<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:01:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Online relationships lead to better marriages</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/05/online-relationships-lead-to-better-marriages/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/05/online-relationships-lead-to-better-marriages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 21:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online dating]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=391117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jesse Brown considers a new study on virtual unions]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/05/online-relationships-lead-to-better-marriages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Jesse Brown considers a new study on virtual unions
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book review: Life in a Marital Institution: Twenty Years of Monogamy in One Terrifying Memoir</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/10/life-in-a-marital-institution-twenty-years-of-monogamy-in-one-terrifying-memoir/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/10/life-in-a-marital-institution-twenty-years-of-monogamy-in-one-terrifying-memoir/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarked</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bookmarked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Braly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=381693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Author James Braly pens a raw and hilarious account of a marriage]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/10/life-in-a-marital-institution-twenty-years-of-monogamy-in-one-terrifying-memoir/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Author James Braly pens a raw and hilarious account of a marriage
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wed and in the red</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/17/wed-and-in-the-red/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/17/wed-and-in-the-red/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Manisha Krishnan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weddings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=370517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Qataris are holding back on weddings for savings]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/17/wed-and-in-the-red/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Qataris are holding back on weddings for savings
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why we ignore signs of a cheating spouse, and other cases of &#8216;betrayal blindness&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/03/wait-what-was-that-whoosh/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/03/wait-what-was-that-whoosh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[betrayal blindness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=365605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mysterious process by which we ignore betrayal]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/03/wait-what-was-that-whoosh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The mysterious process by which we ignore betrayal
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why shorter men have younger wives</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/19/why-shorter-men-have-younger-wives-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/19/why-shorter-men-have-younger-wives-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katie Engelhart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marina Adshade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=350272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And An Economist’s Other Surprising Theories About Quirks Of The Heart]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/19/why-shorter-men-have-younger-wives-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	And An Economist’s Other Surprising Theories About Quirks Of The Heart
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online dating and the search for true love &#8212; or loves</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/30/true-loves/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/30/true-loves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katie Engelhart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[true love]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=341284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The soulmate search will soon be mobile, transparent and constant]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/30/true-loves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The soulmate search will soon be mobile, transparent and constant
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good news &#8230; Bad news</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/03/good-news-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/03/good-news-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 10:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good news, bad news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Famous Five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsunami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wen Jiabao]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=310245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another way of looking at the week]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/03/good-news-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Another way of looking at the week
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What divorce can teach about marriage</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/23/in-order-to-form-a-more-perfect-union/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/23/in-order-to-form-a-more-perfect-union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana Adam Shapiro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murderball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=304321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Couples should fight more and not compromise]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/23/in-order-to-form-a-more-perfect-union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Couples should fight more and not compromise
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;End of Men&#8217; author: women are avoiding men, and men are becoming childish</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/19/on-women-avoiding-men-men-becoming-childish-and-other-consequences-of-female-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/19/on-women-avoiding-men-men-becoming-childish-and-other-consequences-of-female-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Bethune</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advancement of women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female breadwinners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender in the workplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanna Rosin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=292641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hanna Rosin in conversation with Brian Bethune]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/19/on-women-avoiding-men-men-becoming-childish-and-other-consequences-of-female-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Hanna Rosin in conversation with Brian Bethune
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marriage, men, and mother syndrome</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/21/marriage-men-and-mother-syndrome/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/21/marriage-men-and-mother-syndrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[couples counselling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=284153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you supervise your husband like one of your kids, you’ve got problems]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/21/marriage-men-and-mother-syndrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	If you supervise your husband like one of your kids, you’ve got problems
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Their marriage is not legally valid under Canadian law&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/12/their-marriage-is-not-legally-valid-under-canadian-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/12/their-marriage-is-not-legally-valid-under-canadian-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=233211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In court, the Harper government is apparently arguing against the legality of some same-sex...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/12/their-marriage-is-not-legally-valid-under-canadian-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In court, the Harper government is apparently arguing against the legality of some same-sex...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rage against the dying of the light</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/14/rage-against-the-dying-of-the-light/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/14/rage-against-the-dying-of-the-light/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terminal illness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/15/rage-against-the-dying-of-the-light/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A terminally ill husband can anger, even infuriate, his loving wife]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/14/rage-against-the-dying-of-the-light/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	A terminally ill husband can anger, even infuriate, his loving wife
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Young, divorced and stigmatized</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/24/young-divorced-and-stigmatized/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/24/young-divorced-and-stigmatized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Lunau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/24/young-divorced-and-stigmatized/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flash-in-the-pan marriages are for celebs; the norm is fewer divorces and more serious commitments]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/24/young-divorced-and-stigmatized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Flash-in-the-pan marriages are for celebs; the norm is fewer divorces and more serious commitments
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>You can’t mandate marriage, even if it’s good for society</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/11/you-can%e2%80%99t-mandate-marriage-even-if-it%e2%80%99s-good-for-society/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/11/you-can%e2%80%99t-mandate-marriage-even-if-it%e2%80%99s-good-for-society/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/13/you-can%e2%80%99t-mandate-marriage-even-if-it%e2%80%99s-good-for-society/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marriage may not matter as much as it once did to young couples. But it matters a lot to society at large.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/11/you-can%e2%80%99t-mandate-marriage-even-if-it%e2%80%99s-good-for-society/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	Marriage may not matter as much as it once did to young couples. But it matters a lot to society at large.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to stay married</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/06/how-to-stay-married/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/06/how-to-stay-married/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anne Kingston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/06/how-to-stay-married/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your man can’t make you happy, but there’s a new theory on how a lengthy union can help get you there]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/06/how-to-stay-married/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	Your man can’t make you happy, but there’s a new theory on how a lengthy union can help get you there
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The war on snoring heats up</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/25/the-war-on-snoring-heats-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/25/the-war-on-snoring-heats-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Lunau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowne Plaza Hotel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sleep deprivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snore absorption room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=205705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That steam engine in your bed is bad for your health, worse for your marriage]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/25/the-war-on-snoring-heats-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	That steam engine in your bed is bad for your health, worse for your marriage
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good news, bad news: May 5-12, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/13/good-news-bad-news-may-5-12-2011-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/13/good-news-bad-news-may-5-12-2011-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 15:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good news, bad news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Pension Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liu Xiaobo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord Triesman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria Shriver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Peace Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nobel prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Dziekanski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory of relativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=191421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RCMP officers involved in Robert Dziekanski's death face perjury charges, while scientists prove Einstein was right]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/13/good-news-bad-news-may-5-12-2011-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The RCMP officers involved in Robert Dziekanski's death face perjury charges, while scientists prove Einstein was right
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>My wife didn&#039;t make that quilt. I did.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/30/my-wife-didnt-make-that-quilt-i-did/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/30/my-wife-didnt-make-that-quilt-i-did/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manquilter.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quilting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=179305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A growing number of men are taking up quilting, many of them retired engineers]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/30/my-wife-didnt-make-that-quilt-i-did/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
	A growing number of men are taking up quilting, many of them retired engineers
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cross-border love</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/09/cross-border-love/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/09/cross-border-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[globalized romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=175976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happens when the trend of globalized romance runs into the reality of immigration crackdowns, red tape and tough job markets]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/09/cross-border-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	What happens when the trend of globalized romance runs into the reality of immigration crackdowns, red tape and tough job markets
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The formula for who should do the dishes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/17/the-formula-for-who-should-do-the-dishes/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/17/the-formula-for-who-should-do-the-dishes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spousonomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply and demand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=171202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Economic theories applied to housework can save a marriage]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/17/the-formula-for-who-should-do-the-dishes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	Economic theories applied to housework can save a marriage
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the &#039;price of sex&#039; is at an all-time low</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/09/on-hooking-up-marrying-down-and-how-womens-success-lowers-the-price-of-sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/09/on-hooking-up-marrying-down-and-how-womens-success-lowers-the-price-of-sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Lunau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Campus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=170671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sociologist Mark Regenerus on hooking up, marrying down, and the effect of women's success on our sex lives]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/09/on-hooking-up-marrying-down-and-how-womens-success-lowers-the-price-of-sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
	Sociologist Mark Regenerus on hooking up, marrying down, and the effect of women's success on our sex lives
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear John, I love Jane</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/06/dear-john-i-love-jane/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/06/dear-john-i-love-jane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dear John I Love Jane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexually dysfunctional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=162265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Straight women with kind, loving husbands explain why they became lesbians]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/06/dear-john-i-love-jane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
	Straight women with kind, loving husbands explain why they became lesbians
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why should polygamy be a crime?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/26/why-should-polygamy-be-a-crime/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/26/why-should-polygamy-be-a-crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COYNE: We don’t need to ban polygamy to ban rape: it’s banned already.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/26/why-should-polygamy-be-a-crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>307</slash:comments>
	COYNE: We don’t need to ban polygamy to ban rape: it’s banned already.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The gown dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/the-gown-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/the-gown-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 20:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princess Diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s not just Kate Middleton’s big day. It’s her biggest fashion test.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/the-gown-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	It’s not just Kate Middleton’s big day. It’s her biggest fashion test.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ring&#039;s cycle</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/the-rings-cycle/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/the-rings-cycle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 20:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Findlay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Charles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princess Diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Princess Di chose the stone that her son’s new fiancée wears with pride]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/the-rings-cycle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	Princess Di chose the stone that her son’s new fiancée wears with pride
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A common occurrence</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/a-common-occurrence/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/a-common-occurrence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Lunau</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courtship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princess Diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prince William isn’t unusual in wedding a commoner—royals just don’t marry royals anymore]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/a-common-occurrence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	Prince William isn’t unusual in wedding a commoner—royals just don’t marry royals anymore
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>PHOTOS: The pageantry of the past</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/pageantry-of-the-past/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/pageantry-of-the-past/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princess Diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last century, royal weddings have become grand public spectacles. Thousands gather to watch shows of uncommon refinement—and ordinary optimism.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/pageantry-of-the-past/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	Over the last century, royal weddings have become grand public spectacles. Thousands gather to watch shows of uncommon refinement—and ordinary optimism.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Learning from past mistakes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/learning-from-past-mistakes/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/learning-from-past-mistakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anne Kingston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Charles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princess Diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why William and Kate’s royal marriage may actually work out]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/learning-from-past-mistakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Why William and Kate’s royal marriage may actually work out
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Date nights</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/date-nights/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/date-nights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From ‘wobbles’ to wedding plans: William and Kate meet, break up and make up]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/date-nights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	From ‘wobbles’ to wedding plans: William and Kate meet, break up and make up
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A man in uniform</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/a-man-in-uniform/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/a-man-in-uniform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William hasn’t got his military duds dirty yet, but they still matter—and will on the big day]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/a-man-in-uniform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	William hasn’t got his military duds dirty yet, but they still matter—and will on the big day
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The call of the aisle</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/the-call-of-the-aisle/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/the-call-of-the-aisle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Belluz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Andrew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Charles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princess Diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal ceremony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal weddings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Paul’s Cathedral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westminster Abbey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=158696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will and Kate will likely follow in family footsteps, wherever they choose to tie the knot]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/the-call-of-the-aisle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Will and Kate will likely follow in family footsteps, wherever they choose to tie the knot
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A great and important moment for Canada as well</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/a-great-and-important-moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/a-great-and-important-moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Johnston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princess Diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal weddings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=158665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[British Prime Minister David Cameron called the engagement between William and Kate “a great day for the country.”]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/a-great-and-important-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	British Prime Minister David Cameron called the engagement between William and Kate “a great day for the country.”
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The business of marriage</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/the-business-of-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/the-business-of-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commemorative Collectors Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorabilia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princess Diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal weddings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=158641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lavish royal wedding could boost the British economy—and in an age of austerity, outrage taxpayers]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/the-business-of-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	A lavish royal wedding could boost the British economy—and in an age of austerity, outrage taxpayers
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Something very special&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/something-very-special/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/something-very-special/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Gulli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princess Diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Their long courtship provoked ridicule. But William and Kate were friends first. They test drove marriage. And he gave her plenty of time to back out.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/25/something-very-special/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Their long courtship provoked ridicule. But William and Kate were friends first. They test drove marriage. And he gave her plenty of time to back out.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The royal engagement: do we still care?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/24/do-we-still-care/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/24/do-we-still-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed, we do. After years of indifference to the Crown, Canada is enjoying a true royal moment]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/24/do-we-still-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	Indeed, we do. After years of indifference to the Crown, Canada is enjoying a true royal moment
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, he Will</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/23/yes-he-will/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/23/yes-he-will/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princess Diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the stuff that dreams are made of. Or so England hopes.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/23/yes-he-will/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	This is the stuff that dreams are made of. Or so England hopes.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kate Middleton: An uncommon princess</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/22/an-uncommon-princess/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/22/an-uncommon-princess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Köhler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princess Diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her rise from middle-class roots to the royal family]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/22/an-uncommon-princess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	Her rise from middle-class roots to the royal family
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;It cheers everyone up&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/19/it-cheers-everyone-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/19/it-cheers-everyone-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 18:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princess Diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=158612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Britain reacts with enthusiasm to news of the impending wedding]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/19/it-cheers-everyone-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	Britain reacts with enthusiasm to news of the impending wedding
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The man who will be king</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/19/the-man-who-will-be-king/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/19/the-man-who-will-be-king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 14:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Gillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princess Diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rescue pilot, partygoer, dutiful son: against all odds, Will has achieved an equilibrium that evaded his parents]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/19/the-man-who-will-be-king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
	Rescue pilot, partygoer, dutiful son: against all odds, Will has achieved an equilibrium that evaded his parents
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why children are horrifically good soldiers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/08/why-children-are-good-soldiers/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/08/why-children-are-good-soldiers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finishing the hat: Collected Lyrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harold Pinter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must you go? My life with Harold Pinter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proofiness: The dark arts of mathematical deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siberia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snakewoman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snakewoman of little Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[They fight like soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travels in Siberia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=156448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plus, Antonia Fraser’s marriage to Harold Pinter, the fakeness of statistics, and Stephen Sondheim]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/08/why-children-are-good-soldiers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	Plus, Antonia Fraser’s marriage to Harold Pinter, the fakeness of statistics, and Stephen Sondheim
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsmakers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/29/newsmakers-44/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/29/newsmakers-44/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alpine skiing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chen Wei-yih]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dalai lama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manchester United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mel Gibson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Public Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Bossman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott hartnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slovenia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rent is Too Damn High Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Rooney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=154813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zimbabwe’s femme fatale, the Mel Gibson non-comeback, and one man’s war against rent that’s too damn high]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/29/newsmakers-44/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Zimbabwe’s femme fatale, the Mel Gibson non-comeback, and one man’s war against rent that’s too damn high
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donny Osmond is my matchmaker</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/donny-osmond-is-my-matchmaker/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/donny-osmond-is-my-matchmaker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donny and Marie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donny Osmond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[las vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Variety Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=152079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a Vancouver widow met her idol in Las Vegas, one thing led to another]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/21/donny-osmond-is-my-matchmaker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	After a Vancouver widow met her idol in Las Vegas, one thing led to another
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Margaret Trudeau&#039;s last breakdown</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/08/just-margaret/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/08/just-margaret/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anne Kingston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bipolar disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Changing my Mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margaret Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental-health advocate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre Elliott Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre Trudeau]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=151409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trudeau speaks frankly about drugs, men, and how she survived the lows]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/08/just-margaret/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Trudeau speaks frankly about drugs, men, and how she survived the lows
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should you stay or should you go?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/should-you-stay-or-should-you-go-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/should-you-stay-or-should-you-go-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 20:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counselling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial responsibilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kimberly Ventus-Dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[When You Have Outgrown Him: Whether to Stay or Go]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=149879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women who’ve ‘outgrown’ their husbands need to ask themselves some key questions]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/07/should-you-stay-or-should-you-go-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Women who’ve ‘outgrown’ their husbands need to ask themselves some key questions
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#039;s get married—for an hour</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/16/lets-get-married%e2%80%94for-an-hour/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/16/lets-get-married%e2%80%94for-an-hour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism and politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahmoud Ahmadinejad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=146146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Young unmarried couples craving a getaway turn to the legal loophole of “temporary marriages”]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/16/lets-get-married%e2%80%94for-an-hour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Young unmarried couples craving a getaway turn to the legal loophole of “temporary marriages”
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
