<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; GDP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/gdp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:39:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should the recent GDP slump affect the 2013 federal budget?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/should-the-recent-gdp-slump-affect-the-2013-federal-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/should-the-recent-gdp-slump-affect-the-2013-federal-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=356294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The short answer is no. So is the long answer. Here's why.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/should-the-recent-gdp-slump-affect-the-2013-federal-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The short answer is no. So is the long answer. Here's why.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economy crawled forward 0.6 per cent in the last three months of the year</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/01/economy-crawled-forward-0-6-per-cent-in-last-three-months-of-the-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/01/economy-crawled-forward-0-6-per-cent-in-last-three-months-of-the-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=355781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2012 growth was 1.8 per cent, down from 2.6 per cent last year]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/01/economy-crawled-forward-0-6-per-cent-in-last-three-months-of-the-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	2012 growth was 1.8 per cent, down from 2.6 per cent last year
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic growth in late 2012 on track to be lower than predicted: Bank of Canada</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/25/economic-growth-in-late-2012-on-track-to-be-lower-than-predicted-bank-of-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/25/economic-growth-in-late-2012-on-track-to-be-lower-than-predicted-bank-of-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Economic growth in the last three months of 2012 will likely come in below...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/25/economic-growth-in-late-2012-on-track-to-be-lower-than-predicted-bank-of-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Economic growth in the last three months of 2012 will likely come in below...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The U.S. economy shrank—better news than you think</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/30/the-u-s-economy-shrank-better-news-than-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/30/the-u-s-economy-shrank-better-news-than-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=344444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slowdown likely to be short-lived, say experts]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/30/the-u-s-economy-shrank-better-news-than-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Slowdown likely to be short-lived, say experts
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. GDP growth nearly five times Canada&#8217;s in third quarter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/30/u-s-gdp-growth-nearly-five-time-canadas-in-third-quarter/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/30/u-s-gdp-growth-nearly-five-time-canadas-in-third-quarter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=321783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GDP growth - Canada: 0.6; U.S.A: 2.7]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/30/u-s-gdp-growth-nearly-five-time-canadas-in-third-quarter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	GDP growth - Canada: 0.6; U.S.A: 2.7
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. GDP: federal govt. spending saves the day</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/26/u-s-gdp-grew-two-per-cent-in-third-quarter-beating-expectations-and-looking-pretty-awful/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/26/u-s-gdp-grew-two-per-cent-in-third-quarter-beating-expectations-and-looking-pretty-awful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=307592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad news...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/26/u-s-gdp-grew-two-per-cent-in-third-quarter-beating-expectations-and-looking-pretty-awful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Bad news...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does a trade deficit mean for GDP? Not much.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/11/what-does-a-trade-deficit-mean-for-gdp-not-much/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/11/what-does-a-trade-deficit-mean-for-gdp-not-much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade deficit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=292223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Net exports fell in three of the last four phases of economic expansion]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/11/what-does-a-trade-deficit-mean-for-gdp-not-much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Net exports fell in three of the last four phases of economic expansion
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the housing market is pumping up our GDP numbers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/how-the-housing-market-is-pumping-up-our-gdp-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/how-the-housing-market-is-pumping-up-our-gdp-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 19:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=256056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The charts say it all]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/how-the-housing-market-is-pumping-up-our-gdp-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The charts say it all
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The lost decade of Canadian exports</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/chart-shows-canadian-exports-lost-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/chart-shows-canadian-exports-lost-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=250474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have a problem, and it dates back to well before the Great Recession]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/09/chart-shows-canadian-exports-lost-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	We have a problem, and it dates back to well before the Great Recession
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>As the economy slows down, should austerity pick up speed?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/31/as-economy-slows-should-austerity-pick-up-speed/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/31/as-economy-slows-should-austerity-pick-up-speed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=236837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada&#8217;s GDP numbers for November came out this morning, and it was a rude...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/31/as-economy-slows-should-austerity-pick-up-speed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Canada&#8217;s GDP numbers for November came out this morning, and it was a rude...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The cost and savings of OAS</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/27/the-cost-and-the-savings-of-oas/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/27/the-cost-and-the-savings-of-oas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Milligan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Age Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=236061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Milligan considers the ramifications of changes to Old Age Security.
By 2031 &#8212;...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/27/the-cost-and-the-savings-of-oas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Kevin Milligan considers the ramifications of changes to Old Age Security.
By 2031 &#8212;...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six percent, until it&#8217;s not six percent</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/19/six-percent-until-its-not-six-percent/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/19/six-percent-until-its-not-six-percent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escalator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health transfers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=230500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Finance Minister shows his hand on health transfers.
Under Ottawa’s plan, funding for...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/19/six-percent-until-its-not-six-percent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Finance Minister shows his hand on health transfers.
Under Ottawa’s plan, funding for...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why happiness suddenly matters</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/14/why-happiness-suddenly-matters-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/14/why-happiness-suddenly-matters-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Stagnation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross national happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happiness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=171093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you're a politician, there are only a couple of ways you can tackle the falling-income problem]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/14/why-happiness-suddenly-matters-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	If you're a politician, there are only a couple of ways you can tackle the falling-income problem
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada: jobs juggernaut</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/19/canada-jobs-juggernaut/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/19/canada-jobs-juggernaut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kirby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=142323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada is free and clear of the recession]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/19/canada-jobs-juggernaut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Canada is free and clear of the recession
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ottawa’s stimulus fiasco</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/27/ottawas-stimulus-fiasco/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/27/ottawas-stimulus-fiasco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic action plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=140070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A circus school, a ferry to nowhere, lawn-bowling greens. This is vital infrastructure?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/27/ottawas-stimulus-fiasco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A circus school, a ferry to nowhere, lawn-bowling greens. This is vital infrastructure?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wanted: free trade activists</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/01/wanted-free-trade-activists/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/01/wanted-free-trade-activists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=134679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ottawa says it’s on the verge of a historic pact with the EU, but corporate Canada isn’t sold on the idea]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/01/wanted-free-trade-activists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	Ottawa says it’s on the verge of a historic pact with the EU, but corporate Canada isn’t sold on the idea
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran: bracing for a backlash</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/13/bracing-for-a-backlash/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/13/bracing-for-a-backlash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katie Engelhart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farideh Farhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iranian economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamic Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahmoud Ahmadinejad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Majlis Research Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Iranian American Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smuggling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tehran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=106694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facing insolvency, Ahmadinejad will cut popular state subsidies]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/13/bracing-for-a-backlash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	Facing insolvency, Ahmadinejad will cut popular state subsidies
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The shrimp and the damage done</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/11/the-shrimp-and-the-damage-done/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/11/the-shrimp-and-the-damage-done/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Stern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private jet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Tol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stern Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=97294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne chimes in on this whole "climate change" mess]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/11/the-shrimp-and-the-damage-done/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
	Andrew Coyne chimes in on this whole "climate change" mess
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Econowatch</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/11/econowatch-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/11/econowatch-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kirby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive bonus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=97310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A weekly scorecard on the state of the economy in North America and beyond]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/11/econowatch-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	A weekly scorecard on the state of the economy in North America and beyond
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A lost decade of growth</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/12/a-lost-decade-of-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/12/a-lost-decade-of-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kirby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A lost decade of growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=74344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many real indicators put us back to where we were 10 years ago]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/12/a-lost-decade-of-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	Many real indicators put us back to where we were 10 years ago
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>One sip of that deficit punch can make us all addicts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/30/one-sip-of-that-deficit-punch-can-make-us-all-addicts/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/30/one-sip-of-that-deficit-punch-can-make-us-all-addicts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defecit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Martin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Tories had done what Martin failed to do, we’d be looking at a $13-billion surplus]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/30/one-sip-of-that-deficit-punch-can-make-us-all-addicts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	If the Tories had done what Martin failed to do, we’d be looking at a $13-billion surplus
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
