces-the-budget-to-twitter-game-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Economic Action Plan 2013 seen form the Twitterverse
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trudeau predicts federal-provincial friction over Budget 2013</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/trudeau-predicts-fed-prov-friction-over-budget-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/trudeau-predicts-fed-prov-friction-over-budget-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 22:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance minister jim flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The issue of job training will create conflict between the Conservative government and the provinces]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/trudeau-predicts-fed-prov-friction-over-budget-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The issue of job training will create conflict between the Conservative government and the provinces
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The conservative agenda in the numbers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/the-conservative-agenda-in-the-numbers-of-budget-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/the-conservative-agenda-in-the-numbers-of-budget-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon details the 'starve the beast strategy' in budget 2013]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/the-conservative-agenda-in-the-numbers-of-budget-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon details the 'starve the beast strategy' in budget 2013
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ottawa bureau reacts to 2013&#8242;s federal budget</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/our-view-from-the-hill-the-ottawa-bureau-reacts-to-2013s-federal-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/our-view-from-the-hill-the-ottawa-bureau-reacts-to-2013s-federal-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Taylor-Vaisey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Taylor-Vaisey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hear immediate thoughts from John Geddes, Paul Wells and Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/our-view-from-the-hill-the-ottawa-bureau-reacts-to-2013s-federal-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Hear immediate thoughts from John Geddes, Paul Wells and Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget 2013: Idle Some More</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-2013-idol-some-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-2013-idol-some-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Wells on a chastened government's tactical retreat]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-2013-idol-some-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Paul Wells on a chastened government's tactical retreat
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Flaherty&#8217;s budget of contradictions</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-overview-jim-flahertys-trick-plus-everything-else-you-need-to-know-about-budget-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-overview-jim-flahertys-trick-plus-everything-else-you-need-to-know-about-budget-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can the government be a “benign and silent partner” and still take major action? John Geddes evaluates.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-overview-jim-flahertys-trick-plus-everything-else-you-need-to-know-about-budget-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Can the government be a “benign and silent partner” and still take major action? John Geddes evaluates.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bye-bye, CIDA: budget reveals department to be eliminated</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/bye-bye-cida-budget-reveals-department-to-be-eliminated/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/bye-bye-cida-budget-reveals-department-to-be-eliminated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal agency to be amalgamated with DFAIT]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/bye-bye-cida-budget-reveals-department-to-be-eliminated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Federal agency to be amalgamated with DFAIT
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The question of infrastructure &#8212; and a $53-billion answer</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/jim-flaherty-commits-53b-to-infrastructure/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/jim-flaherty-commits-53b-to-infrastructure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The test of Flaherty’s budget? How municipalities greet big numbers and long-term horizons.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/jim-flaherty-commits-53b-to-infrastructure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The test of Flaherty’s budget? How municipalities greet big numbers and long-term horizons.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flaherty says jobs grant will enable employers to fill their own skills gaps</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/flaherty-says-jobs-grant-will-enable-employers-to-fill-their-own-skills-gaps/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/flaherty-says-jobs-grant-will-enable-employers-to-fill-their-own-skills-gaps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Taylor-Vaisey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Taylor-Vaisey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[‘We are trying to get to the point where training means jobs, not just training,' Finance Minister says]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/flaherty-says-jobs-grant-will-enable-employers-to-fill-their-own-skills-gaps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	‘We are trying to get to the point where training means jobs, not just training,' Finance Minister says
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget shifts Canada Day party to Heritage, and away from National Capital Commission</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-shifts-canada-day-party-to-heritage-and-away-from-national-capital-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-shifts-canada-day-party-to-heritage-and-away-from-national-capital-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among the signature elements of the Conservative party’s approach to political marketing is its...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-shifts-canada-day-party-to-heritage-and-away-from-national-capital-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Among the signature elements of the Conservative party’s approach to political marketing is its...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full transcript of Finance Minister Jim Flaherty&#8217;s 2013 budget speech</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/finance-minister-jim-flaherty-we-are-well-placed-to-prosper/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/finance-minister-jim-flaherty-we-are-well-placed-to-prosper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Taylor-Vaisey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Taylor-Vaisey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[‘We are well-placed to prosper’]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/finance-minister-jim-flaherty-we-are-well-placed-to-prosper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	‘We are well-placed to prosper’
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada&#8217;s international aid agency to close, programs merged with Foreign Affairs</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/canadas-international-aid-agency-to-close-programs-merged-with-foreign-affairs/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/canadas-international-aid-agency-to-close-programs-merged-with-foreign-affairs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; A 45-year-old federal agency that&#8217;s spent billions improving the lives of people...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/canadas-international-aid-agency-to-close-programs-merged-with-foreign-affairs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; A 45-year-old federal agency that&#8217;s spent billions improving the lives of people...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cost of coming to Canada, and becoming a Canadian citizen, likely to rise</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/cost-of-coming-to-canada-and-becoming-a-canadian-citizen-likely-to-rise/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/cost-of-coming-to-canada-and-becoming-a-canadian-citizen-likely-to-rise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; The cost of coming to Canada — and becoming a Canadian citizen...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/cost-of-coming-to-canada-and-becoming-a-canadian-citizen-likely-to-rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; The cost of coming to Canada — and becoming a Canadian citizen...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
