<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; Philippe Lagasse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/philippe-lagasse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;The de-patriation of the Canadian constitution&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/04/the-de-partiation-of-the-canadian-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/04/the-de-partiation-of-the-canadian-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Twomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal succession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=346354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House passes a problematic bill]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/04/the-de-partiation-of-the-canadian-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The House passes a problematic bill
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Queen of Canada is dead; long live the British Queen</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/03/the-queen-of-canada-is-dead-long-live-the-british-queen/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/03/the-queen-of-canada-is-dead-long-live-the-british-queen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Charles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Elizabeth II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Nicholson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal succession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=346153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Conservatives must rethink their approach to succession]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/02/03/the-queen-of-canada-is-dead-long-live-the-british-queen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Why the Conservatives must rethink their approach to succession
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Act to assent to alterations in the law touching the Succession to the Throne</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/31/an-act-to-assent-to-alterations-in-the-law-touching-the-succession-to-the-throne/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/31/an-act-to-assent-to-alterations-in-the-law-touching-the-succession-to-the-throne/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Bowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Flynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal succession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=345231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservatives have now tabled the legislation that will, in the words of the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/31/an-act-to-assent-to-alterations-in-the-law-touching-the-succession-to-the-throne/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The Conservatives have now tabled the legislation that will, in the words of the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting to Friday</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/09/getting-to-friday/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/09/getting-to-friday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aboriginal affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Johnston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idle No More]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shawn Atleo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theresa Spence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=334747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global News journalists were told to leave Attawapiskat yesterday, apparently at the behest of...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/09/getting-to-friday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Global News journalists were told to leave Attawapiskat yesterday, apparently at the behest of...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The latest on the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/the-latest-on-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/the-latest-on-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 03:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KPMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=325601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reuters, the Canadian Press, Star, Globe and CTV report that a four-person panel will...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/12/07/the-latest-on-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Reuters, the Canadian Press, Star, Globe and CTV report that a four-person panel will...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35 on trial</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/21/the-f-35-on-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/21/the-f-35-on-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winslow Wheeler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=284989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP will convene two public roundtables this morning on the Hill to hear...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/21/the-f-35-on-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The NDP will convene two public roundtables this morning on the Hill to hear...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The F-35 questions that need to be asked</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/03/the-f-35-questions-that-need-to-be-asked/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/03/the-f-35-questions-that-need-to-be-asked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 11:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CF-18]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public accounts committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=256529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philippe Lagassé offers some free advice to the opposition.
The key question that must...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/03/the-f-35-questions-that-need-to-be-asked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Philippe Lagassé offers some free advice to the opposition.
The key question that must...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What did the cabinet know and why was the F-35 allowed to proceed?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/what-did-the-cabinet-know-and-why-was-the-f-35-allowed-to-proceed/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/what-did-the-cabinet-know-and-why-was-the-f-35-allowed-to-proceed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 12:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Ivison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public accounts committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=256015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While a number of department officials—including the deputy minister of defence and the assistant...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/05/01/what-did-the-cabinet-know-and-why-was-the-f-35-allowed-to-proceed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	While a number of department officials—including the deputy minister of defence and the assistant...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accountability and the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/04/accountability-and-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/04/accountability-and-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=250512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alan Williams, the former assistant deputy minister who has been raising concerns about the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/04/accountability-and-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Alan Williams, the former assistant deputy minister who has been raising concerns about the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The value of the F-35</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/the-value-of-the-f-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/the-value-of-the-f-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Massie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=166226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the American joint strike fighter program continues to be a source of questions, ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/the-value-of-the-f-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
	While the American joint strike fighter program continues to be a source of questions, ...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Parliament decide?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/10/will-parliament-decide/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/10/will-parliament-decide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deepak Obhrai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter MacKay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister's office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=157182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philippe Lagasse questions the potential precedent of putting the future of the Afghan mission...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/11/10/will-parliament-decide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	Philippe Lagasse questions the potential precedent of putting the future of the Afghan mission...
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
