<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Lawful Access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/lawful-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:50:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The return of C-30?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/15/the-return-of-c-30/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/15/the-return-of-c-30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=315126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Police chiefs are pushing for the resurrection of the government&#8217;s &#8220;lawful access&#8221; legislation.
In...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/15/the-return-of-c-30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Police chiefs are pushing for the resurrection of the government&#8217;s &#8220;lawful access&#8221; legislation.
In...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public policy and the real world</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/05/public-policy-and-the-real-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/05/public-policy-and-the-real-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Husbands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eaton Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luka Rocco Magnotta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Nicholson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=264019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Geist dismisses Vic Toews&#8217; attempt to link the case of Luka Rocco Magnotta...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/05/public-policy-and-the-real-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Michael Geist dismisses Vic Toews&#8217; attempt to link the case of Luka Rocco Magnotta...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Speaker rules against Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/06/the-speaker-rules-against-anonymous/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/06/the-speaker-rules-against-anonymous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Scheer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=243942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Public Safety Minister Vic Toews rose in the House to claim that...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/06/the-speaker-rules-against-anonymous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Last week, Public Safety Minister Vic Toews rose in the House to claim that...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vic Toews stands, the government waits, the public disagrees</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/27/vic-toews-stands-the-government-waits-the-public-disagrees/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/27/vic-toews-stands-the-government-waits-the-public-disagrees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angus Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=242316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Public Safety Minister attempts to defend himself.
Let me be clear: Bill C-30...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/27/vic-toews-stands-the-government-waits-the-public-disagrees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Public Safety Minister attempts to defend himself.
Let me be clear: Bill C-30...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>As the privacy fight turned ugly, democracy made a comeback</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/24/as-the-privacy-fight-turned-ugly-democracy-made-a-comeback/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/24/as-the-privacy-fight-turned-ugly-democracy-made-a-comeback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill c-30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=241216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While a certain amount of electronic surveillance is justified, the possibility that such information could be made available without a warrant should be of concern to every Canadian]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/24/as-the-privacy-fight-turned-ugly-democracy-made-a-comeback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	While a certain amount of electronic surveillance is justified, the possibility that such information could be made available without a warrant should be of concern to every Canadian
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vic Toews stands with Vic Toews</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/23/vic-toews-stands-with-vic-toews/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/23/vic-toews-stands-with-vic-toews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Solomon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Gurney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=241838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Public Safety Minister writes to the National Post to counter the suggestion he...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/23/vic-toews-stands-with-vic-toews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Public Safety Minister writes to the National Post to counter the suggestion he...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>You either stand with Vic Toews or&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/23/you-either-stand-with-vic-toews-or/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/23/you-either-stand-with-vic-toews-or/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockwell Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=241615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stockwell Day, one of Mr. Toews&#8217; predecessors at Public Safety, explains his position on...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/23/you-either-stand-with-vic-toews-or/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stockwell Day, one of Mr. Toews&#8217; predecessors at Public Safety, explains his position on...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vic Toews, meet Fake Ann Cavoukian</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/21/vic-toews-meet-fake-ann-cavoukian/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/21/vic-toews-meet-fake-ann-cavoukian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jesse Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Cavoukian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fake Ann Cavoukian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake Twitter accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Privacy Commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=241051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ironically, Ontario's privacy commissioner (a harsh critic of Lawful Access) also has a detested Twitter doppelganger]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/21/vic-toews-meet-fake-ann-cavoukian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Ironically, Ontario's privacy commissioner (a harsh critic of Lawful Access) also has a detested Twitter doppelganger
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to salvage C-30</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/21/how-to-salvage-c-30/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/21/how-to-salvage-c-30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Fraser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivor Tossell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=240992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Fraser offers four amendments.
There are many, many problems with the warrantless access...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/21/how-to-salvage-c-30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	David Fraser offers four amendments.
There are many, many problems with the warrantless access...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Threats and support for Vic Toews</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/21/threats-and-support-for-vic-toews/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/21/threats-and-support-for-vic-toews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Association of Police Chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long gun registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=240964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A second video purported to be from Anonymous has been released.
The Canadian Association...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/21/threats-and-support-for-vic-toews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A second video purported to be from Anonymous has been released.
The Canadian Association...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where do we draw the line?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/20/where-do-we-draw-the-line/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/20/where-do-we-draw-the-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denis coderre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kris Kotarski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shelly Glover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=240921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kris Kotarski makes an important observation: what Vic Toews said last Monday wasn&#8217;t without...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/20/where-do-we-draw-the-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Kris Kotarski makes an important observation: what Vic Toews said last Monday wasn&#8217;t without...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Failed his ministerial responsibilities&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/18/failed-his-ministerial-responsibilities/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/18/failed-his-ministerial-responsibilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 23:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Dewar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=240889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Dewar releases a statement calling on Vic Toews to resign.
Over the past...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/18/failed-his-ministerial-responsibilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Paul Dewar releases a statement calling on Vic Toews to resign.
Over the past...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vic Toews v. C-30</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/18/vic-toews-v-c-30/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/18/vic-toews-v-c-30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=240882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also from the Public Safety Minister&#8217;s interview with The House, there seems to be...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/18/vic-toews-v-c-30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Also from the Public Safety Minister&#8217;s interview with The House, there seems to be...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What we&#8217;re really talking about when we talk about lawful access</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/17/what-were-really-talking-about-when-we-talk-about-lawful-access/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/17/what-were-really-talking-about-when-we-talk-about-lawful-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Fraser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry Milewski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=240744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terry Milewski reviews sections 33 and 34 of the government&#8217;s online surveillance legislation.
First,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/17/what-were-really-talking-about-when-we-talk-about-lawful-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Terry Milewski reviews sections 33 and 34 of the government&#8217;s online surveillance legislation.
First,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Dirty, sleazy Internet tricks&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/17/dirty-sleazy-internet-tricks/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/17/dirty-sleazy-internet-tricks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Menzies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=240740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seven times during QP this morning—six times by John Baird, once by Ted Menzies—the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/17/dirty-sleazy-internet-tricks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Seven times during QP this morning—six times by John Baird, once by Ted Menzies—the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>House of Intrigue</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/17/house-of-intrigue/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/17/house-of-intrigue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=240593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sun reports that before Vic Toews went out and said that thing he...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/17/house-of-intrigue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Sun reports that before Vic Toews went out and said that thing he...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vikileaks: a bad way to make a good point</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/16/vikileaks-a-bad-way-to-make-a-good-point/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/16/vikileaks-a-bad-way-to-make-a-good-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jesse Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=240306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada has learned a lot more about Vic Toews than it needed to]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/16/vikileaks-a-bad-way-to-make-a-good-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Canada has learned a lot more about Vic Toews than it needed to
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>#TellVicEverything</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/16/tellviceverything/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/16/tellviceverything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=240454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Public Safety Minister gets his own hashtag....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/16/tellviceverything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Public Safety Minister gets his own hashtag....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Vic Toews teaches us a valuable lesson</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/15/the-commons-vic-toews-teaches-us-a-valuable-lesson/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/15/the-commons-vic-toews-teaches-us-a-valuable-lesson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francoise Boivin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Goodale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=240211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where once his critics stood with child pornographers, now he welcomes their advice]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/15/the-commons-vic-toews-teaches-us-a-valuable-lesson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Where once his critics stood with child pornographers, now he welcomes their advice
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where does John Williamson stand?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/15/john-williamson-maverick-watch-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/15/john-williamson-maverick-watch-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Williamson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=240217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservative backbencher speaks with reporters after QP today about the government&#8217;s online surveillance...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/15/john-williamson-maverick-watch-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Conservative backbencher speaks with reporters after QP today about the government&#8217;s online surveillance...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vic Toews denies himself</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/15/vic-toews-denies-himself/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/15/vic-toews-denies-himself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=239960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Public Safety Minister has apparently moved past trying to parse himself to simply...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/15/vic-toews-denies-himself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Public Safety Minister has apparently moved past trying to parse himself to simply...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What we&#8217;re talking about when we talk about lawful access</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/15/what-were-talking-about-when-we-talk-about-lawful-access/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/15/what-were-talking-about-when-we-talk-about-lawful-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Caoukian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Hartley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Nicholson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=239901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ontario privacy commissioner dismisses both the government&#8217;s argument and its rhetoric.
“Simply put,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/15/what-were-talking-about-when-we-talk-about-lawful-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Ontario privacy commissioner dismisses both the government&#8217;s argument and its rhetoric.
“Simply put,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vic Toews parses himself</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/15/vic-toews-parses-himself/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/15/vic-toews-parses-himself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Solomon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=239877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interview with CTV, the Public Safety Minister maintains there&#8217;s a difference between...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/15/vic-toews-parses-himself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In an interview with CTV, the Public Safety Minister maintains there&#8217;s a difference between...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawful Access: a creepy Valentine from Vic Toews</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/14/lawful-access-a-creepy-valentine-from-vic-toews/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/14/lawful-access-a-creepy-valentine-from-vic-toews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jesse Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harper government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=239708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one will 'read emails without a warrant,' he says. Indeed, it may be much worse than that.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/14/lawful-access-a-creepy-valentine-from-vic-toews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	No one will 'read emails without a warrant,' he says. Indeed, it may be much worse than that.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vic Toews is watching</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/14/vic-toews-is-watching/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/14/vic-toews-is-watching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockwell Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=239750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government has tabled its online surveillance legislation, now dubbed the &#8220;Protecting Children from...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/14/vic-toews-is-watching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The government has tabled its online surveillance legislation, now dubbed the &#8220;Protecting Children from...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil disagreement</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/13/civil-disagreement/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/13/civil-disagreement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francis Scarpaleggia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=239632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From QP this afternoon, Public Safety Minister Vic Toews responds to concerns raised by...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/13/civil-disagreement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	From QP this afternoon, Public Safety Minister Vic Toews responds to concerns raised by...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Police: No &#8216;good examples&#8217; of why we need Lawful Access</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/18/police-no-good-examples-of-why-we-need-lawful-access/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/18/police-no-good-examples-of-why-we-need-lawful-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jesse Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal Privacy Commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Service Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenMedia.ca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provincial Privacy Commissioner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=234286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evidence obtained by OpenMedia shows struggle to justify warrantless Internet surveillance ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/18/police-no-good-examples-of-why-we-need-lawful-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Evidence obtained by OpenMedia shows struggle to justify warrantless Internet surveillance 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Canadians have not been given sufficient justification&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/28/canadians-have-not-been-given-sufficient-justification/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/28/canadians-have-not-been-given-sufficient-justification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Stoddart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy commissioner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=222151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The privacy commissioner questions the Harper government&#8217;s push for &#8220;lawful access&#8221; legislation.
Despite repeated...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/28/canadians-have-not-been-given-sufficient-justification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	The privacy commissioner questions the Harper government&#8217;s push for &#8220;lawful access&#8221; legislation.
Despite repeated...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slacktivism defeats Lawful Access</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/21/slacktivism-defeats-lawful-access/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/21/slacktivism-defeats-lawful-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jesse Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openmedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slacktivism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes, staying at home in front the computer is the best thing you can do]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/21/slacktivism-defeats-lawful-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	Sometimes, staying at home in front the computer is the best thing you can do
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Omnibus toughness</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/20/omnibus-toughness/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/20/omnibus-toughness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-terrorism Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Nicholson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=216269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government has announced details of its omnibus crime bill: The Safe Streets and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/20/omnibus-toughness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	The government has announced details of its omnibus crime bill: The Safe Streets and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fight promotion</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/15/fight-promotion/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/15/fight-promotion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charmaine Borg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=215650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP is touting its readiness to fight the government&#8217;s &#8220;lawful access&#8221; legislation.
“What...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/15/fight-promotion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	The NDP is touting its readiness to fight the government&#8217;s &#8220;lawful access&#8221; legislation.
“What...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worried about terrorism? Not us.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/09/worried-not-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/09/worried-not-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama in Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=213639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new poll shows that 10 years after 9/11, Canadians aren’t concerned about the threat of terrorism]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/09/worried-not-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	A new poll shows that 10 years after 9/11, Canadians aren’t concerned about the threat of terrorism
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The RCMP and Montreal police ignored cybercrime while demanding new powers to fight cybercrime</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/22/the-rcmp-and-montreal-police-ignored-cyber-criminal-while-demanding-new-powers-to-fight-cyber-crime/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/22/the-rcmp-and-montreal-police-ignored-cyber-criminal-while-demanding-new-powers-to-fight-cyber-crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jesse Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david mabus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dennis markuze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=210724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "David Mabus" case raises serious questions about law enforcement's interest in catching online criminals]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/22/the-rcmp-and-montreal-police-ignored-cyber-criminal-while-demanding-new-powers-to-fight-cyber-crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
	The "David Mabus" case raises serious questions about law enforcement's interest in catching online criminals
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawful access and online freedom</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/12/lawful-access-and-online-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/12/lawful-access-and-online-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander Ly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Webb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill C-50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill C-51]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill C-52]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=209120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alexander Ly and Andrew Webb oppose the government&#8217;s &#8220;lawful access&#8221; legislation.
Under current laws,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/12/lawful-access-and-online-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	Alexander Ly and Andrew Webb oppose the government&#8217;s &#8220;lawful access&#8221; legislation.
Under current laws,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawful Access: spyware for cops</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/28/lawful-access-spyware-for-cops/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/28/lawful-access-spyware-for-cops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jesse Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mashable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=199183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone else is using "bots", so why shouldn't the police?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/28/lawful-access-spyware-for-cops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
	Everyone else is using "bots", so why shouldn't the police?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will anonymity and hyperlinks be illegal in Canada?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/10/will-anonymity-and-hyperlinks-be-illegal-in-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/10/will-anonymity-and-hyperlinks-be-illegal-in-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 21:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jesse Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=191023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How an obscure provision in a Conservative crime bill could change the Internet in Canada]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/10/will-anonymity-and-hyperlinks-be-illegal-in-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>90</slash:comments>
	How an obscure provision in a Conservative crime bill could change the Internet in Canada
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harper&#039;s promise: a warrantless online surveillance state</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/harpers-promise-a-warrantless-online-surveillance-state/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/harpers-promise-a-warrantless-online-surveillance-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jesse Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawful Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockwell Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=183479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why 'lawful access' legislation is on its way and why that should worry you]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/harpers-promise-a-warrantless-online-surveillance-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>112</slash:comments>
	Why 'lawful access' legislation is on its way and why that should worry you
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
