<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Chrysler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/chrysler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:23:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Detroit auto show: Return of the trucks</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/15/detroit-auto-show-return-of-the-trucks/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/15/detroit-auto-show-return-of-the-trucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sorensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit auto show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North American International Auto Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pick-up trucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=337354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After three years of smaller cars, Americans just like to drive trucks]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/15/detroit-auto-show-return-of-the-trucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	After three years of smaller cars, Americans just like to drive trucks
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bailout: boom or bust?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/bailout-boom-or-bust/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/bailout-boom-or-bust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tamsin McMahon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=312490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three years on, the debate over whether saving Detroit was worth it still rages]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/bailout-boom-or-bust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Three years on, the debate over whether saving Detroit was worth it still rages
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Europe&#8217;s own carmageddon</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/10/carmageddon-returns/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/10/carmageddon-returns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peugeot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=299670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The auto industry is in full-blown crisis yet again, but this time it’s not Detroit]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/10/carmageddon-returns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The auto industry is in full-blown crisis yet again, but this time it’s not Detroit
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>State of the anti-union</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/05/state-of-the-anti-union/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/05/state-of-the-anti-union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tamsin McMahon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caterpillar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chattanooga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercedes-Benz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergio Marchionne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volkswagen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=248855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Automakers are flooding to the Deep South for cheap, union-free labour]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/05/state-of-the-anti-union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Automakers are flooding to the Deep South for cheap, union-free labour
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrysler: Detroit’s comeback kid</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/14/detroits-comeback-kid/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/14/detroits-comeback-kid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=238843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chrysler that has staged the most miraculous comeback of all the automakers]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/14/detroits-comeback-kid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Chrysler that has staged the most miraculous comeback of all the automakers
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Playing for Jeeps</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/22/playing-for-jeeps/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/22/playing-for-jeeps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sorensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Call of Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Warfare 3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=226385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chrysler is hoping to cash in on the stampede to buy the latest version of the Call of Duty video game series]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/22/playing-for-jeeps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	Chrysler is hoping to cash in on the stampede to buy the latest version of the Call of Duty video game series
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good news, bad news: May 19-26, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/03/good-news-bad-news-may-19-26-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/03/good-news-bad-news-may-19-26-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good news, bad news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Pizza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coca Cola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omar Khadr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver Pizza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=195083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google lets you pay with your cellphone; California mistakenly releases hundreds of violent inmates]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/03/good-news-bad-news-may-19-26-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Google lets you pay with your cellphone; California mistakenly releases hundreds of violent inmates
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Detroit: crumbling—but more so</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/05/crumbling%e2%80%94but-more-so/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/05/crumbling%e2%80%94but-more-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sorensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=181034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Census data shows Detroit's population is down 25 per cent from a decade ago]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/05/crumbling%e2%80%94but-more-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Census data shows Detroit's population is down 25 per cent from a decade ago
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A stylish little gas guzzler</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/07/a-stylish-little-gas-guzzler/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/07/a-stylish-little-gas-guzzler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sorensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiat 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUVs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=169637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drivers shouldn't expect huge fuel savings from the Fiat 500]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/07/a-stylish-little-gas-guzzler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	Drivers shouldn't expect huge fuel savings from the Fiat 500
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motor City magic</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/14/motor-city-magic/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/14/motor-city-magic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sorensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=166659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Detroit rediscovers its old swagger as Toyota is stuck answering questions]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/14/motor-city-magic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	Detroit rediscovers its old swagger as Toyota is stuck answering questions
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex, speed and loud music</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/13/sex-speed-and-loud-music/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/13/sex-speed-and-loud-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sorensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodge Ram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North American International Auto Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=166623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The awkwardness of this year's Detroit auto show (plus VIDEO)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/13/sex-speed-and-loud-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The awkwardness of this year's Detroit auto show (plus VIDEO)
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clash of the cruisers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/clash-of-the-cruisers/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/clash-of-the-cruisers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sorensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet Caprice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crown Victoria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police patrol vehicle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=149906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Ford set to retire the Crown Victoria, automakers are battling to build the next generation police car]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/clash-of-the-cruisers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	With Ford set to retire the Crown Victoria, automakers are battling to build the next generation police car
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why big trucks mean big sales</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/10/why-big-trucks-mean-big-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/10/why-big-trucks-mean-big-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodge Ram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pickup truck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=130430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Detroit Three automakers are engaged in a spitting contest over whose truck is manliest]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/10/why-big-trucks-mean-big-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	The Detroit Three automakers are engaged in a spitting contest over whose truck is manliest
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roaring right back</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/21/roaring-right-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/21/roaring-right-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kirby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linamar Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linda Hasenfratz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northern tiger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subprime mortgages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=116237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Canada has recovered so quickly from the recession]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/21/roaring-right-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	How Canada has recovered so quickly from the recession
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Detroit’s dirty secret: SUVs rule</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/28/detroits-dirty-secret-suvs-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/28/detroits-dirty-secret-suvs-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kirby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expedition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln navigator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUVs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=103310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carmakers are talking green, but buyers still want their big trucks]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/28/detroits-dirty-secret-suvs-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	Carmakers are talking green, but buyers still want their big trucks
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Detroit Auto Show: Electric dreams</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/15/electric-dreams/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/15/electric-dreams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit auto show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green cars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=101468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a horrid year, Detroit sees hope in a small, green future]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/15/electric-dreams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	After a horrid year, Detroit sees hope in a small, green future
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsmakers &#039;09: Mergers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/10/newsmakers-09-mergers/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/10/newsmakers-09-mergers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex rodriguez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivanka Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mergers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Vick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suncor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The year's biggest mergers]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/10/newsmakers-09-mergers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The year's biggest mergers
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsmakers &#039;09: Road warrior</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/08/newsmakers-09-road-warrior-frank-stronach-opel/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/08/newsmakers-09-road-warrior-frank-stronach-opel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Stronach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magna International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breakup between Frank Stronach &#38; Opel]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/08/newsmakers-09-road-warrior-frank-stronach-opel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	Breakup between Frank Stronach &#38; Opel
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Racing to rebuild GM</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/19/racing-to-rebuild-gm/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/19/racing-to-rebuild-gm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Lutz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadillac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cash for clunkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevy Cobalt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda Civic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jalopnik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maximum Bob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traverse SUV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=91646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sales are coming back, as is the swagger. Is this rebound for real?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/19/racing-to-rebuild-gm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	Sales are coming back, as is the swagger. Is this rebound for real?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fiscal conservative</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/21/fiscal-conservative/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/21/fiscal-conservative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Finance Minister talks to Canadian Business.
<strong>OK, you say you’re a fiscal conservative, ...</strong>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/21/fiscal-conservative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
	The Finance Minister talks to Canadian Business.
<strong>OK, you say you’re a fiscal conservative, ...</strong>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Econowatch</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/econowatch-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/econowatch-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Maich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econowatch Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cadbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[german brothels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virgin galactic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A weekly scorecard on the state of the economy in North America and beyond]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/07/econowatch-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	A weekly scorecard on the state of the economy in North America and beyond
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future is tiny</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/25/the-future-is-tiny/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/25/the-future-is-tiny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 15:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Campbell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyundai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North American auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=72173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s not just cars that are getting smaller, so are car companies]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/25/the-future-is-tiny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	It’s not just cars that are getting smaller, so are car companies
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thrift is the new black</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/11/econowatch-14/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/11/econowatch-14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kirby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econowatch Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian employment numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hummer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Air Transport Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miley cyrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starter homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=4079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But will people refuse to spend once things improve? Plus what do you get when you mix a deep recession with Miley Cyrus?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/11/econowatch-14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	But will people refuse to spend once things improve? Plus what do you get when you mix a deep recession with Miley Cyrus?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A frustrated Flaherty</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/09/a-frustrated-flaherty/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/09/a-frustrated-flaherty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chryster Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=49014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty is confronted by some friendly pensioners.
&#8220;Listen, this is a very serious...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/09/a-frustrated-flaherty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	Jim Flaherty is confronted by some friendly pensioners.
&#8220;Listen, this is a very serious...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: The eternal shame of the Ivy Leaguer</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/30/the-commons-the-eternal-shame-of-the-ivy-leaguer/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/30/the-commons-the-eternal-shame-of-the-ivy-leaguer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carr Center for Human Rights Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Valeriote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Rickford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saanich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Catharines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=46522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harvard is a stain Ignatieff might never wash away]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/30/the-commons-the-eternal-shame-of-the-ivy-leaguer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
	Harvard is a stain Ignatieff might never wash away
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>And then there were two?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/13/and-then-there-were-two-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/13/and-then-there-were-two-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Campbell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Three]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Three]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom LaSorda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windsor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=43349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Chrysler's departure would mean for the Canadian auto industry]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/13/and-then-there-were-two-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
	What Chrysler's departure would mean for the Canadian auto industry
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magna edges closer to making cars</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/magna-edges-closer-to-making-cars/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/magna-edges-closer-to-making-cars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Campbell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magna International]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=1586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Magna says it will work with Ford to build a new electric car]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/01/28/magna-edges-closer-to-making-cars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Magna says it will work with Ford to build a new electric car
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sad Reality facing General Motors</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/12/the-sad-reality-facing-general-motors/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/12/the-sad-reality-facing-general-motors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Maich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hopelessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=24112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BY STEVE MAICH]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/12/the-sad-reality-facing-general-motors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
	BY STEVE MAICH
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rise and fall of the young fogeys</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/24/megapundit-rise-and-fall-of-the-young-fogeys/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/24/megapundit-rise-and-fall-of-the-young-fogeys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>selley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Megapundit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caisse de depot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conrad Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Three]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dirty oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominic LeBlanc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Waxman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Dumont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montreal Grand Prix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pacific rim summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=19436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WEEKEND ROUNDUP]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/24/megapundit-rise-and-fall-of-the-young-fogeys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	WEEKEND ROUNDUP
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The car industry crash, by the numbers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/21/the-car-industry-crash-by-the-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/21/the-car-industry-crash-by-the-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>selley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Three]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=19169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A close look at what used to be known as the Big Three]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/21/the-car-industry-crash-by-the-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	A close look at what used to be known as the Big Three
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real reason a Big Three bailout is a bad idea</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/the-real-reason-a-big-three-bailout-is-a-bad-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/the-real-reason-a-big-three-bailout-is-a-bad-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Three]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hope is that billions of dollars will succeed where hundreds of millions failed]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/the-real-reason-a-big-three-bailout-is-a-bad-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>133</slash:comments>
	The hope is that billions of dollars will succeed where hundreds of millions failed
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>As Paul says, please try to keep up</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/14/as-paul-says-please-try-to-keep-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/14/as-paul-says-please-try-to-keep-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dalton McGuinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Prentice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=17892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[January 16: Ottawa turns down auto aid
January 17: No bailout for Ford, Flaherty...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/14/as-paul-says-please-try-to-keep-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	January 16: Ottawa turns down auto aid
January 17: No bailout for Ford, Flaherty...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guess who has a plan to save the auto industry?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/14/guess-who-has-a-plan-to-save-the-auto-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/14/guess-who-has-a-plan-to-save-the-auto-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windsor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=17759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neil Young. And yes, it includes a bailout....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/14/guess-who-has-a-plan-to-save-the-auto-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	Neil Young. And yes, it includes a bailout....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who revived the electric car?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/02/who-revived-the-electric-car/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/02/who-revived-the-electric-car/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Gillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The auto industry faces its biggest changes in 100 years]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/02/who-revived-the-electric-car/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	The auto industry faces its biggest changes in 100 years
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrysler&#039;s bold leap, and questionable colour scheme</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/09/23/chryslers-bold-leap-and-questionable-colour-scheme/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/09/23/chryslers-bold-leap-and-questionable-colour-scheme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Campbell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodge ev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plug-in]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=9175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chrysler is going electric. It announced today three new plug-in cars, the first of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/09/23/chryslers-bold-leap-and-questionable-colour-scheme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	Chrysler is going electric. It announced today three new plug-in cars, the first of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vipers, Magna and the Nürburgring</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/08/28/vipers-magna-and-the-nurburgring/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/08/28/vipers-magna-and-the-nurburgring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Campbell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dodge viper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magna]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=6169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chrysler is thinking about selling off the Dodge Viper, its iconic  600 hp sports...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/08/28/vipers-magna-and-the-nurburgring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Chrysler is thinking about selling off the Dodge Viper, its iconic  600 hp sports...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iacocca, A O.k.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/27/iacocca-a-ok/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/27/iacocca-a-ok/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Campbell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[$140 a barrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee Iacocca]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=2521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it finally happened. Oil passed $140 a barrel. The world as we know...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/27/iacocca-a-ok/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	So it finally happened. Oil passed $140 a barrel. The world as we know...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
