<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; pension reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/pension-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:28:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pension reform isn&#8217;t for everyone</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/09/pension-reform-isnt-for-everyone/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/09/pension-reform-isnt-for-everyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue Allan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=331396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An expanded CPP could hurt low-income earners, says Stephen Gordon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/09/pension-reform-isnt-for-everyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	An expanded CPP could hurt low-income earners, says Stephen Gordon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finance ministers meet to talk about pension reform, but likely not implement</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/16/finance-ministers-meet-to-talk-about-pension-reform-but-likely-not-implement-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/16/finance-ministers-meet-to-talk-about-pension-reform-but-likely-not-implement-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 01:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Canadian Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Need to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=329208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA &#8211; Canada&#8217;s fragile economy, deficits and pension reform — and possibly smoothing over...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/16/finance-ministers-meet-to-talk-about-pension-reform-but-likely-not-implement-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	OTTAWA &#8211; Canada&#8217;s fragile economy, deficits and pension reform — and possibly smoothing over...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the government wants to trick us into saving more</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/09/how-the-government-wants-to-trick-us-into-saving-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/09/how-the-government-wants-to-trick-us-into-saving-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econowatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioural economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harper government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pooled registered pension plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=238674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never mind the hypothetical cuts to OAS, Ottawa's got some actual pension measures before Parliament]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/09/how-the-government-wants-to-trick-us-into-saving-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Never mind the hypothetical cuts to OAS, Ottawa's got some actual pension measures before Parliament
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Policy alert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/policy-alert-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/policy-alert-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Pension Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=181507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack Layton promises pension reform.
To remedy this issue, Layton said an elected NDP...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/policy-alert-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Jack Layton promises pension reform.
To remedy this issue, Layton said an elected NDP...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signs of life for Michael Ignatieff</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/26/signs-of-life-for-michael-ignatieff/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/26/signs-of-life-for-michael-ignatieff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barry devolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucien Bouchard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montreal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nik nanos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=111230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prorogation allowed Ignatieff to see through the fog of his foibles and find his vision]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/26/signs-of-life-for-michael-ignatieff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>116</slash:comments>
	Prorogation allowed Ignatieff to see through the fog of his foibles and find his vision
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Should you be interested in making our minority Parliament work&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/15/should-you-be-interested-in-making-our-minority-parliament-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/15/should-you-be-interested-in-making-our-minority-parliament-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-and-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detainees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maternal health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prorogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proroguing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transfers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=107675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently in response to a request from the Prime Minister, Michael Ignatieff writes to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/02/15/should-you-be-interested-in-making-our-minority-parliament-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	Apparently in response to a request from the Prime Minister, Michael Ignatieff writes to...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>First the HST, then pensions—Ignatieff&#039;s new game?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/09/first-the-hst-then-pensions%e2%80%94ignatieffs-new-game/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/09/first-the-hst-then-pensions%e2%80%94ignatieffs-new-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Chretien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=96985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patterns in politics are obviously more revealing than isolated actions. When Michael Ignatieff decided...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/09/first-the-hst-then-pensions%e2%80%94ignatieffs-new-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
	Patterns in politics are obviously more revealing than isolated actions. When Michael Ignatieff decided...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turnabout, fair play, etc.</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/turnabout-fair-play-etc/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/turnabout-fair-play-etc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill C-201]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-201]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Newton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Police Complaints Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Stoffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter MacKay, responding to opposition questions, October 19. I will note that when it...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/26/turnabout-fair-play-etc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	Peter MacKay, responding to opposition questions, October 19. I will note that when it...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idea alert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/22/idea-alert-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/22/idea-alert-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guaranteed income supplement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=88558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack Layton talks pension reform.
NDP Leader Jack Layton is proposing a national pension...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/22/idea-alert-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
	Jack Layton talks pension reform.
NDP Leader Jack Layton is proposing a national pension...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
