<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Paula Broadwell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/paula-broadwell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:00:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Petraeus affair: It&#8217;s &#8216;Mean Girls&#8217; for people with jobs</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/14/the-petraeus-affair-its-mean-girls-for-people-with-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/14/the-petraeus-affair-its-mean-girls-for-people-with-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emma Teitel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jill Kelley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Broadwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petraeus affair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=314598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And not so much about the personal indiscretions of public figures]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/14/the-petraeus-affair-its-mean-girls-for-people-with-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	And not so much about the personal indiscretions of public figures
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Petraeus and the Shlock Doctrine</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/petraeus-and-the-shlock-doctrine/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/petraeus-and-the-shlock-doctrine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 03:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue Allan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jill Kelley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Broadwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petraeus affair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=314140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this a sex scandal, a security scandal, a new hybrid or none of the above? Anne Kingston explains.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/13/petraeus-and-the-shlock-doctrine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Is this a sex scandal, a security scandal, a new hybrid or none of the above? Anne Kingston explains.
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
