<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; GST</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/gst/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:53:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Note to the NDP (and everyone else): the popular tax hikes don&#8217;t increase tax revenues</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/24/note-to-the-ndp-and-everyone-else-the-popular-tax-hikes-dont-increase-tax-revenues/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/24/note-to-the-ndp-and-everyone-else-the-popular-tax-hikes-dont-increase-tax-revenues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate tax rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high income taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starve the beast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=374916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon on good politics and not very good economics]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/24/note-to-the-ndp-and-everyone-else-the-popular-tax-hikes-dont-increase-tax-revenues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon on good politics and not very good economics
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;I would consider raising the GST but only if needed&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/14/i-would-consider-raising-the-gst-but-only-if-needed/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/14/i-would-consider-raising-the-gst-but-only-if-needed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Hall Findlay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=336801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amid all else on Friday afternoon, Martha Hall Findlay released a statement to explain...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/14/i-would-consider-raising-the-gst-but-only-if-needed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Amid all else on Friday afternoon, Martha Hall Findlay released a statement to explain...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Martha Hall Findlay and the GST</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/11/martha-hall-findlay-and-the-gst/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/11/martha-hall-findlay-and-the-gst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Hall Findlay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=336060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Liberal leadership contender explains herself to the Canadian Press.
The former Toronto MP...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/11/martha-hall-findlay-and-the-gst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Liberal leadership contender explains herself to the Canadian Press.
The former Toronto MP...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dealing with inequality, part I: The bottom 99 per cent</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/11/dealing-with-inequality-part-i-the-bottom-99-per-cent/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/11/dealing-with-inequality-part-i-the-bottom-99-per-cent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=331333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon on why you should love the GST/HST]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/11/dealing-with-inequality-part-i-the-bottom-99-per-cent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon on why you should love the GST/HST
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who wants to raise the GST?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/10/who-wants-to-raise-the-gst/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/10/who-wants-to-raise-the-gst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Hall Findlay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=335580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Liberal MP Martha Hall Findlay does, apparently.
An important thing she mentioned was...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/10/who-wants-to-raise-the-gst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Former Liberal MP Martha Hall Findlay does, apparently.
An important thing she mentioned was...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The trouble with taxes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/08/334563/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/08/334563/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 18:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-and-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=334563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Globe wonders whether this will be the year we learn to love taxes....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/08/334563/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Globe wonders whether this will be the year we learn to love taxes....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trudeau and the GST</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/03/trudeau-and-the-gst/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/03/trudeau-and-the-gst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Solomon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter DeVries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=322817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During his interview on CBC&#8217;s The House, Justin Trudeau ruled out an increase in...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/03/trudeau-and-the-gst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	During his interview on CBC&#8217;s The House, Justin Trudeau ruled out an increase in...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idea alert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/24/idea-alert-64/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/24/idea-alert-64/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Mintz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value added tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=242059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack Mintz, an economist whose expertise the Harper government values very, very, very, very,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/24/idea-alert-64/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Jack Mintz, an economist whose expertise the Harper government values very, very, very, very,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brian Topp goes there</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/21/brian-topp-goes-there/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/21/brian-topp-goes-there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Topp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=221117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP leadership candidate talks taxes.
&#8220;I will be talking about income taxes and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/21/brian-topp-goes-there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
	The NDP leadership candidate talks taxes.
&#8220;I will be talking about income taxes and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raise taxes to reduce inequality</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/17/raise-taxes-to-reduce-inequality/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/17/raise-taxes-to-reduce-inequality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Fingas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Moffatt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VATs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=220335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Moffatt argues we aren&#8217;t prepared to do what&#8217;s necessary to reduce inequality.
The...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/17/raise-taxes-to-reduce-inequality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	Mike Moffatt argues we aren&#8217;t prepared to do what&#8217;s necessary to reduce inequality.
The...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A state of perfect disharmony</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/29/a-state-of-perfect-disharmony/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/29/a-state-of-perfect-disharmony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/06/a-state-of-perfect-disharmony/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COYNE: You'd think provinces would not have to be bribed to act in their own interest]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/29/a-state-of-perfect-disharmony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	COYNE: You'd think provinces would not have to be bribed to act in their own interest
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cutting the right taxes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter DeVries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Clark and Peter DeVries propose a new tax plan to fix the government&#8217;s...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/cutting-the-right-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
	Scott Clark and Peter DeVries propose a new tax plan to fix the government&#8217;s...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right place, right time, right party</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/right-place-right-time-right-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/right-place-right-time-right-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Blaikie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Mulroney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Wheat Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Kenney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Crosbie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Whyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Stevenson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preston Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Byfield]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/29/right-place-right-time-right-party/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Wells on how Ted Byfield helped pave the way for Harper's majority win]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/right-place-right-time-right-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
	Paul Wells on how Ted Byfield helped pave the way for Harper's majority win
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In praise of VAT</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/16/in-praise-of-vat/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/16/in-praise-of-vat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=215929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon tries to reconcile progressives with sales taxes.
Outside Canada, it is generally...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/16/in-praise-of-vat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon tries to reconcile progressives with sales taxes.
Outside Canada, it is generally...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The demise of the HST (II)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/29/the-demise-of-the-hst-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/29/the-demise-of-the-hst-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frances Woolley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=212087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frances Woolley considers the merits of stealth taxation.
The federal GST or goods and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/29/the-demise-of-the-hst-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	Frances Woolley considers the merits of stealth taxation.
The federal GST or goods and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>You are invited to a tax party</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/26/you-are-invited-to-a-tax-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/26/you-are-invited-to-a-tax-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Macdonald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Vander Zalm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fight HST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=205645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[B.C. residents tune out the spin, and turn to each other for the HST vote]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/26/you-are-invited-to-a-tax-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
	B.C. residents tune out the spin, and turn to each other for the HST vote
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The structural deficit that dare not speak its name</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/07/the-structural-deficit-that-dare-not-speak-its-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/07/the-structural-deficit-that-dare-not-speak-its-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=195968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon sees yesterday&#8217;s budget as an implicit acknowledgement of a structural deficit.
Many...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/07/the-structural-deficit-that-dare-not-speak-its-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon sees yesterday&#8217;s budget as an implicit acknowledgement of a structural deficit.
Many...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Harper has planned for Ottawa</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/20/what-harper-has-planned-for-ottawa/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/20/what-harper-has-planned-for-ottawa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paul Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TFSAs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=185983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The PM plans to continue shrinking government; health care transfers will help]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/20/what-harper-has-planned-for-ottawa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>215</slash:comments>
	The PM plans to continue shrinking government; health care transfers will help
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bull Meter: Michael Ignatieff on the Conservatives’ economic record</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/michael-ignatieff-on-the-conservatives%e2%80%99-economic-record/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/michael-ignatieff-on-the-conservatives%e2%80%99-economic-record/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Belluz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Bull Meter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bull meter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=180588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2009, the federal government&#8217;s balance sheet went from showing a surplus of $9.597...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/michael-ignatieff-on-the-conservatives%e2%80%99-economic-record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
	In 2009, the federal government&#8217;s balance sheet went from showing a surplus of $9.597...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia&#039;s haves and have-nots</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/15/the-haves-and-the-have-nots/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/15/the-haves-and-the-have-nots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[have-not]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New South Wales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=176651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New South Wales used to be Australia's economic engine. Now, it's set to receive equalization.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/15/the-haves-and-the-have-nots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	New South Wales used to be Australia's economic engine. Now, it's set to receive equalization.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Popular economics</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/01/popular-economics/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/01/popular-economics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Moffatt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=169474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Moffatt considers the corporate tax rate debate, while Stephen Gordon considers the GST....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/01/popular-economics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
	Mike Moffatt considers the corporate tax rate debate, while Stephen Gordon considers the GST....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What a New Democrat wants</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/13/what-a-new-democrat-wants/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/13/what-a-new-democrat-wants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Pension Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guaranteed income supplement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=166793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Akin reviews Jack Layton&#8217;s demands.
&#8220;New Democrats are fighting to make sure stronger...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/13/what-a-new-democrat-wants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
	David Akin reviews Jack Layton&#8217;s demands.
&#8220;New Democrats are fighting to make sure stronger...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The economist</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/13/the-economist/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/13/the-economist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Brodie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=166759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Harper, September 2008. “My own belief is if we were going to have...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/13/the-economist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
	Stephen Harper, September 2008. “My own belief is if we were going to have...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;A price solution for an income problem&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/26/a-price-solution-for-an-income-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/26/a-price-solution-for-an-income-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmonized sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=154520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon questions the NDP call for a tax break on home-heating costs.
If...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/26/a-price-solution-for-an-income-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon questions the NDP call for a tax break on home-heating costs.
If...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Sound economic theory</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/20/the-commons-sound-economic-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/20/the-commons-sound-economic-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guelph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Lady of Lourdes High School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Goodale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=153774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suddenly, it matters what economists think]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/20/the-commons-sound-economic-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Suddenly, it matters what economists think
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where ideas are considered dangerous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/ideas-are-dangerous/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/ideas-are-dangerous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=149911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finance Minister Jim Flaherty was praised for rising above ideology]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/ideas-are-dangerous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Finance Minister Jim Flaherty was praised for rising above ideology
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Being right v. Sounding right</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/05/being-right-v-sounding-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/05/being-right-v-sounding-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=150902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon sees what&#8217;s going on here.
A disconcerting trend is establishing itself in...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/05/being-right-v-sounding-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon sees what&#8217;s going on here.
A disconcerting trend is establishing itself in...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idea alert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/04/idea-alert-30/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/04/idea-alert-30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=150610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack Layton pitches tax relief.
The federal NDP wants Ottawa to scrap the federal...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/04/idea-alert-30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Jack Layton pitches tax relief.
The federal NDP wants Ottawa to scrap the federal...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>People like it</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/27/people-like-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/27/people-like-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=144365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Globe&#8217;s epic profile of Jim Flaherty, the Finance Minister explains why cutting...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/27/people-like-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	From the Globe&#8217;s epic profile of Jim Flaherty, the Finance Minister explains why cutting...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most exclusive PM interview ever</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/24/most-exclusive-pm-interview-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/24/most-exclusive-pm-interview-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Feschuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scott Feschuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[five years]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helena Guergis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Chretien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Beatles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Throne Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wait times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Gretzky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=116197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Harper from five years ago has a few questions for his present-day alter ego]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/24/most-exclusive-pm-interview-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	Stephen Harper from five years ago has a few questions for his present-day alter ego
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idea alert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/03/idea-alert-22/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/03/idea-alert-22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=113602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Economist Stephen Gordon wishes for a staggered reincrease of the GST, then opens the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/03/idea-alert-22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
	Economist Stephen Gordon wishes for a staggered reincrease of the GST, then opens the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idea alert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/23/idea-alert-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/23/idea-alert-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Kenny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mounties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCMP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=110741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RCMP report tabled yesterday by Colin Kenny and a delegation of Liberal senators...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/23/idea-alert-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
	The RCMP report tabled yesterday by Colin Kenny and a delegation of Liberal senators...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gerard Kennedy Maverick Watch</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/29/gerard-kennedy-maverick-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/29/gerard-kennedy-maverick-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerard Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=104746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Liberal MP dares champion the notions of &#8220;discussion&#8221; and &#8220;consideration&#8221; and even &#8220;debate.&#8221;...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/29/gerard-kennedy-maverick-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
	The Liberal MP dares champion the notions of &#8220;discussion&#8221; and &#8220;consideration&#8221; and even &#8220;debate.&#8221;...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are taxes the only way out of the deficit?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/26/we-will-pay-for-this-one-way-or-another/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/26/we-will-pay-for-this-one-way-or-another/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C.D. Howe Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=102864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ANDREW COYNE: The government has a choice. It can either break its promise not to raise taxes. Or it can break its promise not to cut transfers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/26/we-will-pay-for-this-one-way-or-another/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
	ANDREW COYNE: The government has a choice. It can either break its promise not to raise taxes. Or it can break its promise not to cut transfers.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Week: Good news/Bad news</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/27/this-week-good-newsbad-news-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/27/this-week-good-newsbad-news-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good news, bad news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lambert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gosselins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=94570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A week in the life of twilight]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/27/this-week-good-newsbad-news-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	A week in the life of twilight
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad Hoc Parliamentary Reform of the Week</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/24/ad-hoc-parliamentary-reform-of-the-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/24/ad-hoc-parliamentary-reform-of-the-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dalton McGuinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen's Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Hudak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=94171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the government won&#8217;t answer your requests in Question Period, leave.
Frustrated by Premier...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/24/ad-hoc-parliamentary-reform-of-the-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	If the government won&#8217;t answer your requests in Question Period, leave.
Frustrated by Premier...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A few kind words for harmonization</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/23/a-few-kind-words-for-harmonization/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/23/a-few-kind-words-for-harmonization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value-added tax regime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=93224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ANDREW COYNE: It isn’t a tax grab. Prices won’t increase. So why all the fuss?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/23/a-few-kind-words-for-harmonization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
	ANDREW COYNE: It isn’t a tax grab. Prices won’t increase. So why all the fuss?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#039;s the GST, stupid</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/13/its-the-gst-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/13/its-the-gst-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=92559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon tries to figure out the federal deficit.
And here we have an...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/13/its-the-gst-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon tries to figure out the federal deficit.
And here we have an...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time for Ignatieff to take a chance</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/16/time-for-ignatieff-to-take-a-chance/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/16/time-for-ignatieff-to-take-a-chance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coyne's Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=87204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Liberal leader wants to show some backbone and differentiate himself from Harper, he should start by addressing the deficit issue]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/16/time-for-ignatieff-to-take-a-chance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
	If the Liberal leader wants to show some backbone and differentiate himself from Harper, he should start by addressing the deficit issue
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How we got from there to here</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/13/how-we-got-from-there-to-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/13/how-we-got-from-there-to-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transfers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=86914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Star sorts out how the federal books got the way they are.
Taking...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/13/how-we-got-from-there-to-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>110</slash:comments>
	The Star sorts out how the federal books got the way they are.
Taking...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two-part harmony</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/07/two-part-harmony/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/07/two-part-harmony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=86092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack Layton, in QP yesterday, wondering if Stephen Harper agrees with his previous self....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/07/two-part-harmony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
	Jack Layton, in QP yesterday, wondering if Stephen Harper agrees with his previous self....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ignatieff&#039;s HST stance unmurkified? ITQ wouldn&#039;t go that far, but it&#039;s a start.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/21/ignatieffs-hst-stance-unmurkified-itq-wouldnt-go-that-far-but-its-a-start/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/21/ignatieffs-hst-stance-unmurkified-itq-wouldnt-go-that-far-but-its-a-start/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kadyomalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside the Queensway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmonization for the nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maybe there's something in the air at the toronto hilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rsvp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stalking the wily ignatieff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=83262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, in marked contrast to his reaction to being questioned about his HST stance...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/21/ignatieffs-hst-stance-unmurkified-itq-wouldnt-go-that-far-but-its-a-start/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
	Well, in marked contrast to his reaction to being questioned about his HST stance...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Flaherty Maverick Watch</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/19/jim-flaherty-maverick-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/19/jim-flaherty-maverick-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 03:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax harmonization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=83030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Days after a report that he&#8217;s been told to zip it, the Finance Minister...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/19/jim-flaherty-maverick-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
	Days after a report that he&#8217;s been told to zip it, the Finance Minister...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: And that&#039;s when the nuns started yelling</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/16/the-commons-and-thats-when-the-nuns-started-yelling/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/16/the-commons-and-thats-when-the-nuns-started-yelling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body bags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominic LeBlanc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerry Byrne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Rafferty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seal hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seal hunt protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Blaney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swine Flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wayne easter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=82152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All eyes were on Jack Layton, after those unruly "sisters" were escorted outside]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/16/the-commons-and-thats-when-the-nuns-started-yelling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
	All eyes were on Jack Layton, after those unruly "sisters" were escorted outside
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shush now, Jim</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/16/shush-now-jim/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/16/shush-now-jim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax harmonization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=81991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty, March 30. Last week, Ontario’s Liberal government, after objecting to the combined...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/16/shush-now-jim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
	Jim Flaherty, March 30. Last week, Ontario’s Liberal government, after objecting to the combined...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
