<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Peter Van Loan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/peter-van-loan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:28:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Thomas Mulcair and the envelope</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/thomas-mulcair-and-the-envelope/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/thomas-mulcair-and-the-envelope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Vaillancourt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montreal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What was the NDP leader offered in 1994?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/thomas-mulcair-and-the-envelope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	What was the NDP leader offered in 1994?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Van Loan on Mulcair: why so quiet on corruption, Tom?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/van-loan-on-mulcair-why-so-quiet-on-corruption-tom/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/van-loan-on-mulcair-why-so-quiet-on-corruption-tom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Patriquin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charbonneau commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Vaillancourt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec corruption inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=384791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government House Leader's statement on bribery allegations in La Presse]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/16/van-loan-on-mulcair-why-so-quiet-on-corruption-tom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Government House Leader's statement on bribery allegations in La Presse
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The CBC, C-60 and splitting the bill</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/the-cbc-c-60-and-splitting-the-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/the-cbc-c-60-and-splitting-the-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective bargaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=379685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another omnibus bill, another fight]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/05/02/the-cbc-c-60-and-splitting-the-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Another omnibus bill, another fight
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government denies link between RCMP arrests and House terrorism debate</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/22/government-denies-any-link-between-rcmp-arrests-and-house-terrorism-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/22/government-denies-any-link-between-rcmp-arrests-and-house-terrorism-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Geddes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Geddes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Combating Terrorism Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root causes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=375546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spokesman says no connection between Bill S-7 debate and arrests in alleged train attack plot]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/22/government-denies-any-link-between-rcmp-arrests-and-house-terrorism-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Spokesman says no connection between Bill S-7 debate and arrests in alleged train attack plot
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: A day to debate terrorism</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/22/the-commons-a-day-to-debate-terrorism/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/22/the-commons-a-day-to-debate-terrorism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Candice Bergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dany Morin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Lamoureux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S-7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Via terror plot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=375338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau, the Boston Marathon bombing and Uncle Albert]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/22/the-commons-a-day-to-debate-terrorism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Justin Trudeau, the Boston Marathon bombing and Uncle Albert
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Backbench Spring: Justin Trudeau joins the cause</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/the-backbench-spring-justin-trudeau-joins-the-cause/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/the-backbench-spring-justin-trudeau-joins-the-cause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Trudeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LaVar Payne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Warawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=374347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberals will move to change the rules around statements by members]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/the-backbench-spring-justin-trudeau-joins-the-cause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Liberals will move to change the rules around statements by members
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Warawa challenges the soul of our parliamentary democracy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/26/mark-warawa-challenges-the-soul-of-our-parliamentary-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/26/mark-warawa-challenges-the-soul-of-our-parliamentary-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon O'Connor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Benoit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Warawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Members' Statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statements by Members]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=364851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A point of order that exposes the rot]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/26/mark-warawa-challenges-the-soul-of-our-parliamentary-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A point of order that exposes the rot
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter Van Loan objects to name-calling, proceeds to name-call</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/peter-van-loan-objects-to-name-calling-proceeds-to-name-call/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/peter-van-loan-objects-to-name-calling-proceeds-to-name-call/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pierre poilievre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=362468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government House Leader is profoundly saddened]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/20/peter-van-loan-objects-to-name-calling-proceeds-to-name-call/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Government House Leader is profoundly saddened
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is helping to select the next PBO? And how did we get an interim PBO?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/07/who-is-helping-to-select-the-next-pbo-and-how-did-we-get-an-interim-pbo/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/07/who-is-helping-to-select-the-next-pbo-and-how-did-we-get-an-interim-pbo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 23:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library of parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonia L'Heureux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=358267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More questions about the parliamentary budget officer]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/03/07/who-is-helping-to-select-the-next-pbo-and-how-did-we-get-an-interim-pbo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	More questions about the parliamentary budget officer
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suddenly the Prime Minister believes he needs the opposition&#8217;s permission?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/suddenly-the-prime-minister-believes-he-needs-the-oppositions-permission/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/suddenly-the-prime-minister-believes-he-needs-the-oppositions-permission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 23:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time allocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has he forgotten about the option of time allocation?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/suddenly-the-prime-minister-believes-he-needs-the-oppositions-permission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Has he forgotten about the option of time allocation?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to spend a year not doing anything on Senate reform, while demanding change</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/how-to-spend-a-year-not-doing-anything-on-senate-reform-while-demanding-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/how-to-spend-a-year-not-doing-anything-on-senate-reform-while-demanding-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Uppal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time allocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why don't the Conservatives just pass their bill?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/27/how-to-spend-a-year-not-doing-anything-on-senate-reform-while-demanding-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Why don't the Conservatives just pass their bill?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Senators need not fear unemployment</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/25/the-commons-senators-need-not-fear-unemployment/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/25/the-commons-senators-need-not-fear-unemployment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=354012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diane Finley explains the difference between a quota and a target]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/25/the-commons-senators-need-not-fear-unemployment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Diane Finley explains the difference between a quota and a target
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitchel Raphael on MPs’ pleasures— from drag queens to grilled cheese</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/19/mitchel-raphael-on-mps-pleasures-from-drag-queens-to-grilled-cheese-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/19/mitchel-raphael-on-mps-pleasures-from-drag-queens-to-grilled-cheese-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitchel Raphael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dairy Farmers of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eve Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Rempel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=350218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Why they skipped Poutine Week...</strong>
There is always something to celebrate in the office]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/19/mitchel-raphael-on-mps-pleasures-from-drag-queens-to-grilled-cheese-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<strong>Why they skipped Poutine Week...</strong>
There is always something to celebrate in the office
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: And so Stephen Harper finds himself having to defend unelected Senators</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/the-commons-and-so-stephen-harper-finds-himself-having-to-defend-unelected-senators/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/the-commons-and-so-stephen-harper-finds-himself-having-to-defend-unelected-senators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Duffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Wallin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick brazeau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Julian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=350290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh for the bygone simplicity of Senate reform]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/13/the-commons-and-so-stephen-harper-finds-himself-having-to-defend-unelected-senators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Oh for the bygone simplicity of Senate reform
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>PHOTO GALLERY: Big Cheeses Gather in Ottawa</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/05/photo-gallery-big-cheeses-gather-in-ottawa/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/05/photo-gallery-big-cheeses-gather-in-ottawa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 03:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitchel Raphael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Diary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dairy Farmers of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairmont Chateau Laurier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Valeriote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Crowder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Munson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Duncan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Rafferty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Williamson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Chong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yvon Godin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=347040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MPs  helped packed  the ballroom  of the Fairmont Château Laurier for a reception put...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/05/photo-gallery-big-cheeses-gather-in-ottawa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	MPs  helped packed  the ballroom  of the Fairmont Château Laurier for a reception put...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter Van Loan searches for an ethical standard</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/31/peter-van-loan-continues-his-search-for-an-ethical-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/31/peter-van-loan-continues-his-search-for-an-ethical-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=345348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the Conflict of Interest Act and the PM's guide for ministers ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/31/peter-van-loan-continues-his-search-for-an-ethical-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Regarding the Conflict of Interest Act and the PM's guide for ministers 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Stephen Harper is exultant, Peter Van Loan is confused</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/30/the-commons-stephen-harper-is-exultant-peter-van-loan-is-confused/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/30/the-commons-stephen-harper-is-exultant-peter-van-loan-is-confused/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Lauzon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=344799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marking seven years with a misunderstanding of the rules]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/30/the-commons-stephen-harper-is-exultant-peter-van-loan-is-confused/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Marking seven years with a misunderstanding of the rules
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Speaker on Parliament</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/13/the-speaker-on-parliament/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/13/the-speaker-on-parliament/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Scheer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speaker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=327825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Speaker returned to the House yesterday with a response to the points of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/13/the-speaker-on-parliament/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Speaker returned to the House yesterday with a response to the points of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What it means when Peter Van Loan gets upset</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/what-it-means-when-peter-van-loan-gets-upset/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/what-it-means-when-peter-van-loan-gets-upset/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Goodale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=325897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there meaning in last week's question period commotion?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/10/what-it-means-when-peter-van-loan-gets-upset/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Is there meaning in last week's question period commotion?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Procedural war</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/procedural-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/procedural-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Beardsley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=325246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keith Beardsley considers Peter Van Loan&#8217;s walk across the aisle, opposition delays and omnibus...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/procedural-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Keith Beardsley considers Peter Van Loan&#8217;s walk across the aisle, opposition delays and omnibus...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the seven-point plan be enough to prevent a Russian invasion?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/will-the-seven-point-plan-be-enough-to-prevent-a-russian-invasion/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/will-the-seven-point-plan-be-enough-to-prevent-a-russian-invasion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denis coderre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacques Gourde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathieu Ravignat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=325100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning&#8217;s QP has just concluded. The F-35 procurement was, predictably, a particular point...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/will-the-seven-point-plan-be-enough-to-prevent-a-russian-invasion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	This morning&#8217;s QP has just concluded. The F-35 procurement was, predictably, a particular point...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The testimony of Paul Dewar</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/the-testimony-of-paul-dewar/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/the-testimony-of-paul-dewar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Dewar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=324737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After QP today, Paul Dewar, who can be seen on the video walking over...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/the-testimony-of-paul-dewar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	After QP today, Paul Dewar, who can be seen on the video walking over...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The post-fight points of order</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/the-post-fight-points-of-order/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/the-post-fight-points-of-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=324544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shortly after 10am this morning, the House had a little talk about yesterday&#8217;s unpleasantness....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/the-post-fight-points-of-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Shortly after 10am this morning, the House had a little talk about yesterday&#8217;s unpleasantness....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The post-fight interviews</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/the-post-fight-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/the-post-fight-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=324478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan claims his government colleagues were concerned for his safety yesterday and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/06/the-post-fight-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Peter Van Loan claims his government colleagues were concerned for his safety yesterday and...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disturbance in the House</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/05/showdown-in-the-commons/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/05/showdown-in-the-commons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 22:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Alini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Comartin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Goodale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=324013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The benches empty as Peter Van Loan crosses the aisle]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/05/showdown-in-the-commons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The benches empty as Peter Van Loan crosses the aisle
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CAPTION CHALLENGE &#8211; Peter Van Loan: The Candy Man?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/05/caption-challenge-peter-van-loan-the-candy-man/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/05/caption-challenge-peter-van-loan-the-candy-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitchel Raphael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Diary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Candy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=323759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House leader Peter Van Loan with a basket of candy.  WIll leave the captions...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/05/caption-challenge-peter-van-loan-the-candy-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	House leader Peter Van Loan with a basket of candy.  WIll leave the captions...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why bother with a House of Commons?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/03/why-bother-with-a-house-of-commons/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/03/why-bother-with-a-house-of-commons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-38]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Boudria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul McLeod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=322655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaron Wherry on parliamentary democracy and Peter van Loan's proposal]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/03/why-bother-with-a-house-of-commons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Aaron Wherry on parliamentary democracy and Peter van Loan's proposal
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not quite a sleepover after all</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/29/not-quite-a-sleepover-after-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/29/not-quite-a-sleepover-after-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Scheer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speaker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=321413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As per the Speaker&#8217;s ruling this morning, there will be a maximum of 47...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/29/not-quite-a-sleepover-after-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	As per the Speaker&#8217;s ruling this morning, there will be a maximum of 47...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How did the House end up passing C-290 unanimously?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/16/how-did-the-house-end-up-passing-c-290-unanimously/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/16/how-did-the-house-end-up-passing-c-290-unanimously/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-290]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Comartin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Chong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports betting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports gambling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=315333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among Michael Chong&#8217;s objections to C-290, Joe Comartin&#8217;s sports betting bill, is the manner...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/16/how-did-the-house-end-up-passing-c-290-unanimously/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Among Michael Chong&#8217;s objections to C-290, Joe Comartin&#8217;s sports betting bill, is the manner...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questioning the existence of the Intergovernmental Affairs Minister</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/07/questioning-the-existence-of-the-intergovernmental-affairs-minister/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/07/questioning-the-existence-of-the-intergovernmental-affairs-minister/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerry-Lynne Findlay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Penashue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pierre poilievre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Aubin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=312328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday afternoon, the NDP sent up Robert Aubin to ask Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Peter...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/07/questioning-the-existence-of-the-intergovernmental-affairs-minister/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Yesterday afternoon, the NDP sent up Robert Aubin to ask Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Peter...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our vibrant democracy</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/02/our-vibrant-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/02/our-vibrant-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 19:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Zimmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kennedy Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Members' Statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statements by Members]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=310834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday afternoon, the NDP&#8217;s Kennedy Stewart rose during statements by members with the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/11/02/our-vibrant-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	On Tuesday afternoon, the NDP&#8217;s Kennedy Stewart rose during statements by members with the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: How big is your budget?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/31/the-commons-how-big-is-your-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/31/the-commons-how-big-is-your-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie angus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Tilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denis Lebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Kenney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Crowder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Duncan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Leslie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Toone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Aubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosane Dore Lefebrve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sadia Groguhe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=309826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Halloween in the Commons: Time to shame the committee chairs]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/31/the-commons-how-big-is-your-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Halloween in the Commons: Time to shame the committee chairs
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Stephen Harper agree with Stephen Harper?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/12/does-stephen-harper-agree-with-stephen-harper/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/12/does-stephen-harper-agree-with-stephen-harper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=302924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Liberals have an opposition day on Tuesday and they have tabled three options...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/12/does-stephen-harper-agree-with-stephen-harper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Liberals have an opposition day on Tuesday and they have tabled three options...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Team Farce</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/03/team-farce/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/03/team-farce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-and-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eve Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kellie Leitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shelly Glover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=299565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By my count, 57 Conservative MPs have used the phrase &#8220;carbon tax&#8221; in the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/10/03/team-farce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	By my count, 57 Conservative MPs have used the phrase &#8220;carbon tax&#8221; in the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The farce is strong in these ones</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/21/the-farce-is-strong-in-these-ones-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/21/the-farce-is-strong-in-these-ones-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Saxton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-and-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Warkentin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Paradis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerry Ritz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gord Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Preston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Seeback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LaVar Payne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Benoit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil McColeman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre Lemieux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pierre poilievre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randy Hoback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Dykstra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shelly Glover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=296106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among the Conservaties who stood in the House this week and criticized the NDP&#8217;s...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/21/the-farce-is-strong-in-these-ones-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Among the Conservaties who stood in the House this week and criticized the NDP&#8217;s...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: The Harper government fully embraces satire</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/19/the-commons-the-harper-government-fully-embraces-satire/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/19/the-commons-the-harper-government-fully-embraces-satire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Dykstra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=295343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And it happened under the leadership of Peter Van Loan]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/19/the-commons-the-harper-government-fully-embraces-satire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	And it happened under the leadership of Peter Van Loan
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuancing the farce, Part Two</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/18/nuancing-the-farce-part-two/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/18/nuancing-the-farce-part-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-and-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=294660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a CBC panel yesterday afternoon—the relevant discussion starts at about the 5:40 mark—Peter...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/18/nuancing-the-farce-part-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	On a CBC panel yesterday afternoon—the relevant discussion starts at about the 5:40 mark—Peter...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: The joke is on you, Canada</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/17/the-commons-the-joke-is-on-you-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/17/the-commons-the-joke-is-on-you-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 23:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Saxton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blake Richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-and-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerry Ritz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Preston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil McColeman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shelly Glover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Blaney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Truppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Uppal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=294570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaron Wherry on the first day back]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/17/the-commons-the-joke-is-on-you-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Aaron Wherry on the first day back
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Return of the omnibus</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/13/return-of-the-omnibus/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/13/return-of-the-omnibus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnibus legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=293357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservatives promise another omnibus budget bill, Nathan Cullen mixes his metaphors.
“Will I...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/13/return-of-the-omnibus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Conservatives promise another omnibus budget bill, Nathan Cullen mixes his metaphors.
“Will I...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What they said about the PBO</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/25/what-they-said-about-the-pbo/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/25/what-they-said-about-the-pbo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Ablonczy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monte Solberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pbo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Menzies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=270554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A short history of Conservatives speaking excitedly about the creation of a parliamentary budget...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/25/what-they-said-about-the-pbo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A short history of Conservatives speaking excitedly about the creation of a parliamentary budget...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Mulcair and Harper wish each other a lovely summer</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/21/the-commons-thomas-mulcair-and-stephen-harper-wish-each-other-a-lovely-summer/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/21/the-commons-thomas-mulcair-and-stephen-harper-wish-each-other-a-lovely-summer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 21:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bal Gosal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Watson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Kellway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rona Ambrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=269651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And Peter MacKay gives one last sermon]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/21/the-commons-thomas-mulcair-and-stephen-harper-wish-each-other-a-lovely-summer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	And Peter MacKay gives one last sermon
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;It is incumbent upon all members of Parliament to be informed before they vote&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/12/it-is-incumbent-upon-all-members-of-parliament-to-be-informed-before-they-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/12/it-is-incumbent-upon-all-members-of-parliament-to-be-informed-before-they-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wayne easter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=266428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Picking up where the discussion left off yesterday, Nathan Cullen returned to his point...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/12/it-is-incumbent-upon-all-members-of-parliament-to-be-informed-before-they-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Picking up where the discussion left off yesterday, Nathan Cullen returned to his point...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commons: Question of the day — &#8216;What is a fabulation?&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/11/the-commons-john-baird-and-peter-van-loan-learn-a-new-word/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/11/the-commons-john-baird-and-peter-van-loan-learn-a-new-word/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=265998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During QP, John Baird and Peter Van Loan learn a new word]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/11/the-commons-john-baird-and-peter-van-loan-learn-a-new-word/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	During QP, John Baird and Peter Van Loan learn a new word
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>C-38: A breach of privilege?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/11/c-38-a-breach-of-privilege/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/11/c-38-a-breach-of-privilege/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Scheer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary budget officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=265986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NDP House leader Nathan Cullen rose after QP this afternoon on a point of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/11/c-38-a-breach-of-privilege/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	NDP House leader Nathan Cullen rose after QP this afternoon on a point of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>C-38: Why do you hate jobs, growth and prosperity?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/10/c-38-why-do-hate-jobs-growth-and-prosperity/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/10/c-38-why-do-hate-jobs-growth-and-prosperity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Implementation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-38]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Van Loan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=265744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A statement released this afternoon by Government House leader Peter Van Loan.
&#8220;The Harper...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/06/10/c-38-why-do-hate-jobs-growth-and-prosperity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	A statement released this afternoon by Government House leader Peter Van Loan.
&#8220;The Harper...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
