<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Mark Jarvis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/mark-jarvis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Backbench Spring: What about the Liberal motion?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/24/the-backbench-spring-what-about-the-liberal-motion/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/24/the-backbench-spring-what-about-the-liberal-motion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Members' Statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statements by Members]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=376168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fate of members' statements faces a vote]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/24/the-backbench-spring-what-about-the-liberal-motion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The fate of members' statements faces a vote
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nobody&#8217;s home</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/23/nobodys-home/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/23/nobodys-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ned Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sitting days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=340729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim Harper notes the eerie silence around the nation&#8217;s legislatures.
Anecdotally, it appears Canadians...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/23/nobodys-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Tim Harper notes the eerie silence around the nation&#8217;s legislatures.
Anecdotally, it appears Canadians...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The absentee B.C. legislature</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/13/the-absentee-b-c-legislature/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/13/the-absentee-b-c-legislature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christie Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark D. Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike de jong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=336019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why we should be worried about a government that sits for only 19 days in a full calendar year]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/13/the-absentee-b-c-legislature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Why we should be worried about a government that sits for only 19 days in a full calendar year
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Running away from the legislature</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/16/running-away-from-the-legislature/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/16/running-away-from-the-legislature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christy Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dalton McGuinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Loewen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prorogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=303794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Loewen condemns Dalton McGuinty&#8217;s use of prorogation.
Is McGuinty’s comportment worse than Harper’s?...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/16/running-away-from-the-legislature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Peter Loewen condemns Dalton McGuinty&#8217;s use of prorogation.
Is McGuinty’s comportment worse than Harper’s?...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our troubled House</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/07/our-troubled-house/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/07/our-troubled-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 12:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[committees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lori Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Democrats have called a news conference for 10:30am this morning to outline...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/07/our-troubled-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The New Democrats have called a news conference for 10:30am this morning to outline...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Power, Parliament and the Prime Minister</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/04/power-parliament-and-the-prime-minister/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/04/power-parliament-and-the-prime-minister/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 20:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmund Burke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F.H. Buckley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lori Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruth Ellen Brosseau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westminster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donner winners Mark Jarvis and Lori Turnbull argue that the Prime Minister has become...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/04/power-parliament-and-the-prime-minister/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Donner winners Mark Jarvis and Lori Turnbull argue that the Prime Minister has become...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In praise of democracy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/02/in-praise-of-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/02/in-praise-of-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 13:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratizing the Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donner Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lori Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Aucoin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=256253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night in Toronto, the Donner Prize for the best public policy book in...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/02/in-praise-of-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Last night in Toronto, the Donner Prize for the best public policy book in...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saving the House of Commons (II)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/05/saving-the-house-of-commons-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/05/saving-the-house-of-commons-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratizing the Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=228475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further to this, Mark Jarvis chimes in via email with some of the other...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/05/saving-the-house-of-commons-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	Further to this, Mark Jarvis chimes in via email with some of the other...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>At the prime minister&#8217;s whim</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/28/at-the-prime-ministers-whim/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/28/at-the-prime-ministers-whim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lori Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Aucoin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prororgation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=227207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amid speculation that the Prime Minister might prorogue Parliament, Lori Turnbull advocates for the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/28/at-the-prime-ministers-whim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
	Amid speculation that the Prime Minister might prorogue Parliament, Lori Turnbull advocates for the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In defence of partisanship</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/26/in-defence-of-partisanship/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/26/in-defence-of-partisanship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratizing the Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lori Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Aucoin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=217144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iPolitics publishes an excerpt from Democratizing the Constitution.
There are several reasons why the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/26/in-defence-of-partisanship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
	iPolitics publishes an excerpt from Democratizing the Constitution.
There are several reasons why the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In memoriam</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/in-memoriam-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/in-memoriam-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratizing the Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Aucoin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=201011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Aucoin, the celebrated political science professor and scholar, passed away yesterday at the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/in-memoriam-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	Peter Aucoin, the celebrated political science professor and scholar, passed away yesterday at the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#039;t get cocky</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/08/dont-get-cocky/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/08/dont-get-cocky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brigette DePape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratizing the Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lori Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark D. Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Aucoin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech from the Throne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Throne Speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=196217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis manages to take issue with both sides of the Brigette DePape debate....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/08/dont-get-cocky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	Mark Jarvis manages to take issue with both sides of the Brigette DePape debate....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The House: Considering reform</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/24/the-house-considering-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/24/the-house-considering-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 18:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=193839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, Mark Jarvis wrote here about potential parliamentary reforms as part of our...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/24/the-house-considering-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	Last month, Mark Jarvis wrote here about potential parliamentary reforms as part of our...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
