<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; omnibus legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/omnibus-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The CBC, C-60 and splitting the bill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/the-cbc-c-60-and-splitting-the-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/the-cbc-c-60-and-splitting-the-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective bargaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=379685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another omnibus bill, another fight]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/the-cbc-c-60-and-splitting-the-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Another omnibus bill, another fight
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>C-60: the first budget implementation act of 2013</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/c-60-the-first-budget-implementation-act-of-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/c-60-the-first-budget-implementation-act-of-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=378415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A slightly smaller kind of omnibus]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/29/c-60-the-first-budget-implementation-act-of-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A slightly smaller kind of omnibus
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the New Democrats want</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/21/what-the-new-democrats-want/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/21/what-the-new-democrats-want/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=353113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The official opposition makes its budget demands]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/21/what-the-new-democrats-want/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The official opposition makes its budget demands
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The enduring mystery of the Navigable Waters Protection Act</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/21/the-enduring-mystery-of-the-navigable-waters-protection-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/21/the-enduring-mystery-of-the-navigable-waters-protection-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Energy Pipeline Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Marit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navigable Waters Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saskatchewan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=352980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did the pipeline industry inspire the changes?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/21/the-enduring-mystery-of-the-navigable-waters-protection-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Did the pipeline industry inspire the changes?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justin Trudeau&#8217;s democratic reforms</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/04/justin-trudeaus-democratic-reforms/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/04/justin-trudeaus-democratic-reforms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=346248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Liberal leadership candidate promises fewer free votes than the Conservatives did in 2006]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/04/justin-trudeaus-democratic-reforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Liberal leadership candidate promises fewer free votes than the Conservatives did in 2006
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Omnibus No More</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/10/omnibus-no-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/10/omnibus-no-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aboriginal affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-38]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Selley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idle No More]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=335535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Selley points to one part of C-45, last year&#8217;s second budget implementation act....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/10/omnibus-no-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Chris Selley points to one part of C-45, last year&#8217;s second budget implementation act....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The trouble with the budget</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/08/the-trouble-with-the-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/08/the-trouble-with-the-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 18:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter DeVries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Clark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=334570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Clark and Peter DeVries explain how to fix the budget process.
The use...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/08/the-trouble-with-the-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Scott Clark and Peter DeVries explain how to fix the budget process.
The use...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A bad precedent</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/19/a-bad-precedent/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/19/a-bad-precedent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-38]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=330308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative MP Larry Miller suggests opposition complaints about the size of this year&#8217;s omnibus...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/19/a-bad-precedent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Conservative MP Larry Miller suggests opposition complaints about the size of this year&#8217;s omnibus...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>#IdleNoMore and the fight for democracy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/18/idlenomore-and-the-fight-for-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/18/idlenomore-and-the-fight-for-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aboriginal affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wab Kinew]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=329791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wab Kinew explains the Idle No More protests.
<strong>2. #IdleNoMore is about the Environment...</strong>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/18/idlenomore-and-the-fight-for-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Wab Kinew explains the Idle No More protests.
<strong>2. #IdleNoMore is about the Environment...</strong>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>#IdleNoMore</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/11/idlenomore/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/11/idlenomore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aboriginal affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolyn Bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Crowder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=326519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest budget bill draws aboriginal protests.
Chantal Chagnon, an aboriginal singer and drummer...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/11/idlenomore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The latest budget bill draws aboriginal protests.
Chantal Chagnon, an aboriginal singer and drummer...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Is this any way to run a democracy?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/05/the-commons-is-this-any-way-to-run-a-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/05/the-commons-is-this-any-way-to-run-a-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denis Lebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Watson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Leslie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=323485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sitting and standing for hours and hours]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/05/the-commons-is-this-any-way-to-run-a-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Sitting and standing for hours and hours
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debating C-45</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/04/debating-c-45-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/04/debating-c-45-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Thibeault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judy Foote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Seeback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre-Luc Dusseault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Opitz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=323275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The proposed amendments are presently being read into the record and put to voice...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/04/debating-c-45-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The proposed amendments are presently being read into the record and put to voice...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A rough guide to Bill C-45, the second budget implementation act</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/03/a-rough-guide-to-bill-c-45-the-second-budget-implementation-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/03/a-rough-guide-to-bill-c-45-the-second-budget-implementation-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 16:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navigable Waters Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=322680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What's the deal with the son of omnibus? Aaron Wherry explains]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/03/a-rough-guide-to-bill-c-45-the-second-budget-implementation-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	What's the deal with the son of omnibus? Aaron Wherry explains
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another voting marathon approaches</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/20/another-voting-marathon-approaches/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/20/another-voting-marathon-approaches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brison]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=316909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Brison has submitted some 3,000 amendments to C-45 to be considered by the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/20/another-voting-marathon-approaches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Scott Brison has submitted some 3,000 amendments to C-45 to be considered by the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cram session</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/08/cram-session/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/08/cram-session/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Christopherson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=313116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The opposition parties are unimpressed with how little time is being allowed for the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/08/cram-session/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The opposition parties are unimpressed with how little time is being allowed for the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Counting the days on C-45</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/01/counting-the-days-on-c-45/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/01/counting-the-days-on-c-45/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=310516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House is scheduled to be on break for the week of November 12...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/01/counting-the-days-on-c-45/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The House is scheduled to be on break for the week of November 12...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is &#8216;omnibus&#8217; a bad word now?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/31/is-omnibus-a-bad-word-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/31/is-omnibus-a-bad-word-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=309728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent poll from Forum Research.
‘Do you agree or disagree the government should...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/31/is-omnibus-a-bad-word-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A recent poll from Forum Research.
‘Do you agree or disagree the government should...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;A complete dog&#8217;s breakfast&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/26/a-complete-dogs-breakfast/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/26/a-complete-dogs-breakfast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Goodale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=307638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ralph Goodale&#8217;s contribution to the C-45 debate.

The Conservatives passed a motion of time...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/26/a-complete-dogs-breakfast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Ralph Goodale&#8217;s contribution to the C-45 debate.

The Conservatives passed a motion of time...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An outbreak of democracy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/24/an-outbreak-of-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/24/an-outbreak-of-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=306687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CBC says the Conservatives will allow various parts of C-45, the latest budget...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/24/an-outbreak-of-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The CBC says the Conservatives will allow various parts of C-45, the latest budget...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navigable waters and the environment</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/24/navigable-waters-and-the-environment/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/24/navigable-waters-and-the-environment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denis Lebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Leslie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navigable Waters Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=306478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of the changes to the Navigable Waters Protection Act that are included in the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/24/navigable-waters-and-the-environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Of the changes to the Navigable Waters Protection Act that are included in the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s the opposition&#8217;s fault that these omnibus bills exist, apparently</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/22/its-the-oppositions-fault-that-these-omnibus-bills-exist-apparently/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/22/its-the-oppositions-fault-that-these-omnibus-bills-exist-apparently/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Solomon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=305730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On CBC radio&#8217;s The House this weekend, Evan Solomon interviewed Jim Flaherty. During that...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/22/its-the-oppositions-fault-that-these-omnibus-bills-exist-apparently/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	On CBC radio&#8217;s The House this weekend, Evan Solomon interviewed Jim Flaherty. During that...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take the Jim Flaherty Budget Challenge</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/19/take-the-jim-flaherty-budget-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/19/take-the-jim-flaherty-budget-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=305098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Cheadle finds a few discrepancies between the spring budget and the latest budget...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/19/take-the-jim-flaherty-budget-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Bruce Cheadle finds a few discrepancies between the spring budget and the latest budget...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Jim Flaherty challenges everyone to a reading contest</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/18/the-commons-jim-flaherty-challenges-everyone-to-a-reading-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/18/the-commons-jim-flaherty-challenges-everyone-to-a-reading-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 21:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blake Richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=305009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>The Scene....</strong> Thomas Mulcair agreed with Stephen Harper. Just not now. Or at least]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/18/the-commons-jim-flaherty-challenges-everyone-to-a-reading-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<strong>The Scene....</strong> Thomas Mulcair agreed with Stephen Harper. Just not now. Or at least
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everything that C-45 touches</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/18/everything-that-c-45-touches/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/18/everything-that-c-45-touches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=304845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In all, C-45, the second budget implementation act, amends or affects the Income Tax...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/18/everything-that-c-45-touches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In all, C-45, the second budget implementation act, amends or affects the Income Tax...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>C-45: Meet the new omnibus budget bill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/18/c-45-meet-the-new-omnibus-budget-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/18/c-45-meet-the-new-omnibus-budget-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=304756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is C-45, the second budget implementation bill, which was tabled in the House...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/18/c-45-meet-the-new-omnibus-budget-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Here is C-45, the second budget implementation bill, which was tabled in the House...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Son of Omnibus</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/17/son-of-omnibus/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/17/son-of-omnibus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill C-38]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=304041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Atop the notice paper this morning, under &#8220;introduction of government bills,&#8221; is the following....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/17/son-of-omnibus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Atop the notice paper this morning, under &#8220;introduction of government bills,&#8221; is the following....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debating democracy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/16/debating-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/16/debating-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=303804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House is presently considering the Liberal motion on the use of omnibus legislation....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/16/debating-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The House is presently considering the Liberal motion on the use of omnibus legislation....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Harper, this is your life</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/15/stephen-harper-this-is-your-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/15/stephen-harper-this-is-your-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=303401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Liberals have decided they will indeed use their opposition day tomorrow to consider ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/15/stephen-harper-this-is-your-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Liberals have decided they will indeed use their opposition day tomorrow to consider ...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Stephen Harper agree with Stephen Harper?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/12/does-stephen-harper-agree-with-stephen-harper/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/12/does-stephen-harper-agree-with-stephen-harper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=302924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Liberals have an opposition day on Tuesday and they have tabled three options...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/12/does-stephen-harper-agree-with-stephen-harper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Liberals have an opposition day on Tuesday and they have tabled three options...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why doesn&#8217;t the House Affairs committee want to consider omnibus legislation?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/05/why-doesnt-the-house-affairs-committee-want-to-consider-omnibus-legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/05/why-doesnt-the-house-affairs-committee-want-to-consider-omnibus-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedure and House Affairs committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=300776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After going in camera yesterday, the Procedure and House Affairs committee apparently decided to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/05/why-doesnt-the-house-affairs-committee-want-to-consider-omnibus-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	After going in camera yesterday, the Procedure and House Affairs committee apparently decided to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idea alert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/25/idea-alert-72/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/25/idea-alert-72/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter DeVries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Clark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=296709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Clark and Peter DeVries review the recent trouble with omnibus budget bills and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/25/idea-alert-72/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Scott Clark and Peter DeVries review the recent trouble with omnibus budget bills and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loading up the omnibus bill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/20/loading-up-the-omnibus-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/20/loading-up-the-omnibus-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=295842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Again this afternoon, the Liberals asked the Conservatives to table a separate bill to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/20/loading-up-the-omnibus-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Again this afternoon, the Liberals asked the Conservatives to table a separate bill to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back to business</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/17/back-to-business-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/17/back-to-business-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=294338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chantal Hebert, Tim Harper, Joan Bryden and the Star preview the fall sitting. My...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/17/back-to-business-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Chantal Hebert, Tim Harper, Joan Bryden and the Star preview the fall sitting. My...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Return of the omnibus</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/13/return-of-the-omnibus/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/13/return-of-the-omnibus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=293357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservatives promise another omnibus budget bill, Nathan Cullen mixes his metaphors.
“Will I...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/13/return-of-the-omnibus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Conservatives promise another omnibus budget bill, Nathan Cullen mixes his metaphors.
“Will I...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Parliament&#8217;s fundamental purpose&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/21/parliaments-fundamental-purpose/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/21/parliaments-fundamental-purpose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-38]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=269620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It will obviously be awhile now before the Procedure and House Affairs committee reconvenes,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/21/parliaments-fundamental-purpose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	It will obviously be awhile now before the Procedure and House Affairs committee reconvenes,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;We may have reached the point where we are going too far&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/11/we-may-have-reached-the-point-where-we-are-going-too-far/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/11/we-may-have-reached-the-point-where-we-are-going-too-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 18:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allan MacEachen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucien Lamoureux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McCleave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speaker Lamoureux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Knowles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=258337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the afternoon of January 26, 1971, Robert McCleave, the Progressive Conservative MP for...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/11/we-may-have-reached-the-point-where-we-are-going-too-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	On the afternoon of January 26, 1971, Robert McCleave, the Progressive Conservative MP for...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unpacking the budget bill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/10/unpacking-the-budget-bill-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/10/unpacking-the-budget-bill-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 13:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shawn McCarthy delves into the environmental regulation amendments.
Ministers will have new discretion to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/10/unpacking-the-budget-bill-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Shawn McCarthy delves into the environmental regulation amendments.
Ministers will have new discretion to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The games begin</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/09/the-games-begin-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/09/the-games-begin-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 20:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yvon Godin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moments ago, after a recorded vote was compelled on a motion that &#8220;a member...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/09/the-games-begin-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Moments ago, after a recorded vote was compelled on a motion that &#8220;a member...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many ways can you split a budget bill?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/08/how-many-ways-can-you-split-a-budget-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/08/how-many-ways-can-you-split-a-budget-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lowell murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Canadian Press talks to Nathan Cullen.
“The prime minister today had an opportunity...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/08/how-many-ways-can-you-split-a-budget-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Canadian Press talks to Nathan Cullen.
“The prime minister today had an opportunity...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still talking about debating the budget bill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/08/still-talking-about-debating-the-budget-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/08/still-talking-about-debating-the-budget-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 21:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am reasonably assured that the Conservatives and New Democrats continue to discuss the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/08/still-talking-about-debating-the-budget-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	I am reasonably assured that the Conservatives and New Democrats continue to discuss the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q&amp;A: Peter Van Loan</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/07/qa-peter-van-loan/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/07/qa-peter-van-loan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 17:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government House leader in conversation after the NDP called for the budget implementation act to be split]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/07/qa-peter-van-loan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Government House leader in conversation after the NDP called for the budget implementation act to be split
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Split the bill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/07/split-the-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/07/split-the-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 15:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seeking a conversation with the government side, the NDP will be presenting a motion...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/07/split-the-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Seeking a conversation with the government side, the NDP will be presenting a motion...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who here believes in democracy?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/04/who-here-believes-in-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/04/who-here-believes-in-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 19:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time allocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From QP this morning, Marc Garneau challenges the government backbench.
<strong>Marc Garneau:...</strong> Madam Speaker,]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/04/who-here-believes-in-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	From QP this morning, Marc Garneau challenges the government backbench.
<strong>Marc Garneau:...</strong> Madam Speaker,
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A short history of budget implementation acts</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/04/a-short-history-of-budget-implementation-acts/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/04/a-short-history-of-budget-implementation-acts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 15:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Courtesy of Parliament&#8217;s indispensable website, here is a list of budget implementation acts going...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/04/a-short-history-of-budget-implementation-acts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Courtesy of Parliament&#8217;s indispensable website, here is a list of budget implementation acts going...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Day Two of the budget debate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/04/day-two-of-the-budget-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/04/day-two-of-the-budget-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 14:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter kent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=257044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thursday&#8217;s budget debate began with a time allocation motion. Nathan Cullen, among others, was...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/04/day-two-of-the-budget-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Thursday&#8217;s budget debate began with a time allocation motion. Nathan Cullen, among others, was...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
