<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; NATO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/nato/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:14:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Absurdity, here and there</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/09/absurdity-here-and-there/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/09/absurdity-here-and-there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amir Attaran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamid Karzai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transfers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=232477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest squabble over Afghan detainees, national security and access to information involves hairdos....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/09/absurdity-here-and-there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The latest squabble over Afghan detainees, national security and access to information involves hairdos....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking part in a demonstration of fine European hospitality</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/15/taking-part-in-a-demonstration-of-fine-european-hospitality/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/15/taking-part-in-a-demonstration-of-fine-european-hospitality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Taxpayers Federation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hotel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Istanbul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Munich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turkey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=229992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Canadian Taxpayers Federation wants the Defence Minister to explain his choice of accommodations...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/12/15/taking-part-in-a-demonstration-of-fine-european-hospitality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Canadian Taxpayers Federation wants the Defence Minister to explain his choice of accommodations...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Freedom seldom flowers in undisturbed ground&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/24/freedom-seldom-flowers-in-undisturbed-ground/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/24/freedom-seldom-flowers-in-undisturbed-ground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=226829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The prepared text of the Prime Minister&#8217;s remarks at today&#8217;s Parliament Hill ceremony marking...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/24/freedom-seldom-flowers-in-undisturbed-ground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The prepared text of the Prime Minister&#8217;s remarks at today&#8217;s Parliament Hill ceremony marking...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The science and politics of risk</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/31/the-science-and-politics-of-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/31/the-science-and-politics-of-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kabul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=222590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Canadian Forces suffer their first death since transitioning to a training mission in Afghanistan]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/31/the-science-and-politics-of-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Canadian Forces suffer their first death since transitioning to a training mission in Afghanistan
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the Haqqanis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/21/meet-the-haqqanis/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/21/meet-the-haqqanis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haqqani network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=221132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unlike the Taliban, Afghanistan's Haqqani network fields "world-class fighters" who are keen to disrupt the peace process]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/21/meet-the-haqqanis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	Unlike the Taliban, Afghanistan's Haqqani network fields "world-class fighters" who are keen to disrupt the peace process
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three more months</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/26/three-more-months/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/26/three-more-months/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=217207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the Conservatives and Liberals voting in favour, the House approved a three-month extension...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/26/three-more-months/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	With the Conservatives and Liberals voting in favour, the House approved a three-month extension...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case for changing the mission in Libya</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/26/the-case-for-changing-the-mission-in-libya/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/26/the-case-for-changing-the-mission-in-libya/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=217154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is NDP defence critic Jack Harris&#8217; speech to the House on the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/26/the-case-for-changing-the-mission-in-libya/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	The following is NDP defence critic Jack Harris&#8217; speech to the House on the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case for staying engaged in Libya</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/26/the-case-for-staying-engaged-in-libya/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/26/the-case-for-staying-engaged-in-libya/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=217149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House of Commons is presently debating an extension to the mission in Libya....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/26/the-case-for-staying-engaged-in-libya/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	The House of Commons is presently debating an extension to the mission in Libya....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israel alone</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/israel-alone/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/israel-alone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Petrou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anwar Sadat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arab spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahmoud Abbas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recep Tayyip Erdogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statehood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/29/israel-alone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With key regional allies now hostile, the Jewish state appears isolated as never before]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/23/israel-alone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
	With key regional allies now hostile, the Jewish state appears isolated as never before
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kosovo: independent, but a basket case</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/21/independent-but-a-basket-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/21/independent-but-a-basket-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border Crossings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kosovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Balkans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/22/independent-but-a-basket-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The economy is dead, corruption is rampant, and Serbia remains hostile]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/21/independent-but-a-basket-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	The economy is dead, corruption is rampant, and Serbia remains hostile
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jaw-jaw v. War-war</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/06/jaw-jaw-v-war-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/06/jaw-jaw-v-war-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roland Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winston Churchill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=213117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roland Paris considers the Prime Minister&#8217;s comments on soldiers and arguments.
Turning back to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/06/jaw-jaw-v-war-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
	Roland Paris considers the Prime Minister&#8217;s comments on soldiers and arguments.
Turning back to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soldiers, arguments and revolution</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/02/soldiers-arguments-and-revolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/02/soldiers-arguments-and-revolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enlightenment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[French Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georg Lichtenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk Wetters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koselleck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=212847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An astute reader finds the context of Lichtenberg&#8217;s quote in a 2008 book by...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/02/soldiers-arguments-and-revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	An astute reader finds the context of Lichtenberg&#8217;s quote in a 2008 book by...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The challenging transition in Libya</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/02/power-is-in-our-hands/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/02/power-is-in-our-hands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bab al-Aziziya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Col. Moammar Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mustafa Abdul Jalil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rebels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tripoli]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=212391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['Power is in our hands']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/02/power-is-in-our-hands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	'Power is in our hands'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;The argument of force&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/01/the-argument-of-force/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/01/the-argument-of-force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonel Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=212538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Prime Minister considers the lesson of Libya.
And in a continuation of the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/01/the-argument-of-force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	The Prime Minister considers the lesson of Libya.
And in a continuation of the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada “punched well above its weight” in Libya strikes</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/26/canada-%e2%80%9cpunched-well-above-its-weight%e2%80%9d-in-libya-strikes/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/26/canada-%e2%80%9cpunched-well-above-its-weight%e2%80%9d-in-libya-strikes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=211835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NATO official says Canadian Forces' contributions disproportionate to its size]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/26/canada-%e2%80%9cpunched-well-above-its-weight%e2%80%9d-in-libya-strikes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
	NATO official says Canadian Forces' contributions disproportionate to its size
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;The beginning of the end&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/24/the-beginning-of-the-end-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/24/the-beginning-of-the-end-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonel Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Yglesias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moammar Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spencer Ackerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=211428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Prime Minister talks about the latest developments in Libya.
“We have to be...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/24/the-beginning-of-the-end-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	The Prime Minister talks about the latest developments in Libya.
“We have to be...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good news, bad news: August 4-11, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/18/good-news-bad-news-august-4-11-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/18/good-news-bad-news-august-4-11-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good news, bad news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al-Shabab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amnesty International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denis Lebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Kenney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nycole Turmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whole Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yingluck Shinawatra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=208569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aid flows into Mogadishu after al-Shabaab retreats, while NATO forces see a deadly week in Afghanistan]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/18/good-news-bad-news-august-4-11-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Aid flows into Mogadishu after al-Shabaab retreats, while NATO forces see a deadly week in Afghanistan
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;That&#8217;s enough of the military equation for Canada&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/09/thats-enough-of-the-military-equation-for-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/09/thats-enough-of-the-military-equation-for-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonel Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moammar Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Dewar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=208299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP seems unlikely to support an extension of the Libya mission.
“Come the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/09/thats-enough-of-the-military-equation-for-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
	The NDP seems unlikely to support an extension of the Libya mission.
“Come the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;A slow process&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/08/a-slow-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/08/a-slow-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 20:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anders Fogh Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Bouchard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonel Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moammar Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=208255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Canadian general overseeing NATO&#8217;s operations in Libya quibbles with the suggestion that the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/08/a-slow-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	The Canadian general overseeing NATO&#8217;s operations in Libya quibbles with the suggestion that the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much longer in Libya?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/26/how-much-longer-in-libya/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/26/how-much-longer-in-libya/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Admiral Mullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Crumley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonel Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=206738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the outset of the Libyan mission, the Prime Minister ventured a prediction of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/26/how-much-longer-in-libya/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	At the outset of the Libyan mission, the Prime Minister ventured a prediction of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>End of the U.S. empire?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/25/end-of-the-empire/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/25/end-of-the-empire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luiza Ch. Savage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=205718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After years of foreign wars and interventions, a new mood of isolationism is sweeping America]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/25/end-of-the-empire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
	After years of foreign wars and interventions, a new mood of isolationism is sweeping America
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gadhafi pushes NATO to the brink</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/14/gadhafi-pushes-nato-to-the-brink/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/14/gadhafi-pushes-nato-to-the-brink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arab spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moammar Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=204642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Alliance's battle for Libya is also an existential one]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/14/gadhafi-pushes-nato-to-the-brink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	Why the Alliance's battle for Libya is also an existential one
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Canada&#8217;s help is required&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/14/canadas-help-is-required/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/14/canadas-help-is-required/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaddafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=204513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Baird explains why we&#8217;re bombing Libya.
That&#8217;s what took me to Libya late...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/14/canadas-help-is-required/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
	John Baird explains why we&#8217;re bombing Libya.
That&#8217;s what took me to Libya late...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still fighting over Alexander the Great</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/14/still-fighting-over-alexander/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/14/still-fighting-over-alexander/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Petrou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander the Great]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macedonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skopje]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=200904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or is it Alexander the Macedonian?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/14/still-fighting-over-alexander/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Or is it Alexander the Macedonian?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada’s next mission</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/07/canada%e2%80%99s-next-mission/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/07/canada%e2%80%99s-next-mission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Petrou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top02]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghan National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=199832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2009, the Afghan army lost more soldiers than it recruited, 86 per cent of recruits couldn't spell their name. That's all changing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/07/canada%e2%80%99s-next-mission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	In 2009, the Afghan army lost more soldiers than it recruited, 86 per cent of recruits couldn't spell their name. That's all changing.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defence spending: does the party in power spell the difference?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/defence-spending-does-the-party-in-power-spell-the-difference/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/defence-spending-does-the-party-in-power-spell-the-difference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=200546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Canada pulling its fighting troops out of Kandahar this month, there&#8217;s growing interest...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/05/defence-spending-does-the-party-in-power-spell-the-difference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
	With Canada pulling its fighting troops out of Kandahar this month, there&#8217;s growing interest...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada’s top soldier wants NATO&#039;s big job</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/21/canada%e2%80%99s-top-soldier-wants-natos-big-job/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/21/canada%e2%80%99s-top-soldier-wants-natos-big-job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=198530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walter Natynczyk reportedly vying for alliance’s top military role]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/21/canada%e2%80%99s-top-soldier-wants-natos-big-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Walter Natynczyk reportedly vying for alliance’s top military role
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada’s top soldier wants NATO&#8217;s big job</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/21/canada%e2%80%99s-top-soldier-wants-natos-big-job-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/21/canada%e2%80%99s-top-soldier-wants-natos-big-job-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=198530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walter Natynczyk reportedly vying for alliance’s top military role]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/21/canada%e2%80%99s-top-soldier-wants-natos-big-job-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Walter Natynczyk reportedly vying for alliance’s top military role
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The dissenting Ms. May</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/15/the-dissenting-ms-may/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/15/the-dissenting-ms-may/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arab League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonel Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=197149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A day after denying unanimous consent to move along a crime bill, Elizabeth May...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/15/the-dissenting-ms-may/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
	A day after denying unanimous consent to move along a crime bill, Elizabeth May...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Standing firm in Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/14/standing-firm/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/14/standing-firm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Petrou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kandahar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[withdrawal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=196382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In spite of the impending pullout, Canadian troops remain committed to their mission]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/14/standing-firm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In spite of the impending pullout, Canadian troops remain committed to their mission
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The other war we&#039;re in</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/13/the-other-war-were-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/13/the-other-war-were-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=196898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Canada's mission in Libya going the way our leaders expected?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/13/the-other-war-were-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
	Is Canada's mission in Libya going the way our leaders expected?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Defense Secretary warns NATO of looming irrelevance</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/10/u-s-defense-secretary-warns-nato-of-looming-irrelevance/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/10/u-s-defense-secretary-warns-nato-of-looming-irrelevance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=196790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too many countries shirking their duty, says Gates]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/10/u-s-defense-secretary-warns-nato-of-looming-irrelevance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	Too many countries shirking their duty, says Gates
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good news, bad news: June 2-9, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/09/good-news-bad-news-june-2-9-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/09/good-news-bad-news-june-2-9-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good news, bad news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antihydrogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don schroeder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golan Heights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kofi annan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newfoundland and Labrador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard LeBlanc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Hortons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winnipeg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winnipeg jets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=196414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A wrongfully convicted woman regains her freedom, while a Boston player gets knocked out of the playoffs by a vicious hit]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/09/good-news-bad-news-june-2-9-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	A wrongfully convicted woman regains her freedom, while a Boston player gets knocked out of the playoffs by a vicious hit
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oil and water: Libya&#039;s potent mixture</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/23/oil-and-water-a-potent-mixture-oil/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/23/oil-and-water-a-potent-mixture-oil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 13:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rebels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=192823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rebels and loyalists are fighting a bitter battle in the arid south]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/23/oil-and-water-a-potent-mixture-oil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	Rebels and loyalists are fighting a bitter battle in the arid south
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;All options are back on the table&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/16/all-options-are-back-on-the-table/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/16/all-options-are-back-on-the-table/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 20:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=192087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a leaked cable from the U.S. embassy in Ottawa, the Harper government...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/16/all-options-are-back-on-the-table/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	According to a leaked cable from the U.S. embassy in Ottawa, the Harper government...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;A good working relationship&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/13/a-good-working-relationship/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/13/a-good-working-relationship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 14:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=191748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another leaked cable sheds light on our pitched battle with the Russians for the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/13/a-good-working-relationship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
	Another leaked cable sheds light on our pitched battle with the Russians for the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;The government would look at the possibility&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/12/the-government-would-look-at-the-possibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/12/the-government-would-look-at-the-possibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 22:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawrence cannon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=191589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Around the same time Mr. Harper said publicly that the post-2011 mission in Afghanistan...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/12/the-government-would-look-at-the-possibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	Around the same time Mr. Harper said publicly that the post-2011 mission in Afghanistan...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Libya another Iraq?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/28/is-libya-another-iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/28/is-libya-another-iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Petrou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moammar Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saddam Hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=178863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The West plunges into another brutal Mideast conflict. How long will we have to stay this time?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/28/is-libya-another-iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	The West plunges into another brutal Mideast conflict. How long will we have to stay this time?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The rank amateurs trying to bring down Gadhafi</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/14/rank-amateurs/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/14/rank-amateurs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moammar Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Libyan Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no-fly zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ras Lanuf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rebels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=176549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Organizing civilians into orderly fighting forces is the Libyan rebellion's biggest challenge]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/14/rank-amateurs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	Organizing civilians into orderly fighting forces is the Libyan rebellion's biggest challenge
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The first step is denial</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/14/the-first-step-is-denial/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/14/the-first-step-is-denial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heroin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=171422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russia blames NATO policies for its heroin crisis. But is Afghanistan just a scapegoat for a broader problem?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/14/the-first-step-is-denial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	Russia blames NATO policies for its heroin crisis. But is Afghanistan just a scapegoat for a broader problem?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What was that about hearts and minds?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/01/hearts-and-minds-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/01/hearts-and-minds-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamid Karzai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kandahar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Kandahar, NATO forces have been destroying homes ‘to make them safe.’ Sound familiar?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/01/hearts-and-minds-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
	In Kandahar, NATO forces have been destroying homes ‘to make them safe.’ Sound familiar?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pinky swear</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/20/pinky-swear/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/20/pinky-swear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 16:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawrence cannon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=159337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawrence Cannon assures that Canada will withdraw from Afghanistan in 2014.
&#8220;We might be...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/20/pinky-swear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	Lawrence Cannon assures that Canada will withdraw from Afghanistan in 2014.
&#8220;We might be...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The least we could do</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/18/the-least-we-could-do/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/18/the-least-we-could-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Security Assistance Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupational hazard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tragedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=158595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until the defence of Afghanistan can be left to the Afghans, somebody has to do the fighting]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/18/the-least-we-could-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
	Until the defence of Afghanistan can be left to the Afghans, somebody has to do the fighting
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where to and what now?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/17/where-to/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/17/where-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kabul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kandahar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=158559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Postmedia questions where Canadian soldiers will end up stationed after July 2011.
While Harper...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/17/where-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
	Postmedia questions where Canadian soldiers will end up stationed after July 2011.
While Harper...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Why bother?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/16/the-commons-why-bother/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/16/the-commons-why-bother/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kabul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kandahar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawrence cannon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=158405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As it is, the matter of extending the Afghan mission will now pass with neither a debate, nor a vote]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/16/the-commons-why-bother/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
	As it is, the matter of extending the Afghan mission will now pass with neither a debate, nor a vote
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

