<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; ethics commissioner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/ethics-commissioner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:08:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Andrew Cash: History&#8217;s most-conflicted monster?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/22/andrew-cash-historys-most-conflicted-monster/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/22/andrew-cash-historys-most-conflicted-monster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dragon's Den]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=353285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['We haven't had any issues about Dragon's Den come up']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/22/andrew-cash-historys-most-conflicted-monster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	'We haven't had any issues about Dragon's Den come up'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter Van Loan searches for an ethical standard</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/31/peter-van-loan-continues-his-search-for-an-ethical-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/31/peter-van-loan-continues-his-search-for-an-ethical-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=345348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the Conflict of Interest Act and the PM's guide for ministers ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/31/peter-van-loan-continues-his-search-for-an-ethical-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Regarding the Conflict of Interest Act and the PM's guide for ministers 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Stephen Harper is exultant, Peter Van Loan is confused</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/30/the-commons-stephen-harper-is-exultant-peter-van-loan-is-confused/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/30/the-commons-stephen-harper-is-exultant-peter-van-loan-is-confused/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Lauzon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=344799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marking seven years with a misunderstanding of the rules]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/30/the-commons-stephen-harper-is-exultant-peter-van-loan-is-confused/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Marking seven years with a misunderstanding of the rules
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please stop pestering the CRTC</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/25/please-stop-pestering-the-crtc/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/25/please-stop-pestering-the-crtc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Carrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eve Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=342065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ethics commissioner issued two more compliance orders yesterday concerning letters sent to the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/25/please-stop-pestering-the-crtc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The ethics commissioner issued two more compliance orders yesterday concerning letters sent to the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;It was improper&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/18/it-was-improper/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/18/it-was-improper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=338952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ethics commissioner weighs in on Jim Flaherty's letter to the CRTC]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/18/it-was-improper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Ethics commissioner weighs in on Jim Flaherty's letter to the CRTC
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meanwhile, at the ethics commissioner&#8217;s office</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/17/meanwhile-at-the-ethics-commissioners-office/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/17/meanwhile-at-the-ethics-commissioners-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary dawson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=338575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I emailed the office of the ethics commissioner to ask if the commissioner was...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/17/meanwhile-at-the-ethics-commissioners-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	I emailed the office of the ethics commissioner to ask if the commissioner was...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nigel Wright and Barrick</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/12/nigel-wright-and-barrick/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/12/nigel-wright-and-barrick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrick Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister's office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=292430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ethics commissioner is going to follow up on CP&#8217;s investigation of contact between...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/12/nigel-wright-and-barrick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The ethics commissioner is going to follow up on CP&#8217;s investigation of contact between...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tony Clement cleared to continue pitching his constituents&#8217; wares to China</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/18/tony-clement-cleared-to-continue-pitching-his-constituents-wares-to-china/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/18/tony-clement-cleared-to-continue-pitching-his-constituents-wares-to-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=275376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ethics commissioner clears Tony Clement in the case of the promotional video, but...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/18/tony-clement-cleared-to-continue-pitching-his-constituents-wares-to-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The ethics commissioner clears Tony Clement in the case of the promotional video, but...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christian Paradis&#8217; choice of lodging</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/27/christian-paradis-choice-of-lodging/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/27/christian-paradis-choice-of-lodging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Paradis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict of interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcel aubut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec Nordiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahim Jaffer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=248585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less than a week after he was scolded by the ethics commissioner for his...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/27/christian-paradis-choice-of-lodging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Less than a week after he was scolded by the ethics commissioner for his...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;No substance&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/21/no-substance/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/21/no-substance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helena Guergis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary dawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCMP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=139571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Helena Guergis&#8217; lawyer says the RCMP has effectively cleared his client.
At last report,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/21/no-substance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Helena Guergis&#8217; lawyer says the RCMP has effectively cleared his client.
At last report,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meanwhile, in Guergis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/12/meanwhile-in-guergis/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/12/meanwhile-in-guergis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 03:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alf Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derrick Snowdy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government operations committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helena Guergis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nazim Gillani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister's office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahim Jaffer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=125939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The private investigator says the Prime Minister&#8217;s Office did not accurately report to the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/12/meanwhile-in-guergis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
	The private investigator says the Prime Minister&#8217;s Office did not accurately report to the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fight the real enemy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/07/fight-the-real-enemy-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/07/fight-the-real-enemy-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 13:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derek Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary dawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun & Partners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=125012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amid talk yesterday of Rahim Jaffer, Helena Guergis, Devinder Shory, lobbyists, religion, ideology, firearms,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/07/fight-the-real-enemy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>214</slash:comments>
	Amid talk yesterday of Rahim Jaffer, Helena Guergis, Devinder Shory, lobbyists, religion, ideology, firearms,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>You are free to continue issuing giant novelty cheques</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/29/you-are-free-to-continue-issuing-giant-novelty-cheques/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/29/you-are-free-to-continue-issuing-giant-novelty-cheques/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giant novelty cheques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary dawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=123255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ethics commissioner concludes that the use of giant novelty cheques by unelected officials...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/29/you-are-free-to-continue-issuing-giant-novelty-cheques/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
	The ethics commissioner concludes that the use of giant novelty cheques by unelected officials...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tonight in all that and still more</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/23/tonight-in-all-that-and-still-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/23/tonight-in-all-that-and-still-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derrick Snowdy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helena Guergis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Jordan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary dawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Glemaud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahim Jaffer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=122105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ms. Guergis seems interested in being the Conservative candidate for Simcoe-Grey whenever the next...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/23/tonight-in-all-that-and-still-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
	Ms. Guergis seems interested in being the Conservative candidate for Simcoe-Grey whenever the next...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>This afternoon in Guergis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/20/this-afternoon-in-guergis-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/20/this-afternoon-in-guergis-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derrick Snowdy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helena Guergis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahim Jaffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCMP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=121391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though reported last night to have decided not to proceed with an investigation of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/20/this-afternoon-in-guergis-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	Though reported last night to have decided not to proceed with an investigation of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tonight in Guergis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/19/tonight-in-guergis-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/19/tonight-in-guergis-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 03:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helena Guergis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Rubel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary dawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Glemaud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahim Jaffer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=121322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ethics commissioner decides, for the second time, that she won&#8217;t investigate. An attempt...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/19/tonight-in-guergis-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
	The ethics commissioner decides, for the second time, that she won&#8217;t investigate. An attempt...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>This afternoon in Guergis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/13/this-afternoon-in-guergis/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/13/this-afternoon-in-guergis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helena Guergis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary dawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahim Jaffer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=120226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Jaffer used Ms. Guergis&#8217; ministerial chauffeur. The ethics commissioner won&#8217;t investigate whatever allegations...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/13/this-afternoon-in-guergis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
	Mr. Jaffer used Ms. Guergis&#8217; ministerial chauffeur. The ethics commissioner won&#8217;t investigate whatever allegations...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: A mysterious stranger enters the story</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/12/the-commons-a-mysterious-stranger-enters-the-story/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/12/the-commons-a-mysterious-stranger-enters-the-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alfonso Gagliano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anita Neville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Elliott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helena Guergis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Chretien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Raitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcel Proulx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Holland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahim Jaffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=120061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allegations about Guergis "came forth from a third party"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/12/the-commons-a-mysterious-stranger-enters-the-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
	Allegations about Guergis "came forth from a third party"
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Bring it on</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/27/the-commons-bring-it-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/27/the-commons-bring-it-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David McGuinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marlene Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Men and women of principle can only be pushed so far]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/27/the-commons-bring-it-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
	Men and women of principle can only be pushed so far
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chequegate and the Ethics Commish</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/chequegate-and-the-ethics-commish/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/chequegate-and-the-ethics-commish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Potter Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;the very fact that Chequegate is an ethical matter is precisely why it doesn&#8217;t...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/chequegate-and-the-ethics-commish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	&#8230;the very fact that Chequegate is an ethical matter is precisely why it doesn&#8217;t...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruby Dhalla and the ethics commissioner: looks like a dead end</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/08/ruby-dhalla-and-the-ethics-commissioner-looks-like-a-dead-end/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/08/ruby-dhalla-and-the-ethics-commissioner-looks-like-a-dead-end/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 23:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest Code for Members of the House of Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duff conacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary dawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruby Dhalla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=55985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ruby Dhalla and her lawyer suggest new layers of complexity and even conspiracy in...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/08/ruby-dhalla-and-the-ethics-commissioner-looks-like-a-dead-end/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
	Ruby Dhalla and her lawyer suggest new layers of complexity and even conspiracy in...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Her side</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/08/her-side/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/08/her-side/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Levitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary dawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruby Dhalla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=55893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ruby Dhalla press conference—an unequivocal denial]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/08/her-side/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
	The Ruby Dhalla press conference—an unequivocal denial
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please investigate me</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/07/please-investigate-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/07/please-investigate-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 04:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary dawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruby Dhalla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=55355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ruby Dhalla calls in the ethics commissioner....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/07/please-investigate-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	Ruby Dhalla calls in the ethics commissioner....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>the problem is the office, not the officer</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/05/19/the-problem-is-the-office-not-the-officer/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/05/19/the-problem-is-the-office-not-the-officer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Potter Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=1116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More people are clueing in to just what a bad idea the office of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/05/19/the-problem-is-the-office-not-the-officer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	More people are clueing in to just what a bad idea the office of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The scourge of Strategic Lawsuits Against Parliamentary Participation: Liveblogging the Ethics Committee</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/05/13/the-scourge-of-strategic-lawsuits-against-parliamentary-participation-liveblogging-the-ethics-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/05/13/the-scourge-of-strategic-lawsuits-against-parliamentary-participation-liveblogging-the-ethics-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Thibault]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>3:31:20 PM ...</strong>
So I have a confession to make: I was actually going to]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/05/13/the-scourge-of-strategic-lawsuits-against-parliamentary-participation-liveblogging-the-ethics-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<strong>3:31:20 PM ...</strong>
So I have a confession to make: I was actually going to
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ethics commish: making things worse since 2004</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/05/13/ethics-commish-making-things-worse-since-2004/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/05/13/ethics-commish-making-things-worse-since-2004/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Potter Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William Kaplan has a good op-ed in today&#8217;s Globe, in which he questions ethics...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/05/13/ethics-commish-making-things-worse-since-2004/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	William Kaplan has a good op-ed in today&#8217;s Globe, in which he questions ethics...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
