<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; F-35 fighter jet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/f-35-fighter-jet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 00:59:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Losing soldiers was a shock to everybody’s system&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/on-lessons-from-afghanistan-the-f-35-controversy-and-cutting-military-spending-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/on-lessons-from-afghanistan-the-f-35-controversy-and-cutting-military-spending-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 fighter jet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=355208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In conversation with Defence Minister Peter MacKay on Afghanistan, the F-35 controversy and military spending]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/on-lessons-from-afghanistan-the-f-35-controversy-and-cutting-military-spending-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In conversation with Defence Minister Peter MacKay on Afghanistan, the F-35 controversy and military spending
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Defence to buy fewer bombs if F-35 selected as new air force fighter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/14/national-defence-to-buy-fewer-bombs-if-f-35-selected-as-new-air-force-fighter/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/14/national-defence-to-buy-fewer-bombs-if-f-35-selected-as-new-air-force-fighter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 fighter jet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=351041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; If the Harper government proceeds with its controversial F-35 program, the stealth...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/14/national-defence-to-buy-fewer-bombs-if-f-35-selected-as-new-air-force-fighter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; If the Harper government proceeds with its controversial F-35 program, the stealth...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada to talk to allies, competitors in options to replace CF-18s, sources</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/24/canada-to-talk-to-allies-competitors-in-options-to-replace-cf-18s-sources/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/24/canada-to-talk-to-allies-competitors-in-options-to-replace-cf-18s-sources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 fighter jet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=318967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; The agency overseeing the replacement of the country&#8217;s CF-18s intends to talk...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/24/canada-to-talk-to-allies-competitors-in-options-to-replace-cf-18s-sources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; The agency overseeing the replacement of the country&#8217;s CF-18s intends to talk...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy to see Oda go? Really, you shouldn&#8217;t be.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/05/happy-to-see-oda-go-really-you-shouldnt-be/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/05/happy-to-see-oda-go-really-you-shouldnt-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Goldenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bev Oda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 fighter jet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minister of international cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=272279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her departure had little to do with anything relevant]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/05/happy-to-see-oda-go-really-you-shouldnt-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Her departure had little to do with anything relevant
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The opposition must ask better questions about the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/02/the-opposition-must-learn-to-ask-better-questions-about-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/02/the-opposition-must-learn-to-ask-better-questions-about-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 21:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 fighter jet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 secretariat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public accounts committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Fonberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=256394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's a good one: Why is this jet the only possible future fighter aircraft for the Canadian Forces?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/02/the-opposition-must-learn-to-ask-better-questions-about-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Here's a good one: Why is this jet the only possible future fighter aircraft for the Canadian Forces?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Japan chooses F-35 jet as air defence mainstay</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/20/japan-chooses-f-35-jet-as-air-defense-mainstay/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/20/japan-chooses-f-35-jet-as-air-defense-mainstay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 fighter jet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=230629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fantino welcomes Tokyo's pick]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/20/japan-chooses-f-35-jet-as-air-defense-mainstay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Fantino welcomes Tokyo's pick
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>F-35 jet faces new delays</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/02/f-35-jet-faces-new-delays/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/02/f-35-jet-faces-new-delays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 fighter jet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=228242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. vice-admiral 'surprised' by swelling cost]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/02/f-35-jet-faces-new-delays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	U.S. vice-admiral 'surprised' by swelling cost
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget woes may kill U.S. F-35 plans</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/15/budget-woes-may-kill-u-s-f-35-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/15/budget-woes-may-kill-u-s-f-35-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 fighter jet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=225330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cancellation could impact Canada's purchase]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/15/budget-woes-may-kill-u-s-f-35-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	Cancellation could impact Canada's purchase
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>F-35 jets not fit for pilot training, U.S. study finds</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/01/f-35-jets-not-fit-for-pilot-training-u-s-study-finds/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/01/f-35-jets-not-fit-for-pilot-training-u-s-study-finds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 fighter jet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=222894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pentagon’s top weapons tester sees risk of "serious mishap"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/01/f-35-jets-not-fit-for-pilot-training-u-s-study-finds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	Pentagon’s top weapons tester sees risk of "serious mishap"
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New multi-billion dollar fighter jets ill-equipped for Arctic use</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/24/new-multi-billion-dollar-fighter-jets-ill-equipped-for-arctic-use/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/24/new-multi-billion-dollar-fighter-jets-ill-equipped-for-arctic-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 fighter jet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=221328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[F-35 jets can’t communicate from Canada’s north]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/24/new-multi-billion-dollar-fighter-jets-ill-equipped-for-arctic-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	F-35 jets can’t communicate from Canada’s north
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joint Strike Fighter costs are soaring</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/13/costs-are-soaring-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/13/costs-are-soaring-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 fighter jet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=151354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The F-35 project is plagued by cost overruns. But Ottawa says it’s insulated from sticker shock.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/13/costs-are-soaring-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The F-35 project is plagued by cost overruns. But Ottawa says it’s insulated from sticker shock.
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
