<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Parliament</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/parliament/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:25:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does the PMO think Justin Trudeau is already prime minister?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/18/does-the-pmo-think-justin-trudeau-is-already-prime-minister/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/18/does-the-pmo-think-justin-trudeau-is-already-prime-minister/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Lobb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Rathgeber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacques Demers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Luther King Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister's office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=396615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let us applaud this interest in documentation and disclosure]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/18/does-the-pmo-think-justin-trudeau-is-already-prime-minister/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Let us applaud this interest in documentation and disclosure
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The transparency games</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/18/the-transparency-games/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/18/the-transparency-games/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=396556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP makes a move]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/18/the-transparency-games/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The NDP makes a move
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brent Rathgeber reflects on the independent life</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/17/the-independent-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/17/the-independent-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Rathgeber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=396420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['More doors have open for me than closed,' says rogue MP ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/17/the-independent-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	'More doors have open for me than closed,' says rogue MP 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In our hour of need, Justin Trudeau promises us better</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/17/in-our-hour-of-need-justin-trudeau-promises-us-better/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/17/in-our-hour-of-need-justin-trudeau-promises-us-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 23:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blaine Calkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Rempel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pierre poilievre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Goodale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Uppal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vic Toews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=396312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the absence of an agenda, there are only various scandals to wonder about ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/17/in-our-hour-of-need-justin-trudeau-promises-us-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In the absence of an agenda, there are only various scandals to wonder about 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Stephen Harper won&#8217;t tell you about same-sex marriage</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/15/what-stephen-harper-wont-tell-you-about-same-sex-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/15/what-stephen-harper-wont-tell-you-about-same-sex-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 05:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>macleans.ca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Goldenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Chretien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=395263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s time for the PM to speak out, writes Adam Goldenberg]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/15/what-stephen-harper-wont-tell-you-about-same-sex-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	It’s time for the PM to speak out, writes Adam Goldenberg
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The end</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/14/the-end-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/14/the-end-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 20:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Kenney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pierre poilievre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=395260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['We need to show some respect for the Canadian public']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/14/the-end-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	'We need to show some respect for the Canadian public'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whatever happened to the Reform party?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/14/whatever-happened-to-the-reform-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/14/whatever-happened-to-the-reform-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Trost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Rathgeber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave MacKenzie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kennedy Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reform Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Armstrong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=395088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House considers e-petitions]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/14/whatever-happened-to-the-reform-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The House considers e-petitions
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would any governing party tolerate an MP like Brent Rathgeber?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/12/brent-rathgeber-the-ghost-of-principles-past-and-practical-reality/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/12/brent-rathgeber-the-ghost-of-principles-past-and-practical-reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 22:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Rathgeber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Hyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claude Patry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lise St. Denis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Plamondon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc-Andre Morin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=394212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The independent MP for Edmonton-St. Albert takes his seat]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/12/brent-rathgeber-the-ghost-of-principles-past-and-practical-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The independent MP for Edmonton-St. Albert takes his seat
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transparency theatre</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/12/transparency-theatre/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/12/transparency-theatre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=394019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone has someone else to blame for something]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/12/transparency-theatre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Everyone has someone else to blame for something
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q&amp;A: Brent Rathgeber on his resignation and Conservative principles</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/12/qa-brent-rathgeber-on-his-resignation-conservative-principles-and-the-pmo/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/12/qa-brent-rathgeber-on-his-resignation-conservative-principles-and-the-pmo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Rathgeber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-461]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister's office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=393999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['For the sake of the country, we gotta turn this ship around']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/12/qa-brent-rathgeber-on-his-resignation-conservative-principles-and-the-pmo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	'For the sake of the country, we gotta turn this ship around'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The complicated matter of James Bezan and Shelly Glover</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/11/the-complicated-matter-of-james-bezan-and-shelly-glover/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/11/the-complicated-matter-of-james-bezan-and-shelly-glover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Scheer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Bezan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Walsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shelly Glover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speaker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=393801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP appeals to the Speaker]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/11/the-complicated-matter-of-james-bezan-and-shelly-glover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The NDP appeals to the Speaker
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>This week in parliamentary reform</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/11/this-week-in-parliamentary-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/11/this-week-in-parliamentary-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Trost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Rathgeber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kennedy Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=393731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expenses, audits and petitions]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/11/this-week-in-parliamentary-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Expenses, audits and petitions
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The secret PMO fund that maybe never existed</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/10/the-secret-pmo-fund-that-maybe-never-existed/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/10/the-secret-pmo-fund-that-maybe-never-existed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pierre poilievre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister's office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=393331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Democrats and Conservatives get their money's worth regardless]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/10/the-secret-pmo-fund-that-maybe-never-existed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The New Democrats and Conservatives get their money's worth regardless
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The independent MP for Edmonton-St.Albert and his bill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/10/the-independent-mp-for-edmonton-st-albert-and-his-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/10/the-independent-mp-for-edmonton-st-albert-and-his-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Butt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Rathgeber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-461]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Nicholson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Goguen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=393227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The unsettled matter of Brent Rathgeber]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/10/the-independent-mp-for-edmonton-st-albert-and-his-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The unsettled matter of Brent Rathgeber
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deepak Obhrai: &#8216;This statement is mine&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/07/deepak-obhrai-this-statement-is-mine/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/07/deepak-obhrai-this-statement-is-mine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 17:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deepak Obhrai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Members' Statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statements by Members]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=392889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Conservative MP defends himself]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/07/deepak-obhrai-this-statement-is-mine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A Conservative MP defends himself
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can an MP ask a constituent&#8217;s question during QP?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/07/can-an-mp-ask-a-constituents-question-during-qp/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/07/can-an-mp-ask-a-constituents-question-during-qp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reform Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speaker Parent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=392775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The matter of crowd-sourcing Question Period]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/07/can-an-mp-ask-a-constituents-question-during-qp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The matter of crowd-sourcing Question Period
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Shelly Glover and James Bezan still be sitting in the House of Commons?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/07/should-shelly-glover-and-james-bezan-still-be-sitting-in-the-house-of-commons/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/07/should-shelly-glover-and-james-bezan-still-be-sitting-in-the-house-of-commons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Scheer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Bezan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc mayrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael behiels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Andrews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shelly Glover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Hall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=392745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Speaker's decision is questioned]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/07/should-shelly-glover-and-james-bezan-still-be-sitting-in-the-house-of-commons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Speaker's decision is questioned
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Harper on floor-crossing, circa 2006</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/06/stephen-harper-on-floor-crossing-circa-2006/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/06/stephen-harper-on-floor-crossing-circa-2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 00:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Rathgeber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Emerson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=392595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['Members of Parliament should have that freedom']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/06/stephen-harper-on-floor-crossing-circa-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	'Members of Parliament should have that freedom'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Brent Rathgeber and Stephen Harper&#8217;s control issues</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/06/the-commons-brent-rathgeber-and-stephen-harpers-control-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/06/the-commons-brent-rathgeber-and-stephen-harpers-control-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Rathgeber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmonton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathieu Ravignat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=392491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The member for Edmonton-St. Albert stands in judgment]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/06/the-commons-brent-rathgeber-and-stephen-harpers-control-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The member for Edmonton-St. Albert stands in judgment
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why was Brent Rathgeber&#8217;s bill amended?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/06/why-was-brent-rathgebers-bill-amended/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/06/why-was-brent-rathgebers-bill-amended/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Butt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Rathgeber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathieu Ravignat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister's office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Nicholson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=392303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['I think that's a lack of respect for the legislative process']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/06/why-was-brent-rathgebers-bill-amended/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	'I think that's a lack of respect for the legislative process'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Stephen Harper answers at least one question</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/05/the-commons-stephen-harper-answers-at-least-one-question/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/05/the-commons-stephen-harper-answers-at-least-one-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 21:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew MacDougall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Perrin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Vallee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ray novak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=391865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So at least we know that Nigel Wright said he made no offer to any other senator]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/05/the-commons-stephen-harper-answers-at-least-one-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	So at least we know that Nigel Wright said he made no offer to any other senator
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accountability Act II?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/05/accountability-act-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/05/accountability-act-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=391578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dinner receipts and per diems, but how about larger matters of governance?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/05/accountability-act-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Dinner receipts and per diems, but how about larger matters of governance?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>MPs sitting late as government pushes through bills beneath the scandal smoke</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/04/mps-sitting-late-as-government-pushes-through-bills-beneath-the-scandal-smoke/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/04/mps-sitting-late-as-government-pushes-through-bills-beneath-the-scandal-smoke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 20:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=391313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; You might not know it from a glance at the nightly news,...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/04/mps-sitting-late-as-government-pushes-through-bills-beneath-the-scandal-smoke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; You might not know it from a glance at the nightly news,...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dream no little dream</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/04/dream-no-little-dream/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/04/dream-no-little-dream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JS Woodsworth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=391079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Democrats want to defund the Senate]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/04/dream-no-little-dream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The New Democrats want to defund the Senate
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A transparency-measuring contest</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/04/a-transparency-measuring-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/04/a-transparency-measuring-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 14:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cowan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Lamoreux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marjory lebreton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=390911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rush to be seen being accountable]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/04/a-transparency-measuring-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The rush to be seen being accountable
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duffy-Wright: The expenses, the severance and the investigation</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/30/duffy-wright-the-expenses-the-severance-and-the-investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/30/duffy-wright-the-expenses-the-severance-and-the-investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 12:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary dawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=389662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More questions about Clusterduff]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/30/duffy-wright-the-expenses-the-severance-and-the-investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	More questions about Clusterduff
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Harper scolds his rivals and preaches disclosure</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/29/stephen-harper-scolds-his-rivals-and-preaches-disclosure/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/29/stephen-harper-scolds-his-rivals-and-preaches-disclosure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 22:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=389491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['Any information we have that is relevant we will reveal immediately']]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/29/stephen-harper-scolds-his-rivals-and-preaches-disclosure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	'Any information we have that is relevant we will reveal immediately'
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whatever happened to the Backbench Spring?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/29/whatever-happened-to-the-backbench-spring/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/29/whatever-happened-to-the-backbench-spring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 17:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Warkentin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Chong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Andrews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=389209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be nice to think the House could help sort out the Duffy-Wright affair]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/29/whatever-happened-to-the-backbench-spring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	It would be nice to think the House could help sort out the Duffy-Wright affair
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The cross-examination of Stephen Harper</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/29/the-cross-examination-of-stephen-harper/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/29/the-cross-examination-of-stephen-harper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 13:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=389101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair puts 16 questions to the Prime Minister]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/29/the-cross-examination-of-stephen-harper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Thomas Mulcair puts 16 questions to the Prime Minister
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where in the world is Mike Duffy?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/28/where-in-the-world-is-mike-duffy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/28/where-in-the-world-is-mike-duffy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 01:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Tkachuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Furey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=388923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['Canadians have a right to know all the facts,' the Senator said last week, 'in the right place and time.'  Where to now? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/28/where-in-the-world-is-mike-duffy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	'Canadians have a right to know all the facts,' the Senator said last week, 'in the right place and time.'  Where to now? 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Harper pleads ignorance and claims clarity</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/28/stephen-harper-pleads-ignorance-and-claims-clarity/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/28/stephen-harper-pleads-ignorance-and-claims-clarity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 22:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=388811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twenty-four questions for the Prime Minister]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/28/stephen-harper-pleads-ignorance-and-claims-clarity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Twenty-four questions for the Prime Minister
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: With the PM away, James Moore muddles through another day</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/27/the-commons-with-the-prime-minister-away-james-moore-muddles-through-another-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/27/the-commons-with-the-prime-minister-away-james-moore-muddles-through-another-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 21:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=388402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Heritage Minister finds reasons to be disappointed in others]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/27/the-commons-with-the-prime-minister-away-james-moore-muddles-through-another-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Heritage Minister finds reasons to be disappointed in others
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Nigel Wright actually said about what Nigel Wright says he did</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/27/what-nigel-wright-actually-said-about-what-nigel-wright-says-he-did/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/27/what-nigel-wright-actually-said-about-what-nigel-wright-says-he-did/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 20:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=388381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government tries to claim the chief of staff acted alone]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/27/what-nigel-wright-actually-said-about-what-nigel-wright-says-he-did/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The government tries to claim the chief of staff acted alone
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why not public hearings into the Wright-Duffy affair?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/27/why-not-public-hearings-into-the-wright-duffy-affair/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/27/why-not-public-hearings-into-the-wright-duffy-affair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 15:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Andrews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=388302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A proposal goes before the ethics committee]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/27/why-not-public-hearings-into-the-wright-duffy-affair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A proposal goes before the ethics committee
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the ethics commissioner enough?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/25/is-the-ethics-commissioner-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/25/is-the-ethics-commissioner-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary dawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=388016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can Mary Dawson sort out the Duffy-Wright affair?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/25/is-the-ethics-commissioner-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Can Mary Dawson sort out the Duffy-Wright affair?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the hell happened here?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/23/the-commons-what-the-hell-happened-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/23/the-commons-what-the-hell-happened-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 21:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carolyn stewart olsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Christopherson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister's office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Edward Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=387215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Commons: Of Wright and Duffy and the Senate, there is only one question that needs be answered]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/23/the-commons-what-the-hell-happened-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Commons: Of Wright and Duffy and the Senate, there is only one question that needs be answered
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Senate&#8217;s investigation of Mike Duffy is like a game of Clue</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/22/the-senates-investigation-of-mike-duffy-is-like-a-game-of-clue/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/22/the-senates-investigation-of-mike-duffy-is-like-a-game-of-clue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carolyn stewart olsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Tkachuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cowan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=386774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first draft is leaked and fingers are pointed]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/22/the-senates-investigation-of-mike-duffy-is-like-a-game-of-clue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The first draft is leaked and fingers are pointed
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: The Conservatives run out of answers</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/22/the-commons-the-conservatives-run-out-of-answers/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/22/the-commons-the-conservatives-run-out-of-answers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=386552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And Pat Martin wonders where it all went wrong]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/22/the-commons-the-conservatives-run-out-of-answers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	And Pat Martin wonders where it all went wrong
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thomas Mulcair announces catchy phrase for abolishing the Senate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/22/thomas-mulcair-announces-catchy-phrase-for-abolishing-the-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/22/thomas-mulcair-announces-catchy-phrase-for-abolishing-the-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=386439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On rolling up the red carpet]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/22/thomas-mulcair-announces-catchy-phrase-for-abolishing-the-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	On rolling up the red carpet
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is this any way to treat a scandal?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/22/is-this-any-way-to-treat-a-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/22/is-this-any-way-to-treat-a-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cowan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Andrews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=386319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The matter of Nigel Wright and Mike Duffy is pursued in the House and Senate]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/22/is-this-any-way-to-treat-a-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The matter of Nigel Wright and Mike Duffy is pursued in the House and Senate
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: John Baird tries to explain what he understands to be true</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/21/the-commons-john-baird-tries-to-explain-what-he-understands-to-be-true/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/21/the-commons-john-baird-tries-to-explain-what-he-understands-to-be-true/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Perrin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Goodale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ray novak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Nicholson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=386131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The opposition is not appeased by the Prime Minister's acknowledgement of unhappiness ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/21/the-commons-john-baird-tries-to-explain-what-he-understands-to-be-true/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The opposition is not appeased by the Prime Minister's acknowledgement of unhappiness 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rest assured, Mr. Harper is very upset about all of this</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/21/rest-assured-mr-harper-is-very-upset-about-all-of-this/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/21/rest-assured-mr-harper-is-very-upset-about-all-of-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marjory lebreton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=385860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But he will not be distracted from focusing on the economy]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/21/rest-assured-mr-harper-is-very-upset-about-all-of-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	But he will not be distracted from focusing on the economy
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In this new crisis, the faint echo of a previous crisis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/18/in-this-new-crisis-the-faint-echo-of-a-previous-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/18/in-this-new-crisis-the-faint-echo-of-a-previous-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=385264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the coalition crisis of 2008 to the Senate crisis of 2013]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/18/in-this-new-crisis-the-faint-echo-of-a-previous-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	From the coalition crisis of 2008 to the Senate crisis of 2013
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The week of Mike Duffy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/the-week-of-mike-duffy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/the-week-of-mike-duffy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=385144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attempting to make sense of the matter of the housing allowance]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/17/the-week-of-mike-duffy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Attempting to make sense of the matter of the housing allowance
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justin Trudeau wants to know what you&#8217;d ask Stephen Harper</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/13/justin-trudeau-wants-to-know-what-youd-ask-stephen-harper/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/13/justin-trudeau-wants-to-know-what-youd-ask-stephen-harper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 16:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reform Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=383483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taking QP to the people]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/13/justin-trudeau-wants-to-know-what-youd-ask-stephen-harper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Taking QP to the people
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
