<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Budget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/budget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:34:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Parliament as defender of the public purse&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/08/parliament-as-defender-of-the-public-purse/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/08/parliament-as-defender-of-the-public-purse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 03:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective bargaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crown corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pierre poilievre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=381977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pierre Poilievre invokes the highest principle]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/08/parliament-as-defender-of-the-public-purse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Pierre Poilievre invokes the highest principle
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The quiet cuts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/07/the-quiet-cuts-36/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/07/the-quiet-cuts-36/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 17:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privy Council Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiet cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=381206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Job losses in the public service]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/07/the-quiet-cuts-36/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Job losses in the public service
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A quiet cut?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/a-quiet-cut/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/a-quiet-cut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 16:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liam Sweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiet cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=379831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did hundreds of millions in CIDA funding just lapse?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/a-quiet-cut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Did hundreds of millions in CIDA funding just lapse?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The CBC, C-60 and splitting the bill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/the-cbc-c-60-and-splitting-the-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/the-cbc-c-60-and-splitting-the-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective bargaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=379685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another omnibus bill, another fight]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/the-cbc-c-60-and-splitting-the-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Another omnibus bill, another fight
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>C-60: the first budget implementation act of 2013</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/c-60-the-first-budget-implementation-act-of-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/c-60-the-first-budget-implementation-act-of-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=378415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A slightly smaller kind of omnibus]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/c-60-the-first-budget-implementation-act-of-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A slightly smaller kind of omnibus
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fewer jobs, less growth</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/fewer-jobs-less-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/fewer-jobs-less-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=378309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What budget cuts mean for the economy]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/fewer-jobs-less-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	What budget cuts mean for the economy
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enter the librarian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/23/enter-the-librarian/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/23/enter-the-librarian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonia L'Heureux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=375759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The interim PBO requests disclosure from the government]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/23/enter-the-librarian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The interim PBO requests disclosure from the government
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking news: Your imported hockey helmet will cost less</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/breaking-news-your-imported-hockey-helmet-will-cost-less/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/breaking-news-your-imported-hockey-helmet-will-cost-less/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Thibeault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=374411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Finance Department admits an oversight]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/breaking-news-your-imported-hockey-helmet-will-cost-less/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Finance Department admits an oversight
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The quiet cuts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/17/the-quiet-cuts-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/17/the-quiet-cuts-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health council of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiet cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=372928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Health Council's funding is withdrawn]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/17/the-quiet-cuts-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Health Council's funding is withdrawn
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do you explain away an increase in tariffs?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/16/how-do-you-explain-away-an-increase-in-tariffs/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/16/how-do-you-explain-away-an-increase-in-tariffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Thibeault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Moffatt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murray Rankin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shelly Glover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=372665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['There are no tax increases in budget 2013']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/16/how-do-you-explain-away-an-increase-in-tariffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	'There are no tax increases in budget 2013'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The quiet cuts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/16/the-quiet-cuts-34/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/16/the-quiet-cuts-34/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Revenue Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Fisheries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiet cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=372535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reductions at the Canada Revenue Agency, Passport Canada and Elections Canada]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/16/the-quiet-cuts-34/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Reductions at the Canada Revenue Agency, Passport Canada and Elections Canada
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The iPod Tax debate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/12/the-ipod-tax-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/12/the-ipod-tax-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=370990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP asks that this House condemn...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/12/the-ipod-tax-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The NDP asks that this House condemn...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The iPod tax: The finance department responds</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/the-ipod-tax-the-finance-department-responds/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/the-ipod-tax-the-finance-department-responds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 02:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Moffatt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=370308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More on the portable music player tariff crisis]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/the-ipod-tax-the-finance-department-responds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	More on the portable music player tariff crisis
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great iPod Tax Crisis of 2013</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/09/the-great-ipod-tax-crisis-of-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/09/the-great-ipod-tax-crisis-of-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Moffatt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=369766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How the cost of an iPod became the signature issue of the budget]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/09/the-great-ipod-tax-crisis-of-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	How the cost of an iPod became the signature issue of the budget
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The quiet cuts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/08/the-quiet-cuts-33/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/08/the-quiet-cuts-33/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Eaves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiet cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suzanne Legault]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=369249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The access to information system grows less accessible]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/08/the-quiet-cuts-33/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The access to information system grows less accessible
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The estimates don&#8217;t make sense</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/01/the-estimates-dont-make-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/01/the-estimates-dont-make-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter DeVries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Clark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=366686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to fix the way Parliament is supposed to scrutinize government spending]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/01/the-estimates-dont-make-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	How to fix the way Parliament is supposed to scrutinize government spending
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The quiet cuts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/28/the-quiet-cuts-32/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/28/the-quiet-cuts-32/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 04:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiet cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=365403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can't afford to officially oppose droughts anymore]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/28/the-quiet-cuts-32/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	We can't afford to officially oppose droughts anymore
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Stephen Harper would rather not focus on the details</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/27/the-commons-stephen-harper-would-rather-not-focus-on-the-details-of-the-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/27/the-commons-stephen-harper-would-rather-not-focus-on-the-details-of-the-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Leslie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Menzies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=365325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Commons: Read Ted Menzies' lips]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/27/the-commons-stephen-harper-would-rather-not-focus-on-the-details-of-the-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Commons: Read Ted Menzies' lips
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;We feel that we&#8217;ve given them that office&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/27/we-feel-that-weve-given-them-that-office/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/27/we-feel-that-weve-given-them-that-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Paikin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=365128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Page talks to Steve Paikin]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/27/we-feel-that-weve-given-them-that-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Kevin Page talks to Steve Paikin
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Ted Menzies challenges everyone to find a tax increase in the budget</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/26/the-commons-ted-menzies-challenges-everyone-to-find-a-tax-increase-in-the-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/26/the-commons-ted-menzies-challenges-everyone-to-find-a-tax-increase-in-the-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Christopherson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Menzies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=364934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The budget becomes a reading comprehension test]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/26/the-commons-ted-menzies-challenges-everyone-to-find-a-tax-increase-in-the-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The budget becomes a reading comprehension test
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does budget secrecy mean anymore?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/26/what-does-budget-secrecy-mean-anymore/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/26/what-does-budget-secrecy-mean-anymore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Small]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Ashfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCMP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=364800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here a leak, there a leak, everywhere a leak leak]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/26/what-does-budget-secrecy-mean-anymore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Here a leak, there a leak, everywhere a leak leak
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Flaherty&#8217;s $1 billion tax on everything (except hockey gear and baby clothes)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/jim-flahertys-1-billion-tax-on-everything-except-hockey-gear-and-baby-clothes/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/jim-flahertys-1-billion-tax-on-everything-except-hockey-gear-and-baby-clothes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=364483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservatives raise tariffs on hundreds of items]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/25/jim-flahertys-1-billion-tax-on-everything-except-hockey-gear-and-baby-clothes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Conservatives raise tariffs on hundreds of items
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hockey gear cheaper, but tariff changes likely to widen Canada-U.S. price gap</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/hockey-gear-cheaper-but-tariff-changes-likely-to-widen-canada-u-s-price-gap/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/hockey-gear-cheaper-but-tariff-changes-likely-to-widen-canada-u-s-price-gap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Canadians will be paying hundreds of millions of dollars more on everything...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/hockey-gear-cheaper-but-tariff-changes-likely-to-widen-canada-u-s-price-gap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Canadians will be paying hundreds of millions of dollars more on everything...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do you hate veterans?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/why-do-you-hate-veterans/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/why-do-you-hate-veterans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Post Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Conservative MP explains why MPs have to support the budget]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/why-do-you-hate-veterans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A Conservative MP explains why MPs have to support the budget
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The morning after: piecing together the Budget</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/the-morning-after-piecing-together-the-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/the-morning-after-piecing-together-the-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What we think we know and what we definitely don't know]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/22/the-morning-after-piecing-together-the-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	What we think we know and what we definitely don't know
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Jim Flaherty toasts his fine work</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/the-commons-jim-flaherty-toasts-his-fine-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/the-commons-jim-flaherty-toasts-his-fine-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 22:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geoff Regan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tilly O'Neill-Gordon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=363379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The deficit will be eliminated. Somehow.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/the-commons-jim-flaherty-toasts-his-fine-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The deficit will be eliminated. Somehow.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget day and everything after</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-day-and-everything-after/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-day-and-everything-after/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter DeVries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Clark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=362987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our annual test of parliamentary democracy]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/budget-day-and-everything-after/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Our annual test of parliamentary democracy
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The budget striptease</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/the-budget-striptease/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/the-budget-striptease/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=362497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leaks and spoilers abound]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/the-budget-striptease/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Leaks and spoilers abound
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The definitive guide to the budget</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/19/the-definitive-guide-to-the-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/19/the-definitive-guide-to-the-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 01:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=362263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everything you could possibly ever hope to know]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/19/the-definitive-guide-to-the-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Everything you could possibly ever hope to know
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exit interview with Parliamentary Budget Officer Kevin Page</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/18/exit-interview-with-parliamentary-budget-officer-kevin-page/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/18/exit-interview-with-parliamentary-budget-officer-kevin-page/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=361100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The PBO talks about his tenure and his hopes and fears for the office]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/18/exit-interview-with-parliamentary-budget-officer-kevin-page/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The PBO talks about his tenure and his hopes and fears for the office
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to expect when you&#8217;re expecting a budget</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/14/what-to-expect-when-youre-expecting-a-budget-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/14/what-to-expect-when-youre-expecting-a-budget-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=360503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick guide to everything you need to read over the next week]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/14/what-to-expect-when-youre-expecting-a-budget-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A quick guide to everything you need to read over the next week
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your tax dollars at work on you</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/11/your-tax-dollars-at-work-on-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/11/your-tax-dollars-at-work-on-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=359254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Government ads: They taste awful, but they work]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/11/your-tax-dollars-at-work-on-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Government ads: They taste awful, but they work
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The public accounts committee decides it&#8217;s only so interested in fiscal sustainability</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/08/the-public-accounts-committee-decides-its-only-so-interested-in-fiscal-sustainability/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/08/the-public-accounts-committee-decides-its-only-so-interested-in-fiscal-sustainability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daryl Kramp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerry Byrne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public accounts committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=358331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deciding not to bother the finance department]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/08/the-public-accounts-committee-decides-its-only-so-interested-in-fiscal-sustainability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Deciding not to bother the finance department
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better know a talking point</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/07/better-know-a-talking-point-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/07/better-know-a-talking-point-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 18:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=358086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservaties say they've done the math, but they won't show their work]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/07/better-know-a-talking-point-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Conservaties say they've done the math, but they won't show their work
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Parliament has lost control of the estimate process&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/parliament-has-lost-control-of-the-estimate-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/parliament-has-lost-control-of-the-estimate-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C.D. Howe Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter DeVries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=357457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The complaints of a young Reform MP]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/parliament-has-lost-control-of-the-estimate-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The complaints of a young Reform MP
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>And now a word from Scott Clark and Peter DeVries</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/and-now-a-word-from-scott-clark-and-peter-devries/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/and-now-a-word-from-scott-clark-and-peter-devries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 14:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter DeVries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Clark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=357312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The two former finance officials respond to the government's criticism]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/and-now-a-word-from-scott-clark-and-peter-devries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The two former finance officials respond to the government's criticism
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Stephen Harper sees partisan people</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/05/the-commons-stephen-harper-sees-partisan-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/05/the-commons-stephen-harper-sees-partisan-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 23:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Duncan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[main estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter DeVries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=357132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Always keep an eye out for Liberal sympathizers]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/05/the-commons-stephen-harper-sees-partisan-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Always keep an eye out for Liberal sympathizers
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;The fact is no one in Parliament can tell Canadians what the government is planning to spend&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/05/he-fact-is-no-one-in-parliament-can-tell-canadians-what-the-government-is-planning-to-spend/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/05/he-fact-is-no-one-in-parliament-can-tell-canadians-what-the-government-is-planning-to-spend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter DeVries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Clark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=356992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The budget process is a mess]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/05/he-fact-is-no-one-in-parliament-can-tell-canadians-what-the-government-is-planning-to-spend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The budget process is a mess
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>About those estimates</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/28/about-those-estimates/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/28/about-those-estimates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[main estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter DeVries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Clark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More confusion over the government's spending]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/28/about-those-estimates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	More confusion over the government's spending
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Tony Clement would prefer you disregard his estimates now</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/the-commons-tony-clement-would-prefer-you-disregard-his-estimates-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/the-commons-tony-clement-would-prefer-you-disregard-his-estimates-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denis Lebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerry Ritz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[main estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olivia Chow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Goguen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rest assured, the Conservatives are saving money. Somehow.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/the-commons-tony-clement-would-prefer-you-disregard-his-estimates-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Rest assured, the Conservatives are saving money. Somehow.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada watching to see if border pact threatened by U.S. budget cuts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/canada-watching-to-see-if-border-pact-threatened-by-u-s-budget-cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/canada-watching-to-see-if-border-pact-threatened-by-u-s-budget-cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey Wiebe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border pact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird says Canada will be watching closely to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/canada-watching-to-see-if-border-pact-threatened-by-u-s-budget-cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird says Canada will be watching closely to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: The age of austerity, as not seen on TV</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/the-commons-the-age-of-austerity-as-not-seen-on-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/the-commons-the-age-of-austerity-as-not-seen-on-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hélène Laverdière]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[main estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sean casey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Blaney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In light of spending cuts, perhaps a new advertising campaign is in order]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/the-commons-the-age-of-austerity-as-not-seen-on-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In light of spending cuts, perhaps a new advertising campaign is in order
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you know how your federal government is spending your money?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/do-you-know-how-your-federal-government-is-spending-your-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/do-you-know-how-your-federal-government-is-spending-your-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[main estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The short answer is no]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/do-you-know-how-your-federal-government-is-spending-your-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The short answer is no
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Kevin Page might well be the best friend the Canadian taxpayer has&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/22/kevin-page-might-well-be-the-best-friend-the-canadian-taxpayer-has/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/22/kevin-page-might-well-be-the-best-friend-the-canadian-taxpayer-has/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Martin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=353270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat Martin speaks to a conference of budget officers]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/22/kevin-page-might-well-be-the-best-friend-the-canadian-taxpayer-has/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Pat Martin speaks to a conference of budget officers
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The enduring mystery of the Navigable Waters Protection Act</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/21/the-enduring-mystery-of-the-navigable-waters-protection-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/21/the-enduring-mystery-of-the-navigable-waters-protection-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Energy Pipeline Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Marit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navigable Waters Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saskatchewan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=352980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did the pipeline industry inspire the changes?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/21/the-enduring-mystery-of-the-navigable-waters-protection-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Did the pipeline industry inspire the changes?
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
