<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Lockheed Martin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/lockheed-martin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2012 on Parliament Hill: John Geddes sums up a year in 12 chapters</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/29/yet-another-years-federal-politics-in-12-chapters/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/29/yet-another-years-federal-politics-in-12-chapters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auditor General of Canada F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.C. Premier Christy Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Mulroney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative MP David Wilks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defence Minister Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Party of Canada leadership race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Gateway Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Marois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister stephen harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robocalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=332258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A search for coherence at the closing of the year]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/29/yet-another-years-federal-politics-in-12-chapters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A search for coherence at the closing of the year
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A clearer path for fighter jets, but a grim day for Peter MacKay</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/a-clearer-path-for-jet-fighters-but-a-grim-day-for-mackay/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/a-clearer-path-for-jet-fighters-but-a-grim-day-for-mackay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KPMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes explains why rebooting the plan is not as easy as pressing a button ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/a-clearer-path-for-jet-fighters-but-a-grim-day-for-mackay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes explains why rebooting the plan is not as easy as pressing a button 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An F-35 panel, great—but the hard decisions still loom</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/an-f-35-panel-great-but-the-hard-decisions-still-loom/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/an-f-35-panel-great-but-the-hard-decisions-still-loom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fighter jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KPMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Military College]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=325455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on fresh starts and tough choices ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/an-f-35-panel-great-but-the-hard-decisions-still-loom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on fresh starts and tough choices 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lockheed Martin forces out incoming CEO over relationship with subordinate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/10/lockheed-martin-forces-out-incoming-ceo-over-relationship-with-subordinate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/10/lockheed-martin-forces-out-incoming-ceo-over-relationship-with-subordinate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=313607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BETHESDA, Md. - Lockheed Martin Corp. has ousted its president and future CEO over a relationship with a subordinate.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/10/lockheed-martin-forces-out-incoming-ceo-over-relationship-with-subordinate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	BETHESDA, Md. - Lockheed Martin Corp. has ousted its president and future CEO over a relationship with a subordinate.

	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How could you say no to this?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/how-could-you-say-no-to-this/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/how-could-you-say-no-to-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spencer Ackerman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=253344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spencer Ackerman collects the infomercials and music videos that are being used to sell...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/how-could-you-say-no-to-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Spencer Ackerman collects the infomercials and music videos that are being used to sell...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35: Not just costly but obsolete</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/13/costly-obsolete-its-getting-hard-to-justify-buying-this-jet/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/13/costly-obsolete-its-getting-hard-to-justify-buying-this-jet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B-2 bomber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=251657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To aviation nerds, the Joint Strike Fighter is looking more and more like an ugly mutt]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/13/costly-obsolete-its-getting-hard-to-justify-buying-this-jet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	To aviation nerds, the Joint Strike Fighter is looking more and more like an ugly mutt
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How will we repel an imaginary Russian invasion?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/24/how-will-we-repel-an-imaginary-russian-invasion/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/24/how-will-we-repel-an-imaginary-russian-invasion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=221262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new F-35s will be state-of-the-art in every way except one.
Canada&#8217;s new multibillion-dollar...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/24/how-will-we-repel-an-imaginary-russian-invasion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	The new F-35s will be state-of-the-art in every way except one.
Canada&#8217;s new multibillion-dollar...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>At last, the job of my dreams</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/03/at-last-the-job-of-my-dreams/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/03/at-last-the-job-of-my-dreams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Feschuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scott Feschuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maple leaf foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing manager]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/06/at-last-the-job-of-my-dreams/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some boys yearned to be firefighters or astronauts—others aimed for the bacon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/03/at-last-the-job-of-my-dreams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	Some boys yearned to be firefighters or astronauts—others aimed for the bacon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hacker attack</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/17/hacker-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/17/hacker-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sorensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LulzSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=197371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A rash of high-profile thefts reveals just how unsafe the Internet we depend on has become]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/17/hacker-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	A rash of high-profile thefts reveals just how unsafe the Internet we depend on has become
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35 jet cost controversy: now we&#039;re getting somewhere</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/17/the-f-35-jet-costs-controversy-now-were-getting-somewhere/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/17/the-f-35-jet-costs-controversy-now-were-getting-somewhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=178029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why will Canada's jets cost less than Washington's estimates?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/17/the-f-35-jet-costs-controversy-now-were-getting-somewhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>116</slash:comments>
	Why will Canada's jets cost less than Washington's estimates?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Would you let this man fly your plane?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/13/the-commons-would-you-let-this-man-fly-your-plane/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/13/the-commons-would-you-let-this-man-fly-your-plane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=163654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It took Peter MacKay a mere three sentences to say something of a highly questionable nature]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/13/the-commons-would-you-let-this-man-fly-your-plane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
	It took Peter MacKay a mere three sentences to say something of a highly questionable nature
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The collection of numbers by the numbers (II)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/26/the-collection-of-numbers-by-the-numbers-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/26/the-collection-of-numbers-by-the-numbers-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aboriginals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=140251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Industry Minister has claimed that 160,000 Canadians &#8220;refused&#8221; to complete the long-form census...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/26/the-collection-of-numbers-by-the-numbers-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Industry Minister has claimed that 160,000 Canadians &#8220;refused&#8221; to complete the long-form census...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The collection of numbers by the numbers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/21/the-collection-of-numbers-by-the-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/21/the-collection-of-numbers-by-the-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=139463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Mr. Clement&#8217;s office, the 2006 census cost $567 million, while the 2011...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/21/the-collection-of-numbers-by-the-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	According to Mr. Clement&#8217;s office, the 2006 census cost $567 million, while the 2011...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The end of North American trilaterism</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/29/the-end-of-the-trilateral-dream/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/29/the-end-of-the-trilateral-dream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felipe Calderón]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=134592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harmonization was once all the rage, but under Obama the initiative appears dead]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/06/29/the-end-of-the-trilateral-dream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	Harmonization was once all the rage, but under Obama the initiative appears dead
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
