<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; conservative party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/conservative-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 10:08:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The general</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/27/the-general/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/27/the-general/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=320042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative Senator Doug Finley, one of the primary architects of the Conservative party&#8217;s electoral...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/27/the-general/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Conservative Senator Doug Finley, one of the primary architects of the Conservative party&#8217;s electoral...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Laurier-Sainte-Marie mystery solved?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/24/the-laurier-sainte-marie-mystery-solved/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/24/the-laurier-sainte-marie-mystery-solved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laurier-Sainte-Marie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=318960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cheques are produced and memories are refreshed in connection with donations to the Conservative...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/24/the-laurier-sainte-marie-mystery-solved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Cheques are produced and memories are refreshed in connection with donations to the Conservative...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NDP asks Elections Canada to look at alleged donor fraud involving Tories</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/23/ndp-asks-elections-canada-to-look-at-alleged-donor-fraud-involving-tories/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/23/ndp-asks-elections-canada-to-look-at-alleged-donor-fraud-involving-tories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 20:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=318837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; The NDP is asking Elections Canada to investigate alleged fraud involving donations...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/23/ndp-asks-elections-canada-to-look-at-alleged-donor-fraud-involving-tories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; The NDP is asking Elections Canada to investigate alleged fraud involving donations...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s going on in Laurier-Sainte-Marie?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/23/whats-going-on-in-laurier-sainte-marie/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/23/whats-going-on-in-laurier-sainte-marie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laurier-Sainte-Marie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=318679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Postmedia raises questions about Conservative fundraising efforts in the Quebec riding of Laurier-Sainte-Marie.
The...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/23/whats-going-on-in-laurier-sainte-marie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Postmedia raises questions about Conservative fundraising efforts in the Quebec riding of Laurier-Sainte-Marie.
The...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Staff for Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Peter Penashue unaware of planned update on campaign spending</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/staff-for-intergovernmental-affairs-minister-peter-penashue-unaware-of-planned-update-on-campaign-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/staff-for-intergovernmental-affairs-minister-peter-penashue-unaware-of-planned-update-on-campaign-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=314252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ST. JOHN&#8217;S, N.L. &#8211; If embattled federal Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Peter Penashue planned to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/staff-for-intergovernmental-affairs-minister-peter-penashue-unaware-of-planned-update-on-campaign-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	ST. JOHN&#8217;S, N.L. &#8211; If embattled federal Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Peter Penashue planned to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tories deny splits in their ranks—over Nexen and abortion</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/24/tories-deny-splits-in-their-ranks-over-nexen-and-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/24/tories-deny-splits-in-their-ranks-over-nexen-and-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=296300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the rising prevalence of rogue backbenchers, the federal Conservatives deny that there are...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/24/tories-deny-splits-in-their-ranks-over-nexen-and-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Despite the rising prevalence of rogue backbenchers, the federal Conservatives deny that there are...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going negative</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/03/going-negative-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/03/going-negative-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=271716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Globe editorial board, while allowing that that Conservatives take &#8220;some liberties by accusing...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/03/going-negative-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Globe editorial board, while allowing that that Conservatives take &#8220;some liberties by accusing...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great moments in Conservative history</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/28/great-moments-in-conservative-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/28/great-moments-in-conservative-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=271211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservative party has redesigned its website and added a section on the history...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/28/great-moments-in-conservative-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Conservative party has redesigned its website and added a section on the history...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A second package</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/29/a-second-package/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/29/a-second-package/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 02:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meghan Hurley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspicious package]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=262191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ottawa police have apparently discovered a second suspicious package at the Canada Post sorting...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/29/a-second-package/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Ottawa police have apparently discovered a second suspicious package at the Canada Post sorting...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Who&#8217;s calling?&#8221; &#8220;The Conservatives.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/28/whos-calling-the-conservatives/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/28/whos-calling-the-conservatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Lietaer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robocalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robocon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=242631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservative staffer who ran the party's war room on why the robocalls scandal doesn't add up]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/28/whos-calling-the-conservatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Conservative staffer who ran the party's war room on why the robocalls scandal doesn't add up
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robocall fallout haunts Tories</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/24/robocall-fallout-haunts-tories/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/24/robocall-fallout-haunts-tories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Warnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=241922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allegations of electoral hijinks and possible fraud dogged Conservatives Thursday even as the party...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/24/robocall-fallout-haunts-tories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Allegations of electoral hijinks and possible fraud dogged Conservatives Thursday even as the party...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deceptive election day robocalls tied to Tory-linked firm</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/23/deceptive-election-related-robocalls-tied-to-tory-linked-firm/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/23/deceptive-election-related-robocalls-tied-to-tory-linked-firm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Warnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=241567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voters in Guelph were told their polling stations had moved]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/23/deceptive-election-related-robocalls-tied-to-tory-linked-firm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Voters in Guelph were told their polling stations had moved
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>50 yards from Parliament Hill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/04/50-yards-from-parliament-hill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/04/50-yards-from-parliament-hill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1919]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backbencher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Trost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Selley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuehrerprinzip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humboldt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal party of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party discipline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saskatoon-humboldt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=237954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I almost never disagree with Chris Selley. Indeed, I am almost willing to make...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/04/50-yards-from-parliament-hill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	I almost never disagree with Chris Selley. Indeed, I am almost willing to make...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Just wrong on every level&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/05/just-wrong-on-every-level/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/05/just-wrong-on-every-level/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irwin Cotler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=228432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Anderson rips the Conservative campaign against Irwin Cotler and Peter Van Loan&#8217;s attempt...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/05/just-wrong-on-every-level/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	Bruce Anderson rips the Conservative campaign against Irwin Cotler and Peter Van Loan&#8217;s attempt...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>It doesn&#8217;t have to be true, it just has to be plausible</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/29/it-doesnt-have-to-be-true-it-just-has-to-be-plausible-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/29/it-doesnt-have-to-be-true-it-just-has-to-be-plausible-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irwin Cotler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=227477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Conservative official confirms that the party has been calling Irwin Cotler&#8217;s constituents and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/29/it-doesnt-have-to-be-true-it-just-has-to-be-plausible-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
	A Conservative official confirms that the party has been calling Irwin Cotler&#8217;s constituents and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In and out and settled?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/10/in-and-out-and-settled/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/10/in-and-out-and-settled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative Fund of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glen mcgregor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-and-out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc mayrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sandler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nycole Turmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ottawa citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=224749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(This post last updated at 8:24pm.)
Both the Ottawa Citizen and CTV are reporting...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/10/in-and-out-and-settled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
	(This post last updated at 8:24pm.)
Both the Ottawa Citizen and CTV are reporting...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Britain to the EU: I told you so</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/04/i-told-you-so/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/04/i-told-you-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Financial Stability Facility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euroskeptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eurozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Osborne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letter from Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Clegg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/06/i-told-you-so/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As they watch the debt crisis unfold, hardline Euroskeptics in Britain have never seemed so smug]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/04/i-told-you-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	As they watch the debt crisis unfold, hardline Euroskeptics in Britain have never seemed so smug
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Harper’s majority rules</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/27/harper%e2%80%99s-majority-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/27/harper%e2%80%99s-majority-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Wheat Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dalton McGuinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[majority government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nycole Turmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Hudak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/29/harper%e2%80%99s-majority-rules/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the session ahead, the PM needs to remember that his mandate ‘has a big old fence around it’]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/27/harper%e2%80%99s-majority-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
	In the session ahead, the PM needs to remember that his mandate ‘has a big old fence around it’
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tories stifle widow through IP laws, twirl moustaches, cackle</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/16/tories-stifle-widow-through-ip-laws-twirl-moustaches-cackle/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/16/tories-stifle-widow-through-ip-laws-twirl-moustaches-cackle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jesse Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michaela Keyserlingk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Keyserlingk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=209747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservative party picks an ill-advisded fight against a sympathetic anti-asbetos crusader]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/16/tories-stifle-widow-through-ip-laws-twirl-moustaches-cackle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
	The Conservative party picks an ill-advisded fight against a sympathetic anti-asbetos crusader
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Towards lasting power</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/towards-lasting-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/towards-lasting-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 20:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=200523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Prime Minister talks to our editor-in-chief.
What I want to do, of course,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/towards-lasting-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
	The Prime Minister talks to our editor-in-chief.
What I want to do, of course,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In conversation: Stephen Harper</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/how-he-sees-canada%e2%80%99s-role-in-the-world-and-where-he-wants-to-take-the-country-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/how-he-sees-canada%e2%80%99s-role-in-the-world-and-where-he-wants-to-take-the-country-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[majority government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=199880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The PM on how he sees Canada’s role in the world and where he wants to take the country]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/how-he-sees-canada%e2%80%99s-role-in-the-world-and-where-he-wants-to-take-the-country-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The PM on how he sees Canada’s role in the world and where he wants to take the country
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Socialist or merely social</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/17/socialist-or-merely-social/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/17/socialist-or-merely-social/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vancouver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=198294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joanna Smith previews this weekend&#8217;s existential crisis.
New Democrats are preparing to cast off...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/17/socialist-or-merely-social/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	Joanna Smith previews this weekend&#8217;s existential crisis.
New Democrats are preparing to cast off...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kill the subsidy, but kill them all</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/03/kill-the-subsidy-but-kill-them-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/03/kill-the-subsidy-but-kill-them-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsidies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=194853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne on how political parties should be funded]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/03/kill-the-subsidy-but-kill-them-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>247</slash:comments>
	Andrew Coyne on how political parties should be funded
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>From the magazine</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/06/from-the-magazine-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/06/from-the-magazine-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jenni byrne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=181962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the pages of last week&#8217;s issue, a short profile of Jenni Byrne, the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/06/from-the-magazine-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	From the pages of last week&#8217;s issue, a short profile of Jenni Byrne, the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jenni Byrne: the (other) woman behind Harper</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/the-other-woman-behind-harper/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/the-other-woman-behind-harper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jenni byrne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=180644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tories' top tactician may keep a low profile, but she has a fearsome reputation]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/the-other-woman-behind-harper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
	The Tories' top tactician may keep a low profile, but she has a fearsome reputation
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#039;s so scary about Planet Tory?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/whats-so-scary-about-planet-tory/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/whats-so-scary-about-planet-tory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[majority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=181094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The truth is that Canada has already had a successful conservative revolution]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/whats-so-scary-about-planet-tory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	The truth is that Canada has already had a successful conservative revolution
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>They&#039;re coming after your family</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/election-2011-theyre-coming-after-your-family/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/election-2011-theyre-coming-after-your-family/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=180608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Days into a contest of meanness, a surprisingly clear contrast on honest-to-goodness platforms has suddenly emerged]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/election-2011-theyre-coming-after-your-family/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
	Days into a contest of meanness, a surprisingly clear contrast on honest-to-goodness platforms has suddenly emerged
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bruce Carson show</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/28/the-carson-show-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/28/the-carson-show-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Carson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle MacPherson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=179051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The PMO's one-time Mr. Fixit once considered jumping ship to the Liberals]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/28/the-carson-show-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
	The PMO's one-time Mr. Fixit once considered jumping ship to the Liberals
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;At a time of economic uncertainty&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/23/at-a-time-of-economic-uncertainty/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/23/at-a-time-of-economic-uncertainty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=178821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservative side deviated momentarily from its unwavering focus on the economy last night...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/23/at-a-time-of-economic-uncertainty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
	The Conservative side deviated momentarily from its unwavering focus on the economy last night...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;We expect all participants in public life to adhere to a similar code&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/21/we-expect-all-participants-in-public-life-to-adhere-to-a-similar-code/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/21/we-expect-all-participants-in-public-life-to-adhere-to-a-similar-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=178487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to criticism of its attack on Michael Ignatieff&#8217;s familial heritage, the Conservative...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/21/we-expect-all-participants-in-public-life-to-adhere-to-a-similar-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
	In response to criticism of its attack on Michael Ignatieff&#8217;s familial heritage, the Conservative...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;The Ignatieffs were not typical immigrants&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/18/the-ignatieffs-were-not-typical-immigrants/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/18/the-ignatieffs-were-not-typical-immigrants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=178331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a missive this evening, apparently in response to this video, the Conservative party...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/18/the-ignatieffs-were-not-typical-immigrants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>149</slash:comments>
	In a missive this evening, apparently in response to this video, the Conservative party...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The YouTube vote</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/11/the-youtube-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/11/the-youtube-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=177215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Green party attack on attack ads, released five days ago: 44,175 views.
Conservative party...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/11/the-youtube-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
	Green party attack on attack ads, released five days ago: 44,175 views.
Conservative party...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>U of O professors accuse Tories of witchhunt</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/11/u-of-o-professors-accuse-tories-of-witchhunt/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/11/u-of-o-professors-accuse-tories-of-witchhunt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=171769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mendes and Attaran’s personal information is anonymously requested]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/11/u-of-o-professors-accuse-tories-of-witchhunt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
	Mendes and Attaran’s personal information is anonymously requested
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reports of Laurie Hawn&#039;s support for attack ads were greatly exaggerated</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/31/reports-of-laurie-hawns-support-for-attack-ads-were-greatly-exaggerated/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/31/reports-of-laurie-hawns-support-for-attack-ads-were-greatly-exaggerated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laurie Hawn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=169293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the weekend, CTV reported that Laurie Hawn was defending the Conservative side&#8217;s one!...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/31/reports-of-laurie-hawns-support-for-attack-ads-were-greatly-exaggerated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	Over the weekend, CTV reported that Laurie Hawn was defending the Conservative side&#8217;s one!...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Menzies talks (about wanting your money)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/19/ted-menzies-talks-about-wanting-your-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/19/ted-menzies-talks-about-wanting-your-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Menzies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=167674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservatives have launched a feature on their website called &#8220;Canada Talks.&#8221; So far...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/19/ted-menzies-talks-about-wanting-your-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
	The Conservatives have launched a feature on their website called &#8220;Canada Talks.&#8221; So far...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politics big-city elites, you say. Sound familiar at all?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/30/politics-big-city-elites-you-say-sound-familiar-at-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/30/politics-big-city-elites-you-say-sound-familiar-at-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social conservatism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=148701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is clear that you can’t win in modern politics by having evidence or good ideas on your side]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/30/politics-big-city-elites-you-say-sound-familiar-at-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	It is clear that you can’t win in modern politics by having evidence or good ideas on your side
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guy Giorno: national man of mystery</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/31/national-man-of-mystery/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/31/national-man-of-mystery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 12:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Giorno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=128727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PM's chief of staff target for blame, but insiders say he gets big things right]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/31/national-man-of-mystery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	PM's chief of staff target for blame, but insiders say he gets big things right
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simcoe-Grey for the Simcoe-Greyvians!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/03/simcoe-grey-for-the-simcoe-greyvians/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/03/simcoe-grey-for-the-simcoe-greyvians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 01:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ridings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=124075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne on why Stephen Harper shouldn't be the one who decides whether Helena Guergis runs again]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/03/simcoe-grey-for-the-simcoe-greyvians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>115</slash:comments>
	Andrew Coyne on why Stephen Harper shouldn't be the one who decides whether Helena Guergis runs again
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The press as party whips</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/24/the-press-as-party-whips/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/24/the-press-as-party-whips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/03/24/the-press-as-party-whips/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne questions the press's motives in the abortion debate]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/24/the-press-as-party-whips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>144</slash:comments>
	Andrew Coyne questions the press's motives in the abortion debate
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>News flash: no free lunch after all</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/24/news-flash-no-free-lunch-after-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/24/news-flash-no-free-lunch-after-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/03/24/news-flash-no-free-lunch-after-all/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fraser Institute study confirms what was already plain as day: fiscal &#8220;stimulus&#8221; had nothing...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/24/news-flash-no-free-lunch-after-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>116</slash:comments>
	Fraser Institute study confirms what was already plain as day: fiscal &#8220;stimulus&#8221; had nothing...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hard right? Hardly</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/22/hard-right-hardly/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/22/hard-right-hardly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agricultural policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free votes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inconsistency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private member's bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privatization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahim Jaffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/hard-right-hardly/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Wells says social conservatism is on the rise; Andrew Coyne disagrees]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/22/hard-right-hardly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>115</slash:comments>
	Paul Wells says social conservatism is on the rise; Andrew Coyne disagrees
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maybe not the whole nine yards, but a few</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/04/maybe-not-the-whole-nine-yards/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/04/maybe-not-the-whole-nine-yards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national securities regulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Throne Speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=113894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ANDREW COYNE on the Speech from the Throne]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/04/maybe-not-the-whole-nine-yards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	ANDREW COYNE on the Speech from the Throne
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journalism makes strange bedfellows</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/10/journalism-makes-strange-bedfellows/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/10/journalism-makes-strange-bedfellows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxime Bernier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/02/10/journalism-makes-strange-bedfellows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, that didn’t take long.

  PRESS RELEASE FROM THE NDP


  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
  FEBRUARY...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/10/journalism-makes-strange-bedfellows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
	Well, that didn’t take long.

  PRESS RELEASE FROM THE NDP


  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
  FEBRUARY...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maxime Bernier unplugged</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/bernier-unplugged/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/bernier-unplugged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxime Bernier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/bernier-unplugged/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ANDREW COYNE: The Conservative member's recent "remarkable" speech surely must rule out any return to cabinet]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/09/bernier-unplugged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
	ANDREW COYNE: The Conservative member's recent "remarkable" speech surely must rule out any return to cabinet
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zap, you&#039;re frozen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/08/zap-youre-frozen/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/08/zap-youre-frozen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dubiousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/01/08/zap-youre-frozen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colleague Wherry has been faithfully documenting some of the lamer justifications Tory MPs have...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/08/zap-youre-frozen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
	Colleague Wherry has been faithfully documenting some of the lamer justifications Tory MPs have...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
