<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:27:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to examine Quebec allegations it intervened in Constitution repatriation</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/supreme-court-to-examine-quebec-allegations-it-intervened-in-constitution-repatriation/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/supreme-court-to-examine-quebec-allegations-it-intervened-in-constitution-repatriation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 05:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=369898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QUEBEC &#8211; The Supreme Court of Canada says it will investigate allegations that some...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/supreme-court-to-examine-quebec-allegations-it-intervened-in-constitution-repatriation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	QUEBEC &#8211; The Supreme Court of Canada says it will investigate allegations that some...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to examine Quebec allegations it intervened in Constitution repatriation</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/09/repatriation-of-constitution-in-1982-quebec-demands-that-feds-open-their-books/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/09/repatriation-of-constitution-in-1982-quebec-demands-that-feds-open-their-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=369728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QUEBEC &#8211; The Supreme Court of Canada says it will investigate allegations that some...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/09/repatriation-of-constitution-in-1982-quebec-demands-that-feds-open-their-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	QUEBEC &#8211; The Supreme Court of Canada says it will investigate allegations that some...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quebec&#8217;s new Liberal leader wants the province to endorse the Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/signed-sealed-delivered/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/signed-sealed-delivered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Patriquin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parti Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Couillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=362584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philippe Couillard reveals his ‘pet project’]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/21/signed-sealed-delivered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Philippe Couillard reveals his ‘pet project’
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amending the Constitution to keep the Senate from vetoing the House</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/amending-the-constitution-to-keep-the-senate-from-vetoing-the-house/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/amending-the-constitution-to-keep-the-senate-from-vetoing-the-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bert Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=347076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Prime Minister apparently has a plan]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/amending-the-constitution-to-keep-the-senate-from-vetoing-the-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Prime Minister apparently has a plan
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;The de-patriation of the Canadian constitution&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/04/the-de-partiation-of-the-canadian-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/04/the-de-partiation-of-the-canadian-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Twomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal succession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=346354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House passes a problematic bill]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/04/the-de-partiation-of-the-canadian-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The House passes a problematic bill
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter Lougheed was more than just a provincial man</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/21/more-than-just-a-provincial-man/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/21/more-than-just-a-provincial-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 19:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution Act (1982)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Lougheed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Credit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=295259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alberta premier fought for a more equitable Constitution for all Canadians]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/21/more-than-just-a-provincial-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Alberta premier fought for a more equitable Constitution for all Canadians
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter Lougheed, R.I.P.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/14/peter-lougheed-r-i-p/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/14/peter-lougheed-r-i-p/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empire of the st. lawrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first draft of history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margaret Thatcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national energy program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Lougheed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rene leveseque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victoria charter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=293643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colby Cosh on the Lougheed mystique and its legacy]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/14/peter-lougheed-r-i-p/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Colby Cosh on the Lougheed mystique and its legacy
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quebec and the constitution</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/24/quebec-and-the-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/24/quebec-and-the-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rene Levesque]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=286002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marc Garneau considers Quebec and the repatriation of the constitution.
In the best of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/24/quebec-and-the-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Marc Garneau considers Quebec and the repatriation of the constitution.
In the best of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;New Democrats will continue to work to ensure that one day it becomes part of a Constitution that includes us all&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/17/new-democrats-will-continue-to-work-to-ensure-that-one-day-it-becomes-part-of-a-constitution-that-includes-us-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/17/new-democrats-will-continue-to-work-to-ensure-that-one-day-it-becomes-part-of-a-constitution-that-includes-us-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter of Rights and Freedoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Broadbent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tommy Douglas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=252892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A statement from NDP leader Thomas Mulcair on the anniversary of the Charter.
It...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/17/new-democrats-will-continue-to-work-to-ensure-that-one-day-it-becomes-part-of-a-constitution-that-includes-us-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A statement from NDP leader Thomas Mulcair on the anniversary of the Charter.
It...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;An important step&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/17/an-important-step/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/17/an-important-step/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter of Rights and Freedoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Diefenbaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Nicholson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=252808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A statement from Heritage Minister James Moore and Justice Minister Rob Nicholson on the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/17/an-important-step/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A statement from Heritage Minister James Moore and Justice Minister Rob Nicholson on the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;The Charter enshrines our most cherished Canadian values&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/17/the-charter-enshrines-our-most-cherished-canadian-values/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/17/the-charter-enshrines-our-most-cherished-canadian-values/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter of Rights and Freedoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irwin Cotler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre Trudeau]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=252800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interim Liberal leader Bob Rae&#8217;s statement on the 30th anniversary of the Charter.
“On...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/17/the-charter-enshrines-our-most-cherished-canadian-values/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Interim Liberal leader Bob Rae&#8217;s statement on the 30th anniversary of the Charter.
“On...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Charter Day</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/17/happy-charter-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/17/happy-charter-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Peckford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter of Rights and Freedoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution Act (1982)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Chretien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Night of the Long Knives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=252706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Prime Minister isn&#8217;t quite ready to celebrate.
Harper alluded to the fact that...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/17/happy-charter-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Prime Minister isn&#8217;t quite ready to celebrate.
Harper alluded to the fact that...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Harper&#8217;s Spite of Charter, 30th-anniversary edition</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/16/stephen-harpers-spite-of-charter-30th-anniversary-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/16/stephen-harpers-spite-of-charter-30th-anniversary-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Brodie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rainer Knopff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Morton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=252702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The prime minister is hardly trash-talking the constitution here]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/16/stephen-harpers-spite-of-charter-30th-anniversary-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The prime minister is hardly trash-talking the constitution here
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>When you care enough to send the very best</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/13/when-you-care-enough-to-send-the-very-best/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/13/when-you-care-enough-to-send-the-very-best/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter of Rights and Freedoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irwin Cotler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repatriation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=252261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Harper government will mark the 30th anniversary of the Charter of Rights and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/13/when-you-care-enough-to-send-the-very-best/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Harper government will mark the 30th anniversary of the Charter of Rights and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topp on democratic reform</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/10/topp-on-democratic-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/10/topp-on-democratic-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Topp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prorogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=232599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian Topp&#8217;s latest policy paper covers democratic and parliamentary reform, including a move to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/10/topp-on-democratic-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Brian Topp&#8217;s latest policy paper covers democratic and parliamentary reform, including a move to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep the Senate secondary</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/09/keep-the-senate-secondary/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/09/keep-the-senate-secondary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bert Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=232532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kathryn Blaze Carlson&#8217;s consideration of an elected Senate includes an intriguing anecdote from Senator...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/09/keep-the-senate-secondary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Kathryn Blaze Carlson&#8217;s consideration of an elected Senate includes an intriguing anecdote from Senator...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law class</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/14/law-class/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/14/law-class/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dean del Mastro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=225100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House of Commons law clerk considers Dean Del Mastro&#8217;s demand that the CBC...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/14/law-class/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	The House of Commons law clerk considers Dean Del Mastro&#8217;s demand that the CBC...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to celebrate our 150th?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/30/how-to-celebrate-our-150th/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/30/how-to-celebrate-our-150th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[150]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[150th anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting age]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=199663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We could build a couple NHL arenas. Or we could lower the voting age,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/30/how-to-celebrate-our-150th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
	We could build a couple NHL arenas. Or we could lower the voting age,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>That Senate reform bill: alive in the water</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/22/that-senate-reform-bill-alive-in-the-water/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/22/that-senate-reform-bill-alive-in-the-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amending formula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill C-7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution Act (1982)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ned Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter hogg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate elections reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Reform Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senatorial Selection Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=198641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Harper is not creating a formally elected Senate]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/22/that-senate-reform-bill-alive-in-the-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Why Harper is not creating a formally elected Senate
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A non-binding, voluntary basis for encouragement to consider fundamental change</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/21/a-non-binding-voluntary-basis-for-encouragement-to-consider-fundamental-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/21/a-non-binding-voluntary-basis-for-encouragement-to-consider-fundamental-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=198526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government has now tabled its Senate Reform Act.
It would not require provinces...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/21/a-non-binding-voluntary-basis-for-encouragement-to-consider-fundamental-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
	The government has now tabled its Senate Reform Act.
It would not require provinces...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate reform goes centre stage</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/13/senate-reform-goes-centre-stage/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/13/senate-reform-goes-centre-stage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Throne Speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=196281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Tories believe slow-moving Senate reform might work this time]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/13/senate-reform-goes-centre-stage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	Why the Tories believe slow-moving Senate reform might work this time
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reform or bust</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/31/reform-or-bust/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/31/reform-or-bust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 17:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abolish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dalton McGuinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Dexter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provinces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=194765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to Stephen Harper&#8217;s proposed Senate reforms, the Quebec government says it will...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/31/reform-or-bust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	In response to Stephen Harper&#8217;s proposed Senate reforms, the Quebec government says it will...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hypotheticals (II)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/30/hypotheticals-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/30/hypotheticals-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Peterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Russell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=188772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Russell lays out the options.
When the House does meet and no party...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/30/hypotheticals-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
	Peter Russell lays out the options.
When the House does meet and no party...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The NDP, Quebec and the constitution</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/27/the-ndp-quebec-and-the-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/27/the-ndp-quebec-and-the-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Topp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clarity act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=187407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday on a campaign swing through Quebec, Jack Layton was asked whether as prime...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/27/the-ndp-quebec-and-the-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>116</slash:comments>
	Yesterday on a campaign swing through Quebec, Jack Layton was asked whether as prime...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;There&#039;s so much cuckoo around this&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/theres-so-much-cuckoo-around-this/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/theres-so-much-cuckoo-around-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ned Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Russell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=183685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Canadian Press checks Mr. Harper&#8217;s understanding of the constitution.
A government must have...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/theres-so-much-cuckoo-around-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
	The Canadian Press checks Mr. Harper&#8217;s understanding of the constitution.
A government must have...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A guide to democracy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/12/a-guide-to-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/12/a-guide-to-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cabinet Manual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark D. Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Russell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy forum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=183520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Public Policy Forum has released a summary of a roundtable conducted in March...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/12/a-guide-to-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	The Public Policy Forum has released a summary of a roundtable conducted in March...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Harper and constitutional convention</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/29/stephen-harper-and-constitutional-convention/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/29/stephen-harper-and-constitutional-convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrienne Clarkson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Desserud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=179991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Flanagan, a former advisor to Mr. Harper, is asked for his opinion on...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/29/stephen-harper-and-constitutional-convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
	Tom Flanagan, a former advisor to Mr. Harper, is asked for his opinion on...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The rules of our democracy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/26/the-rules-of-our-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/26/the-rules-of-our-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 13:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lester B. Pearson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rideau Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=179629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Prime Minister will momentarily arrive at Rideau Hall to ask that Parliament be...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/26/the-rules-of-our-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
	The Prime Minister will momentarily arrive at Rideau Hall to ask that Parliament be...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would you like some freedom fries with that?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/25/would-you-like-some-freedom-fries-with-that/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/25/would-you-like-some-freedom-fries-with-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1867]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxime Bernier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=154293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maxime Bernier addresses the faithful in Quebec City]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/25/would-you-like-some-freedom-fries-with-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Maxime Bernier addresses the faithful in Quebec City
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Something we have lately taken to taking seriously</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/17/something-we-have-lately-taken-to-taking-seriously/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/17/something-we-have-lately-taken-to-taking-seriously/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 20:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Topp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidence vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prorogue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=127018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs is presently concerned with a study...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/17/something-we-have-lately-taken-to-taking-seriously/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	The Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs is presently concerned with a study...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicanism: More like a root canal than a crown</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/05/republicanism-more-like-a-root-canal-than-a-crown/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/05/republicanism-more-like-a-root-canal-than-a-crown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Potter Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behiels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=90717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week I interviewed Michael Behiels, a political historian at the University of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/05/republicanism-more-like-a-root-canal-than-a-crown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
	Earlier this week I interviewed Michael Behiels, a political historian at the University of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expert insight on the Governor General&#039;s dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/04/expert-insight-on-the-governor-generals-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/04/expert-insight-on-the-governor-generals-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Toronto Law School]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=22099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[University of Toronto law professor Ed Morgan is an expert on the Constitution and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/12/04/expert-insight-on-the-governor-generals-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	University of Toronto law professor Ed Morgan is an expert on the Constitution and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An illegal election?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/08/29/an-illegal-election/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/08/29/an-illegal-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errol mendes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King-Byng]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=6423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The idea that the Governor General would be within her rights to refuse Harper&#8217;s...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/08/29/an-illegal-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The idea that the Governor General would be within her rights to refuse Harper&#8217;s...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is why we can&#039;t have nice things. Or constitutional debate.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/04/30/this-is-why-we-cant-have-nice-things-or-constitutional-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/04/30/this-is-why-we-cant-have-nice-things-or-constitutional-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c-20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errol mendes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter hogg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[that other guy too]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/this-is-why-we-cant-have-nice-things-or-constitutional-debate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flipping y&#8217;all back to Colleague Wells, who put his Google-fu up against Peter Van...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/04/30/this-is-why-we-cant-have-nice-things-or-constitutional-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Flipping y&#8217;all back to Colleague Wells, who put his Google-fu up against Peter Van...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In defense of sex and blowhards</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/04/29/in-defense-of-sex-and-blowhards/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/04/29/in-defense-of-sex-and-blowhards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Patriquin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Cherry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TQS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, dear. I fear my fellow Maudit Anglais Phil Gohier doth protest too much....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/04/29/in-defense-of-sex-and-blowhards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Oh, dear. I fear my fellow Maudit Anglais Phil Gohier doth protest too much....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The black sheep heads to the butcher&#039;s</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/04/28/the-black-sheep-heads-to-the-butchers/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/04/28/the-black-sheep-heads-to-the-butchers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Marois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TQS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am I the only one who doesn&#8217;t really understand the collective hand-wringing over the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/04/28/the-black-sheep-heads-to-the-butchers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Am I the only one who doesn&#8217;t really understand the collective hand-wringing over the...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
