<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; CPP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/cpp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:39:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pension reform isn&#8217;t for everyone</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/09/pension-reform-isnt-for-everyone/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/09/pension-reform-isnt-for-everyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue Allan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=331396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An expanded CPP could hurt low-income earners, says Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/09/pension-reform-isnt-for-everyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	An expanded CPP could hurt low-income earners, says Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future of pensions</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/18/the-future-of-pensions/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/18/the-future-of-pensions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Pension Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Milligan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=329905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Jim Flaherty and the provinces continue to debate CPP reform, Kevin Milligan considers...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/18/the-future-of-pensions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	While Jim Flaherty and the provinces continue to debate CPP reform, Kevin Milligan considers...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harper and pensions: the choices you make</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/31/harper-and-pensions-long-time-comin/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/31/harper-and-pensions-long-time-comin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Kenney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=236848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Wells on how this could have been an issue in any of the last six federal elections]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/31/harper-and-pensions-long-time-comin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Paul Wells on how this could have been an issue in any of the last six federal elections
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scary stories</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/31/scary-stories/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/31/scary-stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Pension Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joyce Bateman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=236833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government sent up Joyce Bateman during QP yesterday to lament that the NDP...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/31/scary-stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The government sent up Joyce Bateman during QP yesterday to lament that the NDP...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topp on families, health care and pensions</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/26/topp-on-families-health-care-and-pensions/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/26/topp-on-families-health-care-and-pensions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Topp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Pension Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family reunification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=235791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian Topp has released his sixth policy paper, this one on supporting families. He&#8217;s...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/26/topp-on-families-health-care-and-pensions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Brian Topp has released his sixth policy paper, this one on supporting families. He&#8217;s...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mulcair on pensions</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/11/mulcair-on-pensions/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/11/mulcair-on-pensions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Pension Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=232839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair pitches pension reform, including a pension exchange.
The proposed pension exchange would...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/11/mulcair-on-pensions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Thomas Mulcair pitches pension reform, including a pension exchange.
The proposed pension exchange would...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada Pension Plan Fund takes hit</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/10/canada-pension-plan-fund-takes-hit/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/10/canada-pension-plan-fund-takes-hit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=224675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Net assets down nearly $1 billion in latest quarter]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/10/canada-pension-plan-fund-takes-hit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	Net assets down nearly $1 billion in latest quarter
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A savings safety net</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/18/a-savings-safety-net/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/18/a-savings-safety-net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Pension Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RRSP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=158114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doubling Canada Pension Plan benefits would provide all Canadians with a safe retirement, but it’s a risky plan that is set to spark a major political battle]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/18/a-savings-safety-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	Doubling Canada Pension Plan benefits would provide all Canadians with a safe retirement, but it’s a risky plan that is set to spark a major political battle
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsmakers &#039;09: Mergers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/10/newsmakers-09-mergers/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/10/newsmakers-09-mergers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex rodriguez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivanka Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mergers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Vick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suncor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The year's biggest mergers]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/10/newsmakers-09-mergers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The year's biggest mergers
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>First the HST, then pensions—Ignatieff&#039;s new game?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/09/first-the-hst-then-pensions%e2%80%94ignatieffs-new-game/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/09/first-the-hst-then-pensions%e2%80%94ignatieffs-new-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Chretien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=96985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patterns in politics are obviously more revealing than isolated actions. When Michael Ignatieff decided...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/09/first-the-hst-then-pensions%e2%80%94ignatieffs-new-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
	Patterns in politics are obviously more revealing than isolated actions. When Michael Ignatieff decided...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>E pluribus CPP</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/12/e-pluribus-cpp/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/12/e-pluribus-cpp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caisse de depot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/03/12/e-pluribus-cpp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My recent piece on the Caisse de debacle elicited this strange response from Erin...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/12/e-pluribus-cpp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
	My recent piece on the Caisse de debacle elicited this strange response from Erin...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
