<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Election 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/election-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:03:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Harper as Rich Little</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/12/stephen-harper-as-rich-little/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/12/stephen-harper-as-rich-little/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 04:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Mulroney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=393906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new video shows a little levity from the 2011 campaign trail]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/12/stephen-harper-as-rich-little/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A new video shows a little levity from the 2011 campaign trail
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Shelly Glover and James Bezan still be sitting in the House of Commons?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/07/should-shelly-glover-and-james-bezan-still-be-sitting-in-the-house-of-commons/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/07/should-shelly-glover-and-james-bezan-still-be-sitting-in-the-house-of-commons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Scheer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Bezan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc mayrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael behiels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Andrews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shelly Glover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Hall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=392745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Speaker's decision is questioned]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/07/should-shelly-glover-and-james-bezan-still-be-sitting-in-the-house-of-commons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Speaker's decision is questioned
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In other news: election fraud, voter suppression and illegal robocalls</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/29/in-other-news-election-fraud-voter-suppression-and-illegal-robocalls/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/29/in-other-news-election-fraud-voter-suppression-and-illegal-robocalls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 15:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robocalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Uppal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote suppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter suppression]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=389190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This month just keeps getting better]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/29/in-other-news-election-fraud-voter-suppression-and-illegal-robocalls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	This month just keeps getting better
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senators Smith and Greene Raine on expenses and the last election</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/21/senators-smith-on-greene-raine-on-expenses-and-the-last-election/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/21/senators-smith-on-greene-raine-on-expenses-and-the-last-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grant Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Greene Raine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=386034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Answering questions raised by the NDP]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/21/senators-smith-on-greene-raine-on-expenses-and-the-last-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Answering questions raised by the NDP
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The new 338-seat reality</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/01/the-new-338-seat-reality-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/01/the-new-338-seat-reality-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 21:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Wexler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll Maps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=356122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Preparing for 30 new seats to fill]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/01/the-new-338-seat-reality-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Preparing for 30 new seats to fill
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upon further review, the Conservatives discover they did it</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/05/upon-further-review-the-conservatives-discover-they-did-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/05/upon-further-review-the-conservatives-discover-they-did-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred DeLorey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riding boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saskatchewan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=346884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An admission of responsibility for robocalls in Saskatchewan]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/05/upon-further-review-the-conservatives-discover-they-did-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	An admission of responsibility for robocalls in Saskatchewan
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many Pierre Poutines are out there?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/30/how-many-pierre-poutines-are-out-there/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/30/how-many-pierre-poutines-are-out-there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre Poutine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robocalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter suppression]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=321698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glen McGregor and Stephen Maher review the latest numbers from Elections Canada.
Dickson writes...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/30/how-many-pierre-poutines-are-out-there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Glen McGregor and Stephen Maher review the latest numbers from Elections Canada.
Dickson writes...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;No one is more surprised than I am&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/no-one-is-more-surprised-than-i-am/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/no-one-is-more-surprised-than-i-am/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Penashue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=314326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Penashue has released a letter to his constituents.
I was very clear during...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/no-one-is-more-surprised-than-i-am/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Peter Penashue has released a letter to his constituents.
I was very clear during...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Peter Penashue have anything to say for himself?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/does-peter-penashue-have-anything-to-say-for-himself/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/does-peter-penashue-have-anything-to-say-for-himself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Penashue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=314261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, the Intergovernmental Affairs Minister seemed to say that he&#8217;d have something to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/does-peter-penashue-have-anything-to-say-for-himself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Last week, the Intergovernmental Affairs Minister seemed to say that he&#8217;d have something to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penashue to explain himself, eventually</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/06/penashue-to-explain-himself-eventually/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/06/penashue-to-explain-himself-eventually/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Penashue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=312034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Penashue emerged from the House after QP this afternoon to comment on the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/06/penashue-to-explain-himself-eventually/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Peter Penashue emerged from the House after QP this afternoon to comment on the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>More questions for Peter Penashue</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/02/more-questions-for-peter-penashue-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/02/more-questions-for-peter-penashue-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Payton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Penashue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=310701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laura Payton raises more questions about Peter Penashue&#8217;s election campaign. Chris Hall wonders when...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/02/more-questions-for-peter-penashue-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Laura Payton raises more questions about Peter Penashue&#8217;s election campaign. Chris Hall wonders when...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The post-Etobicoke Centre future of elections</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/29/the-post-etobicoke-centre-future-of-elections/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/29/the-post-etobicoke-centre-future-of-elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borys Wrzesnewskyj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etobicoke centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gavin Tighe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Tiele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=308620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Thiele and Gavin Tighe, Borys Wrzesnewskyj&#8217;s lawyers, consider the ramifications of the Supreme...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/29/the-post-etobicoke-centre-future-of-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Thiele and Gavin Tighe, Borys Wrzesnewskyj&#8217;s lawyers, consider the ramifications of the Supreme...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court rules no by-election in Etobicoke Centre</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/25/supreme-court-rules-no-by-election-in-etobicoke-centre/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/25/supreme-court-rules-no-by-election-in-etobicoke-centre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borys Wrzesnewskyj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etobicoke centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Opitz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=307081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Conservative MP Ted Opitz and there...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/25/supreme-court-rules-no-by-election-in-etobicoke-centre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Conservative MP Ted Opitz and there...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;We&#8217;re just better at it&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/24/were-just-better-at-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/24/were-just-better-at-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Kenney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kasra Nejatian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Payton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=306654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laura Payton revisits the &#8220;very ethnic&#8221; ridings the Conservatives targeted in the 2011 election....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/24/were-just-better-at-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Laura Payton revisits the &#8220;very ethnic&#8221; ridings the Conservatives targeted in the 2011 election....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A ruling on Etobicoke Centre is at hand</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/19/a-ruling-on-etobicoke-centre-is-at-hand/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/19/a-ruling-on-etobicoke-centre-is-at-hand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borys Wrzesnewskyj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etobicoke centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Opitz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=305389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A note from the Supreme Court advises that a ruling in the case of ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/19/a-ruling-on-etobicoke-centre-is-at-hand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A note from the Supreme Court advises that a ruling in the case of ...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>He&#8217;s new here</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/18/hes-new-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/18/hes-new-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Penashue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=304952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Penashue explains the trouble with his campaign expenses.
&#8220;Look, last year was my...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/18/hes-new-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Peter Penashue explains the trouble with his campaign expenses.
&#8220;Look, last year was my...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Gerry Ritz did not inspect that ground beef</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/17/the-commons-gerry-ritz-did-not-inspect-that-ground-beef/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/17/the-commons-gerry-ritz-did-not-inspect-that-ground-beef/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian food inspection agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerry Ritz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Penashue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=304401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>The Scene....</strong> Shortly before the farce was laid bare before the House yesterday, Stephen]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/17/the-commons-gerry-ritz-did-not-inspect-that-ground-beef/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<strong>The Scene....</strong> Shortly before the farce was laid bare before the House yesterday, Stephen
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>More questions for Peter Penashue</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/17/more-questions-for-peter-penashue/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/17/more-questions-for-peter-penashue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Penashue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=304172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CBC raises more questions about Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Peter Penashue&#8217;s election campaign.
Mr....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/17/more-questions-for-peter-penashue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The CBC raises more questions about Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Peter Penashue&#8217;s election campaign.
Mr....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;I take full responsibility&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/24/i-take-full-responsibility-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/24/i-take-full-responsibility-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Valeriote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robocalls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=286047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CRTC has fined the Liberal riding association in Guelph for an inappropriate robocall...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/24/i-take-full-responsibility-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The CRTC has fined the Liberal riding association in Guelph for an inappropriate robocall...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Less money available for nurses and doctors and health care&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/27/less-money-available-for-nurses-and-doctors-and-health-care/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/27/less-money-available-for-nurses-and-doctors-and-health-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Selinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health transfers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provinces]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=277500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The premiers seem unimpressed with Jim Flaherty&#8217;s change to the health care funding formula....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/27/less-money-available-for-nurses-and-doctors-and-health-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The premiers seem unimpressed with Jim Flaherty&#8217;s change to the health care funding formula....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking: The 2011 election was maybe a real thing that actually happened</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/13/breaking-the-2011-election-was-maybe-a-real-thing-that-actually-happened/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/13/breaking-the-2011-election-was-maybe-a-real-thing-that-actually-happened/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=274391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CBC investigates.
After the last federal election some observers felt the NDP had...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/13/breaking-the-2011-election-was-maybe-a-real-thing-that-actually-happened/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The CBC investigates.
After the last federal election some observers felt the NDP had...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The meaning of Etobicoke Centre</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/12/the-meaning-of-etobicoke-centre/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/12/the-meaning-of-etobicoke-centre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Goldenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etobicoke centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Fingas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omar Alghabra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=273901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Toronto Star, Greg Fingas, Omar Alghabra and, quoted below, Adam Goldenberg consider the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/12/the-meaning-of-etobicoke-centre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Toronto Star, Greg Fingas, Omar Alghabra and, quoted below, Adam Goldenberg consider the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;A debate about the integrity of the voting system&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/10/a-debate-about-the-integrity-of-the-voting-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/10/a-debate-about-the-integrity-of-the-voting-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 03:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etobicoke centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=273427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National&#8217;s report tonight on today&#8217;s hearing at the Supreme Court....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/10/a-debate-about-the-integrity-of-the-voting-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The National&#8217;s report tonight on today&#8217;s hearing at the Supreme Court....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A day in court</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/10/a-day-in-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/10/a-day-in-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etobicoke centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=273329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CBC, Globe and Canadian Press sum up today&#8217;s Etobicoke Centre hearings at the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/10/a-day-in-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The CBC, Globe and Canadian Press sum up today&#8217;s Etobicoke Centre hearings at the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Etobicoke Centre goes to the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/10/etobicoke-centre-goes-to-the-supreme-court-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/10/etobicoke-centre-goes-to-the-supreme-court-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borys Wrzesnewskyj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian civil liberties association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etobicoke centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Opitz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=273101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The disputed vote in Etobicoke Centre goes to the Supreme Court this morning for...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/10/etobicoke-centre-goes-to-the-supreme-court-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The disputed vote in Etobicoke Centre goes to the Supreme Court this morning for...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where the money and the votes went</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/09/where-the-money-and-the-votes-went/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/09/where-the-money-and-the-votes-went/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice Funke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pundits Guide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=272968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a long post with various charts and graphs, Alice Funke reviews the vote...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/09/where-the-money-and-the-votes-went/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In a long post with various charts and graphs, Alice Funke reviews the vote...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>British democracy in crisis, possibly as healthy as ours</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/06/british-democracy-in-crisis-still-possibly-healthier-than-ours/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/06/british-democracy-in-crisis-still-possibly-healthier-than-ours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 21:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Election Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuart Wilks-Heeg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=272834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report by the Democratic Audit of the United Kingdom concludes that democracy in...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/06/british-democracy-in-crisis-still-possibly-healthier-than-ours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A report by the Democratic Audit of the United Kingdom concludes that democracy in...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election 2011: Jim who?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/06/election-2011-jim-who/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/06/election-2011-jim-who/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 14:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Election Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=272599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the CES 2011 campaign survey, respondents&#8217; answers when asked to name the finance...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/06/election-2011-jim-who/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	From the CES 2011 campaign survey, respondents&#8217; answers when asked to name the finance...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election 2011: Our complicated relationship with politics</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/06/election-2011-our-complicated-relationship-with-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/06/election-2011-our-complicated-relationship-with-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 12:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Election Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=272619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In its post-campaign survey and its mail-back survey, the Canadian Election Study tested several...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/06/election-2011-our-complicated-relationship-with-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In its post-campaign survey and its mail-back survey, the Canadian Election Study tested several...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election 2011: The NDP</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/05/election-2011-the-ndp/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/05/election-2011-the-ndp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Election Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=272164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the next little while, I’m going to dig through the Canadian Election Study‘s...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/05/election-2011-the-ndp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	For the next little while, I’m going to dig through the Canadian Election Study‘s...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election 2011: How we like our democracy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/04/election-2011-how-we-like-our-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/04/election-2011-how-we-like-our-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 14:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Election Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=271851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the next little while, I’m going to dig through the Canadian Election Study‘s...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/04/election-2011-how-we-like-our-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	For the next little while, I’m going to dig through the Canadian Election Study‘s...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election 2011: The leaders</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/03/election-2011-the-leaders/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/03/election-2011-the-leaders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Election Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=271714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the next little while, I&#8217;m going to dig through the Canadian Election Study&#8216;s...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/03/election-2011-the-leaders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	For the next little while, I&#8217;m going to dig through the Canadian Election Study&#8216;s...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What happens if the United States decides to pursue cap-and-trade?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/28/what-happens-if-the-united-states-decides-to-pursue-cap-and-trade/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/28/what-happens-if-the-united-states-decides-to-pursue-cap-and-trade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-and-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter kent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=270989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As previously noted, the Harper government was keen to pursue a continental cap-and-trade system...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/28/what-happens-if-the-united-states-decides-to-pursue-cap-and-trade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	As previously noted, the Harper government was keen to pursue a continental cap-and-trade system...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where the votes went</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/19/where-the-votes-went/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/19/where-the-votes-went/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice Funke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=268815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alice Funke looks at how 2008 voters moved in 2011.
The NDP was able...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/19/where-the-votes-went/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Alice Funke looks at how 2008 voters moved in 2011.
The NDP was able...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The slow build to the Orange Wave</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/01/the-slow-build-to-the-orange-wave/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/01/the-slow-build-to-the-orange-wave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 19:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Lavigne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=263301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brad Lavigne, a key advisor to Jack Layton, maps out the NDP&#8217;s climb from...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/01/the-slow-build-to-the-orange-wave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Brad Lavigne, a key advisor to Jack Layton, maps out the NDP&#8217;s climb from...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Wanton or officious intermeddling&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/25/wanton-or-officious-intermeddling/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/25/wanton-or-officious-intermeddling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Council of Canadians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garry Neil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robocalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter suppression]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=261390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under attack from the Conservative party, the Council of Canadians maintains its perspective.
Council...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/25/wanton-or-officious-intermeddling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Under attack from the Conservative party, the Council of Canadians maintains its perspective.
Council...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redo in Etobicoke Centre?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/18/redo-in-etobicoke-centre/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/18/redo-in-etobicoke-centre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borys Wrzesnewskyj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by-election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etobicoke centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred DeLorey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Opitz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=259828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Ontario court has ruled last year&#8217;s federal election result in Etobicoke Centre to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/18/redo-in-etobicoke-centre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	An Ontario court has ruled last year&#8217;s federal election result in Etobicoke Centre to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: One year later</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/02/the-commons-one-year-later/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/02/the-commons-one-year-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conrad Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=256305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems so long ago. A simpler time. Back when we could still tell ourselves that the F-35 was only going to cost $16 billion]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/02/the-commons-one-year-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	It seems so long ago. A simpler time. Back when we could still tell ourselves that the F-35 was only going to cost $16 billion
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>And now a word from Michael Ignatieff</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/02/and-now-a-word-from-michael-ignatieff/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/02/and-now-a-word-from-michael-ignatieff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 17:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=256313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the anniversary of the end of his first and last national campaign, Michael...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/02/and-now-a-word-from-michael-ignatieff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	On the anniversary of the end of his first and last national campaign, Michael...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>One year ago</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/02/one-year-ago-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/02/one-year-ago-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 12:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=256242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three-hundred and sixty-six days ago a rather remarkable election culminated in a rather remarkable...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/02/one-year-ago-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Three-hundred and sixty-six days ago a rather remarkable election culminated in a rather remarkable...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A study in voter suppression</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/a-study-in-voter-suppression/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/a-study-in-voter-suppression/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Council of Canadians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ekos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Graves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robocalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter suppression]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=254524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of its challenge to the election results in seven ridings, the Council...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/a-study-in-voter-suppression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	As part of its challenge to the election results in seven ridings, the Council...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What happened in Thunder Bay?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/what-happened-in-thunder-bay/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/what-happened-in-thunder-bay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annette Desgagne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Council of Canadians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nipissing-Timiskaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsive Marketing Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robocalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter suppression]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=253311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of its challenge to the election results in seven ridings, the Council...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/what-happened-in-thunder-bay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	As part of its challenge to the election results in seven ridings, the Council...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The hunt for Pierre Poutine comes up blank</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/17/the-hunt-for-pierre-poutine-comes-up-blank/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/17/the-hunt-for-pierre-poutine-comes-up-blank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glen mcgregor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guelph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racknine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robocalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rose Mary Woods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen maher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter suppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=252903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glen McGregor and Stephen Maher uncover a new twist.
Nearly a year after the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/17/the-hunt-for-pierre-poutine-comes-up-blank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Glen McGregor and Stephen Maher uncover a new twist.
Nearly a year after the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>And now a word from Pat Martin</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/16/and-now-a-word-from-pat-martin-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/16/and-now-a-word-from-pat-martin-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racknine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsive Marketing Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robocalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter suppression]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=252629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having previously clarified his remarks about Campaign Research and apologized for his statements about...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/16/and-now-a-word-from-pat-martin-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Having previously clarified his remarks about Campaign Research and apologized for his statements about...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another unsubstantiated smear?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/another-unsubstantiated-smear/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/another-unsubstantiated-smear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter suppression]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=251228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new complaint about misleading calls during the last election, this time from a...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/another-unsubstantiated-smear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A new complaint about misleading calls during the last election, this time from a...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
