<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Globe and Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/globe-and-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:14:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Taliban could have been our &#8220;best partner&#8221; to fight terrorism: Globe reporter</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/14/taliban-could-have-been-our-best-partner-to-fight-terrorism-globe-reporter/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/14/taliban-could-have-been-our-best-partner-to-fight-terrorism-globe-reporter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Petrou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The World Desk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ahmed Rashid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graeme Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Coll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=220259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Globe and Mail reporter Graeme Smith had this to say during a panel discussion...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/14/taliban-could-have-been-our-best-partner-to-fight-terrorism-globe-reporter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	Globe and Mail reporter Graeme Smith had this to say during a panel discussion...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reading the documents</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/22/reading-the-documents/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/22/reading-the-documents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asadullah Khalid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graeme Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Colvin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transfers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=198758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We've posted the trove of Afghan detainee documents online]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/22/reading-the-documents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	We've posted the trove of Afghan detainee documents online
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hope spring eternal</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/28/hope-spring-eternal/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/28/hope-spring-eternal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=187702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Globe and Mail, 2008. &#8220;Instead of carping about a dysfunctional Parliament, for which he...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/28/hope-spring-eternal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
	Globe and Mail, 2008. &#8220;Instead of carping about a dysfunctional Parliament, for which he...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;A confident new Parliament&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/28/a-confident-new-parliament/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/28/a-confident-new-parliament/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=187699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Globe endorses the Conservatives.
The campaign of 2011 – so vicious and often...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/28/a-confident-new-parliament/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
	The Globe endorses the Conservatives.
The campaign of 2011 – so vicious and often...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The preliminary round</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/25/the-preliminary-round/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/25/the-preliminary-round/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endorsement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=186786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In apparently the first of two endorsements, the Globe picks the Liberals over the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/25/the-preliminary-round/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
	In apparently the first of two endorsements, the Globe picks the Liberals over the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cindor Reeves and the Globe and Mail</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/08/cindor-reeves-and-the-globe-and-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/08/cindor-reeves-and-the-globe-and-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Petrou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The World Desk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cindor Reeves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Kenney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Court for Sierra Leone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=170991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Globe has published an editorial calling on Immigration Minister Jason Kenney to allow...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/08/cindor-reeves-and-the-globe-and-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
	The Globe has published an editorial calling on Immigration Minister Jason Kenney to allow...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#039;ll take &quot;Cheap Publicity Stunts&quot; for $1,000, Alex</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/16/ill-take-cheap-publicity-stunts-for-1000-alex/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/16/ill-take-cheap-publicity-stunts-for-1000-alex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-computer chess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bayesian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer chess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep blue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep fritz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fritz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garry kasparov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hubert dreyfus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeopardy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ken jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loebner prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omar el akkad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vladimir kramnik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=167153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IBM's assault on Jeopardy! isn't a triumph for artificial intelligence. It's an embarrassment.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/16/ill-take-cheap-publicity-stunts-for-1000-alex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
	IBM's assault on Jeopardy! isn't a triumph for artificial intelligence. It's an embarrassment.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Checking in on Michael Ignatieff&#039;s inevitable doom</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/30/the-commons-checking-in-on-michael-ignatieffs-inevitable-doom/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/30/the-commons-checking-in-on-michael-ignatieffs-inevitable-doom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by-election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outremont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaughan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winnipeg North]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=161046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has he forgotten the effort that goes into constructing a narrative?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/30/the-commons-checking-in-on-michael-ignatieffs-inevitable-doom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>177</slash:comments>
	Has he forgotten the effort that goes into constructing a narrative?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adventures in polling</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/18/adventures-in-polling/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/18/adventures-in-polling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=158796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s a zany suggestion: if you want to know what people think about coalitions, ask them]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/18/adventures-in-polling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
	Here’s a zany suggestion: if you want to know what people think about coalitions, ask them
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Read all about it: the new boss</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/30/read-all-about-it-the-new-boss/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/30/read-all-about-it-the-new-boss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Lunau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global university ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomson Reuters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=149389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was a Globe front-page story featuring its new owner’s prized asset a conflict of interest?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/30/read-all-about-it-the-new-boss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Was a Globe front-page story featuring its new owner’s prized asset a conflict of interest?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Junius explains that gun-registry math</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/22/junius-explains-that-gun-registry-math/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/22/junius-explains-that-gun-registry-math/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 05:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Blair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-391]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Firearms Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Firearms Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corrections Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long gun registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Holland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliamentary Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Board]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=148581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How journalists and politicians got the idea it costs just $4 million a year]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/22/junius-explains-that-gun-registry-math/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	How journalists and politicians got the idea it costs just $4 million a year
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>On truth in $enten¢ing</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/24/on-truth-in-sentencing/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/24/on-truth-in-sentencing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david friedman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[furman v. georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gregg v. georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law and economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law's order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliamentary Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prison conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth in sentencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=134780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate over the net costs of the government&#8217;s Truth in Sentencing bill is...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/24/on-truth-in-sentencing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
	The debate over the net costs of the government&#8217;s Truth in Sentencing bill is...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rocking the Globe</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/rocking-the-globe/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/rocking-the-globe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 14:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Köhler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Geldof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=126117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Star-struck senior staff let Bono and Bob Geldof edit the <i>Globe and Mail</i>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/rocking-the-globe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	Star-struck senior staff let Bono and Bob Geldof edit the <i>Globe and Mail</i>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oil&#039;s not peaking. It&#039;s jumping the shark</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/13/oils-not-peaking-its-jumping-the-shark/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/13/oils-not-peaking-its-jumping-the-shark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catastrophism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m. king hubbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malthusian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minerals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peak gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peak oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource extraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=120163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COLBY COSH: Throw a dart at the periodic table and there's a group claiming that element is "peaking"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/13/oils-not-peaking-its-jumping-the-shark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
	COLBY COSH: Throw a dart at the periodic table and there's a group claiming that element is "peaking"
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;What of the sexism in the first line of the French version of &#039;O Canada&#039;?&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/05/what-of-the-sexism-in-the-first-line-of-the-french-version-of-o-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/05/what-of-the-sexism-in-the-first-line-of-the-french-version-of-o-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Anthem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two solitudes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=114274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many reasonable arguments against changing the lyrics to &#8216;O Canada&#8217; to make...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/05/what-of-the-sexism-in-the-first-line-of-the-french-version-of-o-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
	There are many reasonable arguments against changing the lyrics to &#8216;O Canada&#8217; to make...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great moments in Canadian humanitarianism</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/02/great-moments-in-canadian-humanitarianism/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/02/great-moments-in-canadian-humanitarianism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denis marier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquake relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haiti earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haitian earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignaz semmelweis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jessica leeder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john snow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naturopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nosode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psorinum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quackery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=113303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The homeopathy Denis Marier has brought to Haiti is what we had <em>before</em> real medicine]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/02/great-moments-in-canadian-humanitarianism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
	The homeopathy Denis Marier has brought to Haiti is what we had <em>before</em> real medicine
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A game-changer on abortion &amp; breast cancer? You make the call</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/12/a-game-changer-on-abortion-breast-cancer-you-make-the-call/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/12/a-game-changer-on-abortion-breast-cancer-you-make-the-call/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gloria galloway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=100949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The long-standing controversy over the link between therapeutic abortion and breast cancer found its...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/12/a-game-changer-on-abortion-breast-cancer-you-make-the-call/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>105</slash:comments>
	The long-standing controversy over the link between therapeutic abortion and breast cancer found its...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Globe and Blatchford</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/08/the-globe-and-blatchford/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/08/the-globe-and-blatchford/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christie Blatchford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graeme Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Koring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=96697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 20 years in journalism I have never seen anything resembling the systematic and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/08/the-globe-and-blatchford/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>176</slash:comments>
	In 20 years in journalism I have never seen anything resembling the systematic and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;We have no worries about the possibility of prosecution&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/01/we-have-no-worries-about-the-possibility-of-prosecution/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/01/we-have-no-worries-about-the-possibility-of-prosecution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amir Attaran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geneva conventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michel Gauthier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=95371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 31, 2006, two days before the Canadian Press reported an estimate that...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/01/we-have-no-worries-about-the-possibility-of-prosecution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
	On May 31, 2006, two days before the Canadian Press reported an estimate that...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What should have been known and when?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/26/what-should-have-been-known-and-when/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/26/what-should-have-been-known-and-when/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIHRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helmand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louise Arbour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michel Gauthier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Colvin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN High Commissioner for Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=94507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gen. Michel Gauthier made reference Wednesday afternoon to the Globe and Mail&#8217;s reporting in...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/26/what-should-have-been-known-and-when/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
	Gen. Michel Gauthier made reference Wednesday afternoon to the Globe and Mail&#8217;s reporting in...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Left jobless by the global recession? This government cares about you!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/08/long-time-workers-left-jobless-by-the-global-recession-this-government-cares-about-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/08/long-time-workers-left-jobless-by-the-global-recession-this-government-cares-about-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[*hums 'one night in bangkok'*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[down the rabbit hole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EI reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this is not a game]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=80120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tories say they have big plans for EI reform]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/08/long-time-workers-left-jobless-by-the-global-recession-this-government-cares-about-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
	Tories say they have big plans for EI reform
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eternal sunshine of the Globe and Mail mind</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/13/eternal-sunshine-of-the-globe-and-mail-mind/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/13/eternal-sunshine-of-the-globe-and-mail-mind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endorsement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=75668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[October 10. Whatever you think of him, the Stephen Harper of today is not...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/13/eternal-sunshine-of-the-globe-and-mail-mind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
	October 10. Whatever you think of him, the Stephen Harper of today is not...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>By popular demand, the latest edition of &quot;What&#039;s Tom Flanagan Going On About Now?&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/13/by-popular-demand-the-latest-edition-of-whats-tom-flanagan-going-on-about-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/13/by-popular-demand-the-latest-edition-of-whats-tom-flanagan-going-on-about-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[let's all read the newspaper together!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not all that much shorter tom flanagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[those ads (tm)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=70363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, a link to the Globe and Mail&#8217;s presentation thereof, at least. ITQ knows...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/13/by-popular-demand-the-latest-edition-of-whats-tom-flanagan-going-on-about-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
	Well, a link to the Globe and Mail&#8217;s presentation thereof, at least. ITQ knows...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>More journalists on journalists</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/10/more-journalists-on-journalists/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/10/more-journalists-on-journalists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Stackhouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=70255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colleague Anne Kingston&#8217;s article on the big changes at the Globe and Mail is...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/10/more-journalists-on-journalists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	Colleague Anne Kingston&#8217;s article on the big changes at the Globe and Mail is...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>As the Globe turns</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/09/as-the-globe-turns/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/09/as-the-globe-turns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anne Kingston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Crawley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcontinental inc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=67089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Globe and Mail came up with a plan for surviving the newspaper revolution. It didn’t include its editor.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/09/as-the-globe-turns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	The Globe and Mail came up with a plan for surviving the newspaper revolution. It didn’t include its editor.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clarity</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/20/clarity/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/20/clarity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yikes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=65896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Globe editorial employees vote 97% for a mandate to strike....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/20/clarity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	Globe editorial employees vote 97% for a mandate to strike....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey look</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/29/hey-look-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/29/hey-look-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-promotion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/29/hey-look-10/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Wells column, in which I give the Globe a little tough love....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/29/hey-look-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	New Wells column, in which I give the Globe a little tough love....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The old grey Globe she ain’t what she used to be</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/29/the-old-grey-globe-she-ain%e2%80%99t-what-she-used-to-be/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/29/the-old-grey-globe-she-ain%e2%80%99t-what-she-used-to-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paul Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Greenspon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Stackhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Crawley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tearsheet.ca/dev/?p=3747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Globe publisher Philip Crawley announced this week that editor Ed Greenspon had moved on to ‘new challenges’]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/29/the-old-grey-globe-she-ain%e2%80%99t-what-she-used-to-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
	Globe publisher Philip Crawley announced this week that editor Ed Greenspon had moved on to ‘new challenges’
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>He buried the lede. Ed Greenspon&#039;s for the high jump; Stackhouse is the new Globe editor</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/25/he-buried-the-lede-ed-greenspons-for-the-high-jump-stackhouse-is-the-new-globe-editor/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/25/he-buried-the-lede-ed-greenspons-for-the-high-jump-stackhouse-is-the-new-globe-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Greenspon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What does this mean for Roy&#039;s Clog?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=59508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Office email from wordy Globe publisher Phil Crawley:
The need to restructure our business,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/25/he-buried-the-lede-ed-greenspons-for-the-high-jump-stackhouse-is-the-new-globe-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	Office email from wordy Globe publisher Phil Crawley:
The need to restructure our business,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ignatieff: Fantasia on a theme of anonymity</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/30/ignatieff-fantasia-on-a-theme-of-anonymity/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/30/ignatieff-fantasia-on-a-theme-of-anonymity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources close to]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=53651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;&#8230;a senior Ignatieff Liberal has called on the new leader to provide substance to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/30/ignatieff-fantasia-on-a-theme-of-anonymity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
	&#8220;&#8230;a senior Ignatieff Liberal has called on the new leader to provide substance to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coyne v. Wells on the sorry, sorry state of the media: All the self-pity, and twice the denial!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/27/coyne-v-wells-on-the-sorry-sorry-state-of-the-media-all-the-self-pity-and-twice-the-denial/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/27/coyne-v-wells-on-the-sorry-sorry-state-of-the-media-all-the-self-pity-and-twice-the-denial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CanWest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micropayments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plastic Logic eReader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-pity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torstar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macleans.ca/?p=39692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/02/27/coyne-v-wells-on-the-sorry-sorry-state-of-the-media-all-the-self-pity-and-twice-the-denial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
	...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Too cold, boring and far away&quot; &#8211; Oh, Winnipeg. Will you ever win?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/17/too-cold-boring-and-far-away-oh-winnipeg-will-you-ever-win/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/17/too-cold-boring-and-far-away-oh-winnipeg-will-you-ever-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian museum of human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welcome to the manitoba enemies list bill curry!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yay for mandatory disclosure of opinion research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[your move james moore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=18070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Bill Curry, the Globe and Mail  is now a contender for this...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/17/too-cold-boring-and-far-away-oh-winnipeg-will-you-ever-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
	Thanks to Bill Curry, the Globe and Mail  is now a contender for this...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A thought on the now-only-referred-to-as-secret -using-finger-quotes memorandum on food safety</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/08/22/a-thought-on-the-now-only-referred-to-as-secret-using-finger-quotes-memorandum-on-food-safety/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/08/22/a-thought-on-the-now-only-referred-to-as-secret-using-finger-quotes-memorandum-on-food-safety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cabinet confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cfia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confident cabinet ministers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the pentagon papers it's not]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=5536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the Globe and Mail - or, for that matter, CanWest News &#8211; under...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/08/22/a-thought-on-the-now-only-referred-to-as-secret-using-finger-quotes-memorandum-on-food-safety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Is the Globe and Mail - or, for that matter, CanWest News &#8211; under...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The curse of the Komagata Maru: More on that Unfortunate Event in Surrey</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/08/06/the-curse-of-the-komagata-maru-more-on-that-unfortunate-event-in-surrey/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/08/06/the-curse-of-the-komagata-maru-more-on-that-unfortunate-event-in-surrey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apologolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[komagata maru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kory Teneycke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ryan sparrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[well that went well]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yr doing it wrong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=4275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, huh. How about that? Apparently, my entirely uninformed theorizing on what might have...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/08/06/the-curse-of-the-komagata-maru-more-on-that-unfortunate-event-in-surrey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Well, huh. How about that? Apparently, my entirely uninformed theorizing on what might have...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A word from a cynical critic</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/07/01/a-word-from-a-cynical-critic/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/07/01/a-word-from-a-cynical-critic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Maich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Balls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue jays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cito gaston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wild card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=2590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess this editorial in today&#8217;s Globe and Mail is addressed to people like...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/07/01/a-word-from-a-cynical-critic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	I guess this editorial in today&#8217;s Globe and Mail is addressed to people like...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Information wants to be free</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/01/information-wants-to-be-free/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/01/information-wants-to-be-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 23:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inkless Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information wants to be free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shop talk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=1494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or so I&#8217;m told. This news comes courtesy of a reader who was kind...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/06/01/information-wants-to-be-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Or so I&#8217;m told. This news comes courtesy of a reader who was kind...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

