<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; DND</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/dnd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>MPs asked to stand up against intimidation of soldier threatened with discharge</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/12/mps-asked-to-stand-up-against-intimidation-of-soldier-threatened-with-discharge/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/12/mps-asked-to-stand-up-against-intimidation-of-soldier-threatened-with-discharge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=393956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Opposition Liberals will try again Wednesday to hold military officers to account...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/12/mps-asked-to-stand-up-against-intimidation-of-soldier-threatened-with-discharge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Opposition Liberals will try again Wednesday to hold military officers to account...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scrap submarine fleet or buy new ones soon, think-tanks tell Tories</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/11/scrap-submarine-fleet-or-buy-new-ones-soon-think-tanks-tell-tories/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/11/scrap-submarine-fleet-or-buy-new-ones-soon-think-tanks-tell-tories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submarines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=393763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; A pair of think-tanks say the Harper government should either announce plans...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/11/scrap-submarine-fleet-or-buy-new-ones-soon-think-tanks-tell-tories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; A pair of think-tanks say the Harper government should either announce plans...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Documents suggest no more money for overseas military operations</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/25/documents-suggest-no-more-money-for-overseas-military-operations/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/25/documents-suggest-no-more-money-for-overseas-military-operations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; &#8220;There&#8217;s no place like home&#8221; could become the battle cry of the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/25/documents-suggest-no-more-money-for-overseas-military-operations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; &#8220;There&#8217;s no place like home&#8221; could become the battle cry of the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soldier&#8217;s mother wonders whether showing suicide video was worth it</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/03/soldiers-mother-wonders-whether-showing-suicide-video-was-worth-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/03/soldiers-mother-wonders-whether-showing-suicide-video-was-worth-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=288830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Sheila Fynes couldn&#8217;t sleep most nights this summer, wondering whether she made...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/03/soldiers-mother-wonders-whether-showing-suicide-video-was-worth-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Sheila Fynes couldn&#8217;t sleep most nights this summer, wondering whether she made...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>PM names air force general Thomas Lawson as new chief of the defence staff</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/27/pm-names-air-force-general-thomas-lawson-as-new-chief-of-the-defence-staff/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/27/pm-names-air-force-general-thomas-lawson-as-new-chief-of-the-defence-staff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=286359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA - Lt.-Gen. Thomas Lawson has been named as Canada's next new chief of the defence staff, the country's top military post.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/27/pm-names-air-force-general-thomas-lawson-as-new-chief-of-the-defence-staff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA - Lt.-Gen. Thomas Lawson has been named as Canada's next new chief of the defence staff, the country's top military post.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using a search-and-rescue helicopter for a fishing trip sends the wrong message</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/20/what-thats-not-allowed-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/20/what-thats-not-allowed-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Penashue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-and-rescue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=275972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Peter Penashue is upset that a search-and-rescue helicopter was used by...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/20/what-thats-not-allowed-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Peter Penashue is upset that a search-and-rescue helicopter was used by...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meanwhile, at the Defence Department</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/18/meanwhile-at-the-defence-department/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/18/meanwhile-at-the-defence-department/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defence Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Board]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=275155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Citizen discovers why a military truck procurement was halted at the last minute....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/18/meanwhile-at-the-defence-department/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Citizen discovers why a military truck procurement was halted at the last minute....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Checking DND&#8217;s math</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/20/checking-dnds-math/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/20/checking-dnds-math/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=269068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From QP yesterday, Rona Ambrose explains why new cost estimates for the F-35 won&#8217;t...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/20/checking-dnds-math/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	From QP yesterday, Rona Ambrose explains why new cost estimates for the F-35 won&#8217;t...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting the minister</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/05/protecting-the-minister/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/05/protecting-the-minister/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 16:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-and-rescue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter Natynczyk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=264156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laura Payton obtains correspondence related to the Defence Minister&#8217;s helicopter ride.
An email from...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/05/protecting-the-minister/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Laura Payton obtains correspondence related to the Defence Minister&#8217;s helicopter ride.
An email from...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>No need to keep studying the F-35?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/29/no-need-to-keep-studying-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/29/no-need-to-keep-studying-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 13:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Saxton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Pugliese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=261842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The work of the parliamentary committee studying the F-35 procurement is apparently done. At...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/29/no-need-to-keep-studying-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The work of the parliamentary committee studying the F-35 procurement is apparently done. At...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accounting for the Defence Department</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/11/accounting-for-the-defence-department/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/11/accounting-for-the-defence-department/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 13:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=258223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mission in Libya cost significantly more than the Defence Minister once suggested. And...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/11/accounting-for-the-defence-department/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The mission in Libya cost significantly more than the Defence Minister once suggested. And...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Haven&#8217;t made that choice&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/10/havent-made-that-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/10/havent-made-that-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 13:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite various commitments to and demands for a full 36-year lifecycle cost estimate for...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/10/havent-made-that-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Despite various commitments to and demands for a full 36-year lifecycle cost estimate for...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for answers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/09/waiting-for-answers/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/09/waiting-for-answers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 12:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Globe reports that Defence officials made a trip to Washington last week to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/09/waiting-for-answers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Globe reports that Defence officials made a trip to Washington last week to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>PBO v. DND</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/03/pbo-v-dnd/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/03/pbo-v-dnd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 17:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pbo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=256817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parliamentary Budget Officer Kevin Page draws a conclusion.
“Over the past few weeks, it...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/03/pbo-v-dnd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Parliamentary Budget Officer Kevin Page draws a conclusion.
“Over the past few weeks, it...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>When will the lifecycle cost be explained?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/when-will-the-lifecycle-cost-be-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/when-will-the-lifecycle-cost-be-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 17:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public accounts committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Fonberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Board]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=256121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The full lifecycle cost of the F-35 remains elusive.
DND’s deputy minister, Robert Fonberg,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/when-will-the-lifecycle-cost-be-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The full lifecycle cost of the F-35 remains elusive.
DND’s deputy minister, Robert Fonberg,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What did the cabinet know and why was the F-35 allowed to proceed?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/what-did-the-cabinet-know-and-why-was-the-f-35-allowed-to-proceed/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/what-did-the-cabinet-know-and-why-was-the-f-35-allowed-to-proceed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 12:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Ivison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public accounts committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=256015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While a number of department officials—including the deputy minister of defence and the assistant...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/what-did-the-cabinet-know-and-why-was-the-f-35-allowed-to-proceed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	While a number of department officials—including the deputy minister of defence and the assistant...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;You do get the sense there were different books being kept&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/30/you-do-get-the-sense-there-were-different-books-being-kept/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/30/you-do-get-the-sense-there-were-different-books-being-kept/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pbo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=255850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Pages throws a quote on the F-35 fire.
Page told host Evan Solomon...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/30/you-do-get-the-sense-there-were-different-books-being-kept/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Kevin Pages throws a quote on the F-35 fire.
Page told host Evan Solomon...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In case you misunderstood him the first time</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/26/in-case-you-misunderstood-him-the-first-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/26/in-case-you-misunderstood-him-the-first-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public accounts committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=255438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Auditor General appeared before the Public Accounts Committee to explain his findings on...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/26/in-case-you-misunderstood-him-the-first-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Auditor General appeared before the Public Accounts Committee to explain his findings on...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How about that lifecycle cost?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/25/how-about-that-lifecycle-cost/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/25/how-about-that-lifecycle-cost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defence Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Accountability Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pbo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=254678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Parliamentary Budget Officer has written to the deputy minister at Defence.
We have...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/25/how-about-that-lifecycle-cost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Parliamentary Budget Officer has written to the deputy minister at Defence.
We have...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: A simple misunderstanding</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/the-commons-a-simple-misunderstanding/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/the-commons-a-simple-misunderstanding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=254619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So close to the sort of concession the opposition desires and yet, so far]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/the-commons-a-simple-misunderstanding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	So close to the sort of concession the opposition desires and yet, so far
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35 math gets fuzzier</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/the-f-35-math-gets-fuzzier/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/the-f-35-math-gets-fuzzier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=254426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The projected training budget may not be sufficient for the F-35.
About $1.3 billion...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/the-f-35-math-gets-fuzzier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The projected training budget may not be sufficient for the F-35.
About $1.3 billion...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spring break is over</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/spring-break-is-over/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/spring-break-is-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Minsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johanne Provencher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Slack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public accounts committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Dicerni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Ring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=253358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House doesn&#8217;t reconvene until Monday, but the public accounts committee will meet this...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/spring-break-is-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The House doesn&#8217;t reconvene until Monday, but the public accounts committee will meet this...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35 is not like a minivan</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/16/the-f-35-is-not-like-a-minivan/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/16/the-f-35-is-not-like-a-minivan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tabatha Southey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=252642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tabatha Southey finds ten ways that Peter MacKay&#8217;s minivan analogy fails to explain the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/16/the-f-35-is-not-like-a-minivan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Tabatha Southey finds ten ways that Peter MacKay&#8217;s minivan analogy fails to explain the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;But in terms of our numbers, I&#8217;ve been very clear&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/16/but-in-terms-of-our-numbers-ive-been-very-clear/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/16/but-in-terms-of-our-numbers-ive-been-very-clear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Horgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=252542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asked about the price of the F-35, the Prime Minister invokes one of his...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/16/but-in-terms-of-our-numbers-ive-been-very-clear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Asked about the price of the F-35, the Prime Minister invokes one of his...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unpacking Peter MacKay</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/13/unpacking-peter-mackay/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/13/unpacking-peter-mackay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=252307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colin Horgan reviews how the public costing of the F-35 failed to meet the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/13/unpacking-peter-mackay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Colin Horgan reviews how the public costing of the F-35 failed to meet the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Checking Peter MacKay&#8217;s math</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/11/checking-peter-mackays-math/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/11/checking-peter-mackays-math/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry Milewski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=251552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terry Milewski quibbles.

Jacques Bourbeau sees the same problems. 

The Parliamentary Budget Officer&#8217;s report...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/11/checking-peter-mackays-math/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Terry Milewski quibbles.

Jacques Bourbeau sees the same problems. 

The Parliamentary Budget Officer&#8217;s report...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New and old math</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/10/new-and-old-math/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/10/new-and-old-math/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=251476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Defence Minister explains the difference between $25 billion and $15 billion.
“The $10-billion...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/10/new-and-old-math/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Defence Minister explains the difference between $25 billion and $15 billion.
“The $10-billion...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the House of Commons demanded</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/10/what-the-house-of-commons-demanded/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/10/what-the-house-of-commons-demanded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CF-18]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privilege]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=251442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the Harper government was found in contempt of Parliament a year ago, its...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/10/what-the-house-of-commons-demanded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	When the Harper government was found in contempt of Parliament a year ago, its...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The measure of the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/10/the-measure-of-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/10/the-measure-of-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andre Deschamps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=251278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alan Williams, the former assistant deputy minister with National Defence, points with concern to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/10/the-measure-of-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Alan Williams, the former assistant deputy minister with National Defence, points with concern to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idea alert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/idea-alert-66/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/idea-alert-66/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Horgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-18 Super Hornet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=251154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Problem: The Department of National Defence says it needs 65 warplanes, but $9 billion...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/idea-alert-66/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Problem: The Department of National Defence says it needs 65 warplanes, but $9 billion...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>About that documentation</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/about-that-documentation/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/about-that-documentation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Newman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=251117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One last point on the Defence Minister&#8217;s comments this weekend. Nearer the end of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/about-that-documentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	One last point on the Defence Minister&#8217;s comments this weekend. Nearer the end of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>About that timeline</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/about-that-timeline/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/about-that-timeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=251107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his interview with CTV, Peter MacKay also noted the &#8220;discrepancy&#8221; between the 36-year...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/about-that-timeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In his interview with CTV, Peter MacKay also noted the &#8220;discrepancy&#8221; between the 36-year...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better know $25 billion</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/better-know-25-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/better-know-25-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=251102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interview with CTV&#8217;s Question Period, Peter MacKay explains the $25-billion estimate that...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/better-know-25-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In an interview with CTV&#8217;s Question Period, Peter MacKay explains the $25-billion estimate that...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The cuts begin</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/04/the-cuts-begin/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/04/the-cuts-begin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=250547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National Defence is set to eliminate more than a thousand jobs.
At this point...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/04/the-cuts-begin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	National Defence is set to eliminate more than a thousand jobs.
At this point...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lessons learned from the F-35 acquisition debacle</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/03/lessons-learned-from-the-f-35-acquisition-debacle/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/03/lessons-learned-from-the-f-35-acquisition-debacle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 19:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Newland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CF-18]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=250429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defense expert Philippe Lagassé explains what the AG report means for the government, DND and public works]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/03/lessons-learned-from-the-f-35-acquisition-debacle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Defense expert Philippe Lagassé explains what the AG report means for the government, DND and public works
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support the minister</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/28/support-the-minister/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/28/support-the-minister/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nortel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Fonberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=227202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of National Defence didn&#8217;t want Parliament to know how much it was...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/28/support-the-minister/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	The Department of National Defence didn&#8217;t want Parliament to know how much it was...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The quiet cuts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/13/the-quiet-cuts-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/13/the-quiet-cuts-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiet cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Board]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=219821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Defence Department is planning to cut 250 jobs. Treasury Board will eliminate 84...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/13/the-quiet-cuts-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	The Defence Department is planning to cut 250 jobs. Treasury Board will eliminate 84...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to spend $21-billion</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/13/how-to-spend-21-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/13/how-to-spend-21-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CF-18]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Pugliese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laurie Hawn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=163503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Pugliese&#8217;s three-part series on the proposed purchase of 65 F-35s—see here, here and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/13/how-to-spend-21-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>104</slash:comments>
	David Pugliese&#8217;s three-part series on the proposed purchase of 65 F-35s—see here, here and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many? (II)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/02/how-many-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/02/how-many-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawrence cannon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transfers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=162095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the fourth consecutive day, Lawrence Cannon was pressed during QP to say how...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/02/how-many-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	For the fourth consecutive day, Lawrence Cannon was pressed during QP to say how...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The sales job</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/22/the-sales-job/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/22/the-sales-job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Pugliese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Pugliese explains how the government hopes to sell the purchase of new F-35s....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/22/the-sales-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
	David Pugliese explains how the government hopes to sell the purchase of new F-35s....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Week: Good news/Bad news</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/25/this-week-week-of-june-25th/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/25/this-week-week-of-june-25th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burqas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fireworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Bettman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iris Evans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricky Barnes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=66798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plus a week in the life of NHL commissioner Gary Bettman]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/25/this-week-week-of-june-25th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Plus a week in the life of NHL commissioner Gary Bettman
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>This land is my land</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/23/this-land-is-my-land/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/23/this-land-is-my-land/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Friscolanti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Task Force 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JTF 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=4255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trying to build a new home for Canada’s elite commandos sparks a war of its own]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/23/this-land-is-my-land/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1137</slash:comments>
	Trying to build a new home for Canada’s elite commandos sparks a war of its own
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attention Taliban: Here&#039;s our secret plan to fight you</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/16/attention-taliban-heres-our-secret-plan-to-fight-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/16/attention-taliban-heres-our-secret-plan-to-fight-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Potter Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counter-insurgency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pugliese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=2055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Canadian Forces&#8217; counter-insurgency manual is now officially Secret. This, despite the fact that...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/16/attention-taliban-heres-our-secret-plan-to-fight-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Canadian Forces&#8217; counter-insurgency manual is now officially Secret. This, despite the fact that...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
