<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Mike Duffy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/mike-duffy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:28:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In this new crisis, the faint echo of a previous crisis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/18/in-this-new-crisis-the-faint-echo-of-a-previous-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/18/in-this-new-crisis-the-faint-echo-of-a-previous-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=385264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the coalition crisis of 2008 to the Senate crisis of 2013]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/18/in-this-new-crisis-the-faint-echo-of-a-previous-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	From the coalition crisis of 2008 to the Senate crisis of 2013
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The week of Mike Duffy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/the-week-of-mike-duffy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/the-week-of-mike-duffy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=385144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attempting to make sense of the matter of the housing allowance]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/the-week-of-mike-duffy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Attempting to make sense of the matter of the housing allowance
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our View from the Hill: What&#8217;s next for Mike Duffy?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/our-view-from-the-hill-whats-next-for-mike-duffy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/our-view-from-the-hill-whats-next-for-mike-duffy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=385203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... and what's next for Nigel Wright?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/our-view-from-the-hill-whats-next-for-mike-duffy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	... and what's next for Nigel Wright?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Duffy: Notes on a scandal</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/notes-on-a-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/notes-on-a-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew MacDougall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=385037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative Senators to seek new consideration of Mike Duffy's expense claims]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/notes-on-a-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Conservative Senators to seek new consideration of Mike Duffy's expense claims
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The line from Harper&#8217;s office on Wright and Duffy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/the-line-from-harpers-office-on-wright-and-duffy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/the-line-from-harpers-office-on-wright-and-duffy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew MacDougall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=385027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on the Tories' efforts at damage control]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/the-line-from-harpers-office-on-wright-and-duffy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on the Tories' efforts at damage control
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rob Ford stole the show on a frenzied news night</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/rob-ford-stole-the-show-on-a-frenzied-news-night/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/rob-ford-stole-the-show-on-a-frenzied-news-night/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Taylor-Vaisey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Taylor-Vaisey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Godfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Ford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tease the day: Toronto's mayor faces new allegations about substance abuse]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/rob-ford-stole-the-show-on-a-frenzied-news-night/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Tease the day: Toronto's mayor faces new allegations about substance abuse
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Duffy: &#8216;I have decided to sit as an independent Senator&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/mike-duffy-i-have-decided-to-sit-as-an-independent-senator/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/mike-duffy-i-have-decided-to-sit-as-an-independent-senator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Senator Mike Duffy resigned from the Conservative caucus to sit as an...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/mike-duffy-i-have-decided-to-sit-as-an-independent-senator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Senator Mike Duffy resigned from the Conservative caucus to sit as an...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator Mike Duffy resigns from Conservative caucus over expenses scandal</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/senator-mike-duffy-resigns-from-conservative-caucus-over-expenses-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/senator-mike-duffy-resigns-from-conservative-caucus-over-expenses-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 01:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Conservative Senator Mike Duffy has resigned from the Conservative caucus to sit...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/senator-mike-duffy-resigns-from-conservative-caucus-over-expenses-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Conservative Senator Mike Duffy has resigned from the Conservative caucus to sit...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Duffy resigns from the Conservative caucus</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/mike-duffy-resigns-from-the-conservative-caucus/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/mike-duffy-resigns-from-the-conservative-caucus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 01:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marjory lebreton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The embattled senator resigns to sit as an independent]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/mike-duffy-resigns-from-the-conservative-caucus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The embattled senator resigns to sit as an independent
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time to resign? What pundits are saying about Mike Duffy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/time-to-resign-what-pundits-are-saying-about-mike-duffy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/time-to-resign-what-pundits-are-saying-about-mike-duffy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emily Senger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A round-up of press reactions]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/time-to-resign-what-pundits-are-saying-about-mike-duffy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A round-up of press reactions
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check into the cheque: NDP asks Senate ethics office to look at $90K Duffy deal</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/check-into-the-cheque-ndp-asks-senate-ethics-office-to-look-at-90k-duffy-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/check-into-the-cheque-ndp-asks-senate-ethics-office-to-look-at-90k-duffy-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; New Democrat MP Charlie Angus is asking Senate ethics officer Lyse Ricard...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/check-into-the-cheque-ndp-asks-senate-ethics-office-to-look-at-90k-duffy-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; New Democrat MP Charlie Angus is asking Senate ethics officer Lyse Ricard...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Duffy can&#8217;t control the story</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/mike-duffy-cant-control-the-story/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/mike-duffy-cant-control-the-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Taylor-Vaisey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tease the day: Questions about the P.E.I. senator's conduct continue to mount]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/mike-duffy-cant-control-the-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Tease the day: Questions about the P.E.I. senator's conduct continue to mount
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Duffy and Nigel Wright: Still more questions</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/mike-duffy-and-nigel-wright-still-more-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/mike-duffy-and-nigel-wright-still-more-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 12:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deloitte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Oliver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sean casey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did the Senator claim expenses while campaigning for the Conservatives?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/mike-duffy-and-nigel-wright-still-more-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Did the Senator claim expenses while campaigning for the Conservatives?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What we know about Mike Duffy and the $90,172 repayment</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/what-we-know-right-now-about-mike-duffy-and-the-90172-repayment/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/what-we-know-right-now-about-mike-duffy-and-the-90172-repayment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 11:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A glimpse of how Mike Duffy's busy campaign schedule overlapped with the Senate business ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/what-we-know-right-now-about-mike-duffy-and-the-90172-repayment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A glimpse of how Mike Duffy's busy campaign schedule overlapped with the Senate business 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duffy bailout by Harper&#8217;s chief of staff prompts allegations of coverup by PMO</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/duffy-bailout-by-harpers-chief-of-staff-prompts-allegations-of-coverup-by-pmo/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/duffy-bailout-by-harpers-chief-of-staff-prompts-allegations-of-coverup-by-pmo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 04:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Less than a week after the Conservatives hailed Sen. Mike Duffy&#8217;s &#8220;leadership&#8221;...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/duffy-bailout-by-harpers-chief-of-staff-prompts-allegations-of-coverup-by-pmo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Less than a week after the Conservatives hailed Sen. Mike Duffy&#8217;s &#8220;leadership&#8221;...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wright and Duffy: the contrast in styles is vivid, but what about the rules?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/15/wright-and-duffy-the-contrast-in-personas-is-vivid-but-what-about-the-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/15/wright-and-duffy-the-contrast-in-personas-is-vivid-but-what-about-the-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict of interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Fife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Ethics Officer Lyse Ricard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Geddes on the conflict of interest potential in a besieged senator's $90,000 gift]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/15/wright-and-duffy-the-contrast-in-personas-is-vivid-but-what-about-the-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	John Geddes on the conflict of interest potential in a besieged senator's $90,000 gift
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Mike Duffy paid back that $90,172</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/15/how-mike-duffy-paid-back-that-90172/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/15/how-mike-duffy-paid-back-that-90172/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 16:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Tkachuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A gift from the Prime Minister's chief of staff]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/15/how-mike-duffy-paid-back-that-90172/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A gift from the Prime Minister's chief of staff
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>This mess the Senate&#8217;s in</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/14/this-mess-the-senates-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/14/this-mess-the-senates-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 19:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lowell murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marjory lebreton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A legal opinion, a request from the NDP and a statement from Patrick Brazeau]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/14/this-mess-the-senates-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A legal opinion, a request from the NDP and a statement from Patrick Brazeau
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: The Real Senators of Parliament Hill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/09/the-commons-the-real-senators-of-parliament-hill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/09/the-commons-the-real-senators-of-parliament-hill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 22:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Tkachuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cowan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Harb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marjory lebreton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=382319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May you never again have to wonder where your senator lives]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/09/the-commons-the-real-senators-of-parliament-hill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	May you never again have to wonder where your senator lives
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letter suggests Mike Duffy was tipped off about audit that questioned expenses</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/09/letter-suggests-mike-duffy-was-tipped-off-about-audit-that-questioned-expenses/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/09/letter-suggests-mike-duffy-was-tipped-off-about-audit-that-questioned-expenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 17:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=382228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; A letter written last month by Conservative Sen. Mike Duffy suggests he...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/09/letter-suggests-mike-duffy-was-tipped-off-about-audit-that-questioned-expenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; A letter written last month by Conservative Sen. Mike Duffy suggests he...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Conservative denies Mike Duffy offered to repay P.E.I. housing allowance</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/top-conservative-denies-mike-duffy-offered-to-repay-p-e-i-housing-allowance/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/top-conservative-denies-mike-duffy-offered-to-repay-p-e-i-housing-allowance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=374659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Prime Minister Stephen Harper&#8217;s parliamentary House leader has denied that Conservative Sen....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/top-conservative-denies-mike-duffy-offered-to-repay-p-e-i-housing-allowance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Prime Minister Stephen Harper&#8217;s parliamentary House leader has denied that Conservative Sen....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Duffy: Voluntarily, if necessary</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/mike-duffy-voluntarily-if-necessary/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/mike-duffy-voluntarily-if-necessary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=374330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['Words are important']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/mike-duffy-voluntarily-if-necessary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	'Words are important'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: What if we all just refused to be appointed to the Senate?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/the-commons-what-if-we-all-just-refused-to-be-appointed-to-the-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/the-commons-what-if-we-all-just-refused-to-be-appointed-to-the-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 23:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre-Hugues Boisvenu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=357641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somewhere a mariachi band plays a plaintive tune]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/06/the-commons-what-if-we-all-just-refused-to-be-appointed-to-the-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Somewhere a mariachi band plays a plaintive tune
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you know where your senator lives? Does it matter?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/28/do-you-know-where-your-senator-lives-does-it-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/28/do-you-know-where-your-senator-lives-does-it-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 01:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Harb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=355565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate is subject to existential questions]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/28/do-you-know-where-your-senator-lives-does-it-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Senate is subject to existential questions
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you know how much of your money your senators have paid back?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/do-you-know-how-much-of-your-money-your-senators-have-paid-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/do-you-know-how-much-of-your-money-your-senators-have-paid-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Questions abound about who owes what]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/do-you-know-how-much-of-your-money-your-senators-have-paid-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Questions abound about who owes what
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Senators need not fear unemployment</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/25/the-commons-senators-need-not-fear-unemployment/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/25/the-commons-senators-need-not-fear-unemployment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diane Finley explains the difference between a quota and a target]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/25/the-commons-senators-need-not-fear-unemployment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Diane Finley explains the difference between a quota and a target
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Embattled senator Mike Duffy says he &#8216;may have made a mistake&#8217; claiming housing allowance</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/22/i-made-a-mistake-claiming-housing-allowance-says-embattled-senator-duffy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/22/i-made-a-mistake-claiming-housing-allowance-says-embattled-senator-duffy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 22:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=353519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Embattled Conservative Sen. Mike Duffy says he &#8220;may have made a mistake&#8221;...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/22/i-made-a-mistake-claiming-housing-allowance-says-embattled-senator-duffy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Embattled Conservative Sen. Mike Duffy says he &#8220;may have made a mistake&#8221;...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Duffy does not want to be a distraction</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/22/mike-duffy-does-not-want-to-be-a-distraction/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/22/mike-duffy-does-not-want-to-be-a-distraction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 22:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marjory lebreton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Edward Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=353494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senator will repay those living expenses]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/22/mike-duffy-does-not-want-to-be-a-distraction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Senator will repay those living expenses
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: And so Stephen Harper finds himself having to defend unelected Senators</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/the-commons-and-so-stephen-harper-finds-himself-having-to-defend-unelected-senators/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/the-commons-and-so-stephen-harper-finds-himself-having-to-defend-unelected-senators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Julian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=350290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh for the bygone simplicity of Senate reform]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/the-commons-and-so-stephen-harper-finds-himself-having-to-defend-unelected-senators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Oh for the bygone simplicity of Senate reform
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The search for Mike Duffy&#8217;s home</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/08/the-search-for-mike-duffys-home/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/08/the-search-for-mike-duffys-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Harb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Edward Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=348502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senator defends his ties to PEI]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/08/the-search-for-mike-duffys-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Senator defends his ties to PEI
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator Mike Duffy: &#8216;I would never do anything to betray the public trust&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/08/senator-mike-duffy-i-would-never-do-anything-to-betray-the-public-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/08/senator-mike-duffy-i-would-never-do-anything-to-betray-the-public-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 15:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOR THE RECORD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=348412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Embattled Senator Mike Duffy — who represents Cavendish, PEI — has just released the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/08/senator-mike-duffy-i-would-never-do-anything-to-betray-the-public-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Embattled Senator Mike Duffy — who represents Cavendish, PEI — has just released the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: How do you solve a problem like Mike Duffy?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/the-commons-how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-mike-duffy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/the-commons-how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-mike-duffy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerry Ritz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riding boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saskatchewan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=347450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You'd be surprised what adjusting riding boundaries can accomplish]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/the-commons-how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-mike-duffy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	You'd be surprised what adjusting riding boundaries can accomplish
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where does Mike Duffy live?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/where-does-mike-duffy-live/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/where-does-mike-duffy-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Edward Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=347027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaron Wherry on the question of the hour ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/where-does-mike-duffy-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Aaron Wherry on the question of the hour 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated: Senator Mike Duffy takes kitchen exit as reporters seek answers on residence</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/senator-mike-duffy-takes-kitchen-exit-as-reporters-seek-answers-on-residence/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/senator-mike-duffy-takes-kitchen-exit-as-reporters-seek-answers-on-residence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[living allowances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=347562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HALIFAX &#8211; Senator Mike Duffy took a back exit through a Halifax hotel kitchen...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/senator-mike-duffy-takes-kitchen-exit-as-reporters-seek-answers-on-residence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	HALIFAX &#8211; Senator Mike Duffy took a back exit through a Halifax hotel kitchen...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Picking sides in Calgary Centre</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/21/picking-sides-in-calgary-centre/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/21/picking-sides-in-calgary-centre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calgary Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg McLean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joan Crockatt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Soares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lee richardson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rod Bruinooge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=285148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Soares has the endorsements of Rod Bruinooge and Doug Finley, while Greg McLean...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/21/picking-sides-in-calgary-centre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Joe Soares has the endorsements of Rod Bruinooge and Doug Finley, while Greg McLean...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>MPs Party Under the Stars</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/29/mps-party-under-the-stars/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/29/mps-party-under-the-stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitchel Raphael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Diary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Under the Star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=199479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MPs and Senators hit Party Under the Stars, a fundraiser to help purchase electronic...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/29/mps-party-under-the-stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	MPs and Senators hit Party Under the Stars, a fundraiser to help purchase electronic...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Humble brag</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/10/the-commons-humble-brag/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/10/the-commons-humble-brag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bev Oda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brigette DePape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collective Soul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convention centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G8 legacy fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g8 summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacques Demers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Blaney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockwell Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teddy Roosevelt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=196885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Across the street and behind a metal barricade, a young man in a bike...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/10/the-commons-humble-brag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
	Across the street and behind a metal barricade, a young man in a bike...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A lot can change in seven years</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/30/a-lot-can-change-in-seven-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/30/a-lot-can-change-in-seven-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Duceppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=180213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joan Bryden compares the Stephen Harper of today with the Stephen Harper of 2004....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/30/a-lot-can-change-in-seven-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
	Joan Bryden compares the Stephen Harper of today with the Stephen Harper of 2004....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What happened to you guys? You used to be cool</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/09/what-happened-to-you-guys-you-used-to-be-cool/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/09/what-happened-to-you-guys-you-used-to-be-cool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Runciman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glen Patterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irving Gerstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre-Hugues Boisvenu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Neufeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=137863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two of Stephen Harper&#8217;s senators are now openly quibbling with the idea of a...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/09/what-happened-to-you-guys-you-used-to-be-cool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Two of Stephen Harper&#8217;s senators are now openly quibbling with the idea of a...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: A great show of strength</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/the-commons-a-great-show-of-strength/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/the-commons-a-great-show-of-strength/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawrence cannon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockwell Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=127211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before it was just the Liberals, socialists and separatists who wanted our hard-earned money. Now apparently most of the western world is out to rob us.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/the-commons-a-great-show-of-strength/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
	Before it was just the Liberals, socialists and separatists who wanted our hard-earned money. Now apparently most of the western world is out to rob us.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The infomercial era (II)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/the-infomercial-era-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/the-infomercial-era-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 21:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=127231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A leader of tomorrow comes forward to say she deliberately rewrote her question for...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/the-infomercial-era-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
	A leader of tomorrow comes forward to say she deliberately rewrote her question for...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The infomercial era</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/17/the-infomercial-era/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/17/the-infomercial-era/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 02:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister's office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=127044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Prime Minister&#8217;s Office is tonight combatting allegations made by unnamed leaders of tomorrow...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/17/the-infomercial-era/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
	The Prime Minister&#8217;s Office is tonight combatting allegations made by unnamed leaders of tomorrow...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most exclusive PM interview ever</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/24/most-exclusive-pm-interview-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/24/most-exclusive-pm-interview-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Feschuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scott Feschuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[five years]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helena Guergis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Chretien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Beatles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Throne Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wait times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Gretzky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=116197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Harper from five years ago has a few questions for his present-day alter ego]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/24/most-exclusive-pm-interview-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	Stephen Harper from five years ago has a few questions for his present-day alter ego
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baldly going where no senator has</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/18/baldly-going-where-no-senator-has/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/18/baldly-going-where-no-senator-has/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Feschuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scott Feschuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Braveheart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feschuk09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Stoffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=91629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s a reason for Mike Duffy’s behaviour of late: he’s taking down the Senate from within]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/18/baldly-going-where-no-senator-has/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
	There’s a reason for Mike Duffy’s behaviour of late: he’s taking down the Senate from within
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stoffer undaunted</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/11/stoffer-undaunted/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/11/stoffer-undaunted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Stoffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sackville-Eastern Shore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=91815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Stoffer was apparently unpersuaded by Mike Duffy&#8217;s taunts last week.
&#8220;I&#8217;m responsible to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/11/stoffer-undaunted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
	Peter Stoffer was apparently unpersuaded by Mike Duffy&#8217;s taunts last week.
&#8220;I&#8217;m responsible to...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
