<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; National Defence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/national-defence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 10:55:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Arab Spring caught Canadian intelligence off guard: government report</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/07/arab-spring-caught-canadian-intelligence-off-guard-government-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/07/arab-spring-caught-canadian-intelligence-off-guard-government-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 11:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=381016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; The 2011 Arab Spring uprising in the Middle East came as a...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/07/arab-spring-caught-canadian-intelligence-off-guard-government-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; The 2011 Arab Spring uprising in the Middle East came as a...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Losing soldiers was a shock to everybody’s system&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/on-lessons-from-afghanistan-the-f-35-controversy-and-cutting-military-spending-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/on-lessons-from-afghanistan-the-f-35-controversy-and-cutting-military-spending-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 fighter jet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=355208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In conversation with Defence Minister Peter MacKay on Afghanistan, the F-35 controversy and military spending]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/04/on-lessons-from-afghanistan-the-f-35-controversy-and-cutting-military-spending-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In conversation with Defence Minister Peter MacKay on Afghanistan, the F-35 controversy and military spending
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian military losing as much &#8216;teeth&#8217; as &#8216;tail&#8217; in budget cuts: expert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/canadian-military-losing-as-much-teeth-as-tail-in-budget-cuts-expert/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/canadian-military-losing-as-much-teeth-as-tail-in-budget-cuts-expert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Money being cut from National Defence will inevitably slice into the Canadian...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/26/canadian-military-losing-as-much-teeth-as-tail-in-budget-cuts-expert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Money being cut from National Defence will inevitably slice into the Canadian...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senior ranks of Canadian military get makeover ahead of tough federal budget</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/senior-ranks-of-canadian-military-get-makeover-ahead-of-tough-federal-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/senior-ranks-of-canadian-military-get-makeover-ahead-of-tough-federal-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=347234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; A major shakeup is in the offing amid the senior ranks of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/06/senior-ranks-of-canadian-military-get-makeover-ahead-of-tough-federal-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; A major shakeup is in the offing amid the senior ranks of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35: The Conservatives were &#8216;dead right&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/22/the-f-35-the-conservatives-were-dead-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/22/the-f-35-the-conservatives-were-dead-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gary goodyear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KPMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=340320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might have thought that the auditor general&#8217;s report and the KPMG audit amounted...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/22/the-f-35-the-conservatives-were-dead-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	You might have thought that the auditor general&#8217;s report and the KPMG audit amounted...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mythbusting the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/15/mythbusting-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/15/mythbusting-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=328683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaron Wherry checks out the facts in the spin]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/15/mythbusting-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Aaron Wherry checks out the facts in the spin
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The reset button</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/the-reset-button/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/the-reset-button/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 03:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue Allan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaron Wherry catches you up on a day in F-35 news]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/the-reset-button/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Aaron Wherry catches you up on a day in F-35 news
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35: The way we were</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/the-f-35-the-way-we-were/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/the-f-35-the-way-we-were/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Ring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahead of the release of the KPMG audit, here is the transcript of the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/12/the-f-35-the-way-we-were/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Ahead of the release of the KPMG audit, here is the transcript of the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What was the PM talking about?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/what-was-the-prime-minister-talking-about/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/what-was-the-prime-minister-talking-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=326407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What did Stephen Harper mean when he talked about "ripping up those contracts?"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/what-was-the-prime-minister-talking-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	What did Stephen Harper mean when he talked about "ripping up those contracts?"
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Back to the future of the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/the-commons-back-to-the-future-of-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/the-commons-back-to-the-future-of-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Kellway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=326261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The opposition insists on living in the past]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/the-commons-back-to-the-future-of-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The opposition insists on living in the past
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Alexander has the worst job in Ottawa</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/chris-alexander-has-the-worst-job-in-ottawa/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/chris-alexander-has-the-worst-job-in-ottawa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=326097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For whatever reason, Chris Alexander, the parliamentary secretary to the minister of defence, has...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/chris-alexander-has-the-worst-job-in-ottawa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	For whatever reason, Chris Alexander, the parliamentary secretary to the minister of defence, has...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The latest on the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/the-latest-on-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/the-latest-on-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 03:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KPMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=325601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reuters, the Canadian Press, Star, Globe and CTV report that a four-person panel will...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/the-latest-on-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Reuters, the Canadian Press, Star, Globe and CTV report that a four-person panel will...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s going on with the F-35?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/whats-going-on-with-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/whats-going-on-with-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=324979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Postmedia now reports that a final decision will be made this morning, but there...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/whats-going-on-with-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Postmedia now reports that a final decision will be made this morning, but there...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navy struggles to explain deleted, but now recovered intelligence presentations</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/02/navy-struggles-to-explain-deleted-but-now-recovered-intelligence-presentations/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/02/navy-struggles-to-explain-deleted-but-now-recovered-intelligence-presentations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 21:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=322515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Electronic records detailing the planned overhaul of Canadian naval intelligence — created...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/02/navy-struggles-to-explain-deleted-but-now-recovered-intelligence-presentations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Electronic records detailing the planned overhaul of Canadian naval intelligence — created...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gen. Tom Lawson formally takes over as chief of the defence staff</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/29/gen-tom-lawson-formally-takes-over-as-chief-of-the-defence-staff/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/29/gen-tom-lawson-formally-takes-over-as-chief-of-the-defence-staff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=308457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA - The military changed the guard at the top today. Gen. Tom Lawson was officially appointed as chief of the defence staff, taking over the country's highest military post.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/29/gen-tom-lawson-formally-takes-over-as-chief-of-the-defence-staff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA - The military changed the guard at the top today. Gen. Tom Lawson was officially appointed as chief of the defence staff, taking over the country's highest military post.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lt.-Gen. Thomas Lawson to be installed today as Canada&#8217;s new defence chief</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/29/lt-gen-thomas-lawson-to-be-installed-today-as-canadas-new-defence-chief/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/29/lt-gen-thomas-lawson-to-be-installed-today-as-canadas-new-defence-chief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=308323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lt.-Gen. Thomas Lawson will be installed as Chief of Defence Staff, replacing the outgoing General Walt Natynczyk.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/29/lt-gen-thomas-lawson-to-be-installed-today-as-canadas-new-defence-chief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Lt.-Gen. Thomas Lawson will be installed as Chief of Defence Staff, replacing the outgoing General Walt Natynczyk.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Harper government going to consider alternatives to the F-35?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/23/is-the-harper-government-going-to-consider-alternatives-to-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/23/is-the-harper-government-going-to-consider-alternatives-to-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Hornet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=306132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Canadian Press talked to the commander of the Air Force and came away...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/23/is-the-harper-government-going-to-consider-alternatives-to-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Canadian Press talked to the commander of the Air Force and came away...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>DND fires three civilian execs, including official in charge of pension clawback</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/15/dnd-fires-three-civilian-execs-including-official-in-charge-of-pension-clawback/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/15/dnd-fires-three-civilian-execs-including-official-in-charge-of-pension-clawback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=303469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA - Three mid-level civilian executives at National Defence were inexplicably fired earlier this month, including a director who's been at the centre of a class-action lawsuit that could cost the federal treasury up to $600 million.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/15/dnd-fires-three-civilian-execs-including-official-in-charge-of-pension-clawback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA - Three mid-level civilian executives at National Defence were inexplicably fired earlier this month, including a director who's been at the centre of a class-action lawsuit that could cost the federal treasury up to $600 million.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian troops serving with allies in Afghanistan cleared for combat</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/14/canadian-troops-serving-with-allies-in-afghanistan-cleared-for-combat/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/14/canadian-troops-serving-with-allies-in-afghanistan-cleared-for-combat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=303241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA - National Defence successfully pushed the Harper government last year to ease the prohibition on Canadian troops from setting foot in Kandahar and participating in combat operations by establishing an exemption for those serving with allies, internal documents reveal.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/14/canadian-troops-serving-with-allies-in-afghanistan-cleared-for-combat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA - National Defence successfully pushed the Harper government last year to ease the prohibition on Canadian troops from setting foot in Kandahar and participating in combat operations by establishing an exemption for those serving with allies, internal documents reveal.

	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harper government goes back to negotiating table over Sea King replacements</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/11/harper-government-goes-back-to-negotiating-table-over-sea-king-replacements/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/11/harper-government-goes-back-to-negotiating-table-over-sea-king-replacements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=302646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA - The Harper government is once again re-negotiating the contract to replace the air force's outdated Sea King helicopters, The Canadian Press has learned.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/11/harper-government-goes-back-to-negotiating-table-over-sea-king-replacements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA - The Harper government is once again re-negotiating the contract to replace the air force's outdated Sea King helicopters, The Canadian Press has learned.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>About those &#8220;next generation&#8221; tanks</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/13/about-those-next-generation-tanks/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/13/about-those-next-generation-tanks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Pugliese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=293291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Pugliese quibbles with the Defence Minister&#8217;s announcement of new &#8220;next generation&#8221; tanks.
It...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/13/about-those-next-generation-tanks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	David Pugliese quibbles with the Defence Minister&#8217;s announcement of new &#8220;next generation&#8221; tanks.
It...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enter the Avro?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/10/enter-the-avro/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/10/enter-the-avro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avro Arrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis MacKenzie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Clark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=291599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maj0r-General Lewis MacKenzie says a new Avro Arrow should be considered, but figures the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/10/enter-the-avro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Maj0r-General Lewis MacKenzie says a new Avro Arrow should be considered, but figures the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Alexander is confused</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/22/chris-alexander-is-confused/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/22/chris-alexander-is-confused/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=285353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let us try to understand Mr. Alexander's 'understanding' of the 'misunderstanding' that concerned theF-35]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/22/chris-alexander-is-confused/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Let us try to understand Mr. Alexander's 'understanding' of the 'misunderstanding' that concerned theF-35
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Russians aren&#8217;t coming</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/21/the-russians-arent-coming/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/21/the-russians-arent-coming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Pugliese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=285047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite what you might have heard, David Pugliese reports that the Defence department isn&#8217;t...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/21/the-russians-arent-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Despite what you might have heard, David Pugliese reports that the Defence department isn&#8217;t...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35 on trial</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/21/the-f-35-on-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/21/the-f-35-on-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winslow Wheeler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=284989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP will convene two public roundtables this morning on the Hill to hear...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/21/the-f-35-on-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The NDP will convene two public roundtables this morning on the Hill to hear...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using a search-and-rescue helicopter for a fishing trip sends the wrong message</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/20/what-thats-not-allowed-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/20/what-thats-not-allowed-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Penashue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-and-rescue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=275972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Peter Penashue is upset that a search-and-rescue helicopter was used by...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/20/what-thats-not-allowed-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Peter Penashue is upset that a search-and-rescue helicopter was used by...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Checking DND&#8217;s math</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/20/checking-dnds-math/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/20/checking-dnds-math/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=269068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From QP yesterday, Rona Ambrose explains why new cost estimates for the F-35 won&#8217;t...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/20/checking-dnds-math/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	From QP yesterday, Rona Ambrose explains why new cost estimates for the F-35 won&#8217;t...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The subjective time limit</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/15/the-subjective-time-limit/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/15/the-subjective-time-limit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=267969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the Harper government offered its seven-point response to the auditor general&#8217;s concerns about...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/15/the-subjective-time-limit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	When the Harper government offered its seven-point response to the auditor general&#8217;s concerns about...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still waiting</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/12/still-waiting/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/12/still-waiting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=266150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new cost estimate for the F-35 apparently won&#8217;t be ready until the fall,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/12/still-waiting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A new cost estimate for the F-35 apparently won&#8217;t be ready until the fall,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting the minister</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/05/protecting-the-minister/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/05/protecting-the-minister/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 16:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search-and-rescue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter Natynczyk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=264156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laura Payton obtains correspondence related to the Defence Minister&#8217;s helicopter ride.
An email from...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/05/protecting-the-minister/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Laura Payton obtains correspondence related to the Defence Minister&#8217;s helicopter ride.
An email from...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>No need to keep studying the F-35?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/29/no-need-to-keep-studying-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/29/no-need-to-keep-studying-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 13:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Saxton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Pugliese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=261842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The work of the parliamentary committee studying the F-35 procurement is apparently done. At...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/29/no-need-to-keep-studying-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The work of the parliamentary committee studying the F-35 procurement is apparently done. At...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holding pattern</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/22/holding-pattern/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/22/holding-pattern/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=259816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 1, as previously noted, I sent the following questions to the office...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/22/holding-pattern/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	On May 1, as previously noted, I sent the following questions to the office...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accounting for the Defence Department</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/11/accounting-for-the-defence-department/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/11/accounting-for-the-defence-department/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 13:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=258223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mission in Libya cost significantly more than the Defence Minister once suggested. And...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/11/accounting-for-the-defence-department/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The mission in Libya cost significantly more than the Defence Minister once suggested. And...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Haven&#8217;t made that choice&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/10/havent-made-that-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/10/havent-made-that-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 13:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite various commitments to and demands for a full 36-year lifecycle cost estimate for...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/10/havent-made-that-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Despite various commitments to and demands for a full 36-year lifecycle cost estimate for...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sent to the whole</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/09/sent-to-the-whole/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/09/sent-to-the-whole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 15:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[committee of the whole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the conclusion of regular business this evening, the House of Commons will set...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/09/sent-to-the-whole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	At the conclusion of regular business this evening, the House of Commons will set...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for answers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/09/waiting-for-answers/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/09/waiting-for-answers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 12:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Globe reports that Defence officials made a trip to Washington last week to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/09/waiting-for-answers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Globe reports that Defence officials made a trip to Washington last week to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The quiet cuts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/03/the-quiet-cuts-13/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/03/the-quiet-cuts-13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 16:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parks canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiet cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=256778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parks Canada will cut jobs and privatize some operations. Librarians will lose their jobs....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/03/the-quiet-cuts-13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Parks Canada will cut jobs and privatize some operations. Librarians will lose their jobs....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>When will the lifecycle cost be explained?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/when-will-the-lifecycle-cost-be-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/when-will-the-lifecycle-cost-be-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 17:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public accounts committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Fonberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Board]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=256121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The full lifecycle cost of the F-35 remains elusive.
DND’s deputy minister, Robert Fonberg,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/when-will-the-lifecycle-cost-be-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The full lifecycle cost of the F-35 remains elusive.
DND’s deputy minister, Robert Fonberg,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What did the cabinet know and why was the F-35 allowed to proceed?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/what-did-the-cabinet-know-and-why-was-the-f-35-allowed-to-proceed/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/what-did-the-cabinet-know-and-why-was-the-f-35-allowed-to-proceed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 12:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Ivison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public accounts committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=256015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While a number of department officials—including the deputy minister of defence and the assistant...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/what-did-the-cabinet-know-and-why-was-the-f-35-allowed-to-proceed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	While a number of department officials—including the deputy minister of defence and the assistant...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The quiet cuts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/30/the-quiet-cuts-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/30/the-quiet-cuts-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homelessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiet cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=255929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Tobacco Control Strategy is being cut, trade consulates will be closed, a...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/30/the-quiet-cuts-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Federal Tobacco Control Strategy is being cut, trade consulates will be closed, a...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;You do get the sense there were different books being kept&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/30/you-do-get-the-sense-there-were-different-books-being-kept/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/30/you-do-get-the-sense-there-were-different-books-being-kept/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pbo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=255850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Pages throws a quote on the F-35 fire.
Page told host Evan Solomon...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/30/you-do-get-the-sense-there-were-different-books-being-kept/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Kevin Pages throws a quote on the F-35 fire.
Page told host Evan Solomon...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In case you misunderstood him the first time</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/26/in-case-you-misunderstood-him-the-first-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/26/in-case-you-misunderstood-him-the-first-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public accounts committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=255438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Auditor General appeared before the Public Accounts Committee to explain his findings on...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/26/in-case-you-misunderstood-him-the-first-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Auditor General appeared before the Public Accounts Committee to explain his findings on...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: A simple misunderstanding</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/the-commons-a-simple-misunderstanding/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/the-commons-a-simple-misunderstanding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=254619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So close to the sort of concession the opposition desires and yet, so far]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/the-commons-a-simple-misunderstanding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	So close to the sort of concession the opposition desires and yet, so far
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35 math gets fuzzier</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/the-f-35-math-gets-fuzzier/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/the-f-35-math-gets-fuzzier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=254426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The projected training budget may not be sufficient for the F-35.
About $1.3 billion...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/the-f-35-math-gets-fuzzier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The projected training budget may not be sufficient for the F-35.
About $1.3 billion...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spring break is over</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/spring-break-is-over/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/spring-break-is-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Minsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johanne Provencher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Slack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public accounts committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Dicerni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Ring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=253358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House doesn&#8217;t reconvene until Monday, but the public accounts committee will meet this...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/19/spring-break-is-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The House doesn&#8217;t reconvene until Monday, but the public accounts committee will meet this...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
