<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; monarchy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/monarchy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:19:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Coronation&#8217;s 60th: Why the Queen&#8217;s not going anywhere</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/03/coronations-60th-why-the-queens-not-going-anywhere/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/03/coronations-60th-why-the-queens-not-going-anywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Royal Quarters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diamond jubilee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of Windsor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=390266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patricia Treble on why an abdication is unlikely]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/03/coronations-60th-why-the-queens-not-going-anywhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Patricia Treble on why an abdication is unlikely
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coronation&#8217;s 60th: The most perfectly regal dress</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/01/coronations-60th-the-most-perfectly-regal-dress/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/01/coronations-60th-the-most-perfectly-regal-dress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 09:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Royal Quarters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diamond jubilee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=390231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look back at the Queen's sartorial show-stopper]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/01/coronations-60th-the-most-perfectly-regal-dress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A look back at the Queen's sartorial show-stopper
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the best supporting role goes to&#8230;Prince Charles</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/08/and-the-best-supporting-role-goes-to-prince-charles/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/08/and-the-best-supporting-role-goes-to-prince-charles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 18:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Royal Quarters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duchess of Cornwall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Charles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince of Wales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Philip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State opening]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=381620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Queen prepares to 'share the burden of responsibility']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/08/and-the-best-supporting-role-goes-to-prince-charles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Queen prepares to 'share the burden of responsibility'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Willem-Alexander in, Beatrix out: a Dutch family affair</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/30/willem-alexander-in-beatrix-out-a-dutch-family-affair/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/30/willem-alexander-in-beatrix-out-a-dutch-family-affair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Royal Quarters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beatrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investiture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King Willem-Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Máxima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=378666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The queen of the Netherlands passes the torch to her eldest son]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/30/willem-alexander-in-beatrix-out-a-dutch-family-affair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The queen of the Netherlands passes the torch to her eldest son
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Máxima of the Netherlands heralds a new era for royal Europe</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/26/a-new-style-of-queen-maxima-of-the-netherlands/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/26/a-new-style-of-queen-maxima-of-the-netherlands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Royal Quarters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dutch royal family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willem-Alexander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=377681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Netherlands will soon have its first king in 123 years. But it's his queen that has people talking. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/26/a-new-style-of-queen-maxima-of-the-netherlands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Netherlands will soon have its first king in 123 years. But it's his queen that has people talking. 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gastroenteritis conquers Queen, sends her to hospital</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/03/gastroenteritis-conquers-queen-sends-her-to-hospital/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/03/gastroenteritis-conquers-queen-sends-her-to-hospital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Quarters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King Edward VII Hospital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windsor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=356352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the first time in a decade, the Queen is in hospital, felled by...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/03/gastroenteritis-conquers-queen-sends-her-to-hospital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	For the first time in a decade, the Queen is in hospital, felled by...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Queen of Canada is dead; long live the British Queen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/03/the-queen-of-canada-is-dead-long-live-the-british-queen/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/03/the-queen-of-canada-is-dead-long-live-the-british-queen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Charles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Nicholson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal succession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=346153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Conservatives must rethink their approach to succession]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/03/the-queen-of-canada-is-dead-long-live-the-british-queen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Why the Conservatives must rethink their approach to succession
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Act to assent to alterations in the law touching the Succession to the Throne</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/31/an-act-to-assent-to-alterations-in-the-law-touching-the-succession-to-the-throne/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/31/an-act-to-assent-to-alterations-in-the-law-touching-the-succession-to-the-throne/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Bowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Flynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal succession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=345231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservatives have now tabled the legislation that will, in the words of the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/31/an-act-to-assent-to-alterations-in-the-law-touching-the-succession-to-the-throne/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Conservatives have now tabled the legislation that will, in the words of the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inauguration vs. Diamond Jubilee</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/21/inauguration-vs-diamond-jubilee/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/21/inauguration-vs-diamond-jubilee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamond Jubilee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Quarters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diamond jubilee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=340056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maclean's Royal watcher was on hand for a little U.S. pomp and circumstance]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/21/inauguration-vs-diamond-jubilee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Maclean's Royal watcher was on hand for a little U.S. pomp and circumstance
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s all fret about our democracy (and the monarchy)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/21/lets-all-fret-about-our-democracy-and-the-monarchy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/21/lets-all-fret-about-our-democracy-and-the-monarchy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[At Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chantal Hébert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speaker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=330891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The At Issue panel takes viewer questions.

I&#8217;d like the Speaker to be more...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/21/lets-all-fret-about-our-democracy-and-the-monarchy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The At Issue panel takes viewer questions.

I&#8217;d like the Speaker to be more...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Cut our apron strings&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/03/cut-our-apron-strings/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/03/cut-our-apron-strings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 18:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diamond jubilee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Block]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=263621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the Queen watches the boats float along the Thames, the NDP&#8217;s Pat Martin...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/03/cut-our-apron-strings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	While the Queen watches the boats float along the Thames, the NDP&#8217;s Pat Martin...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three amigos, house of Windsor edition</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/28/three-amigos-house-of-windsor-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/28/three-amigos-house-of-windsor-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Royal Quarters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=242623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Queen, Camilla and Kate take tea together tomorrow, it'll be a photo-op like no other]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/28/three-amigos-house-of-windsor-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	If the Queen, Camilla and Kate take tea together tomorrow, it'll be a photo-op like no other
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>If we&#8217;re going to worship idols, can&#8217;t they at least be entertaining?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/16/if-were-going-to-worship-idols-cant-they-at-least-be-entertaining/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/16/if-were-going-to-worship-idols-cant-they-at-least-be-entertaining/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emma Teitel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teitel page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=240459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emma Teitel wonders why we're so fascinated by the Royals]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/16/if-were-going-to-worship-idols-cant-they-at-least-be-entertaining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Emma Teitel wonders why we're so fascinated by the Royals
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crowns and chaos in the Middle East</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/22/crowns-and-chaos-in-the-middle-east/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/22/crowns-and-chaos-in-the-middle-east/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 12:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Col. Moammar Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loya jirga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moammar Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shireen burki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victor menaldo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zahir shah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=235095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abstract: This paper helps explain the variation in political turmoil observed in the MENA...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/22/crowns-and-chaos-in-the-middle-east/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Abstract: This paper helps explain the variation in political turmoil observed in the MENA...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note to Liberals: please stop talking about marijuana</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/13/note-to-liberals-please-stop-talking-about-marijuana/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/13/note-to-liberals-please-stop-talking-about-marijuana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Goldenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymous Liberal Sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Goldenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Young Liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=233756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One says he’s “a proven advocate for members.” Another says he’ll remove “obstacles to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/13/note-to-liberals-please-stop-talking-about-marijuana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	One says he’s “a proven advocate for members.” Another says he’ll remove “obstacles to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Juan Carlos’s bad year</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/20/juan-carlos%e2%80%99s-bad-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/20/juan-carlos%e2%80%99s-bad-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/22/juan-carlos%e2%80%99s-bad-year/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His well-documented health problems pale in comparison to an intensifying corruption scandal centred on his son-in-law]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/20/juan-carlos%e2%80%99s-bad-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	His well-documented health problems pale in comparison to an intensifying corruption scandal centred on his son-in-law
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsmakers of the Year: Will and Kate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/01/a-fairy-tale-wedding-for-a-powerhouse-couple/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/01/a-fairy-tale-wedding-for-a-powerhouse-couple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anne Kingston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsmaker of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsmakers of the year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsmakers-2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/08/a-fairy-tale-wedding-for-a-powerhouse-couple/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will and Kate give the monarchy new blood and relevance. They gave everyone else a love story to remember.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/01/a-fairy-tale-wedding-for-a-powerhouse-couple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
	Will and Kate give the monarchy new blood and relevance. They gave everyone else a love story to remember.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada to support royal succession changes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/13/canada-to-support-royal-succession-changes/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/13/canada-to-support-royal-succession-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=220002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reforms would see crown passed to first-born, regardless of gender]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/13/canada-to-support-royal-succession-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	Reforms would see crown passed to first-born, regardless of gender
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The disappearing Duchess</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/12/the-disappearing-duchess/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/12/the-disappearing-duchess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duchess of windsor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke of Windsor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/13/the-disappearing-duchess/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kate’s recent seclusion has gossip mills churning. But it’s all part of the plan.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/12/the-disappearing-duchess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
	Kate’s recent seclusion has gossip mills churning. But it’s all part of the plan.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The royal visit: So much more than a photo op</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/11/so-much-more-than-a-photo-op-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/11/so-much-more-than-a-photo-op-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal visit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will and Kate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=200812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William and Kate's first great adventure as a married couple breathed new life into an old relationship ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/11/so-much-more-than-a-photo-op-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	William and Kate's first great adventure as a married couple breathed new life into an old relationship 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who says Quebecers don’t love the royals?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/11/eating-it-up-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/11/eating-it-up-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anne Kingston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-monarchist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal visit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=200856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well-wishers outnumbered protesters 10 to one]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/11/eating-it-up-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Well-wishers outnumbered protesters 10 to one
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The compelling pathos of being a prince</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/the-compelling-pathos-of-being-a-prince/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/the-compelling-pathos-of-being-a-prince/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northrop Frye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal visit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=201311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve never much liked the atmosphere surrounding royal visits. The anxiety many Canadians seem...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/the-compelling-pathos-of-being-a-prince/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
	I’ve never much liked the atmosphere surrounding royal visits. The anxiety many Canadians seem...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>We showed them, and the world, a wonderful time</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/we-showed-them-and-the-world-a-wonderful-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/we-showed-them-and-the-world-a-wonderful-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal tour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal visit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=200767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A letter from the editors]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/we-showed-them-and-the-world-a-wonderful-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A letter from the editors
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;re all in the royal family</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/were-all-in-the-royal-family/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/were-all-in-the-royal-family/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal tour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal visit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=200798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COYNE: Perhaps we've grown out of our insecurities—and growing into the monarchy]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/were-all-in-the-royal-family/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>224</slash:comments>
	COYNE: Perhaps we've grown out of our insecurities—and growing into the monarchy
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Kate might need to put on a few pounds</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/why-kate-might-need-to-put-on-a-few-pounds/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/why-kate-might-need-to-put-on-a-few-pounds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barbara Amiel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=200684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lotsa luck Kate. Enjoy those bandage dresses while you can.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/08/why-kate-might-need-to-put-on-a-few-pounds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
	Lotsa luck Kate. Enjoy those bandage dresses while you can.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A gift fit for a king</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/07/a-gift-fit-for-a-king/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/07/a-gift-fit-for-a-king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 15:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Bethune</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King George VI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal tour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal visit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=200700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How a present from the Harpers—a historic copy of <em>Maclean’s</em>—links this tour with the one in 1939]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/07/a-gift-fit-for-a-king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	How a present from the Harpers—a historic copy of <em>Maclean’s</em>—links this tour with the one in 1939
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How monarchist or monarchist how?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/06/how-monarchist-or-monarchist-how/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/06/how-monarchist-or-monarchist-how/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominion Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graham Fraser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Kenney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JJ McCullough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Diefenbaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michaëlle Jean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriotism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal tour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=200613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's hard to tell just where Stephen Harper stands on the monarchy]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/06/how-monarchist-or-monarchist-how/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	It's hard to tell just where Stephen Harper stands on the monarchy
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A royal pain or a PR coup for the PM?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/a-royal-pain-or-a-pr-coup-for-the-pm-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/a-royal-pain-or-a-pr-coup-for-the-pm-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Patriquin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal tour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal visit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RRQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereignty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=199654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quebec nationalists are booing, but the wedding watchers may cheer]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/a-royal-pain-or-a-pr-coup-for-the-pm-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Quebec nationalists are booing, but the wedding watchers may cheer
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>This time they got it right</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/12/this-time-they-got-it-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/12/this-time-they-got-it-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 13:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken MacQueen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=190145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Couple, family, Queen and country came together in a ceremony that is being called the saviour of the monarchy and marriage]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/12/this-time-they-got-it-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Couple, family, Queen and country came together in a ceremony that is being called the saviour of the monarchy and marriage
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Standing on ceremony</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/12/standing-on-ceremony/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/12/standing-on-ceremony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 13:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pippa Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Harry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=190148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six young children, two highly eligible wranglers in Prince Harry and Pippa—all the ingredients for royal chaos, but the attendants behaved (almost) perfectly]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/12/standing-on-ceremony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Six young children, two highly eligible wranglers in Prince Harry and Pippa—all the ingredients for royal chaos, but the attendants behaved (almost) perfectly
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>To see and be seen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/11/to-see-and-be-seen/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/11/to-see-and-be-seen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=190132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The guests did not just observe the spectacle—they were part of it, a dizzying mixture of fame, fashion and faux pas]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/11/to-see-and-be-seen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The guests did not just observe the spectacle—they were part of it, a dizzying mixture of fame, fashion and faux pas
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A dress for the ages</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/10/a-dress-for-the-ages/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/10/a-dress-for-the-ages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 21:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anne Kingston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=190138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kate Middleton found the right balance, honouring royal tradition while putting her own stamp on the day]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/10/a-dress-for-the-ages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Kate Middleton found the right balance, honouring royal tradition while putting her own stamp on the day
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The man in uniform</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/10/the-man-in-uniform/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/10/the-man-in-uniform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 16:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Gulli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=190141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was hard not to think of Diana while watching Prince William on his wedding day]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/10/the-man-in-uniform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	It was hard not to think of Diana while watching Prince William on his wedding day
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not so feudal after all</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/10/not-so-feudal-after-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/10/not-so-feudal-after-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 15:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=190124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The palace’s adroit use of new media has created a more savvy, approachable monarchy]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/10/not-so-feudal-after-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The palace’s adroit use of new media has created a more savvy, approachable monarchy
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Love conquers all</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/love-conquers-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/love-conquers-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 21:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=190143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William and Kate’s mutual affection and tenderness shone through all the pomp and ceremony]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/love-conquers-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	William and Kate’s mutual affection and tenderness shone through all the pomp and ceremony
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Her royal hotness</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/her-royal-hotness/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/her-royal-hotness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 16:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pippa Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=190136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[‘On April 29, a duchess was made and a star was born,’ declared the British press. Pippa took it in stride.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/her-royal-hotness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	‘On April 29, a duchess was made and a star was born,’ declared the British press. Pippa took it in stride.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The twittering classes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/the-twittering-classes/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/the-twittering-classes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 15:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Findlay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=190128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pippa’s show-stealing behind, the frowning flower girl and Bea’s batty headgear dominated Web chatter]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/the-twittering-classes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	Pippa’s show-stealing behind, the frowning flower girl and Bea’s batty headgear dominated Web chatter
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>No bangers and mash?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/no-bangers-and-mash/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/no-bangers-and-mash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 15:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=190121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Key ingredients for the wedding-day feasts—aside from the French bubbly—were sourced from the royal realm]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/no-bangers-and-mash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Key ingredients for the wedding-day feasts—aside from the French bubbly—were sourced from the royal realm
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The other love story</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/28/the-other-love-story/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/28/the-other-love-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Philip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=186355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her duty was to be the Queen, his is to become king. In this they are perfectly united, in love and honour bound.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/28/the-other-love-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Her duty was to be the Queen, his is to become king. In this they are perfectly united, in love and honour bound.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The royal pecking order</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/27/the-one-who-must-be-obeyed/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/27/the-one-who-must-be-obeyed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=186329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Precedence is a carefully observed royal rite]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/27/the-one-who-must-be-obeyed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Precedence is a carefully observed royal rite
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kate’s royal catwalk is a hit</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/27/queen-making/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/27/queen-making/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Gillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=186353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[‘She’s not put a foot wrong’]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/27/queen-making/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	‘She’s not put a foot wrong’
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kate Middleton&#039;s middle-class advantage</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/27/the-middle-class-advantage/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/27/the-middle-class-advantage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Treble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=186340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tight-knit Middletons have thrived through hard work and strong family values. The Queen approves.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/27/the-middle-class-advantage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	The tight-knit Middletons have thrived through hard work and strong family values. The Queen approves.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Week: Newsmakers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/newsmakers-58/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/newsmakers-58/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bi-polar disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ezra Levant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goodluck Jonathan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luongo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[madonna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc emery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Three cups of tea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William and Kate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=186297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Madonna’s newest epiphany, Stephen Harper’s women problem, and signs of sanity from Jan Brewer]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/newsmakers-58/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Madonna’s newest epiphany, Stephen Harper’s women problem, and signs of sanity from Jan Brewer
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In conversation: historian Andrew Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/25/why-kate%e2%80%99s-middle-class-roots-matter-how-she%e2%80%99s-like-the-queen-mum-and-ranking-william/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/25/why-kate%e2%80%99s-middle-class-roots-matter-how-she%e2%80%99s-like-the-queen-mum-and-ranking-william/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=186280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Kate’s middle-class roots matter, how she’s like the Queen Mum, and ranking William]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/25/why-kate%e2%80%99s-middle-class-roots-matter-how-she%e2%80%99s-like-the-queen-mum-and-ranking-william/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	Why Kate’s middle-class roots matter, how she’s like the Queen Mum, and ranking William
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Harpers turn down Will And Kate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/01/turning-down-will-and-kate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/01/turning-down-will-and-kate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=180865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PM's wife confirms neither she nor her husband will attend royal wedding]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/01/turning-down-will-and-kate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	PM's wife confirms neither she nor her husband will attend royal wedding
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
