<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macleans.ca &#187; proportional representation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/proportional-representation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www2.macleans.ca</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s only national weekly current affairs magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:01:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Scheer madness of Saskatchewan&#8217;s boundary battle</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/30/the-scheer-madness-of-saskatchewans-boundary-battle/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/30/the-scheer-madness-of-saskatchewans-boundary-battle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Scheer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moose Jaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Boughen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saskatchewan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saskatoon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=344387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colby Cosh on pie slices and the boundaries commission ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/30/the-scheer-madness-of-saskatchewans-boundary-battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Colby Cosh on pie slices and the boundaries commission 
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Her plan is simple&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/28/her-plan-is-simple/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/28/her-plan-is-simple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joyce Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=343415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An email from the Joyce Murray campaign yesterday: Ms. Murray is pleased with the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/28/her-plan-is-simple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	An email from the Joyce Murray campaign yesterday: Ms. Murray is pleased with the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t go chasing waterfalls</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/26/dont-go-chasing-waterfalls/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/26/dont-go-chasing-waterfalls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maclean's Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranked ballot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=342554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The case against a one-time pact to bury first-past-the-post]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/26/dont-go-chasing-waterfalls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	The case against a one-time pact to bury first-past-the-post
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth May&#8217;s proposal for electoral reform</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/18/elizabeth-mays-proposal-for-electoral-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/18/elizabeth-mays-proposal-for-electoral-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=339217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a copy of the letter Elizabeth May sent to opposition MPs about...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/18/elizabeth-mays-proposal-for-electoral-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Here is a copy of the letter Elizabeth May sent to opposition MPs about...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth May and political cooperation</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/18/elizabeth-may-and-political-cooperation/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/18/elizabeth-may-and-political-cooperation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Mulcair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=338985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In December, Elizabeth May apparently wrote a letter to New Democrats, Liberals and independent...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/01/18/elizabeth-may-and-political-cooperation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In December, Elizabeth May apparently wrote a letter to New Democrats, Liberals and independent...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justifying the Liberal party&#8217;s existence</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/11/justifying-the-liberal-partys-existence/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/11/justifying-the-liberal-partys-existence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arts funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Den Tandt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=292028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Den Tandt proposes a dozen policy directions for the Liberal party.
Make the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/11/justifying-the-liberal-partys-existence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Michael Den Tandt proposes a dozen policy directions for the Liberal party.
Make the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Our voting system is weakening Canada’s cohesion&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/20/our-voting-system-is-weakening-canadas-cohesion/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/20/our-voting-system-is-weakening-canadas-cohesion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=284934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephane Dion&#8217;s speech on electoral reform to the Green party convention this past weekend....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/08/20/our-voting-system-is-weakening-canadas-cohesion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephane Dion&#8217;s speech on electoral reform to the Green party convention this past weekend....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 more things you need to know about the Alberta election</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/10-more-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-alberta-election/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/10-more-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-alberta-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 alberta election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alberta ndp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alberta new democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alberta party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alberta pcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alison redford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Mason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridget pastoor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bruce mcallister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danielle Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david hancock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doug black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floor crossing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guy boutilier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heather Forsyth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ian urquhart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal party of alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new democratic party of alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc party of alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[progressive conservative party of alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rachel notley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raj Sherman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott tannas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators-in-waiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Morton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turncoats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildrose party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildrose party of alberta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=254446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NDP leader Brian Mason's first words on reaching the podium? "The phone booth just doubled!"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/24/10-more-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-alberta-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	NDP leader Brian Mason's first words on reaching the podium? "The phone booth just doubled!"
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idea alert</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/23/idea-alert-68/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/23/idea-alert-68/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preferential voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=254264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephane Dion proposes a preferential voting system that would expand the size of ridings...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/23/idea-alert-68/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Stephane Dion proposes a preferential voting system that would expand the size of ridings...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nash on electoral reform</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/28/nash-on-electoral-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/28/nash-on-electoral-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Topp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Dewar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Nash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=242604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peggy Nash promises to pursue proportional representation.
Nash’s plan calls for moving proportional representation...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/02/28/nash-on-electoral-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	Peggy Nash promises to pursue proportional representation.
Nash’s plan calls for moving proportional representation...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revolution by referendum</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/30/revolution-by-referendum/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/30/revolution-by-referendum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=227747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nathan Cullen puts democratic reform on the agenda.
As Prime Minister, Nathan Cullen would: ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/30/revolution-by-referendum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
	Nathan Cullen puts democratic reform on the agenda.
As Prime Minister, Nathan Cullen would: ...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let the people decide how they want to decide</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/16/let-the-people-decide-how-they-want-to-decide/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/16/let-the-people-decide-how-they-want-to-decide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first past the post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan McLeod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=225520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonathan McLeod rips the idea of asking the courts to rule against first-past-the-post.
A...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/16/let-the-people-decide-how-they-want-to-decide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
	Jonathan McLeod rips the idea of asking the courts to rule against first-past-the-post.
A...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratic rights</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/15/democratic-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/15/democratic-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Vote Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first past the post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=225357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elizabeth May is joining an attempt to challenge the first-past-the-post electoral system as a...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/11/15/democratic-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
	Elizabeth May is joining an attempt to challenge the first-past-the-post electoral system as a...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is democratic reform dying out?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/17/voting-for-more-of-the-same/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/17/voting-for-more-of-the-same/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 14:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Gillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first past the post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FPTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.K.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=191249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First-past-the-post systems are proving remarkably durable]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/17/voting-for-more-of-the-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
	First-past-the-post systems are proving remarkably durable
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why electoral reform would hurt Quebec</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/11/why-electoral-reform-would-hurt-quebec/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/11/why-electoral-reform-would-hurt-quebec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 23:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deux Maudits Anglais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=191182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could Quebec's place in the federation decline in the coming years?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/11/why-electoral-reform-would-hurt-quebec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
	Could Quebec's place in the federation decline in the coming years?
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alternate realities</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/alternate-realities/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/alternate-realities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 15:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Gohier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=190560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is what the new House of Commons would look like with proportional representation....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/alternate-realities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
	Here is what the new House of Commons would look like with proportional representation....
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case for proportional representation</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/the-case-for-proportional-representation/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/the-case-for-proportional-representation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 20:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saskatchewan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=189993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Popular vote and seat totals for the province of Saskatchewan.
Conservatives 256,004 votes (13...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/the-case-for-proportional-representation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>151</slash:comments>
	Popular vote and seat totals for the province of Saskatchewan.
Conservatives 256,004 votes (13...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;The Special Committee for Democratic Improvement&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/01/the-special-committee-for-democratic-improvement/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/01/the-special-committee-for-democratic-improvement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=175179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NDP has tabled a motion, to be debated tomorrow, that calls for a...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/01/the-special-committee-for-democratic-improvement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
	The NDP has tabled a motion, to be debated tomorrow, that calls for a...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The House: Other ideas</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/23/the-house-other-ideas/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/23/the-house-other-ideas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=174107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In writing about the House of Commons, I touched on one idea for reform:...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/23/the-house-other-ideas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
	In writing about the House of Commons, I touched on one idea for reform:...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;The one exception is Canada&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/24/the-one-exception-is-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/24/the-one-exception-is-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first past the post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hung parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London School of Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Dunleavy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westminster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=144025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In light of the Australian result, Patrick Dunleavy with the London School of Economics...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/24/the-one-exception-is-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	In light of the Australian result, Patrick Dunleavy with the London School of Economics...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game theory</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/game-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/game-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 16:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=127146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wanted to know how much each party has spent per vote in the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/18/game-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
	Ever wanted to know how much each party has spent per vote in the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>That UK election, in full: a guide for the perplexed</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/10/that-uk-election-in-full-a-guide-for-the-perplexed/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/10/that-uk-election-in-full-a-guide-for-the-perplexed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 04:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Clegg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opportunism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strange bedfellows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/05/10/that-uk-election-in-full-a-guide-for-the-perplexed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ANDREW COYNE's quick guide to the leaders, the bargaining positions, and the stakes]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/10/that-uk-election-in-full-a-guide-for-the-perplexed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
	ANDREW COYNE's quick guide to the leaders, the bargaining positions, and the stakes
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Britvote &#039;10: anyone and anything</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/05/britvote-10-anyone-and-anything/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/05/britvote-10-anyone-and-anything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 15:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative Party (UK)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons (uk)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hung parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lib-lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mervyn king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Clegg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single transferable vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westminster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=124286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's almost as if Britain is more afraid of a 'hanging' than it is of having Random Niceguy MP take power]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/05/britvote-10-anyone-and-anything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
	It's almost as if Britain is more afraid of a 'hanging' than it is of having Random Niceguy MP take power
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clegg: is he good for the Canucks?</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/23/clegg-is-he-good-for-the-canucks/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/23/clegg-is-he-good-for-the-canucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colby Cosh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colby Cosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[betfair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[betting markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative Party (UK)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[devolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first past the post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lib-lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lib-lab pact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margaret Thatcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Clegg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[one man one vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scottish devolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social democratic party (UK)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK general election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Lothian Question]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=122263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fiasco for first-past-the-post would be bad news for its future in Canada]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/23/clegg-is-he-good-for-the-canucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
	A fiasco for first-past-the-post would be bad news for its future in Canada
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The problem with our MPs is that we need more of them (II)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/01/the-problem-with-our-mps-is-that-we-need-more-of-them-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/01/the-problem-with-our-mps-is-that-we-need-more-of-them-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mowat Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[representaiton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ridings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Fletcher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=118679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After withdrawing an earlier attempt to adjust the House seating arrangement, the Conservatives are...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/01/the-problem-with-our-mps-is-that-we-need-more-of-them-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
	After withdrawing an earlier attempt to adjust the House seating arrangement, the Conservatives are...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratic reform will break out tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/29/democratic-reform-will-break-out-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/29/democratic-reform-will-break-out-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond The Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.macleans.ca/?p=73453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Urban repeats the case for proportional representation.
This structural bias is exacerbated by...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/29/democratic-reform-will-break-out-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	Michael Urban repeats the case for proportional representation.
This structural bias is exacerbated by...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Slightly) shorter Coyne</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/11/slightly-shorter-coyne/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/11/slightly-shorter-coyne/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/05/10/slightly-shorter-coyne/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elsewhere you will find a lengthy piece by me explaining why I support the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/11/slightly-shorter-coyne/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
	Elsewhere you will find a lengthy piece by me explaining why I support the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Try BC-STV (not the real thing, but an incredibly lifelike simulation)</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/10/try-bc-stv-not-the-real-thing-but-an-incredibly-lifelike-simulation/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/10/try-bc-stv-not-the-real-thing-but-an-incredibly-lifelike-simulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 02:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/05/10/try-bc-stv-not-the-real-thing-but-an-incredibly-lifelike-simulation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is pretty cool. It simulates the voting process under BC&#8217;s proposed STV, using...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/10/try-bc-stv-not-the-real-thing-but-an-incredibly-lifelike-simulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	This is pretty cool. It simulates the voting process under BC&#8217;s proposed STV, using...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attention Tory &quot;STV is for socialists and losers&quot; smart-alecks!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/10/attention-tory-stv-is-a-socialist-plot-smart-alecks/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/10/attention-tory-stv-is-a-socialist-plot-smart-alecks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 01:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/05/10/attention-tory-stv-is-a-socialist-plot-smart-alecks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you know that STV is the system the Harper government envisages for electing...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/10/attention-tory-stv-is-a-socialist-plot-smart-alecks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	Did you know that STV is the system the Harper government envisages for electing...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>About that counting system</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/10/about-that-counting-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/10/about-that-counting-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 00:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Coyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Andrew Coyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/2009/05/10/about-that-counting-system/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The biggest single knock against STV, the one that the critics have had the...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/05/10/about-that-counting-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	The biggest single knock against STV, the one that the critics have had the...
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Megapundit: Sticking it to the Ayatollah</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/27/megapundit-sticking-it-to-the-ayatollah/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/27/megapundit-sticking-it-to-the-ayatollah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>selley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Megapundit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cabinet shuffle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caucasus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Pound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election promises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iacobucci inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Manley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[madonna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ignatieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=13985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>WEEKEND ROUNDUP</strong>
<strong>Must-reads: ...</strong>Daphne Bramham on Nazanin Afshin-Jam; David Olive and Greg Weston on]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/27/megapundit-sticking-it-to-the-ayatollah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
	<strong>WEEKEND ROUNDUP</strong>
<strong>Must-reads: ...</strong>Daphne Bramham on Nazanin Afshin-Jam; David Olive and Greg Weston on
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Megapundit: Hard to starboard!</title>
		<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/17/megapundit-hard-to-starboard/</link>
		<comments>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/17/megapundit-hard-to-starboard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>selley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Megapundit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloc Québécois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[centrism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportional representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stéphane Dion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniting the left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter turnout]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macleans.wordpress.com/?p=13421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Must-reads: ...</strong>Chantal Hébert, Josée Legault and John Robson on the battle for the political]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www2.macleans.ca/2008/10/17/megapundit-hard-to-starboard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	<strong>Must-reads: ...</strong>Chantal Hébert, Josée Legault and John Robson on the battle for the political
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
