<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; environment canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/environment-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:18:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The quiet cuts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/18/the-quiet-cuts-31/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/18/the-quiet-cuts-31/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiet cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=361561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientific research at Environment Canada takes a hit]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/18/the-quiet-cuts-31/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Scientific research at Environment Canada takes a hit
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would Canadians support a carbon tax?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/12/would-canadians-support-a-carbon-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/12/would-canadians-support-a-carbon-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-and-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Neuman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=359512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe. But if it were that easy, Stephane Dion would be PM]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/12/would-canadians-support-a-carbon-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Maybe. But if it were that easy, Stephane Dion would be PM
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth May, investigative reporter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/29/elizabeth-may-investigative-reporter/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/29/elizabeth-may-investigative-reporter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister's office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=344197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Green MP had the the final question this afternoon and rose with the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/29/elizabeth-may-investigative-reporter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Green MP had the the final question this afternoon and rose with the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most of Canada likely in for a green Christmas Day</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/17/most-of-canada-likely-in-for-a-green-christmas-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/17/most-of-canada-likely-in-for-a-green-christmas-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment canada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=329319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TORONTO &#8211; Waking up to a winter wonderland on Christmas Day will be more...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/17/most-of-canada-likely-in-for-a-green-christmas-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	TORONTO &#8211; Waking up to a winter wonderland on Christmas Day will be more...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What not to wear, Canadian edition: (Mother Nature dictates style)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/14/what-not-to-wear-canadian-edition-mother-nature-dictates-style/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/14/what-not-to-wear-canadian-edition-mother-nature-dictates-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment canada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=314525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Forget fashion magazines — a new survey suggests an increasing number of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/14/what-not-to-wear-canadian-edition-mother-nature-dictates-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Forget fashion magazines — a new survey suggests an increasing number of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The quiet cuts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/the-quiet-cuts-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/the-quiet-cuts-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike De Souza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter kent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiet cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Duck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=253572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike De Souza tallies the cuts at Environment Canada.
About $4 million in funding...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/the-quiet-cuts-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Mike De Souza tallies the cuts at Environment Canada.
About $4 million in funding...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The quiet cuts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/16/the-quiet-cuts-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/16/the-quiet-cuts-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian food inspection agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cfia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[listeriosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiet cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=234041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Environment Canada declared 60 scientists and researchers to be surplus.
Meanwhile, the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/16/the-quiet-cuts-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Last week, Environment Canada declared 60 scientists and researchers to be surplus.
Meanwhile, the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Environment Canada report warns of oilsands concerns</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/22/environment-canada-report-warns-of-oilsands-concerns/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/22/environment-canada-report-warns-of-oilsands-concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oilsands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=230918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['Secret' presentation calls contamination of Athabasca River 'a high-profile concern']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/22/environment-canada-report-warns-of-oilsands-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	'Secret' presentation calls contamination of Athabasca River 'a high-profile concern'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The quiet cuts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/15/the-quiet-cuts-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/15/the-quiet-cuts-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiet cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=215622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among various cuts at Environment Canada, the government is apparently about to eliminate an...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/15/the-quiet-cuts-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
	Among various cuts at Environment Canada, the government is apparently about to eliminate an...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has anyone in B.C. seen the sun?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/08/has-anyone-seen-the-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/08/has-anyone-seen-the-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunshine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tourism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=207543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gloomy weather in B.C. is taking its toll on tourism]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/08/has-anyone-seen-the-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Gloomy weather in B.C. is taking its toll on tourism
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The quiet cuts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/04/the-quiet-cuts-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/04/the-quiet-cuts-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter kent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiet cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=207592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Environment Canada is due to shed somewhere between 300 and 700 jobs.
He said...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/04/the-quiet-cuts-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
	Environment Canada is due to shed somewhere between 300 and 700 jobs.
He said...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Environment Canada rejects recycling, buys new office furniture</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/29/environment-canada-rejects-recycling-buys-new-office-furniture/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/29/environment-canada-rejects-recycling-buys-new-office-furniture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment canada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=207107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Department spent $140K to store furniture it didn’t keep]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/29/environment-canada-rejects-recycling-buys-new-office-furniture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	Department spent $140K to store furniture it didn’t keep
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is your home tornado-proof?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/05/storm-warnings/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/05/storm-warnings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Lunau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tornado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tornado Alley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=136451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everybody talks about tornadoes, but nobody does anything about protection]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/05/storm-warnings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Everybody talks about tornadoes, but nobody does anything about protection
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>So, does this mean we can finally be interested in something other than the economic crisis? Liveblogging the AG and Enviro Commissioners&#039; embargoed press conference</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/05/so-does-this-mean-we-can-finally-be-interested-in-something-other-than-the-economic-crisis-liveblogging-the-ag-and-enviro-commissioners-embargoed-press-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/05/so-does-this-mean-we-can-finally-be-interested-in-something-other-than-the-economic-crisis-liveblogging-the-ag-and-enviro-commissioners-embargoed-press-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bus pass boondoggle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott vaughan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheila Fraser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whatever happened to joanne gelin-- oh right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=33854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[12:03:53 PM
So you guys? Turns out it&#8217;s really too bad that we&#8217;re not...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/05/so-does-this-mean-we-can-finally-be-interested-in-something-other-than-the-economic-crisis-liveblogging-the-ag-and-enviro-commissioners-embargoed-press-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
	12:03:53 PM
So you guys? Turns out it&#8217;s really too bad that we&#8217;re not...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
