<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; opposition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/opposition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:05:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sex and romance on Parliament Hill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/14/roses-are-orange/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/14/roses-are-orange/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Soule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosane Dore Lefebrve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Powers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=335049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Young MPs challenge attitudes about relationships between politicians and staffers]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/14/roses-are-orange/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Young MPs challenge attitudes about relationships between politicians and staffers
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Tom Mulcair is Stephen Harper&#8217;s first real Opposition threat in years</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/30/get-ready-for-beethoven-vs-nickelback/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/30/get-ready-for-beethoven-vs-nickelback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paul Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=248886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Wells: Get ready for Beethoven vs. Nickelback in federal politics]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/03/30/get-ready-for-beethoven-vs-nickelback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Paul Wells: Get ready for Beethoven vs. Nickelback in federal politics
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;I think Canadians are fed up&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/13/i-think-canadians-are-fed-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/13/i-think-canadians-are-fed-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 16:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=191806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack Layton promises a measured opposition.
The NDP will ask “tough” questions but will...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/13/i-think-canadians-are-fed-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
	Jack Layton promises a measured opposition.
The NDP will ask “tough” questions but will...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The enduring challenge of the opposition leader</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/03/the-enduring-challenge-of-the-opposition-leader/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/03/the-enduring-challenge-of-the-opposition-leader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 20:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leader of the opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Borden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Stanfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilfrid Laurier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=165467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Anderson sees little political advantage to be found for Michael Ignatieff in the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/03/the-enduring-challenge-of-the-opposition-leader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>124</slash:comments>
	Bruce Anderson sees little political advantage to be found for Michael Ignatieff in the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>We have everything to fear but fear itself</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/14/we-have-everything-to-fear/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/14/we-have-everything-to-fear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Feschuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scott Feschuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=151426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And our Prime Minister won’t ever let us forget it]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/10/14/we-have-everything-to-fear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	And our Prime Minister won’t ever let us forget it
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are taxes the only way out of the deficit?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/26/we-will-pay-for-this-one-way-or-another/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/26/we-will-pay-for-this-one-way-or-another/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C.D. Howe Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=102864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ANDREW COYNE: The government has a choice. It can either break its promise not to raise taxes. Or it can break its promise not to cut transfers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/26/we-will-pay-for-this-one-way-or-another/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
	ANDREW COYNE: The government has a choice. It can either break its promise not to raise taxes. Or it can break its promise not to cut transfers.
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8230; Same as the old (Liberal) boss</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/20/same-as-the-old-liberal-boss/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/20/same-as-the-old-liberal-boss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Potter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Potter Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=51135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite their new leader&#8217;s big talk about the Liberal caucus ceasing to sit on...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/20/same-as-the-old-liberal-boss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	Despite their new leader&#8217;s big talk about the Liberal caucus ceasing to sit on...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
