<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; mike de jong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/mike-de-jong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The absentee B.C. legislature</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/13/the-absentee-b-c-legislature/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/13/the-absentee-b-c-legislature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christie Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark D. Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike de jong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=336019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why we should be worried about a government that sits for only 19 days in a full calendar year]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/13/the-absentee-b-c-legislature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Why we should be worried about a government that sits for only 19 days in a full calendar year
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The voting age: should it be raised to 50?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/the-voting-age-should-it-be-raised-to-50/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/the-voting-age-should-it-be-raised-to-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age of majority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andré blais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike de jong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turnout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter eligibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter turnout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting age]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=164085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Makes about as much sense as lowering it to 16]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/16/the-voting-age-should-it-be-raised-to-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
	Makes about as much sense as lowering it to 16
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
