<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; F-35</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/f-35/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:16:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Think of the F-35 as a Senate with wings</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/07/the-commons-think-of-the-f-35-as-a-senate-with-wings/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/07/the-commons-think-of-the-f-35-as-a-senate-with-wings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 22:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Kellway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=358194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though at least the Senate can operate in cloudy weather]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/07/the-commons-think-of-the-f-35-as-a-senate-with-wings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Though at least the Senate can operate in cloudy weather
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opposition demands F-35 be dropped after leaked Pentagon report cites more flaws</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/opposition-demands-f-35-be-dropped-after-leaked-pentagon-report-cites-more-flaws/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/opposition-demands-f-35-be-dropped-after-leaked-pentagon-report-cites-more-flaws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 03:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=357844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Opposition parties say the Harper government should exclude the F-35 from its...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/opposition-demands-f-35-be-dropped-after-leaked-pentagon-report-cites-more-flaws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Opposition parties say the Harper government should exclude the F-35 from its...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35: The Conservatives were &#8216;dead right&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/22/the-f-35-the-conservatives-were-dead-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/22/the-f-35-the-conservatives-were-dead-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gary goodyear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KPMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=340320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might have thought that the auditor general&#8217;s report and the KPMG audit amounted...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/22/the-f-35-the-conservatives-were-dead-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	You might have thought that the auditor general&#8217;s report and the KPMG audit amounted...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dan Ross on the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/21/dan-ross-on-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/21/dan-ross-on-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister's office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=340053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan Ross, the former assistant deputy minister of defence materiel, tells Postmedia that the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/21/dan-ross-on-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Dan Ross, the former assistant deputy minister of defence materiel, tells Postmedia that the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harper on the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/22/harper-on-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/22/harper-on-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Horgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dawna Friesen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=331389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Prime Minister&#8217;s interview with Global, Mr. Harper&#8217;s explanation of the F-35 procurement....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/22/harper-on-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	From the Prime Minister&#8217;s interview with Global, Mr. Harper&#8217;s explanation of the F-35 procurement....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kevin Page on the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/17/kevin-page-on-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/17/kevin-page-on-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Clark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=329309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Parliamentary Budget Officer considers the F-35 experience.
<strong>Tom Clark:...</strong> Let’s stick with the]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/17/kevin-page-on-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Parliamentary Budget Officer considers the F-35 experience.
<strong>Tom Clark:...</strong> Let’s stick with the
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mythbusting the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/15/mythbusting-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/15/mythbusting-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=328683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaron Wherry checks out the facts in the spin]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/15/mythbusting-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Aaron Wherry checks out the facts in the spin
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q&amp;A with Thomas Mulcair</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/14/qa-thomas-mulcair/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/14/qa-thomas-mulcair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid rain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-377]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-and-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNOOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murray Rankin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nycole Turmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=328551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The leader of the NDP talks to Aaron Wherry about Layton's legacy, carbon pricing, the Liberal leadership race and Twitter ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/14/qa-thomas-mulcair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The leader of the NDP talks to Aaron Wherry about Layton's legacy, carbon pricing, the Liberal leadership race and Twitter 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Out with the old F-35 logic, in with the new</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/14/out-with-the-old-f-35-logic-in-with-the-new/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/14/out-with-the-old-f-35-logic-in-with-the-new/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Horgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=328484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colin Horgan finds that an old accounting for the F-35 procurement seems to have...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/14/out-with-the-old-f-35-logic-in-with-the-new/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Colin Horgan finds that an old accounting for the F-35 procurement seems to have...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The silver lining in the F-35 fiasco</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/13/theres-a-silver-lining-in-the-cloudy-f-35-fiasco/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/13/theres-a-silver-lining-in-the-cloudy-f-35-fiasco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defence Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fighter jet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada’s democratic institutions performed well, and are defending taxpayer interests]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/13/theres-a-silver-lining-in-the-cloudy-f-35-fiasco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Canada’s democratic institutions performed well, and are defending taxpayer interests
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35: Kind of almost like a flying national television, radio and Internet network</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/13/the-f-35-kind-of-almost-like-a-flying-national-television-radio-and-internet-network/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/13/the-f-35-kind-of-almost-like-a-flying-national-television-radio-and-internet-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Zimmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A la Dean Del Mastro, Conservative MP Bob Zimmer attempts to put the F-35...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/13/the-f-35-kind-of-almost-like-a-flying-national-television-radio-and-internet-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A la Dean Del Mastro, Conservative MP Bob Zimmer attempts to put the F-35...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>F-35: Hubris is a Greek word that means &#8216;what just happened&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/f-35-hubris-is-a-greek-word-that-means-what-just-happened/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/f-35-hubris-is-a-greek-word-that-means-what-just-happened/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter MacKay and the PM should hang their heads in shame]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/f-35-hubris-is-a-greek-word-that-means-what-just-happened/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Peter MacKay and the PM should hang their heads in shame
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The reset button</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/the-reset-button/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/the-reset-button/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 03:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue Allan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaron Wherry catches you up on a day in F-35 news]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/the-reset-button/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Aaron Wherry catches you up on a day in F-35 news
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A clearer path for fighter jets, but a grim day for Peter MacKay</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/a-clearer-path-for-jet-fighters-but-a-grim-day-for-mackay/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/a-clearer-path-for-jet-fighters-but-a-grim-day-for-mackay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KPMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes explains why rebooting the plan is not as easy as pressing a button ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/a-clearer-path-for-jet-fighters-but-a-grim-day-for-mackay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes explains why rebooting the plan is not as easy as pressing a button 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35 audit</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/the-f-35-audit/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/the-f-35-audit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KPMG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#8220;Next Generation Fighter Capability Annual Update&#8221; is here. The first CP dispatch from...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/the-f-35-audit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The &#8220;Next Generation Fighter Capability Annual Update&#8221; is here. The first CP dispatch from...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ottawa &#8216;hits reset&#8217; on new jet fighters; report warns of soaring costs</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/independent-report-says-9-billion-may-not-be-enough-to-buy-65-f-35s/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/independent-report-says-9-billion-may-not-be-enough-to-buy-65-f-35s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KPMG says jets may be too expensive for Defence department]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/independent-report-says-9-billion-may-not-be-enough-to-buy-65-f-35s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	KPMG says jets may be too expensive for Defence department
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35: The way we were</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/the-f-35-the-way-we-were/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/the-f-35-the-way-we-were/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Ring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahead of the release of the KPMG audit, here is the transcript of the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/the-f-35-the-way-we-were/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Ahead of the release of the KPMG audit, here is the transcript of the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Update on the Seven-Point Plan on replacing Canada’s fighter jets&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/update-on-the-seven-point-plan-on-replacing-canadas-fighter-jets/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/update-on-the-seven-point-plan-on-replacing-canadas-fighter-jets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government is promising a statement from Rona Ambrose and Peter MacKay at 3:15pm,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/update-on-the-seven-point-plan-on-replacing-canadas-fighter-jets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The government is promising a statement from Rona Ambrose and Peter MacKay at 3:15pm,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Thomas Mulcair attempts to conduct an intervention</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/11/the-commons-thomas-mulcair-attempts-to-conduct-an-intervention/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/11/the-commons-thomas-mulcair-attempts-to-conduct-an-intervention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=326958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Desk-thumping and 'fear mongering' about the F-35]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/11/the-commons-thomas-mulcair-attempts-to-conduct-an-intervention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Desk-thumping and 'fear mongering' about the F-35
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What was the PM talking about?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/what-was-the-prime-minister-talking-about/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/what-was-the-prime-minister-talking-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=326407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What did Stephen Harper mean when he talked about "ripping up those contracts?"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/what-was-the-prime-minister-talking-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	What did Stephen Harper mean when he talked about "ripping up those contracts?"
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Back to the future of the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/the-commons-back-to-the-future-of-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/the-commons-back-to-the-future-of-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Kellway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=326261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The opposition insists on living in the past]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/the-commons-back-to-the-future-of-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The opposition insists on living in the past
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Alexander has the worst job in Ottawa</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/chris-alexander-has-the-worst-job-in-ottawa/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/chris-alexander-has-the-worst-job-in-ottawa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=326097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For whatever reason, Chris Alexander, the parliamentary secretary to the minister of defence, has...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/chris-alexander-has-the-worst-job-in-ottawa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	For whatever reason, Chris Alexander, the parliamentary secretary to the minister of defence, has...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mulcair on the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/mulcair-on-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/mulcair-on-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Clark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=325903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the NDP leader&#8217;s interview with Tom Clark on the West Block.
<strong>Tom Clark:...</strong>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/mulcair-on-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	From the NDP leader&#8217;s interview with Tom Clark on the West Block.
<strong>Tom Clark:...</strong>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35: Cheap by comparison to a national health care system</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/the-f-35-cheap-by-comparison-to-a-national-health-care-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/the-f-35-cheap-by-comparison-to-a-national-health-care-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dean del Mastro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=325901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dean Del Mastro attempts to put the F-35 in perspective.
If we were to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/the-f-35-cheap-by-comparison-to-a-national-health-care-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Dean Del Mastro attempts to put the F-35 in perspective.
If we were to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The latest on the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/the-latest-on-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/the-latest-on-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 03:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KPMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=325601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reuters, the Canadian Press, Star, Globe and CTV report that a four-person panel will...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/the-latest-on-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Reuters, the Canadian Press, Star, Globe and CTV report that a four-person panel will...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An F-35 panel, great—but the hard decisions still loom</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/an-f-35-panel-great-but-the-hard-decisions-still-loom/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/an-f-35-panel-great-but-the-hard-decisions-still-loom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fighter jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KPMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Military College]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=325455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on fresh starts and tough choices ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/an-f-35-panel-great-but-the-hard-decisions-still-loom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on fresh starts and tough choices 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;The whole government should resign&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/the-whole-government-should-resign/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/the-whole-government-should-resign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 18:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=325155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An excerpt from NDP MP Jack Harris&#8217; scrum with reporters after QP.
<strong>Reporter:...</strong> The]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/the-whole-government-should-resign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	An excerpt from NDP MP Jack Harris&#8217; scrum with reporters after QP.
<strong>Reporter:...</strong> The
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter MacKay gets an official endorsement</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/peter-mackay-gets-an-official-endorsement/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/peter-mackay-gets-an-official-endorsement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister's office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=325145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Prime Minister&#8217;s Office tweets its &#8220;full confidence&#8221; in the Defence Minister....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/peter-mackay-gets-an-official-endorsement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Prime Minister&#8217;s Office tweets its &#8220;full confidence&#8221; in the Defence Minister....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the seven-point plan be enough to prevent a Russian invasion?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/will-the-seven-point-plan-be-enough-to-prevent-a-russian-invasion/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/will-the-seven-point-plan-be-enough-to-prevent-a-russian-invasion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denis coderre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacques Gourde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathieu Ravignat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=325100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning&#8217;s QP has just concluded. The F-35 procurement was, predictably, a particular point...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/will-the-seven-point-plan-be-enough-to-prevent-a-russian-invasion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	This morning&#8217;s QP has just concluded. The F-35 procurement was, predictably, a particular point...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>On second thought?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/on-second-thought-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/on-second-thought-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laurie Hawn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=325064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The planning and priorities committee of the cabinet is presently meeting on Parliament Hill,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/on-second-thought-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The planning and priorities committee of the cabinet is presently meeting on Parliament Hill,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s going on with the F-35?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/whats-going-on-with-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/whats-going-on-with-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=324979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Postmedia now reports that a final decision will be made this morning, but there...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/whats-going-on-with-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Postmedia now reports that a final decision will be made this morning, but there...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Our comprehensive, transparent approach&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/our-comprehensive-transparent-approach/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/our-comprehensive-transparent-approach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 03:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=324858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A statement issued just now by Rona Ambrose&#8217;s office.
The Government has received the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/our-comprehensive-transparent-approach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A statement issued just now by Rona Ambrose&#8217;s office.
The Government has received the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35: So much for all that?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/the-f-35-so-much-for-all-that/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/the-f-35-so-much-for-all-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue Allan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Den Tandt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister's office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=324788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CTV reports that an independent audit of the proposed F-35 procurement estimates a total...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/the-f-35-so-much-for-all-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	CTV reports that an independent audit of the proposed F-35 procurement estimates a total...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Rona Ambrose slips on a fifth generation banana peel</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/05/the-commons-rona-ambrose-slips-on-a-fifth-generation-banana-peel/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/05/the-commons-rona-ambrose-slips-on-a-fifth-generation-banana-peel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Kellway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=324078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Public Works Minister commits a Kinsley gaffe]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/05/the-commons-rona-ambrose-slips-on-a-fifth-generation-banana-peel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Public Works Minister commits a Kinsley gaffe
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada to talk to allies, competitors in options to replace CF-18s, sources</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/24/canada-to-talk-to-allies-competitors-in-options-to-replace-cf-18s-sources/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/24/canada-to-talk-to-allies-competitors-in-options-to-replace-cf-18s-sources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 fighter jet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=318967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; The agency overseeing the replacement of the country&#8217;s CF-18s intends to talk...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/24/canada-to-talk-to-allies-competitors-in-options-to-replace-cf-18s-sources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; The agency overseeing the replacement of the country&#8217;s CF-18s intends to talk...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Harper government going to consider alternatives to the F-35?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/23/is-the-harper-government-going-to-consider-alternatives-to-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/23/is-the-harper-government-going-to-consider-alternatives-to-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Hornet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=306132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Canadian Press talked to the commander of the Air Force and came away...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/23/is-the-harper-government-going-to-consider-alternatives-to-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Canadian Press talked to the commander of the Air Force and came away...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Defence says head of air force misspoke on F-35 options</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/23/national-defence-says-head-of-air-force-misspoke-on-f-35-options/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/23/national-defence-says-head-of-air-force-misspoke-on-f-35-options/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=306092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA - A statement from National Defence says the head of the air force misspoke when saying the Harper government had yet to direct the air force to look at aircraft other than the contentious F-35 stealth fighter.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/23/national-defence-says-head-of-air-force-misspoke-on-f-35-options/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA - A statement from National Defence says the head of the air force misspoke when saying the Harper government had yet to direct the air force to look at aircraft other than the contentious F-35 stealth fighter.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>RCAF yet to be ordered to look at aircraft options other than F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/22/rcaf-yet-to-be-ordered-to-look-at-aircraft-options-other-than-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/22/rcaf-yet-to-be-ordered-to-look-at-aircraft-options-other-than-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=305966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; More than six months after the auditor general delivered his scathing critique...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/22/rcaf-yet-to-be-ordered-to-look-at-aircraft-options-other-than-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; More than six months after the auditor general delivered his scathing critique...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The world of spin</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/25/the-world-of-spin/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/25/the-world-of-spin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=296576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[W5 goes looking for answers on the F-35.
Silence from the Minister of Defence....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/25/the-world-of-spin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	W5 goes looking for answers on the F-35.
Silence from the Minister of Defence....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today in transparency</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/11/today-in-transparency/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/11/today-in-transparency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privilege]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=292284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The auditor general&#8217;s office, in order to fulfill an access to information requests, wants...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/11/today-in-transparency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The auditor general&#8217;s office, in order to fulfill an access to information requests, wants...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The gynecological case for the Avro Arrow</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/11/the-gynecological-case-for-the-avro-arrow/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/11/the-gynecological-case-for-the-avro-arrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avro Arrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis MacKenzie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=292260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[General Lewis MacKenzie concludes his condemnation of the F-35 and argument for the Avro...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/11/the-gynecological-case-for-the-avro-arrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	General Lewis MacKenzie concludes his condemnation of the F-35 and argument for the Avro...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>House of Commons takes auditor general to court over access to F-35 information</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/11/house-of-commons-takes-auditor-general-to-court-over-access-to-f-35-information/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/11/house-of-commons-takes-auditor-general-to-court-over-access-to-f-35-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=292081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House of Commons is taking auditor general Micheal Ferguson to court in an...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/11/house-of-commons-takes-auditor-general-to-court-over-access-to-f-35-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The House of Commons is taking auditor general Micheal Ferguson to court in an...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enter the Avro?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/10/enter-the-avro/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/10/enter-the-avro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avro Arrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis MacKenzie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Clark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=291599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maj0r-General Lewis MacKenzie says a new Avro Arrow should be considered, but figures the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/10/enter-the-avro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Maj0r-General Lewis MacKenzie says a new Avro Arrow should be considered, but figures the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better than Congress</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/07/better-than-congress/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/07/better-than-congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winslow Wheeler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=290972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Winslow Wheeler, who participated in the NDP&#8217;s F-35 hearings last month, finds that MPs...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/07/better-than-congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Winslow Wheeler, who participated in the NDP&#8217;s F-35 hearings last month, finds that MPs...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another one for the F-35 file</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/29/another-one-for-the-f-35-file/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/29/another-one-for-the-f-35-file/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=287088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While digging around for something else this week, I happened to come across the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/29/another-one-for-the-f-35-file/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	While digging around for something else this week, I happened to come across the...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
