Posts Tagged ‘Ed Fast’

Managing supply management

By Aaron Wherry - Monday, November 14, 2011 - 0 Comments

Once seemingly kept out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership as a result of its support for supply management, the Harper government is now ready to enter into negotiations.

The Prime Minister said Canada can “easily meet” the broad strokes of the agreement unveiled Saturday by Mr. Obama, even if it means throwing into the mix a supply management system that forces Canadians to pay higher prices for products like milk, cheese, chicken and eggs…

“We will make an application and I am optimistic we will participate in the future,” he added. “Whenever we enter negotiations, as we’ve done in the past with other countries, as we’re doing right now with Europe, we always say that all matters are on the table. But of course Canada will seek to defend and promote our specific interests in every single sector of the economy.”

In its campaign platform and Throne Speech, the government vowed to continue to defend supply management.

Eliminating supply management would satisfy the first demand of Mike Moffatt’s nascent Economist Party. Last week, Campbell Clark called on the government to free the cheese.

  • The Herb Gray School

    By Aaron Wherry - Friday, October 21, 2011 at 10:00 AM - 17 Comments

    Steven Fletcher, Oct. 19. Mr. Speaker, I reject the premise of the member’s question.

    John Baird, Oct. 19. Mr. Speaker, it will not come as any surprise to my friend from northern Ontario that I do not agree with the premise of his question.

    Ed Fast, Oct. 19.  Mr. Speaker, I do not accept the premise of that question.

    Stephen Harper, Oct. 19. Mr. Speaker, I completely disagree with the premise of that question.

    Denis Lebel, Oct. 18. Mr. Speaker, I do not accept the premise of that question.

    John Baird, Oct. 17. Mr. Speaker, it will not come as any surprise to that member or to the House that I categorically reject the premise of the member’s question.

    Brent Rathgeber, Oct. 17. Mr. Speaker, I absolutely disagree with the premise of that question.

    John Baird, Oct. 7. Mr. Speaker, I say to my friend from Winnipeg Centre that it will not come as any surprise to him that I disagree with the premise of his question. Continue…

  • This year's models

    By Aaron Wherry - Wednesday, May 18, 2011 at 10:43 AM - 65 Comments

    Welcome to live coverage of this morning’s cabinet shuffle, wherein we find out which backbenchers we have to pretend to take more seriously for the next little while.

    There’s been a steady stream of Conservatives arriving at Rideau Hall and the Prime Minister is due shortly. So far we seem only to know for sure that John Baird will be the next Foreign Affairs Minister. Presumably he will be counted on to bluster away opposition criticism of the government’s international endeavours, charm foreign officials and periodically convene breathless news conferences to report the latest breathtaking developments in our make-believe war with Russia. Presumably he’ll do fine. His image problem notwithstanding.

    10:45am. Our Andrew Coyne is already deeply disappointed with all of this. Follow his Twitter feed this morning to watch his head explode repeatedly.

    10:52am. The Prime Minister has now arrived. The swearing in is to commence in about 20 minutes.

    11:04am. CTV reports a 39-member ministry, which equals an all-time high mark. Welcome to the new era of smaller government.

    11:07am. Peter Van Loan apparently goes back to House leader. Welcome to the new era of non-partisan Harper governance. Continue…

  • The Commons: Anatomy of an outrage

    By Aaron Wherry - Wednesday, June 2, 2010 at 6:10 PM - 130 Comments

    The Scene. The afternoon culminated in a protracted and passionate debate, the crux of the discussion being perhaps the most profound question facing Western democracy and human discourse as we enter the second decade of this new century: To what extent should one be allowed to stand and publicly accuse another of evil?

    In this particular context—within the walls of the House of Commons, members on all sides rising in the moments after Question Period on points of order to vent and plead and attempt reason—it might easily be dismissed as a matter of Parliamentary procedure. But then what happens here is, quite literally, a representation of us—of who we are, and what we become, when taken together. And so here we find ourselves.

    Consider the case of Mark Holland, the Liberal member for Ajax—Pickering. Continue…

  • Jason Kenney is unimpressed

    By Aaron Wherry - Tuesday, March 24, 2009 at 5:46 PM - 5 Comments

    From his Twitter feed.

    I’m always amazed by how many special interest micro-issues the opposition raises during QP, rather than issues of general public concern.

    The government has been allowed six of its own questions so far this week. Mike Wallace asked about the government’s position on what an American television personality had said about our military. Steven Blaney ridiculed the Liberal leader and asked to hear what the government has done for Quebec. Rodney Weston asked how the government was supporting seal hunters. Ed Fast asked when the government would begin spending its economic stimulus (giving Vic Toews opportunity to allege opposition obstruction). Kevin Sorenson asked the government to clarify its position on Kashmir. And Bev Shipley asked the Human Resources Minister to repeat her announcement from earlier in the day.

  • The Commons: In Review

    By Aaron Wherry - Monday, June 23, 2008 at 4:44 PM - 0 Comments

    The best, worst and merely laughable of the recently completed Parliamentary session

    The Scene. Late last week, at the press conference he’d called to formally reject the Liberal green plan he hadn’t bothered to read, Jason Kenney was asked to account for his government’s tone—the language with which it had chosen to engage the current debate.

    “I don’t think that Canadians are so humourless and earnest,” he posited, “that they reject humour in political discourse.”

    There are at least two problems with this assessment.

    At the outset, it assumes that what Mr. Kenney’s had to say has been particularly funny. This is, by most objective standards, a stretch. His particular line on the Liberal carbon tax relies on the fact that the word “shift” sounds something like a swear. While perhaps uproarious when compared with other discussions around here—so many of them having to do with war and poverty and other sufferings—most of us ceased finding this pun particularly hilarious around the first time we kissed a girl (or boy, as it were).

    But, in fairness to Mr. Kenney, let’s pretend his comedic stylings on this front have been the stuff of a night at the Apollo. Even if that were the case, so, er, what? Continue…

  • The Commons: ‘I think you’re full of shift!’

    By Aaron Wherry - Wednesday, June 18, 2008 at 6:52 PM - 0 Comments

    The Government of Canada appeals directly to your most juvenile impulses

    The Scene. Question Period had begun and Liberal Ujjal Dosanjh was asking the government to account for the unwieldy matter of Julie Couillard and the upright citizens brigade in the Conservative back row was displeased.

    “No one cares!” lamented Dean Del Mastro.

    “Let’s talk about policy!” pleaded Ed Fast.

    Just moments earlier, their seatmate, the reliably obedient Rick Dykstra, had tried to do just that. Here, from his member statement, was his take on environmental taxation, the politics and practicalities of distributing wealth across civil and economic lines and how best the federal government can balance short-term necessities with long-term social sustainability.

    “There is an old saying that it is better to light a candle than curse the darkness,” Dykstra reported, “but if the leader of the opposition formed government, if he imposed a carbon tax, our country would face a wall of darkness.”

    Nearly 50 years ago this July, John F. Kennedy referred to the same old saying upon accepting the Democratic nomination. Here was what he found in that proverb. Continue…

  • The Commons: There is no there there

    By Aaron Wherry - Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 6:55 PM - 0 Comments

    Behold government as a figment of the Prime Minister’s imagination

    The Scene. Shortly before Question Period, the Prime Minister strode into the House, looking refreshed after his trip to Halifax to announce… well, to announce what exactly? An announcement? A thought? A theory? An idea? A projection? A notion?

    Nominally, yesterday’s do was billed as Canada’s new military strategy for the next two decades. But, as one columnist put it today, “the complete plan is apparently locked inside Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s brain.”

    Perhaps then, the opposition could ask that the government table the Prime Minister’s formidable cranium. It’d be interesting to see that thing transcribed. Though no doubt they’d have to black out the sweary bits. Continue…

From Macleans