<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; partisanship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/partisanship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:23:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Brad Trost Maverick Watch</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/31/brad-trost-maverick-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/31/brad-trost-maverick-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Trost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party discipline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=236828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservative backbencher deviates from the script.
In a recent commentary aired on News...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/01/31/brad-trost-maverick-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Conservative backbencher deviates from the script.
In a recent commentary aired on News...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy democracy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/28/occupy-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/28/occupy-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Jedras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=222148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff Jedras questions the suggestion that Occupy protesters would simply be better off voting....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/28/occupy-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Jeff Jedras questions the suggestion that Occupy protesters would simply be better off voting....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Difference of opinion alert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/21/difference-of-opinion-alert/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/21/difference-of-opinion-alert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Trost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nycole Turmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Merrifield]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=221056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago, the official opposition suggested a difference of opinion on the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/21/difference-of-opinion-alert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	A few weeks ago, the official opposition suggested a difference of opinion on the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idea alert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/17/idea-alert-59/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/17/idea-alert-59/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Chong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=220331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Berlin proposes a new kind of parliamentary government.
Provincial and federal systems are...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/17/idea-alert-59/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	David Berlin proposes a new kind of parliamentary government.
Provincial and federal systems are...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;The reality of mass politics makes parties absolutely necessary&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/29/the-reality-of-mass-politics-makes-parties-absolutely-necessary/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/29/the-reality-of-mass-politics-makes-parties-absolutely-necessary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naheed Nenshi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=217753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Potter defends the existence of political parties.
Nenshi also pointedly refused to affiliate...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/29/the-reality-of-mass-politics-makes-parties-absolutely-necessary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
	Andrew Potter defends the existence of political parties.
Nenshi also pointedly refused to affiliate...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In defence of partisanship</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/26/in-defence-of-partisanship/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/26/in-defence-of-partisanship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratizing the Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lori Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Jarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Aucoin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=217144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iPolitics publishes an excerpt from Democratizing the Constitution.
There are several reasons why the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/09/26/in-defence-of-partisanship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
	iPolitics publishes an excerpt from Democratizing the Constitution.
There are several reasons why the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The centre in crisis</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/29/the-centre-in-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/29/the-centre-in-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=207179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob Rae draws lessons from the U.S. debt crisis.
The deep partisanship that has...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/29/the-centre-in-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
	Bob Rae draws lessons from the U.S. debt crisis.
The deep partisanship that has...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ideological purity and governance</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/29/ideological-purity-and-governance/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/29/ideological-purity-and-governance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fareed Zakaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=207103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In light of the U.S. debt crisis, Fareed Zakaria compares the American system to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/29/ideological-purity-and-governance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	In light of the U.S. debt crisis, Fareed Zakaria compares the American system to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Different system, same problems</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/12/different-system-same-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/12/different-system-same-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 18:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reformr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mickey Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=201775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This lament for their current situation and call for congressional reform in the United...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/07/12/different-system-same-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	This lament for their current situation and call for congressional reform in the United...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The post-party era</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/21/the-post-party-era/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/21/the-post-party-era/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Savoie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=178397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donald Savoie laments for the decline of the political party.
The problem is that...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/21/the-post-party-era/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
	Donald Savoie laments for the decline of the political party.
The problem is that...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The precise nature of the problem</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/11/the-precise-nature-of-the-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/11/the-precise-nature-of-the-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glen Pearson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=171916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glen Pearson notes the misdirection inherent in fretting about decorum.
I’m all for more...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/11/the-precise-nature-of-the-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	Glen Pearson notes the misdirection inherent in fretting about decorum.
I’m all for more...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tribal politics</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/04/tribal-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/04/tribal-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shankar Vedantam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=170204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shankar Vedantam argues that partisanship is the new racism.
When partisanship is seen as...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/04/tribal-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
	Shankar Vedantam argues that partisanship is the new racism.
When partisanship is seen as...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things we worried about in the 1960s</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/03/things-we-worried-about-in-the-1960s/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/03/things-we-worried-about-in-the-1960s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ngram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=165471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bit late to the Ngram party, but here are the English references to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/03/things-we-worried-about-in-the-1960s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	A bit late to the Ngram party, but here are the English references to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Necessary partisanship (II)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/15/necessary-partisanship-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/15/necessary-partisanship-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Yglesias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=163859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matthew Yglesias makes the case for labels.
Normally, how much you’re willing to pay...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/15/necessary-partisanship-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
	Matthew Yglesias makes the case for labels.
Normally, how much you’re willing to pay...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Necessary partisanship</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/14/necessary-partisanship/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/14/necessary-partisanship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Beam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=163842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christopher Beam picks apart the No Labels movement. His argument that it&#8217;s the incentives...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/12/14/necessary-partisanship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
	Christopher Beam picks apart the No Labels movement. His argument that it&#8217;s the incentives...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the prorogation of Parliament set off a populist revolt?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/25/the-people-speak/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/25/the-people-speak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghan detainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=102975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The people speak]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/25/the-people-speak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
	The people speak
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baldly going where no senator has</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/18/baldly-going-where-no-senator-has/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/18/baldly-going-where-no-senator-has/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Feschuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scott Feschuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Braveheart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feschuk09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Stoffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=91629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s a reason for Mike Duffy’s behaviour of late: he’s taking down the Senate from within]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/18/baldly-going-where-no-senator-has/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
	There’s a reason for Mike Duffy’s behaviour of late: he’s taking down the Senate from within
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disturbance in the House</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/disturbance-in-the-house/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/disturbance-in-the-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Parliamentary Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Members' Statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter milliken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statements by Members]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=91267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the autumn issue of Canadian Parliamentary Review, Evan Sotiropoulos applies a little qualitative...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/disturbance-in-the-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	In the autumn issue of Canadian Parliamentary Review, Evan Sotiropoulos applies a little qualitative...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New politics</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/new-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/new-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Chretien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Manley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=89717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bit late to this, but here is John Manley reflecting on his time in...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/new-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	Bit late to this, but here is John Manley reflecting on his time in...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>On discourse</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/09/on-discourse/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/09/on-discourse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=86786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bit late to this, but here is Andrew Steele considering the state of modern...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/09/on-discourse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>151</slash:comments>
	Bit late to this, but here is Andrew Steele considering the state of modern...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>By the numbers (II)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/05/by-the-numbers-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/05/by-the-numbers-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statements by Members]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=54784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Harper, Friday. &#8220;We just had an election. What we&#8217;re looking for from Ignatieff...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/05/by-the-numbers-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	Stephen Harper, Friday. &#8220;We just had an election. What we&#8217;re looking for from Ignatieff...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loyalty</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/13/loyalty/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/13/loyalty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Bow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=49375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Bow considers partisanship, politics, democracy, civil discourse and blogging....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/13/loyalty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	James Bow considers partisanship, politics, democracy, civil discourse and blogging....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>On partisanship</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/23/on-partisanship/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/23/on-partisanship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=19291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reginald Stackhouse: The purpose of the opposition is to prevent the government and its...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/23/on-partisanship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	Reginald Stackhouse: The purpose of the opposition is to prevent the government and its...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grey skies are gonna get even darker. Put on an angry scowl!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/megapundit-grey-skies-are-gonna-get-even-darker-put-on-an-angry-scowl/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/megapundit-grey-skies-are-gonna-get-even-darker-put-on-an-angry-scowl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>selley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Megapundit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hooligans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-vitro fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Creba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen's University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senior citizens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Throne Speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=18881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Everybody hold hands...</strong>
Fear not, Canada. As soon as we’re back in the black,]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/11/20/megapundit-grey-skies-are-gonna-get-even-darker-put-on-an-angry-scowl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	<strong>Everybody hold hands...</strong>
Fear not, Canada. As soon as we’re back in the black,
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

