<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; military procurement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/military-procurement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:37:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s going on with the F-35?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/whats-going-on-with-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/whats-going-on-with-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=324979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Postmedia now reports that a final decision will be made this morning, but there...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/whats-going-on-with-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Postmedia now reports that a final decision will be made this morning, but there...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is this government&#8217;s defence spending at unprecedented highs?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/25/is-this-governments-defence-spending-at-unprecedented-highs/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/25/is-this-governments-defence-spending-at-unprecedented-highs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Kenney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=270616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politicians so often make grandiose claims, and these are so rarely taken seriously, that...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/25/is-this-governments-defence-spending-at-unprecedented-highs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Politicians so often make grandiose claims, and these are so rarely taken seriously, that...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A question that won&#8217;t appear in Hansard</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/07/a-question-that-wont-appear-in-hansard/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/07/a-question-that-wont-appear-in-hansard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominic LeBlanc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=264728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP pressed the government again yesterday afternoon to explain the limo tab of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/07/a-question-that-wont-appear-in-hansard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The NDP pressed the government again yesterday afternoon to explain the limo tab of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Jason Kenney again surveys the scope of history</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/05/the-commons-jason-kenney-again-surveys-the-scope-of-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/05/the-commons-jason-kenney-again-surveys-the-scope-of-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Kenney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laurie Hawn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=264242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meanwhile, Nathan Cullen challenges Laurie Hawn to a staring contest]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/05/the-commons-jason-kenney-again-surveys-the-scope-of-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Meanwhile, Nathan Cullen challenges Laurie Hawn to a staring contest
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>No need to keep studying the F-35?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/29/no-need-to-keep-studying-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/29/no-need-to-keep-studying-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 13:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Saxton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Pugliese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=261842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The work of the parliamentary committee studying the F-35 procurement is apparently done. At...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/29/no-need-to-keep-studying-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The work of the parliamentary committee studying the F-35 procurement is apparently done. At...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accountability and the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/04/accountability-and-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/04/accountability-and-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=250512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alan Williams, the former assistant deputy minister who has been raising concerns about the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/04/accountability-and-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Alan Williams, the former assistant deputy minister who has been raising concerns about the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Obviously we have not signed a contract&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/16/obviously-we-have-not-signed-a-contract/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/16/obviously-we-have-not-signed-a-contract/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CF-18]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=246386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Harper, November 3, 2010.  We are going to need to replace the aircraft...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/16/obviously-we-have-not-signed-a-contract/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephen Harper, November 3, 2010.  We are going to need to replace the aircraft...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crusade?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/09/crusade/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/09/crusade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crusade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stealth fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=224412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julian Fantino reassures Texas that the Harper government is committed to the F-35 program....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/09/crusade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	Julian Fantino reassures Texas that the Harper government is committed to the F-35 program....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: The F-35 has as many explanations as problems</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/24/the-commons-the-f-35-has-as-many-explanations-as-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/24/the-commons-the-f-35-has-as-many-explanations-as-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Kellaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nycole Turmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Dawn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=221399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest twist involves the small matter of whether or not the expensive aircraft will be useless]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/24/the-commons-the-f-35-has-as-many-explanations-as-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	The latest twist involves the small matter of whether or not the expensive aircraft will be useless
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of jobs and jets</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/15/of-jobs-and-jets/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/15/of-jobs-and-jets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 22:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pork]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/09/15/of-jobs-and-jets/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COYNE on the F-35 controversy]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/15/of-jobs-and-jets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	COYNE on the F-35 controversy
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
