<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 01:47:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>99 stupid things the government did with your money: Part III</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/09/99-stupid-things-the-government-did-with-your-money-part-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/09/99-stupid-things-the-government-did-with-your-money-part-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue Allan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=333378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disappearing bike lanes, pricy picture-hanging, strip club cash]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/09/99-stupid-things-the-government-did-with-your-money-part-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Disappearing bike lanes, pricy picture-hanging, strip club cash
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>99 stupid things the government did with your money: Part I</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/07/99-stupid-things-the-government-did-with-your-money-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/07/99-stupid-things-the-government-did-with-your-money-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kirby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=333357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blue Bombers season tickets, caviar and Black Eyed Peas]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/07/99-stupid-things-the-government-did-with-your-money-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Blue Bombers season tickets, caviar and Black Eyed Peas
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Military sent fishing for dirt on MacKay&#8217;s critics</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/24/military-sent-fishing-for-dirt-on-mackays-critics/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/24/military-sent-fishing-for-dirt-on-mackays-critics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Warnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=241926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wasn&#8217;t a great fall for Defence Minister Peter MacKay. The rugby-playing Nova Scotian...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/24/military-sent-fishing-for-dirt-on-mackays-critics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	It wasn&#8217;t a great fall for Defence Minister Peter MacKay. The rugby-playing Nova Scotian...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ottawa&#8217;s high-flying bureacrats</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/13/ottawas-high-flying-bureacrats/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/13/ottawas-high-flying-bureacrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo Vieira</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=239470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newly-released figures show senior federal bureaucrats paid exorbitant rates to fly to Paris, London...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/13/ottawas-high-flying-bureacrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Newly-released figures show senior federal bureaucrats paid exorbitant rates to fly to Paris, London...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bureaucrats posed for citizenship ceremony in Sun TV stunt</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/02/bureaucrats-posed-for-citizenship-ceremony-in-sun-tv-stunt/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/02/bureaucrats-posed-for-citizenship-ceremony-in-sun-tv-stunt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Warnica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=237313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Documents reveal fakery was coordinated with employees in Jason Kenney's department]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/02/bureaucrats-posed-for-citizenship-ceremony-in-sun-tv-stunt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Documents reveal fakery was coordinated with employees in Jason Kenney's department
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Less worse off</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/27/less-worse-off/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/27/less-worse-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=217255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon considers how much credit the government can take for our relatively good...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/27/less-worse-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon considers how much credit the government can take for our relatively good...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great moments in communications</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/08/great-moments-in-communications/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/08/great-moments-in-communications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harper government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister's office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privy Council Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=176391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Privy Council Office explains that there&#8217;s been no &#8220;formal directive&#8221; to rebrand everything...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/08/great-moments-in-communications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
	The Privy Council Office explains that there&#8217;s been no &#8220;formal directive&#8221; to rebrand everything...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Canada is, and always has been, our country&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/23/canada-is-and-always-has-been-our-country/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/23/canada-is-and-always-has-been-our-country/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 02:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=168438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The prepared text for the Prime Minister&#8217;s remarks to supporters this afternoon to celebrate...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/23/canada-is-and-always-has-been-our-country/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
	The prepared text for the Prime Minister&#8217;s remarks to supporters this afternoon to celebrate...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>She can&#039;t seem to get it right</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/13/she-cant-seem-to-get-it-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/13/she-cant-seem-to-get-it-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Merkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Democratic Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=166099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not even Germany’s enviable economic position is helping Angela Merkel from declining in the polls]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/13/she-cant-seem-to-get-it-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	Not even Germany’s enviable economic position is helping Angela Merkel from declining in the polls
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to make a cabinet</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/how-to-make-a-cabinet/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/how-to-make-a-cabinet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cabinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcel Proulx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the reshuffle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=165805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Canada it involves a complex mix of postal codes and chromosomes]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/how-to-make-a-cabinet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	In Canada it involves a complex mix of postal codes and chromosomes
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The knives are out for Ahmadinejad</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/the-knives-are-out-for-ahmadinejad/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/the-knives-are-out-for-ahmadinejad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Petrou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahmoud Ahmadinejad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traitor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=165861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His brand of extremism is under fire from political and religious opponents]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/the-knives-are-out-for-ahmadinejad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	His brand of extremism is under fire from political and religious opponents
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Stephen Harper will survive in 2011</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/how-stephen-harper-will-survive/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/how-stephen-harper-will-survive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paul Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g-20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=165732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He prorogued parliament and gutted the census but his party is still seen as reliable]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/how-stephen-harper-will-survive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>234</slash:comments>
	He prorogued parliament and gutted the census but his party is still seen as reliable
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crash goes the Colosseum</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/23/crash-goes-the-colosseum/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/23/crash-goes-the-colosseum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colosseum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNESCO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=164209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The country’s historic landmarks are crumbling, and critics say government just doesn’t seem to care]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/23/crash-goes-the-colosseum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	The country’s historic landmarks are crumbling, and critics say government just doesn’t seem to care
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even if it&#039;s broken, don&#039;t fix it</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/17/even-if-its-broken-dont-fix-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/17/even-if-its-broken-dont-fix-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paul Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Against Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Pepall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=163821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PAUL WELLS on a new book that argues against government reform]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/17/even-if-its-broken-dont-fix-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
	PAUL WELLS on a new book that argues against government reform
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do they get away with it?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/10/how-do-they-get-away-with-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/10/how-do-they-get-away-with-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constituency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxime Bernier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transformative policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=162828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter MacKay and Maxime Bernier have been way off-message this year, but Harper hasn’t slapped them down]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/10/how-do-they-get-away-with-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
	Peter MacKay and Maxime Bernier have been way off-message this year, but Harper hasn’t slapped them down
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A dictator in the making?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/08/a-dictator-in-the-making/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/08/a-dictator-in-the-making/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Belluz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amnesty International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dictatorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahinda Rajapaksa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sri Lanka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamil Tigers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=162128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fresh from victory against the Tamil Tigers, Sri Lanka's president is taking steps to stay in power indefinitely]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/08/a-dictator-in-the-making/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
	Fresh from victory against the Tamil Tigers, Sri Lanka's president is taking steps to stay in power indefinitely
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#039;s company</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/02/americas-company/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/02/americas-company/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kirby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=160486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[General Motors’ comeback is about more than cars—it has come to represent hope in the U.S. economy]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/02/americas-company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	General Motors’ comeback is about more than cars—it has come to represent hope in the U.S. economy
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leave our MPs to bicker in peace</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/02/mps-bicker-in-peace/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/02/mps-bicker-in-peace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Feschuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scott Feschuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=160603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing wrong with a little name-calling or yo-momma insulting in Question Period]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/02/mps-bicker-in-peace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	Nothing wrong with a little name-calling or yo-momma insulting in Question Period
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another foot-in-mouth Tory</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/29/another-foot-in-mouth-tory/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/29/another-foot-in-mouth-tory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Lunau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=160206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lord Young of Graffham’s bout of foot-in-mouth disease came just one month after the government announced its deepest public spending cuts]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/29/another-foot-in-mouth-tory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Lord Young of Graffham’s bout of foot-in-mouth disease came just one month after the government announced its deepest public spending cuts
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many does it take to screw in a light bulb?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/29/how-many-does-it-take-to-screw-in-a-light-bulb/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/29/how-many-does-it-take-to-screw-in-a-light-bulb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Paradis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privy Council Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=160747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the process of detailing the government&#8217;s confused response to last summer&#8217;s earthquake, the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/29/how-many-does-it-take-to-screw-in-a-light-bulb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	In the process of detailing the government&#8217;s confused response to last summer&#8217;s earthquake, the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;A new scandal all the time&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/26/a-new-scandal-all-the-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/26/a-new-scandal-all-the-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Patriquin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[La Fédération des travailleurs et travailleuses du Québec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michel Arsenault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parti Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=160016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allegations of wrongdoing keep piling up in Quebec]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/26/a-new-scandal-all-the-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
	Allegations of wrongdoing keep piling up in Quebec
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The most dangerous job in the province</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/15/the-most-dangerous-job/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/15/the-most-dangerous-job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken MacQueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=157101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gordon Campbell is only the latest in a long line of B.C. premiers who’ve been drummed out of office in disgrace]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/15/the-most-dangerous-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	Gordon Campbell is only the latest in a long line of B.C. premiers who’ve been drummed out of office in disgrace
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The watchdogs who never bite</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/15/the-watchdogs-who-never-bite/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/15/the-watchdogs-who-never-bite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christiane Ouimet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary dawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suzanne Legault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watchdog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=157724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those who investigate wrongdoing have little power, and little interest in using what they do have]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/15/the-watchdogs-who-never-bite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	Those who investigate wrongdoing have little power, and little interest in using what they do have
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politics all the way down</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/15/politics-all-the-way-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/15/politics-all-the-way-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=157021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COYNE: Stop crediting the Tories with scruples they show no sign of possessing]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/15/politics-all-the-way-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>169</slash:comments>
	COYNE: Stop crediting the Tories with scruples they show no sign of possessing
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The founding fathers?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/the-founding-fathers/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/the-founding-fathers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Canadians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John A. Macdonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Ralston Saul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis-Hippolyte LaFontaine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Baldwin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=152111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even John A. Macdonald would admit that these two guys are the ones who started it all]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/the-founding-fathers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Even John A. Macdonald would admit that these two guys are the ones who started it all
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Burning down the house</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/burning-down-the-house/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/burning-down-the-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Weinman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=152447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The move toward libertarianism is having extreme consequences, as one Tennessee homeowner discovered]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/burning-down-the-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The move toward libertarianism is having extreme consequences, as one Tennessee homeowner discovered
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A diplomatic game worth losing</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/15/a-diplomatic-game-worth-losing/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/15/a-diplomatic-game-worth-losing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=152155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COYNE on Canada's defeat at the UN Security Council]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/15/a-diplomatic-game-worth-losing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	COYNE on Canada's defeat at the UN Security Council
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitchel Raphael on what happens if you don’t shake the PM&#039;s hand</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/mitchel-raphael-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/mitchel-raphael-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitchel Raphael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Diary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Kirkpatrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=150045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justin’s look-alike, MPs, transsexuals and a bank CEO, Tory party loses its ‘party’ man]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/mitchel-raphael-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Justin’s look-alike, MPs, transsexuals and a bank CEO, Tory party loses its ‘party’ man
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harper and Ignatieff’s very different inner circles</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/breaking-into-the-inner-circle/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/breaking-into-the-inner-circle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Heritage and Human Resources and Skills Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public servants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockwell Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=149953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent hires speak to their different political styles]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/breaking-into-the-inner-circle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Recent hires speak to their different political styles
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memo to the new chief of staff, poor sod</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/memo-to-the-new-chief-of-staff-poor-sod/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/memo-to-the-new-chief-of-staff-poor-sod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Feschuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scott Feschuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onex Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockwell Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=149897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few words of wisdom for the Prime Minister’s new right-hand man]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/memo-to-the-new-chief-of-staff-poor-sod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A few words of wisdom for the Prime Minister’s new right-hand man
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Being right v. Sounding right</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/05/being-right-v-sounding-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/05/being-right-v-sounding-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=150902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon sees what&#8217;s going on here.
A disconcerting trend is establishing itself in...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/05/being-right-v-sounding-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon sees what&#8217;s going on here.
A disconcerting trend is establishing itself in...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Stephen Harper have a plan for Canada?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/04/does-stephen-harper-have-a-plan-for-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/04/does-stephen-harper-have-a-plan-for-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In conversation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=150709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let us know what you think]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/04/does-stephen-harper-have-a-plan-for-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Let us know what you think
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enough immaturity</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/30/enough-immaturity/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/30/enough-immaturity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Pacific scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quebec nationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xenophobia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=149950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A story that should make Quebecers think, not close ranks]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/30/enough-immaturity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A story that should make Quebecers think, not close ranks
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bonhomme strikes back</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/30/bonhomme-strikes-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/30/bonhomme-strikes-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bilingualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bonhomme Carnaval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coyne vs. wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xenophobia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=149948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A veteran Quebec sovereignist accuses <em>Maclean’s</em> of ‘constructive xenophobia']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/30/bonhomme-strikes-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A veteran Quebec sovereignist accuses <em>Maclean’s</em> of ‘constructive xenophobia'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to think about where we&#039;re going</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/29/what-to-think-about-where-were-going/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/29/what-to-think-about-where-were-going/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex himelfarb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=149869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex Himelfarb contemplates the future of government.
One constant theme was the need to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/29/what-to-think-about-where-were-going/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Alex Himelfarb contemplates the future of government.
One constant theme was the need to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A heart that&#039;s full up like a landfill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/17/a-heart-thats-full-up-like-a-landfill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/17/a-heart-thats-full-up-like-a-landfill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no surprises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privy Council Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiohead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=148083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the future, as we move toward a new era of austerity and small...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/17/a-heart-thats-full-up-like-a-landfill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In the future, as we move toward a new era of austerity and small...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>So you want to be a member of Parliament?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/26/any-idiot-could-do-it-but-could-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/26/any-idiot-could-do-it-but-could-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Feschuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scott Feschuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative caucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=143160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It takes a dazzling set of skills to be an MP. Like having a hand, to pound things with.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/26/any-idiot-could-do-it-but-could-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	It takes a dazzling set of skills to be an MP. Like having a hand, to pound things with.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The size, scope and purpose of government</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/24/the-size-scope-and-purpose-of-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/24/the-size-scope-and-purpose-of-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex himelfarb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare state]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=143980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex Himelfarb takes stock of the state and the competing visions of welfare and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/24/the-size-scope-and-purpose-of-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Alex Himelfarb takes stock of the state and the competing visions of welfare and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Wyclef Jean what Haiti needs?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/17/is-wyclef-jean-what-haiti-needs/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/17/is-wyclef-jean-what-haiti-needs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Petrou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hip-hop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyclef Jean]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=142281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hip-hop star could actually win the presidency. Then what?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/17/is-wyclef-jean-what-haiti-needs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The hip-hop star could actually win the presidency. Then what?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A know-nothing strain of conservatism</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/17/a-know-nothing-strain-of-conservatism/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/17/a-know-nothing-strain-of-conservatism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=142269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COYNE: The PM once was viewed as rigid but upright; doctrinaire, but with a certain integrity]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/17/a-know-nothing-strain-of-conservatism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>527</slash:comments>
	COYNE: The PM once was viewed as rigid but upright; doctrinaire, but with a certain integrity
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>We get the feeling you’re tuning out, Steve</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/14/we-get-the-feeling-youre-tuning-out-steve/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/14/we-get-the-feeling-youre-tuning-out-steve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 18:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Feschuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scott Feschuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=142648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FESCHUK: It's year four as PM. Do you know where your cabinet ministers are?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/14/we-get-the-feeling-youre-tuning-out-steve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	FESCHUK: It's year four as PM. Do you know where your cabinet ministers are?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The state adrift</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/13/the-state-adrift/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/13/the-state-adrift/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex himelfarb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=142645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex Himelfarb considers the state of the Canadian state.
Erosion of the state through...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/13/the-state-adrift/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Alex Himelfarb considers the state of the Canadian state.
Erosion of the state through...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What goes on here (II)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/09/what-goes-on-here-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/09/what-goes-on-here-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=131707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last few days, the Canadian Press has published a three-part series (here,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/09/what-goes-on-here-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
	Over the last few days, the Canadian Press has published a three-part series (here,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The first step is admitting the possibility</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/19/the-first-step-is-admitting-the-possibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/19/the-first-step-is-admitting-the-possibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 17:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=127475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rob Silver lays out the conditions for a coalition.
Do not rule out a...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/19/the-first-step-is-admitting-the-possibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
	Rob Silver lays out the conditions for a coalition.
Do not rule out a...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much should we pay and what should we pay for?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/how-much-should-we-pay-and-what-should-we-pay-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/how-much-should-we-pay-and-what-should-we-pay-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 15:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Paikin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=127111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Agenda convenes a panel—including our Andrew Coyne—to discuss the sorts of questions that...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/how-much-should-we-pay-and-what-should-we-pay-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
	The Agenda convenes a panel—including our Andrew Coyne—to discuss the sorts of questions that...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
