<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; F-35s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/f-35s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Auditor and budget officer&#8217;s F-35 critiques watered down in Commons report</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/12/auditor-and-budget-officers-f-35-critiques-watered-down-in-commons-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/12/auditor-and-budget-officers-f-35-critiques-watered-down-in-commons-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=349462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Stinging criticism of the political and bureaucratic fiasco surrounding the F-35 by...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/12/auditor-and-budget-officers-f-35-critiques-watered-down-in-commons-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Stinging criticism of the political and bureaucratic fiasco surrounding the F-35 by...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Possible cut in U.S. F-35 orders &#8216;key&#8217; concern for aerospace industry</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/07/possible-cut-in-u-s-f-35-orders-key-concern-for-aerospace-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/07/possible-cut-in-u-s-f-35-orders-key-concern-for-aerospace-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=348238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; There&#8217;s been hand-wringing within the federal bureaucracy about whether Canadian aerospace companies...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/07/possible-cut-in-u-s-f-35-orders-key-concern-for-aerospace-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; There&#8217;s been hand-wringing within the federal bureaucracy about whether Canadian aerospace companies...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Nations first: the political agenda as the House returns</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/28/first-nations-first-the-political-agenda-as-the-house-returns/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/28/first-nations-first-the-political-agenda-as-the-house-returns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada-EU trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idle No More]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Part of Canada leadership race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theresa Spence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=342449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes considers the PM's To Do list at the start of 2013 ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/28/first-nations-first-the-political-agenda-as-the-house-returns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes considers the PM's To Do list at the start of 2013 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated: Harper government asks F-35 rivals for information on what their fighters can do</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/25/harper-government-asks-f-35-rivals-for-information-on-what-their-fighters-can-do/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/25/harper-government-asks-f-35-rivals-for-information-on-what-their-fighters-can-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=342361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; A questionnaire meant to gauge what options exist to replace the air...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/25/harper-government-asks-f-35-rivals-for-information-on-what-their-fighters-can-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; A questionnaire meant to gauge what options exist to replace the air...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>We mean it about the F-35s. Except when we don&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/13/we-mean-it-except-when-we-dont/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/13/we-mean-it-except-when-we-dont/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BHP Billiton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNOOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petronas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potash corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progress Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Wells on Stephen Harper's recent reversals]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/13/we-mean-it-except-when-we-dont/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Paul Wells on Stephen Harper's recent reversals
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avro Arrow floated as fighter jet alternative</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/09/avro-arrow-floated-as-fighter-jet-alternative/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/09/avro-arrow-floated-as-fighter-jet-alternative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2012 22:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=291588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Avro Arrow was put forward as an alternative to the purchase of F-35 stealth fighter jets, according to documents obtained by Global News. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/09/avro-arrow-floated-as-fighter-jet-alternative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Avro Arrow was put forward as an alternative to the purchase of F-35 stealth fighter jets, according to documents obtained by Global News. 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which part of the Bible covers jet fighter procurement?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/09/which-part-of-the-bible-covers-jet-fighter-procurement/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/09/which-part-of-the-bible-covers-jet-fighter-procurement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Byers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stewart Webb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=239027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julian Fantino, the associate minister of defence, responding this afternoon to questions from the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/09/which-part-of-the-bible-covers-jet-fighter-procurement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Julian Fantino, the associate minister of defence, responding this afternoon to questions from the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: The F-35 has as many explanations as problems</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/24/the-commons-the-f-35-has-as-many-explanations-as-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/24/the-commons-the-f-35-has-as-many-explanations-as-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Kellaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nycole Turmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Dawn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=221399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest twist involves the small matter of whether or not the expensive aircraft will be useless]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/24/the-commons-the-f-35-has-as-many-explanations-as-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	The latest twist involves the small matter of whether or not the expensive aircraft will be useless
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russian jets could top F-35s: report</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/07/russian-jets-could-top-f-35s-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/07/russian-jets-could-top-f-35s-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=213465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada’s new jets defeated in simulation]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/07/russian-jets-could-top-f-35s-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
	Canada’s new jets defeated in simulation
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The sales job</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/22/the-sales-job/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/22/the-sales-job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Pugliese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Pugliese explains how the government hopes to sell the purchase of new F-35s....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/22/the-sales-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
	David Pugliese explains how the government hopes to sell the purchase of new F-35s....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Defence policy if necessary, but not necessarily defence policy&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/19/defence-policy-if-necessary-but-not-necessarily-defence-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/19/defence-policy-if-necessary-but-not-necessarily-defence-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camp Mirage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randall Wakelam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Arab Emirates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Randall Wakelam wonders about what we&#8217;re doing and where we&#8217;re going.
Conventional wisdom was...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/19/defence-policy-if-necessary-but-not-necessarily-defence-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	Randall Wakelam wonders about what we&#8217;re doing and where we&#8217;re going.
Conventional wisdom was...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talking F-35s with a former head of the air force</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/29/talking-f-35s-with-a-former-head-of-the-air-force/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/29/talking-f-35s-with-a-former-head-of-the-air-force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lieutenant-General Angus Watt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=155136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lieutenant-General Angus Watt retired about a year ago as chief of air staff in...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/29/talking-f-35s-with-a-former-head-of-the-air-force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Lieutenant-General Angus Watt retired about a year ago as chief of air staff in...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could Canada take bids on fighter jets and also keep the F-35 option open?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/27/could-canada-take-bids-on-fighter-jets-and-also-keep-the-f-35-option-open/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/27/could-canada-take-bids-on-fighter-jets-and-also-keep-the-f-35-option-open/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rideau Institutie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Staples]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=154696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff&#8217;s vow that as prime minister he would hold an open...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/27/could-canada-take-bids-on-fighter-jets-and-also-keep-the-f-35-option-open/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff&#8217;s vow that as prime minister he would hold an open...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Auditor General&#039;s report and Canada&#039;s curious F-35 deal</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/26/the-auditor-generals-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/26/the-auditor-generals-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheila Fraser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=154560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some disturbing findings surface in Sheila Fraser's audit]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/26/the-auditor-generals-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Some disturbing findings surface in Sheila Fraser's audit
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
