<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; income inequality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/income-inequality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:04:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Manitoba’s choice</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/manitobas-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/manitobas-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Econowatch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manitoba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provincial budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=377974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taxing high earners wouldn’t have filled provincial coffers, writes Kevin Milligan]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/manitobas-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Taxing high earners wouldn’t have filled provincial coffers, writes Kevin Milligan
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A message for the NDP: profits are people, too</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/a-message-for-the-ndp-profits-are-people-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/a-message-for-the-ndp-profits-are-people-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=369001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yours truly, Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/10/a-message-for-the-ndp-profits-are-people-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Yours truly, Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want to help the poor? Don&#8217;t waste your time with the minimum wage</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/19/want-to-help-the-poor-dont-waste-your-time-with-the-minimum-wage/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/19/want-to-help-the-poor-dont-waste-your-time-with-the-minimum-wage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimum wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=351663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon reviews the evidence on the minimum wage]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/19/want-to-help-the-poor-dont-waste-your-time-with-the-minimum-wage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon reviews the evidence on the minimum wage
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dealing with inequality, part I: The bottom 99 per cent</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/11/dealing-with-inequality-part-i-the-bottom-99-per-cent/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/11/dealing-with-inequality-part-i-the-bottom-99-per-cent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=331333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Gordon on why you should love the GST/HST]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/11/dealing-with-inequality-part-i-the-bottom-99-per-cent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Gordon on why you should love the GST/HST
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talking at cross-purposes about income inequality</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/21/talking-at-cross-purposes-about-income-inequality/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/21/talking-at-cross-purposes-about-income-inequality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 00:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gini coefficient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=316095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne&#8217;s column arguing that income inequality has stopped getting worse drew a sharply-worded...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/21/talking-at-cross-purposes-about-income-inequality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Andrew Coyne&#8217;s column arguing that income inequality has stopped getting worse drew a sharply-worded...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What do we know about the 1 per cent?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/19/what-do-we-know-about-the-one-per-cent/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/19/what-do-we-know-about-the-one-per-cent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue Allan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the one percent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=314474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Little, but enough to debunk a few common misconceptions]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/19/what-do-we-know-about-the-one-per-cent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Little, but enough to debunk a few common misconceptions
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking it to the streets</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/10/taking-it-to-the-streets-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/10/taking-it-to-the-streets-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex himelfarb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=301782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex Himelfarb considers democracy, income inequality, consumerism and citizenship.
The result: a marketized politics...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/10/taking-it-to-the-streets-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Alex Himelfarb considers democracy, income inequality, consumerism and citizenship.
The result: a marketized politics...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Claymation Ed Broadbent vs. Dean Del Mastro</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/09/claymation-ed-broadbent-vs-dean-del-mastro/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/09/claymation-ed-broadbent-vs-dean-del-mastro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dean del Mastro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Broadbent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winston Churchill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=301643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Broadbent Institute released a report today on income inequality. Dean Del Mastro is...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/09/claymation-ed-broadbent-vs-dean-del-mastro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Broadbent Institute released a report today on income inequality. Dean Del Mastro is...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taxing high earners is harder than it looks: Quebec edition</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/01/taxing-high-earners-is-harder-than-it-looks-quebec-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/01/taxing-high-earners-is-harder-than-it-looks-quebec-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parti Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=298357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Memo to the PQ: there aren't that many Quebecers in the top-income brackets]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/01/taxing-high-earners-is-harder-than-it-looks-quebec-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Memo to the PQ: there aren't that many Quebecers in the top-income brackets
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dickens at 200: still the best we&#8217;ve got on being poor</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/07/dickens-at-200-still-the-best-weve-got-on-being-poor/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/07/dickens-at-200-still-the-best-weve-got-on-being-poor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Dickens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dickens' 200th Birthday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northrop Frye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=238312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His way of forcing the reader to see and smell the squalor of 19th century England is still unmatched in its moral force]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/07/dickens-at-200-still-the-best-weve-got-on-being-poor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	His way of forcing the reader to see and smell the squalor of 19th century England is still unmatched in its moral force
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nash on innovation</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/17/nash-on-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/17/nash-on-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=234219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late last week, Peggy Nash detailed her innovation policy, including a new Canada Innovation...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/17/nash-on-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Late last week, Peggy Nash detailed her innovation policy, including a new Canada Innovation...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greater equality through taxes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/19/greater-equality-through-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/19/greater-equality-through-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Topp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Milligan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=230427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Milligan and friends consider how to deal with inequality.
Brian Topp assumes his...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/19/greater-equality-through-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Kevin Milligan and friends consider how to deal with inequality.
Brian Topp assumes his...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>OECD: Canada&#8217;s income inequality well above average</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/05/oecd-canadas-income-inequality-well-above-average/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/05/oecd-canadas-income-inequality-well-above-average/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=228515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Job market, tax breaks widening the gap]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/05/oecd-canadas-income-inequality-well-above-average/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	Job market, tax breaks widening the gap
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can we tax our way to equality?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/31/can-we-tax-our-way-to-equality/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/31/can-we-tax-our-way-to-equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupy wall st.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=222370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why transfers to low-income groups may be a better idea than taxes on the rich]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/31/can-we-tax-our-way-to-equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
	Why transfers to low-income groups may be a better idea than taxes on the rich
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rank your income: Where do you stand compared to the rest of Canada?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/25/rank-your-income-where-do-you-stand-compared-to-the-rest-of-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/25/rank-your-income-where-do-you-stand-compared-to-the-rest-of-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Topp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OECD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=221182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our patented calculator tells you how your income stacks up]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/25/rank-your-income-where-do-you-stand-compared-to-the-rest-of-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>92</slash:comments>
	Our patented calculator tells you how your income stacks up
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Jim Flaherty a hippie?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/13/is-jim-flaherty-a-hippie/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/13/is-jim-flaherty-a-hippie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bay Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupy wall st.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=220106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, the Finance Minister quotes Bobby Kennedy and waxes romantic about public service and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/13/is-jim-flaherty-a-hippie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
	First, the Finance Minister quotes Bobby Kennedy and waxes romantic about public service and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The rich keep getting richer. Should we be worried?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/the-rich-keep-getting-richer-should-we-be-worried/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/the-rich-keep-getting-richer-should-we-be-worried/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 21:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OECD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=190339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new OECD report takes on the widening income gap]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/the-rich-keep-getting-richer-should-we-be-worried/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>132</slash:comments>
	A new OECD report takes on the widening income gap
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idea alert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/05/idea-alert-41/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/05/idea-alert-41/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guaranteed income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idea alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=165585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further to the guaranteed income discussion, there is what Brazil has done to great...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/05/idea-alert-41/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
	Further to the guaranteed income discussion, there is what Brazil has done to great...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Megapundit: The Royal Bananadian Mounted Police</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/29/megapundit-the-royal-bananadian-mounted-police/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/29/megapundit-the-royal-bananadian-mounted-police/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>selley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Megapundit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailey Zaveda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Frost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Weese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Dziekanski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sino-Canadian relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=14135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Must-reads: </strong>Ian Mulgrew on the Robert Dziekanski fiasco.
<strong>Canadian justice...</strong>
Shameless cops, creepy hockey]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/29/megapundit-the-royal-bananadian-mounted-police/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	<strong>Must-reads: </strong>Ian Mulgrew on the Robert Dziekanski fiasco.
<strong>Canadian justice...</strong>
Shameless cops, creepy hockey
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
