<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; government advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/government-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:57:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;&#8230; Canadians are entitled to know what their government is up to&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/13/canadians-are-entitled-to-know-what-their-government-is-up-to/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/13/canadians-are-entitled-to-know-what-their-government-is-up-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic action plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=383299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty explains how]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/13/canadians-are-entitled-to-know-what-their-government-is-up-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Jim Flaherty explains how
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your tax dollars at work on you</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/11/your-tax-dollars-at-work-on-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/11/your-tax-dollars-at-work-on-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=359254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Government ads: They taste awful, but they work]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/11/your-tax-dollars-at-work-on-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Government ads: They taste awful, but they work
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better know a talking point</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/better-know-a-talking-point-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/better-know-a-talking-point-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Notes on the government's advertising math]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/better-know-a-talking-point-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Notes on the government's advertising math
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Super Bowl, brought to you by you</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/05/the-super-bowl-brought-you-by-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/05/the-super-bowl-brought-you-by-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathieu Ravignat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=346772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Cheadle provides another accounting of how much the Harper government has increased public...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/05/the-super-bowl-brought-you-by-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Bruce Cheadle provides another accounting of how much the Harper government has increased public...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising rules</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/23/advertising-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/23/advertising-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Dix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=340881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The British Columbia New Democrats are proposing new rules for government advertising.
Dix said...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/23/advertising-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The British Columbia New Democrats are proposing new rules for government advertising.
Dix said...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The War of 1812&#8242;s TV front</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/21/the-war-of-1812s-tv-front/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/21/the-war-of-1812s-tv-front/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War of 1812]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=317289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hill Times tallies $8 million in spending on War of 1812 advertising.
The...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/21/the-war-of-1812s-tv-front/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Hill Times tallies $8 million in spending on War of 1812 advertising.
The...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>As seen on TV</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/09/as-seen-on-tv-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/09/as-seen-on-tv-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontario]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=313308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Harper government has committed another $4 million to advertise itself.
Supplementary estimates released...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/09/as-seen-on-tv-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Harper government has committed another $4 million to advertise itself.
Supplementary estimates released...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>As seen on TV</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/12/as-seen-on-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/12/as-seen-on-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=302801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing not being promoted in those &#8220;Economic Action Plan&#8221; ads: the Harper government&#8217;s...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/12/as-seen-on-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	One thing not being promoted in those &#8220;Economic Action Plan&#8221; ads: the Harper government&#8217;s...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spending to sell yourself while cutting billions</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/11/spending-to-sell-yourself-while-cutting-billions/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/11/spending-to-sell-yourself-while-cutting-billions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Board]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=302038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While fighting the Parliamentary Budget Officer&#8217;s attempts to review its budget cuts, the Harper...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/11/spending-to-sell-yourself-while-cutting-billions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	While fighting the Parliamentary Budget Officer&#8217;s attempts to review its budget cuts, the Harper...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Communicating like a bar fight</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/20/communicating-like-a-bar-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/20/communicating-like-a-bar-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Armour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=234836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jennifer Ditchburn connects the dots between Stephane Dion, Michael Ignatieff, the health care accord...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/20/communicating-like-a-bar-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Jennifer Ditchburn connects the dots between Stephane Dion, Michael Ignatieff, the health care accord...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: The only thing we have to fear is total doom</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/21/the-commons-the-only-thing-we-have-to-fear-is-total-doom/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/21/the-commons-the-only-thing-we-have-to-fear-is-total-doom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCallum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockwell Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=148558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vote Tory, or risk the total annihilation of your country]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/21/the-commons-the-only-thing-we-have-to-fear-is-total-doom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Vote Tory, or risk the total annihilation of your country
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Hold to clarify my amended response is the one I want used no figures&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/29/hold-to-clarify-my-amended-response-is-the-one-i-want-used-no-figures/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/29/hold-to-clarify-my-amended-response-is-the-one-i-want-used-no-figures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ana Curic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Bakos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patricia Valladao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ryan sparrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=118057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ministerial aide Ryan Sparrow helpfully suggests a new slogan for the next Conservative re-election...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/29/hold-to-clarify-my-amended-response-is-the-one-i-want-used-no-figures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	Ministerial aide Ryan Sparrow helpfully suggests a new slogan for the next Conservative re-election...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear prudence</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/17/dear-prudence/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/17/dear-prudence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Rajotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Norlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ten percenters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=92927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Rajotte, in Question Period yesterday. Mr. Speaker, as Canada continues to cope with...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/17/dear-prudence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
	James Rajotte, in Question Period yesterday. Mr. Speaker, as Canada continues to cope with...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A teachable moment</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/a-teachable-moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/a-teachable-moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denise Ghanam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Watson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=91226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Star explores the practice of unelected Conservative candidates turning up at government funding...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/a-teachable-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
	The Star explores the practice of unelected Conservative candidates turning up at government funding...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: If we can&#039;t talk to each other, we can only talk to ourselves</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolyn Bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Paradis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David McGuinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judy Foote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leona Aglukkaq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yasmin Ratansi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And that makes us look crazy]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/the-commons-if-we-cant-talk-to-each-other-we-can-only-talk-to-ourselves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
	And that makes us look crazy
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Bring it on</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/27/the-commons-bring-it-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/27/the-commons-bring-it-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David McGuinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marlene Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Men and women of principle can only be pushed so far]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/27/the-commons-bring-it-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
	Men and women of principle can only be pushed so far
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Unsophisticated debate will not be tolerated in this place</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/the-commons-unsophisticated-debate-will-not-be-tolerated-in-this-place/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/the-commons-unsophisticated-debate-will-not-be-tolerated-in-this-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aboriginals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David McGuinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leona Aglukkaq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Hall Findlay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protesters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Goodale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visitors gallery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Members of the gallery should know better than to imitate the performers below]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/the-commons-unsophisticated-debate-will-not-be-tolerated-in-this-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
	Members of the gallery should know better than to imitate the performers below
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The vast left-wing conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/21/the-vast-left-wing-conspiracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/21/the-vast-left-wing-conspiracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giant novelty cheques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty cheques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative MP Larry Miller tells us what&#8217;s really going on here with all these...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/21/the-vast-left-wing-conspiracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
	Conservative MP Larry Miller tells us what&#8217;s really going on here with all these...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>If only we had a commissioner who was responsible for ethics</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/if-only-we-had-a-commissioner-who-was-responsible-for-ethics/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/if-only-we-had-a-commissioner-who-was-responsible-for-ethics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict of interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giant novelty cheques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary dawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty cheques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CBC explores the irony of news that the ethics commissioner will be investigating the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/20/if-only-we-had-a-commissioner-who-was-responsible-for-ethics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
	CBC explores the irony of news that the ethics commissioner will be investigating the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: And so we come full circle</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giant novelty cheques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Chretien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sponsorship scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wayne easter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tories look for support in the unlikeliest of places]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/the-commons-and-so-we-come-full-circle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>112</slash:comments>
	The Tories look for support in the unlikeliest of places
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rhetorical question of the day</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/rhetorical-question-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/rhetorical-question-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giant novelty cheques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory minimums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Nicholson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Russell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberal Todd Russell, yelling in the direction of Rob Nicholson this afternoon as the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/rhetorical-question-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
	Liberal Todd Russell, yelling in the direction of Rob Nicholson this afternoon as the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Royal Galipeau Maverick Watch</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/royal-galipeau-maverick-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/royal-galipeau-maverick-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal galipeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=87910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservative backbencher admits the giant novelty cheques he handed out upset his stomach....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/19/royal-galipeau-maverick-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	The Conservative backbencher admits the giant novelty cheques he handed out upset his stomach....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Canadians&#039; tax dollars are precious&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/18/canadians-tax-dollars-are-precious/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/18/canadians-tax-dollars-are-precious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=87905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty, Nov. 27. We cannot ask Canadians to tighten their belts during tougher...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/18/canadians-tax-dollars-are-precious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
	Jim Flaherty, Nov. 27. We cannot ask Canadians to tighten their belts during tougher...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everything explained</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/16/everything-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/16/everything-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty cheques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=87880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An anonymous Conservative MP helps us understand why his or her side simply had...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/16/everything-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>90</slash:comments>
	An anonymous Conservative MP helps us understand why his or her side simply had...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mea culpa</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/16/mea-culpa-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/16/mea-culpa-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Stanton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=87810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative MP Bruce Stanton twitters his feelings on the partisan use of giant novelty...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/16/mea-culpa-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
	Conservative MP Bruce Stanton twitters his feelings on the partisan use of giant novelty...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tonight, dinner&#039;s on your local Conservative MP</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/14/tonight-dinners-on-your-local-conservative-mp/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/14/tonight-dinners-on-your-local-conservative-mp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerard Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giant novelty cheques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=87378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Susan Delacourt first wrote about the problematic nature of giant novelty cheques in July....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/14/tonight-dinners-on-your-local-conservative-mp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
	Susan Delacourt first wrote about the problematic nature of giant novelty cheques in July....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heavens, how did that get there? (II)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/14/heavens-how-did-that-get-there-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/14/heavens-how-did-that-get-there-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerald Keddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=87142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upon further review, Gerald Keddy notices the Conservative logo on that giant novelty cheque...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/14/heavens-how-did-that-get-there-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
	Upon further review, Gerald Keddy notices the Conservative logo on that giant novelty cheque...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heavens, how did that get there?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/13/heavens-how-did-that-get-there/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/13/heavens-how-did-that-get-there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerald Keddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=87100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative MP Gerald Keddy claims not to have noticed that a large novelty cheque...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/13/heavens-how-did-that-get-there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>144</slash:comments>
	Conservative MP Gerald Keddy claims not to have noticed that a large novelty cheque...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
